Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B

Percentage Accurate: 86.2% → 99.8%

Time: 14.9s

Alternatives: 11

Speedup: 1.9×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* x (log y)) (* z (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x * log(y)) + (z * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((x * log(y)) + (z * log((1.0d0 - y)))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x * Math.log(y)) + (z * Math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((x * math.log(y)) + (z * math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) + Float64(z * log(Float64(1.0 - y)))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((x * log(y)) + (z * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Log[N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 86.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* x (log y)) (* z (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x * log(y)) + (z * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((x * log(y)) + (z * log((1.0d0 - y)))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x * Math.log(y)) + (z * Math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((x * math.log(y)) + (z * math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) + Float64(z * log(Float64(1.0 - y)))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((x * log(y)) + (z * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Log[N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (fma z (log1p (- y)) (- (* x (log y)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(z, log1p(-y), ((x * log(y)) - t));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(z, log1p(Float64(-y)), Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - t))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(z * N[Log[1 + (-y)], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 85.1%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + x \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   2. associate--l+ 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]

   3. fma-define 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \log \left(1 - y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]

   4. sub-neg 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, x \cdot \log y - t\right) \]

   5. log1p-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, x \cdot \log y - t\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 90.4% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{-50} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{-156}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) - t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -4.4e-50) (not (<= x 5.6e-156)))
   (- (* x (log y)) t)
   (- (* z (log1p (- y))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.4e-50) || !(x <= 5.6e-156)) {
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (z * log1p(-y)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.4e-50) || !(x <= 5.6e-156)) {
		tmp = (x * Math.log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (z * Math.log1p(-y)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -4.4e-50) or not (x <= 5.6e-156):
		tmp = (x * math.log(y)) - t
	else:
		tmp = (z * math.log1p(-y)) - t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -4.4e-50) || !(x <= 5.6e-156))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z * log1p(Float64(-y))) - t);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -4.4e-50], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 5.6e-156]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(z * N[Log[1 + (-y)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -4.3999999999999998e-50 or 5.6000000000000003e-156 < x

   1. Initial program 91.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. mul-1-neg 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)}\right) - t \]

      3. unsub-neg 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y \cdot z\right)} - t \]

   5. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y \cdot z\right)} - t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} - t \]

   if -4.3999999999999998e-50 < x < 5.6000000000000003e-156

   1. Initial program 73.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 67.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)} - t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 67.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. log1p-define 93.5%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

   5. Simplified 93.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{-50} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{-156}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) - t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 90.3% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-50} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-155}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5 + y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.3333333333333333 + \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot -0.25\right)\right) - z\right) - t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -4e-50) (not (<= x 1.9e-155)))
   (- (* x (log y)) t)
   (-
    (*
     y
     (-
      (*
       y
       (+ (* z -0.5) (* y (+ (* z -0.3333333333333333) (* (* z y) -0.25)))))
      z))
    t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4e-50) || !(x <= 1.9e-155)) {
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (y * ((y * ((z * -0.5) + (y * ((z * -0.3333333333333333) + ((z * y) * -0.25))))) - z)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-4d-50)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.9d-155))) then
        tmp = (x * log(y)) - t
    else
        tmp = (y * ((y * ((z * (-0.5d0)) + (y * ((z * (-0.3333333333333333d0)) + ((z * y) * (-0.25d0)))))) - z)) - t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4e-50) || !(x <= 1.9e-155)) {
		tmp = (x * Math.log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (y * ((y * ((z * -0.5) + (y * ((z * -0.3333333333333333) + ((z * y) * -0.25))))) - z)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -4e-50) or not (x <= 1.9e-155):
		tmp = (x * math.log(y)) - t
	else:
		tmp = (y * ((y * ((z * -0.5) + (y * ((z * -0.3333333333333333) + ((z * y) * -0.25))))) - z)) - t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -4e-50) || !(x <= 1.9e-155))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * -0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * -0.3333333333333333) + Float64(Float64(z * y) * -0.25))))) - z)) - t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -4e-50) || ~((x <= 1.9e-155)))
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - t;
	else
		tmp = (y * ((y * ((z * -0.5) + (y * ((z * -0.3333333333333333) + ((z * y) * -0.25))))) - z)) - t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -4e-50], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.9e-155]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * -0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(z * -0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -4.00000000000000003e-50 or 1.8999999999999999e-155 < x

   1. Initial program 91.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. mul-1-neg 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)}\right) - t \]

      3. unsub-neg 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y \cdot z\right)} - t \]

   5. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y \cdot z\right)} - t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} - t \]

   if -4.00000000000000003e-50 < x < 1.8999999999999999e-155

   1. Initial program 73.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 67.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)} - t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 67.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. log1p-define 93.5%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

   5. Simplified 93.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot z + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot z + y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot z + -0.25 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\right)} - t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-50} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-155}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5 + y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.3333333333333333 + \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot -0.25\right)\right) - z\right) - t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.1% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot \log y - z \cdot y\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (- (* x (log y)) (* z y)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x * log(y)) - (z * y)) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((x * log(y)) - (z * y)) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x * Math.log(y)) - (z * y)) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((x * math.log(y)) - (z * y)) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - Float64(z * y)) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((x * log(y)) - (z * y)) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 85.1%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. mul-1-neg 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)}\right) - t \]

   3. unsub-neg 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y \cdot z\right)} - t \]

5. Simplified 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y \cdot z\right)} - t \]

6. Final simplification 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot \log y - z \cdot y\right) - t \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 57.4% accurate, 9.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5 + y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.3333333333333333 + \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot -0.25\right)\right) - z\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (*
   y
   (-
    (* y (+ (* z -0.5) (* y (+ (* z -0.3333333333333333) (* (* z y) -0.25)))))
    z))
  t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * ((y * ((z * -0.5) + (y * ((z * -0.3333333333333333) + ((z * y) * -0.25))))) - z)) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (y * ((y * ((z * (-0.5d0)) + (y * ((z * (-0.3333333333333333d0)) + ((z * y) * (-0.25d0)))))) - z)) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * ((y * ((z * -0.5) + (y * ((z * -0.3333333333333333) + ((z * y) * -0.25))))) - z)) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (y * ((y * ((z * -0.5) + (y * ((z * -0.3333333333333333) + ((z * y) * -0.25))))) - z)) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * -0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * -0.3333333333333333) + Float64(Float64(z * y) * -0.25))))) - z)) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (y * ((y * ((z * -0.5) + (y * ((z * -0.3333333333333333) + ((z * y) * -0.25))))) - z)) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(y * N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * -0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(z * -0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 85.1%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 44.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)} - t \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 44.4%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. log1p-define 58.1%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

5. Simplified 58.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 57.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot z + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot z + y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot z + -0.25 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

7. Final simplification 57.6%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5 + y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.3333333333333333 + \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot -0.25\right)\right) - z\right) - t \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 57.3% accurate, 12.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5 + \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot -0.3333333333333333\right) - z\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (* y (- (* y (+ (* z -0.5) (* (* z y) -0.3333333333333333))) z)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * ((y * ((z * -0.5) + ((z * y) * -0.3333333333333333))) - z)) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (y * ((y * ((z * (-0.5d0)) + ((z * y) * (-0.3333333333333333d0)))) - z)) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * ((y * ((z * -0.5) + ((z * y) * -0.3333333333333333))) - z)) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (y * ((y * ((z * -0.5) + ((z * y) * -0.3333333333333333))) - z)) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * -0.5) + Float64(Float64(z * y) * -0.3333333333333333))) - z)) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (y * ((y * ((z * -0.5) + ((z * y) * -0.3333333333333333))) - z)) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(y * N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * -0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] * -0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 85.1%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 44.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)} - t \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 44.4%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. log1p-define 58.1%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

5. Simplified 58.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 57.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot z + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot z + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

7. Final simplification 57.5%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5 + \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot -0.3333333333333333\right) - z\right) - t \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 48.5% accurate, 15.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -9 \cdot 10^{-53} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 7.3 \cdot 10^{-59}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -9e-53) (not (<= t 7.3e-59))) (- t) (* z (- y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -9e-53) || !(t <= 7.3e-59)) {
		tmp = -t;
	} else {
		tmp = z * -y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-9d-53)) .or. (.not. (t <= 7.3d-59))) then
        tmp = -t
    else
        tmp = z * -y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -9e-53) || !(t <= 7.3e-59)) {
		tmp = -t;
	} else {
		tmp = z * -y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -9e-53) or not (t <= 7.3e-59):
		tmp = -t
	else:
		tmp = z * -y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -9e-53) || !(t <= 7.3e-59))
		tmp = Float64(-t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(-y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -9e-53) || ~((t <= 7.3e-59)))
		tmp = -t;
	else
		tmp = z * -y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -9e-53], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 7.3e-59]], $MachinePrecision]], (-t), N[(z * (-y)), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -8.9999999999999997e-53 or 7.3000000000000004e-59 < t

   1. Initial program 92.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 63.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)} - t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 63.9%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. log1p-define 71.5%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

   5. Simplified 71.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 63.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot t} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

   8. Simplified 63.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

   if -8.9999999999999997e-53 < t < 7.3000000000000004e-59

   1. Initial program 73.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 73.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + x \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      2. associate--l+ 73.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]

      3. fma-define 73.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \log \left(1 - y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]

      4. sub-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, x \cdot \log y - t\right) \]

      5. log1p-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, x \cdot \log y - t\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 61.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(\log \left(1 - y\right) + \frac{x \cdot \log y}{z}\right) - \frac{t}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 61.3%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(\frac{x \cdot \log y}{z} - \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)} \]

      2. div-sub 61.3%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\log \left(1 - y\right) + \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot \log y - t}{z}}\right) \]

      3. sub-neg 61.3%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + \frac{x \cdot \log y - t}{z}\right) \]

      4. log1p-define 87.8%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} + \frac{x \cdot \log y - t}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 87.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \frac{x \cdot \log y - t}{z}\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around inf 5.0%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(1 - y\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 5.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 5.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \log \left(1 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y}\right) \]

      3. log1p-define 29.2%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-1 \cdot y\right)} \]

      4. mul-1-neg 29.2%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{-y}\right) \]

   10. Simplified 29.2%

       \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} \]

   11. Taylor expanded in y around 0 28.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot z + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot z + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)} \]

   12. Taylor expanded in y around 0 27.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   13. Step-by-step derivation

       1. mul-1-neg 27.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y \cdot z} \]

       2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 27.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   14. Simplified 27.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 50.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -9 \cdot 10^{-53} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 7.3 \cdot 10^{-59}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 57.2% accurate, 19.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot -0.5 - z\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* y (- (* (* z y) -0.5) z)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (((z * y) * -0.5) - z)) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (y * (((z * y) * (-0.5d0)) - z)) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (((z * y) * -0.5) - z)) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (y * (((z * y) * -0.5) - z)) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(z * y) * -0.5) - z)) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (y * (((z * y) * -0.5) - z)) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] * -0.5), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 85.1%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 44.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)} - t \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 44.4%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. log1p-define 58.1%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

5. Simplified 58.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 57.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot z + -0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} - t \]

7. Final simplification 57.4%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot -0.5 - z\right) - t \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 56.8% accurate, 35.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot \left(-y\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* z (- y)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (z * -y) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (z * -y) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (z * -y) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (z * -y) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(z * Float64(-y)) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (z * -y) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(z * (-y)), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 85.1%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. mul-1-neg 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)}\right) - t \]

   3. unsub-neg 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y \cdot z\right)} - t \]

5. Simplified 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y \cdot z\right)} - t \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 57.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} - t \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r* 57.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} - t \]

   2. mul-1-neg 57.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z - t \]

8. Simplified 57.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} - t \]

9. Final simplification 57.3%

   \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(-y\right) - t \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 43.2% accurate, 105.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = -t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return -t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(-t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = -t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := (-t)

Derivation

1. Initial program 85.1%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 44.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)} - t \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 44.4%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. log1p-define 58.1%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

5. Simplified 58.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 43.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot t} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 43.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

8. Simplified 43.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

9. Final simplification 43.1%

   \[\leadsto -t \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 2.2% accurate, 211.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 t)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return t
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := t

Derivation

1. Initial program 85.1%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + x \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   2. associate--l+ 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]

   3. fma-define 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \log \left(1 - y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]

   4. sub-neg 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, x \cdot \log y - t\right) \]

   5. log1p-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, x \cdot \log y - t\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 64.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(\log \left(1 - y\right) + \frac{x \cdot \log y}{z}\right) - \frac{t}{z}\right)} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate--l+ 64.1%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(\frac{x \cdot \log y}{z} - \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)} \]

   2. div-sub 64.3%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\log \left(1 - y\right) + \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot \log y - t}{z}}\right) \]

   3. sub-neg 64.3%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + \frac{x \cdot \log y - t}{z}\right) \]

   4. log1p-define 79.0%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} + \frac{x \cdot \log y - t}{z}\right) \]

7. Simplified 79.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \frac{x \cdot \log y - t}{z}\right)} \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. div-inv 78.8%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - t\right) \cdot \frac{1}{z}}\right) \]

   2. fma-neg 78.8%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, -t\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) \]

   3. add-sqr-sqrt 42.1%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \color{blue}{\sqrt{-t} \cdot \sqrt{-t}}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) \]

   4. sqrt-unprod 53.8%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-t\right) \cdot \left(-t\right)}}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) \]

   5. sqr-neg 53.8%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \sqrt{\color{blue}{t \cdot t}}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) \]

   6. sqrt-unprod 23.1%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \color{blue}{\sqrt{t} \cdot \sqrt{t}}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) \]

   7. add-sqr-sqrt 46.6%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \color{blue}{t}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) \]

9. Applied egg-rr 46.6%

   \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t\right) \cdot \frac{1}{z}}\right) \]

10. Taylor expanded in t around inf 2.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]

11. Final simplification 2.3%

    \[\leadsto t \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 99.6% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-z\right) \cdot \left(\left(0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot y\right) + y\right) + \frac{0.3333333333333333}{1 \cdot \left(1 \cdot 1\right)} \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot y\right)\right)\right) - \left(t - x \cdot \log y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (*
   (- z)
   (+
    (+ (* 0.5 (* y y)) y)
    (* (/ 0.3333333333333333 (* 1.0 (* 1.0 1.0))) (* y (* y y)))))
  (- t (* x (log y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (-z * (((0.5 * (y * y)) + y) + ((0.3333333333333333 / (1.0 * (1.0 * 1.0))) * (y * (y * y))))) - (t - (x * log(y)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (-z * (((0.5d0 * (y * y)) + y) + ((0.3333333333333333d0 / (1.0d0 * (1.0d0 * 1.0d0))) * (y * (y * y))))) - (t - (x * log(y)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (-z * (((0.5 * (y * y)) + y) + ((0.3333333333333333 / (1.0 * (1.0 * 1.0))) * (y * (y * y))))) - (t - (x * Math.log(y)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (-z * (((0.5 * (y * y)) + y) + ((0.3333333333333333 / (1.0 * (1.0 * 1.0))) * (y * (y * y))))) - (t - (x * math.log(y)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(-z) * Float64(Float64(Float64(0.5 * Float64(y * y)) + y) + Float64(Float64(0.3333333333333333 / Float64(1.0 * Float64(1.0 * 1.0))) * Float64(y * Float64(y * y))))) - Float64(t - Float64(x * log(y))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (-z * (((0.5 * (y * y)) + y) + ((0.3333333333333333 / (1.0 * (1.0 * 1.0))) * (y * (y * y))))) - (t - (x * log(y)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[((-z) * N[(N[(N[(0.5 * N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(0.3333333333333333 / N[(1.0 * N[(1.0 * 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t - N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024073 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (- (* (- z) (+ (+ (* 0.5 (* y y)) y) (* (/ 0.3333333333333333 (* 1.0 (* 1.0 1.0))) (* y (* y y))))) (- t (* x (log y))))

  (- (+ (* x (log y)) (* z (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))