Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, G

Percentage Accurate: 84.8% → 99.6%

Time: 11.2s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 11.7×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (Math.exp((y * Math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (math.exp((y * math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(y * log(Float64(y / Float64(z + y))))) / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(y * N[Log[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 84.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (Math.exp((y * Math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (math.exp((y * math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(y * log(Float64(y / Float64(z + y))))) / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(y * N[Log[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+80} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 0.002\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -2e+80) (not (<= y 0.002)))
   (+ x (/ (exp (- z)) y))
   (+ x (/ (pow (exp y) (log (/ y (+ y z)))) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2e+80) || !(y <= 0.002)) {
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (pow(exp(y), log((y / (y + z)))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-2d+80)) .or. (.not. (y <= 0.002d0))) then
        tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + ((exp(y) ** log((y / (y + z)))) / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2e+80) || !(y <= 0.002)) {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (Math.pow(Math.exp(y), Math.log((y / (y + z)))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -2e+80) or not (y <= 0.002):
		tmp = x + (math.exp(-z) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (math.pow(math.exp(y), math.log((y / (y + z)))) / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -2e+80) || !(y <= 0.002))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-z)) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64((exp(y) ^ log(Float64(y / Float64(y + z)))) / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -2e+80) || ~((y <= 0.002)))
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + ((exp(y) ^ log((y / (y + z)))) / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -2e+80], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 0.002]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[Power[N[Exp[y], $MachinePrecision], N[Log[N[(y / N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2e80 or 2e-3 < y

   1. Initial program 86.5%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 86.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-to-pow 86.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. +-commutative 86.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 86.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot z}}}{y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-z}}}{y} \]

   if -2e80 < y < 2e-3

   1. Initial program 81.8%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+80} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 0.002\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.1% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.06 \cdot 10^{+24} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 0.0005\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.06e+24) (not (<= y 0.0005)))
   (+ x (/ (exp (- z)) y))
   (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.06e+24) || !(y <= 0.0005)) {
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.06d+24)) .or. (.not. (y <= 0.0005d0))) then
        tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.06e+24) || !(y <= 0.0005)) {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.06e+24) or not (y <= 0.0005):
		tmp = x + (math.exp(-z) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.06e+24) || !(y <= 0.0005))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-z)) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.06e+24) || ~((y <= 0.0005)))
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.06e+24], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 0.0005]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.06e24 or 5.0000000000000001e-4 < y

   1. Initial program 87.7%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 87.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-to-pow 87.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. +-commutative 87.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 87.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot z}}}{y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-z}}}{y} \]

   if -1.06e24 < y < 5.0000000000000001e-4

   1. Initial program 80.0%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

   7. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.06 \cdot 10^{+24} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 0.0005\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 86.6% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.06 \cdot 10^{+24}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(\frac{1}{y} + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-0.16666666666666666 \cdot \frac{z}{y} + \frac{1}{y} \cdot 0.5\right) + \frac{-1}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.06e+24)
   (+
    x
    (+
     (/ 1.0 y)
     (*
      z
      (+
       (* z (+ (* -0.16666666666666666 (/ z y)) (* (/ 1.0 y) 0.5)))
       (/ -1.0 y)))))
   (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.06e+24) {
		tmp = x + ((1.0 / y) + (z * ((z * ((-0.16666666666666666 * (z / y)) + ((1.0 / y) * 0.5))) + (-1.0 / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1.06d+24)) then
        tmp = x + ((1.0d0 / y) + (z * ((z * (((-0.16666666666666666d0) * (z / y)) + ((1.0d0 / y) * 0.5d0))) + ((-1.0d0) / y))))
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.06e+24) {
		tmp = x + ((1.0 / y) + (z * ((z * ((-0.16666666666666666 * (z / y)) + ((1.0 / y) * 0.5))) + (-1.0 / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.06e+24:
		tmp = x + ((1.0 / y) + (z * ((z * ((-0.16666666666666666 * (z / y)) + ((1.0 / y) * 0.5))) + (-1.0 / y))))
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.06e+24)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(1.0 / y) + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(-0.16666666666666666 * Float64(z / y)) + Float64(Float64(1.0 / y) * 0.5))) + Float64(-1.0 / y)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.06e+24)
		tmp = x + ((1.0 / y) + (z * ((z * ((-0.16666666666666666 * (z / y)) + ((1.0 / y) * 0.5))) + (-1.0 / y))));
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.06e+24], N[(x + N[(N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(-0.16666666666666666 * N[(z / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision] * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.06e24

   1. Initial program 85.6%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 85.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-to-pow 85.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. +-commutative 85.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 85.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot z}}}{y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-z}}}{y} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 78.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-0.16666666666666666 \cdot \frac{z}{y} + 0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right) - \frac{1}{y}\right) + \frac{1}{y}\right)} \]

   if -1.06e24 < y

   1. Initial program 83.6%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 95.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 95.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 92.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

   7. Simplified 92.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.06 \cdot 10^{+24}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(\frac{1}{y} + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-0.16666666666666666 \cdot \frac{z}{y} + \frac{1}{y} \cdot 0.5\right) + \frac{-1}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 87.0% accurate, 8.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+24}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.5 + \frac{1}{y} \cdot 0.5\right) + -1\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -5e+24)
   (+ x (/ (+ 1.0 (* z (+ (* z (+ 0.5 (* (/ 1.0 y) 0.5))) -1.0))) y))
   (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5e+24) {
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * (0.5 + ((1.0 / y) * 0.5))) + -1.0))) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-5d+24)) then
        tmp = x + ((1.0d0 + (z * ((z * (0.5d0 + ((1.0d0 / y) * 0.5d0))) + (-1.0d0)))) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5e+24) {
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * (0.5 + ((1.0 / y) * 0.5))) + -1.0))) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -5e+24:
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * (0.5 + ((1.0 / y) * 0.5))) + -1.0))) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -5e+24)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(0.5 + Float64(Float64(1.0 / y) * 0.5))) + -1.0))) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -5e+24)
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * (0.5 + ((1.0 / y) * 0.5))) + -1.0))) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -5e+24], N[(x + N[(N[(1.0 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * N[(0.5 + N[(N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision] * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -5.00000000000000045e24

   1. Initial program 85.6%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 85.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 85.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 85.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 78.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right) - 1\right)}}{y} \]

   if -5.00000000000000045e24 < y

   1. Initial program 83.6%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 95.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 95.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 92.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

   7. Simplified 92.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+24}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.5 + \frac{1}{y} \cdot 0.5\right) + -1\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 85.9% accurate, 11.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{+60}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\left(2 + \frac{\frac{1 - z}{x}}{y}\right) + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.2e+60)
   (* x (+ (+ 2.0 (/ (/ (- 1.0 z) x) y)) -1.0))
   (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.2e+60) {
		tmp = x * ((2.0 + (((1.0 - z) / x) / y)) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1.2d+60)) then
        tmp = x * ((2.0d0 + (((1.0d0 - z) / x) / y)) + (-1.0d0))
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.2e+60) {
		tmp = x * ((2.0 + (((1.0 - z) / x) / y)) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.2e+60:
		tmp = x * ((2.0 + (((1.0 - z) / x) / y)) + -1.0)
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.2e+60)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) / x) / y)) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.2e+60)
		tmp = x * ((2.0 + (((1.0 - z) / x) / y)) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.2e+60], N[(x * N[(N[(2.0 + N[(N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] / x), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.2e60

   1. Initial program 83.3%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 83.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 83.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 83.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 65.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 + -1 \cdot z}}{y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 65.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}}{y} \]

      2. unsub-neg 65.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 - z}}{y} \]

   7. Simplified 65.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 - z}}{y} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around inf 71.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(1 + \frac{1}{x \cdot y}\right) - \frac{z}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-log1p-u 66.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(1 + \frac{1}{x \cdot y}\right) - \frac{z}{x \cdot y}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate--l+ 66.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{1 + \left(\frac{1}{x \cdot y} - \frac{z}{x \cdot y}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 66.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(1 + \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{y \cdot x}} - \frac{z}{x \cdot y}\right)\right)\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 66.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(1 + \left(\frac{1}{y \cdot x} - \frac{z}{\color{blue}{y \cdot x}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. sub-div 66.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(1 + \color{blue}{\frac{1 - z}{y \cdot x}}\right)\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 66.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(1 + \frac{1 - z}{\color{blue}{x \cdot y}}\right)\right) \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 66.3%

       \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(1 + \frac{1 - z}{x \cdot y}\right)\right)} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. expm1-undefine 66.3%

          \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(1 + \frac{1 - z}{x \cdot y}\right)} - 1\right)} \]

       2. sub-neg 66.3%

          \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(1 + \frac{1 - z}{x \cdot y}\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

       3. log1p-undefine 66.3%

          \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(1 + \left(1 + \frac{1 - z}{x \cdot y}\right)\right)}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

       4. rem-exp-log 71.0%

          \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(1 + \frac{1 - z}{x \cdot y}\right)\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

       5. associate-+r+ 71.0%

          \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 + 1\right) + \frac{1 - z}{x \cdot y}\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

       6. metadata-eval 71.0%

          \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{2} + \frac{1 - z}{x \cdot y}\right) + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

       7. associate-/r* 77.8%

          \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\left(2 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1 - z}{x}}{y}}\right) + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

       8. metadata-eval 77.8%

          \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\left(2 + \frac{\frac{1 - z}{x}}{y}\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   12. Simplified 77.8%

       \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 + \frac{\frac{1 - z}{x}}{y}\right) + -1\right)} \]

   if -1.2e60 < y

   1. Initial program 84.3%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 96.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 96.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 96.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

   7. Simplified 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{+60}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\left(2 + \frac{\frac{1 - z}{x}}{y}\right) + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 67.0% accurate, 16.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-112}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-34}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -8e-112) x (if (<= y 2.3e-34) (/ 1.0 y) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -8e-112) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 2.3e-34) {
		tmp = 1.0 / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-8d-112)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y <= 2.3d-34) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / y
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -8e-112) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 2.3e-34) {
		tmp = 1.0 / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -8e-112:
		tmp = x
	elif y <= 2.3e-34:
		tmp = 1.0 / y
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -8e-112)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 2.3e-34)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / y);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -8e-112)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 2.3e-34)
		tmp = 1.0 / y;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -8e-112], x, If[LessEqual[y, 2.3e-34], N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -7.9999999999999996e-112 or 2.30000000000000011e-34 < y

   1. Initial program 90.2%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 90.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 90.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 90.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 65.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -7.9999999999999996e-112 < y < 2.30000000000000011e-34

   1. Initial program 71.7%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-112}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-34}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 84.7% accurate, 42.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{1}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (/ 1.0 y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (1.0 / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (1.0d0 / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (1.0 / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (1.0 / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 84.1%

   \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. exp-prod 93.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

   2. +-commutative 93.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

3. Simplified 93.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 86.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

7. Simplified 86.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

8. Final simplification 86.7%

   \[\leadsto x + \frac{1}{y} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 49.3% accurate, 211.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 84.1%

   \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. exp-prod 93.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

   2. +-commutative 93.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

3. Simplified 93.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 50.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

6. Final simplification 50.6%

   \[\leadsto x \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 91.4% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y}{z + y} < 7.11541576 \cdot 10^{-315}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{\frac{-1}{z}}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{\log \left({\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (< (/ y (+ z y)) 7.11541576e-315)
   (+ x (/ (exp (/ -1.0 z)) y))
   (+ x (/ (exp (log (pow (/ y (+ y z)) y))) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315) {
		tmp = x + (exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (exp(log(pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576d-315) then
        tmp = x + (exp(((-1.0d0) / z)) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (exp(log(((y / (y + z)) ** y))) / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315) {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(Math.log(Math.pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315:
		tmp = x + (math.exp((-1.0 / z)) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (math.exp(math.log(math.pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y / Float64(z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-1.0 / z)) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(log((Float64(y / Float64(y + z)) ^ y))) / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315)
		tmp = x + (exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (exp(log(((y / (y + z)) ^ y))) / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Less[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 7.11541576e-315], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(-1.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[Log[N[Power[N[(y / N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], y], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024073 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, G"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (if (< (/ y (+ z y)) 7.11541576e-315) (+ x (/ (exp (/ -1.0 z)) y)) (+ x (/ (exp (log (pow (/ y (+ y z)) y))) y)))

  (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))