System.Random.MWC.Distributions:truncatedExp from mwc-random-0.13.3.2

Percentage Accurate: 62.4% → 98.5%

Time: 19.0s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 211.0×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. x = 1.1123755883156963e+199
  2. y = 4.1397265251463995e-130
  3. z = 1.900282683356028e+273
  4. t = -1.5850249091718023e+221

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (log (+ (- 1.0 y) (* y (exp z)))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (log(((1.0d0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * Math.exp(z)))) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * math.exp(z)))) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(Float64(1.0 - y) + Float64(y * exp(z)))) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 62.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (log (+ (- 1.0 y) (* y (exp z)))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (log(((1.0d0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * Math.exp(z)))) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * math.exp(z)))) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(Float64(1.0 - y) + Float64(y * exp(z)))) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- x (/ (log1p (* y (expm1 z))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (log1p((y * expm1(z))) / t);
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.log1p((y * Math.expm1(z))) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.log1p((y * math.expm1(z))) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(y * expm1(z))) / t))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(y * N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 64.8%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l- 82.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   2. sub-neg 82.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. log1p-define 87.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   4. neg-sub0 87.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   5. associate-+l- 87.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. neg-sub0 87.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   7. +-commutative 87.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   8. unsub-neg 87.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   9. *-rgt-identity 87.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   10. distribute-lft-out-- 87.0%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   11. expm1-define 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 75.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{\frac{0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right) + \frac{t}{e^{z} + -1}}{y}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{z \cdot \left(y + z \cdot \left(0.16666666666666666 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp z) 1.0)
   (+ x (/ -1.0 (/ (+ (* 0.5 (* y t)) (/ t (+ (exp z) -1.0))) y)))
   (-
    x
    (/ (* z (+ y (* z (+ (* 0.16666666666666666 (* y z)) (* y 0.5))))) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(z) <= 1.0) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / (((0.5 * (y * t)) + (t / (exp(z) + -1.0))) / y));
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((z * (y + (z * ((0.16666666666666666 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.5))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (exp(z) <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = x + ((-1.0d0) / (((0.5d0 * (y * t)) + (t / (exp(z) + (-1.0d0)))) / y))
    else
        tmp = x - ((z * (y + (z * ((0.16666666666666666d0 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.5d0))))) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(z) <= 1.0) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / (((0.5 * (y * t)) + (t / (Math.exp(z) + -1.0))) / y));
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((z * (y + (z * ((0.16666666666666666 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.5))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(z) <= 1.0:
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / (((0.5 * (y * t)) + (t / (math.exp(z) + -1.0))) / y))
	else:
		tmp = x - ((z * (y + (z * ((0.16666666666666666 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.5))))) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(z) <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / Float64(Float64(Float64(0.5 * Float64(y * t)) + Float64(t / Float64(exp(z) + -1.0))) / y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(0.16666666666666666 * Float64(y * z)) + Float64(y * 0.5))))) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (exp(z) <= 1.0)
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / (((0.5 * (y * t)) + (t / (exp(z) + -1.0))) / y));
	else
		tmp = x - ((z * (y + (z * ((0.16666666666666666 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.5))))) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision], 1.0], N[(x + N[(-1.0 / N[(N[(N[(0.5 * N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t / N[(N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[(z * N[(y + N[(z * N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 z) < 1

   1. Initial program 64.6%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 82.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 82.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 87.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 87.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 87.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 87.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 87.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 87.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 87.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 87.0%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

      2. associate-/r/ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{t} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{t} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

      2. *-un-lft-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. clear-num 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in y around 0 77.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right) + \frac{t}{e^{z} - 1}}{y}}} \]

   if 1 < (exp.f64 z)

   1. Initial program 75.7%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 75.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 75.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 83.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 83.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 83.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 83.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 83.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 83.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 83.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 82.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 35.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}{t}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 35.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{e^{z} - 1}{t}} \]

      2. expm1-define 53.0%

         \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

   7. Simplified 53.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 53.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.16666666666666666 \cdot \frac{y \cdot z}{t} + 0.5 \cdot \frac{y}{t}\right) + \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in t around 0 53.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot \left(y + z \cdot \left(0.16666666666666666 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + 0.5 \cdot y\right)\right)}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{\frac{0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right) + \frac{t}{e^{z} + -1}}{y}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{z \cdot \left(y + z \cdot \left(0.16666666666666666 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 87.1% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+125}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1e+125) x (- x (* y (/ (expm1 z) t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1e+125) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y * (expm1(z) / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1e+125) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y * (Math.expm1(z) / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1e+125:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x - (y * (math.expm1(z) / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1e+125)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y * Float64(expm1(z) / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1e+125], x, N[(x - N[(y * N[(N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -9.9999999999999992e124

   1. Initial program 44.7%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 78.3%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 63.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -9.9999999999999992e124 < y

   1. Initial program 69.2%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 83.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 83.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 88.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 88.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 88.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 88.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 88.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 88.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 88.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 88.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 84.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}{t}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 84.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{e^{z} - 1}{t}} \]

      2. expm1-define 93.3%

         \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

   7. Simplified 93.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+125}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 86.3% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.82 \cdot 10^{+127}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.82e+127) x (- x (/ (* y (expm1 z)) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.82e+127) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((y * expm1(z)) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.82e+127) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((y * Math.expm1(z)) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.82e+127:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x - ((y * math.expm1(z)) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.82e+127)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(y * expm1(z)) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.82e+127], x, N[(x - N[(N[(y * N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.82000000000000009e127

   1. Initial program 44.7%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 78.3%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 63.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.82000000000000009e127 < y

   1. Initial program 69.2%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 83.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 83.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 88.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 88.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 88.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 88.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 88.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 88.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 88.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 88.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 84.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}}{t} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-define 93.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

   7. Simplified 93.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.82 \cdot 10^{+127}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 80.5% accurate, 8.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.2 \cdot 10^{-91}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{z \cdot \left(y + z \cdot \left(0.16666666666666666 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -3.2e-91)
   x
   (-
    x
    (/ (* z (+ y (* z (+ (* 0.16666666666666666 (* y z)) (* y 0.5))))) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.2e-91) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((z * (y + (z * ((0.16666666666666666 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.5))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-3.2d-91)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x - ((z * (y + (z * ((0.16666666666666666d0 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.5d0))))) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.2e-91) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((z * (y + (z * ((0.16666666666666666 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.5))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -3.2e-91:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x - ((z * (y + (z * ((0.16666666666666666 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.5))))) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -3.2e-91)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(0.16666666666666666 * Float64(y * z)) + Float64(y * 0.5))))) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -3.2e-91)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x - ((z * (y + (z * ((0.16666666666666666 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.5))))) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -3.2e-91], x, N[(x - N[(N[(z * N[(y + N[(z * N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.19999999999999996e-91

   1. Initial program 77.5%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 83.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 83.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 95.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -3.19999999999999996e-91 < z

   1. Initial program 57.3%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 82.2%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 81.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}{t}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 81.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{e^{z} - 1}{t}} \]

      2. expm1-define 92.4%

         \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

   7. Simplified 92.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 88.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.16666666666666666 \cdot \frac{y \cdot z}{t} + 0.5 \cdot \frac{y}{t}\right) + \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in t around 0 93.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot \left(y + z \cdot \left(0.16666666666666666 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + 0.5 \cdot y\right)\right)}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.2 \cdot 10^{-91}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{z \cdot \left(y + z \cdot \left(0.16666666666666666 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 81.2% accurate, 17.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.1 \cdot 10^{-88}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -3.1e-88) x (- x (* y (/ z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.1e-88) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-3.1d-88)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x - (y * (z / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.1e-88) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -3.1e-88:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x - (y * (z / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -3.1e-88)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y * Float64(z / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -3.1e-88)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x - (y * (z / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -3.1e-88], x, N[(x - N[(y * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.0999999999999998e-88

   1. Initial program 77.5%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 83.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 83.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 95.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -3.0999999999999998e-88 < z

   1. Initial program 57.3%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 82.2%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 93.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 92.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   7. Simplified 92.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.1 \cdot 10^{-88}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 81.2% accurate, 17.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.9 \cdot 10^{-89}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -5.9e-89) x (- x (/ y (/ t z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.9e-89) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / (t / z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-5.9d-89)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x - (y / (t / z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.9e-89) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / (t / z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -5.9e-89:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x - (y / (t / z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -5.9e-89)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / Float64(t / z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -5.9e-89)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x - (y / (t / z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -5.9e-89], x, N[(x - N[(y / N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.90000000000000021e-89

   1. Initial program 77.5%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 83.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 83.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 95.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -5.90000000000000021e-89 < z

   1. Initial program 57.3%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 82.2%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 80.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\log \left(1 + y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)\right)}{t \cdot x}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 80.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\log \left(1 + y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)\right)}{t \cdot x}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 80.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\log \left(1 + y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)\right)}{t \cdot x}\right)} \]

      3. expm1-define 82.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\log \left(1 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t \cdot x}\right) \]

      4. log1p-undefine 91.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}{t \cdot x}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t \cdot x}\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 93.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 93.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{t}\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 92.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}}\right) \]

      3. unsub-neg 92.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

      4. associate-*r/ 93.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]

      5. associate-*l/ 88.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot z} \]

      6. associate-/r/ 92.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]

   10. Simplified 92.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.9 \cdot 10^{-89}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 80.4% accurate, 17.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{-93}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y \cdot z}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.8e-93) x (- x (/ (* y z) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.8e-93) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((y * z) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.8d-93)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x - ((y * z) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.8e-93) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((y * z) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.8e-93:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x - ((y * z) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.8e-93)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(y * z) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.8e-93)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x - ((y * z) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.8e-93], x, N[(x - N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.8000000000000001e-93

   1. Initial program 77.5%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 83.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 83.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 95.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.8000000000000001e-93 < z

   1. Initial program 57.3%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 82.2%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 93.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{-93}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y \cdot z}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 72.0% accurate, 211.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 64.8%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l- 82.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   2. sub-neg 82.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. log1p-define 87.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   4. neg-sub0 87.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   5. associate-+l- 87.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. neg-sub0 87.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   7. +-commutative 87.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   8. unsub-neg 87.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   9. *-rgt-identity 87.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   10. distribute-lft-out-- 87.0%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   11. expm1-define 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 76.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

6. Final simplification 76.1%

   \[\leadsto x \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 75.1% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \frac{-0.5}{y \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -2.8874623088207947 \cdot 10^{+119}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x - \frac{t\_1}{z \cdot z}\right) - t\_1 \cdot \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{z \cdot z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\log \left(1 + z \cdot y\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (/ (- 0.5) (* y t))))
   (if (< z -2.8874623088207947e+119)
     (- (- x (/ t_1 (* z z))) (* t_1 (/ (/ 2.0 z) (* z z))))
     (- x (/ (log (+ 1.0 (* z y))) t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119) {
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = -0.5d0 / (y * t)
    if (z < (-2.8874623088207947d+119)) then
        tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0d0 / z) / (z * z)))
    else
        tmp = x - (log((1.0d0 + (z * y))) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119) {
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t)
	tmp = 0
	if z < -2.8874623088207947e+119:
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)))
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(-0.5) / Float64(y * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x - Float64(t_1 / Float64(z * z))) - Float64(t_1 * Float64(Float64(2.0 / z) / Float64(z * z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * y))) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119)
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)));
	else
		tmp = x - (log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[((-0.5) / N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -2.8874623088207947e+119], N[(N[(x - N[(t$95$1 / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t$95$1 * N[(N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 + N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024073 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "System.Random.MWC.Distributions:truncatedExp from mwc-random-0.13.3.2"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (if (< z -2.8874623088207947e+119) (- (- x (/ (/ (- 0.5) (* y t)) (* z z))) (* (/ (- 0.5) (* y t)) (/ (/ 2.0 z) (* z z)))) (- x (/ (log (+ 1.0 (* z y))) t)))

  (- x (/ (log (+ (- 1.0 y) (* y (exp z)))) t)))