Diagrams.TwoD.Apollonian:descartes from diagrams-contrib-1.3.0.5

Percentage Accurate: 70.8% → 96.7%

Time: 18.3s

Alternatives: 15

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(x * z)) + Float64(y * z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 70.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(x * z)) + Float64(y * z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.7% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := 2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}^{2}\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.25 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{-176}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.38 \cdot 10^{-300}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{x}{y}, z\right)} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (*
          2.0
          (pow (exp (* 0.25 (- (log (- (- y) z)) (log (/ -1.0 x))))) 2.0))))
   (if (<= y -2.25e+14)
     t_0
     (if (<= y -8.2e-176)
       (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z))))
       (if (<= y 1.38e-300)
         t_0
         (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ x (fma z (/ x y) z))) (sqrt y))))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = 2.0 * pow(exp((0.25 * (log((-y - z)) - log((-1.0 / x))))), 2.0);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2.25e+14) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= -8.2e-176) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else if (y <= 1.38e-300) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((x + fma(z, (x / y), z))) * sqrt(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(2.0 * (exp(Float64(0.25 * Float64(log(Float64(Float64(-y) - z)) - log(Float64(-1.0 / x))))) ^ 2.0))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -2.25e+14)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= -8.2e-176)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	elseif (y <= 1.38e-300)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(x + fma(z, Float64(x / y), z))) * sqrt(y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(2.0 * N[Power[N[Exp[N[(0.25 * N[(N[Log[N[((-y) - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -2.25e+14], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, -8.2e-176], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.38e-300], t$95$0, N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(x + N[(z * N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -2.25e14 or -8.2000000000000005e-176 < y < 1.3799999999999999e-300

   1. Initial program 58.9%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      10. +-commutative 58.9%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

      11. +-commutative 58.9%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]

      12. *-commutative 58.9%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]

      13. associate-+l+ 58.9%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      14. +-commutative 58.9%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      15. distribute-rgt-in 59.0%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 59.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 59.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z}} \]

      4. +-commutative 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

      5. associate-+r+ 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      6. *-commutative 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      7. distribute-lft-in 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)}} \]

      8. fma-undefine 59.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \]

      9. add-sqr-sqrt 58.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}}\right)} \]

      10. pow2 58.7%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}}\right)}^{2}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 58.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around -inf 42.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}}^{2} \]

   if -2.25e14 < y < -8.2000000000000005e-176

   1. Initial program 86.7%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 86.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 86.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 86.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 86.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 86.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 86.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 86.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 86.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 86.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      10. +-commutative 86.7%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

      11. +-commutative 86.7%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]

      12. *-commutative 86.7%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]

      13. associate-+l+ 86.7%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      14. +-commutative 86.7%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      15. distribute-rgt-in 86.7%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 48.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]

   if 1.3799999999999999e-300 < y

   1. Initial program 69.9%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 70.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

      2. *-commutative 70.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 70.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 63.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \left(z + \frac{x \cdot z}{y}\right)\right)}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 63.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot \left(x + \left(z + \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot x}}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 63.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \left(z + \frac{z \cdot x}{y}\right)\right)}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 63.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(z + \frac{z \cdot x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot y}} \]

      2. sqrt-prod 78.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x + \left(z + \frac{z \cdot x}{y}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 78.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{z \cdot x}{y} + z\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 79.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{x}{y}} + z\right)} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 79.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{x}{y}, z\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right) \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 79.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{x}{y}, z\right)} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 61.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.25 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}^{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{-176}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.38 \cdot 10^{-300}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}^{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{x}{y}, z\right)} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 95.7% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.9 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}^{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-294}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)\right)}^{0.5}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{x}{y}, z\right)} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -2.9e+14)
   (* 2.0 (pow (exp (* 0.25 (- (log (- y)) (log (/ -1.0 x))))) 2.0))
   (if (<= y 2.2e-294)
     (* 2.0 (pow (fma x y (* z (+ y x))) 0.5))
     (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ x (fma z (/ x y) z))) (sqrt y))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2.9e+14) {
		tmp = 2.0 * pow(exp((0.25 * (log(-y) - log((-1.0 / x))))), 2.0);
	} else if (y <= 2.2e-294) {
		tmp = 2.0 * pow(fma(x, y, (z * (y + x))), 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((x + fma(z, (x / y), z))) * sqrt(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -2.9e+14)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * (exp(Float64(0.25 * Float64(log(Float64(-y)) - log(Float64(-1.0 / x))))) ^ 2.0));
	elseif (y <= 2.2e-294)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * (fma(x, y, Float64(z * Float64(y + x))) ^ 0.5));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(x + fma(z, Float64(x / y), z))) * sqrt(y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -2.9e+14], N[(2.0 * N[Power[N[Exp[N[(0.25 * N[(N[Log[(-y)], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 2.2e-294], N[(2.0 * N[Power[N[(x * y + N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 0.5], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(x + N[(z * N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -2.9e14

   1. Initial program 47.8%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      10. +-commutative 47.8%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

      11. +-commutative 47.8%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]

      12. *-commutative 47.8%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]

      13. associate-+l+ 47.8%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      14. +-commutative 47.8%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      15. distribute-rgt-in 47.9%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 47.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 47.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z}} \]

      4. +-commutative 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

      5. associate-+r+ 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      6. *-commutative 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      7. distribute-lft-in 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)}} \]

      8. fma-undefine 48.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \]

      9. add-sqr-sqrt 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}}\right)} \]

      10. pow2 47.8%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}}\right)}^{2}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 48.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 24.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left({\left(1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\right)}^{0.25}\right)}}^{2} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lft-identity 24.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right)}}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

      2. *-commutative 24.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)}}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

   9. Simplified 24.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left({\left(y \cdot x\right)}^{0.25}\right)}}^{2} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in x around -inf 40.1%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}}^{2} \]

   if -2.9e14 < y < 2.2e-294

   1. Initial program 85.6%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 85.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 85.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 85.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 85.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 85.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 85.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 85.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 85.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 85.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      10. +-commutative 85.6%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

      11. +-commutative 85.6%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]

      12. *-commutative 85.6%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]

      13. associate-+l+ 85.6%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      14. +-commutative 85.6%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      15. distribute-rgt-in 85.7%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow1/2 85.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)}^{0.5}} \]

      2. +-commutative 85.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right)}^{0.5} \]

      3. fma-undefine 85.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}}^{0.5} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 85.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}^{0.5}} \]

   if 2.2e-294 < y

   1. Initial program 70.2%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 70.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

      2. *-commutative 70.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 70.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 64.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \left(z + \frac{x \cdot z}{y}\right)\right)}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 64.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot \left(x + \left(z + \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot x}}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 64.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \left(z + \frac{z \cdot x}{y}\right)\right)}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 64.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(z + \frac{z \cdot x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot y}} \]

      2. sqrt-prod 79.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x + \left(z + \frac{z \cdot x}{y}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 79.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{z \cdot x}{y} + z\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 79.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{x}{y}} + z\right)} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 79.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{x}{y}, z\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right) \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 79.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{x}{y}, z\right)} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.9 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}^{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-294}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)\right)}^{0.5}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{x}{y}, z\right)} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 95.7% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot e^{\left(\log \left(-y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right) \cdot 0.5}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-294}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)\right)}^{0.5}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{x}{y}, z\right)} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -6e+14)
   (* 2.0 (exp (* (- (log (- y)) (log (/ -1.0 x))) 0.5)))
   (if (<= y 2.2e-294)
     (* 2.0 (pow (fma x y (* z (+ y x))) 0.5))
     (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ x (fma z (/ x y) z))) (sqrt y))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -6e+14) {
		tmp = 2.0 * exp(((log(-y) - log((-1.0 / x))) * 0.5));
	} else if (y <= 2.2e-294) {
		tmp = 2.0 * pow(fma(x, y, (z * (y + x))), 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((x + fma(z, (x / y), z))) * sqrt(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -6e+14)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * exp(Float64(Float64(log(Float64(-y)) - log(Float64(-1.0 / x))) * 0.5)));
	elseif (y <= 2.2e-294)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * (fma(x, y, Float64(z * Float64(y + x))) ^ 0.5));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(x + fma(z, Float64(x / y), z))) * sqrt(y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -6e+14], N[(2.0 * N[Exp[N[(N[(N[Log[(-y)], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 2.2e-294], N[(2.0 * N[Power[N[(x * y + N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 0.5], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(x + N[(z * N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -6e14

   1. Initial program 47.8%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      10. +-commutative 47.8%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

      11. +-commutative 47.8%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]

      12. *-commutative 47.8%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]

      13. associate-+l+ 47.8%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      14. +-commutative 47.8%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      15. distribute-rgt-in 47.9%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 47.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 24.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 24.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x}} \]

   7. Simplified 24.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot x}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow1/2 24.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(y \cdot x\right)}^{0.5}} \]

      2. pow-to-exp 22.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{e^{\log \left(y \cdot x\right) \cdot 0.5}} \]

      3. *-commutative 22.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\log \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right)} \cdot 0.5} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 22.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{e^{\log \left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 0.5}} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in x around -inf 40.1%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)} \cdot 0.5} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. mul-1-neg 40.1%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right) \cdot 0.5} \]

       2. unsub-neg 40.1%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)} \cdot 0.5} \]

       3. mul-1-neg 40.1%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\left(\log \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right) \cdot 0.5} \]

   12. Simplified 40.1%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(-y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)} \cdot 0.5} \]

   if -6e14 < y < 2.2e-294

   1. Initial program 85.6%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 85.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 85.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 85.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 85.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 85.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 85.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 85.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 85.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 85.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      10. +-commutative 85.6%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

      11. +-commutative 85.6%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]

      12. *-commutative 85.6%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]

      13. associate-+l+ 85.6%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      14. +-commutative 85.6%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      15. distribute-rgt-in 85.7%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow1/2 85.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)}^{0.5}} \]

      2. +-commutative 85.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right)}^{0.5} \]

      3. fma-undefine 85.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}}^{0.5} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 85.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}^{0.5}} \]

   if 2.2e-294 < y

   1. Initial program 70.2%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 70.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

      2. *-commutative 70.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 70.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 64.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \left(z + \frac{x \cdot z}{y}\right)\right)}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 64.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot \left(x + \left(z + \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot x}}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 64.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \left(z + \frac{z \cdot x}{y}\right)\right)}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 64.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(z + \frac{z \cdot x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot y}} \]

      2. sqrt-prod 79.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x + \left(z + \frac{z \cdot x}{y}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 79.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{z \cdot x}{y} + z\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 79.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{x}{y}} + z\right)} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 79.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{x}{y}, z\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right) \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 79.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{x}{y}, z\right)} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot e^{\left(\log \left(-y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right) \cdot 0.5}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-294}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)\right)}^{0.5}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{x}{y}, z\right)} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 94.2% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot e^{\left(\log \left(-y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right) \cdot 0.5}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 900000000:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot \left(x + \left(z + \frac{z \cdot x}{y}\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -4.6e+14)
   (* 2.0 (exp (* (- (log (- y)) (log (/ -1.0 x))) 0.5)))
   (if (<= y 900000000.0)
     (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y (+ x (+ z (/ (* z x) y))))))
     (* 2.0 (* (sqrt y) (sqrt z))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -4.6e+14) {
		tmp = 2.0 * exp(((log(-y) - log((-1.0 / x))) * 0.5));
	} else if (y <= 900000000.0) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * (x + (z + ((z * x) / y)))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(y) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-4.6d+14)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * exp(((log(-y) - log(((-1.0d0) / x))) * 0.5d0))
    else if (y <= 900000000.0d0) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * (x + (z + ((z * x) / y)))))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (sqrt(y) * sqrt(z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -4.6e+14) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.exp(((Math.log(-y) - Math.log((-1.0 / x))) * 0.5));
	} else if (y <= 900000000.0) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * (x + (z + ((z * x) / y)))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (Math.sqrt(y) * Math.sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -4.6e+14:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.exp(((math.log(-y) - math.log((-1.0 / x))) * 0.5))
	elif y <= 900000000.0:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * (x + (z + ((z * x) / y)))))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (math.sqrt(y) * math.sqrt(z))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -4.6e+14)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * exp(Float64(Float64(log(Float64(-y)) - log(Float64(-1.0 / x))) * 0.5)));
	elseif (y <= 900000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * Float64(x + Float64(z + Float64(Float64(z * x) / y))))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(y) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -4.6e+14)
		tmp = 2.0 * exp(((log(-y) - log((-1.0 / x))) * 0.5));
	elseif (y <= 900000000.0)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * (x + (z + ((z * x) / y)))));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(y) * sqrt(z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -4.6e+14], N[(2.0 * N[Exp[N[(N[(N[Log[(-y)], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 900000000.0], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * N[(x + N[(z + N[(N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -4.6e14

   1. Initial program 47.8%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 47.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      10. +-commutative 47.8%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

      11. +-commutative 47.8%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]

      12. *-commutative 47.8%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]

      13. associate-+l+ 47.8%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      14. +-commutative 47.8%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      15. distribute-rgt-in 47.9%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 47.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 24.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 24.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x}} \]

   7. Simplified 24.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot x}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow1/2 24.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(y \cdot x\right)}^{0.5}} \]

      2. pow-to-exp 22.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{e^{\log \left(y \cdot x\right) \cdot 0.5}} \]

      3. *-commutative 22.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\log \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right)} \cdot 0.5} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 22.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{e^{\log \left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 0.5}} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in x around -inf 40.1%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)} \cdot 0.5} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. mul-1-neg 40.1%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right) \cdot 0.5} \]

       2. unsub-neg 40.1%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)} \cdot 0.5} \]

       3. mul-1-neg 40.1%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\left(\log \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right) \cdot 0.5} \]

   12. Simplified 40.1%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(-y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)} \cdot 0.5} \]

   if -4.6e14 < y < 9e8

   1. Initial program 82.4%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 82.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 82.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 82.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 82.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 82.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 82.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 82.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 82.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 82.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      10. +-commutative 82.4%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

      11. +-commutative 82.4%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]

      12. *-commutative 82.4%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]

      13. associate-+l+ 82.4%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      14. +-commutative 82.4%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      15. distribute-rgt-in 82.4%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 82.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 67.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \left(z + \frac{x \cdot z}{y}\right)\right)}} \]

   if 9e8 < y

   1. Initial program 61.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      10. +-commutative 61.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

      11. +-commutative 61.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]

      12. *-commutative 61.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]

      13. associate-+l+ 61.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      14. +-commutative 61.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      15. distribute-rgt-in 61.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 61.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 30.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 30.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}} \]

      2. sqrt-prod 47.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 47.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 56.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot e^{\left(\log \left(-y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right) \cdot 0.5}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 900000000:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot \left(x + \left(z + \frac{z \cdot x}{y}\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 83.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 650000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)\right)}^{0.5}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 650000000000.0)
   (* 2.0 (pow (fma x y (* z (+ y x))) 0.5))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt y) (sqrt z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 650000000000.0) {
		tmp = 2.0 * pow(fma(x, y, (z * (y + x))), 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(y) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 650000000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * (fma(x, y, Float64(z * Float64(y + x))) ^ 0.5));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(y) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 650000000000.0], N[(2.0 * N[Power[N[(x * y + N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 0.5], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 6.5e11

   1. Initial program 71.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      10. +-commutative 71.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

      11. +-commutative 71.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]

      12. *-commutative 71.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]

      13. associate-+l+ 71.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      14. +-commutative 71.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      15. distribute-rgt-in 71.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 71.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow1/2 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)}^{0.5}} \]

      2. +-commutative 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right)}^{0.5} \]

      3. fma-undefine 71.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}}^{0.5} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 71.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}^{0.5}} \]

   if 6.5e11 < y

   1. Initial program 61.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      10. +-commutative 61.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

      11. +-commutative 61.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]

      12. *-commutative 61.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]

      13. associate-+l+ 61.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      14. +-commutative 61.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      15. distribute-rgt-in 61.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 61.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 30.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 30.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}} \]

      2. sqrt-prod 47.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 47.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 650000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)\right)}^{0.5}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 83.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1150000000:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(z + x\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1150000000.0)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (fma x z (* y (+ z x)))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt y) (sqrt z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1150000000.0) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, z, (y * (z + x))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(y) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1150000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, z, Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(y) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1150000000.0], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * z + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.15e9

   1. Initial program 71.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. +-commutative 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot z} + z \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot z}\right)} \]

      10. associate-+l+ 71.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]

      11. +-commutative 71.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      12. fma-define 71.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      13. distribute-lft-out 71.6%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 71.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 1.15e9 < y

   1. Initial program 61.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      10. +-commutative 61.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

      11. +-commutative 61.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]

      12. *-commutative 61.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]

      13. associate-+l+ 61.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      14. +-commutative 61.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      15. distribute-rgt-in 61.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 61.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 30.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 30.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}} \]

      2. sqrt-prod 47.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 47.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1150000000:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(z + x\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 83.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 210000000:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 210000000.0)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* y z))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt y) (sqrt z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 210000000.0) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(y) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 210000000.0d0) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (sqrt(y) * sqrt(z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 210000000.0) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (Math.sqrt(y) * Math.sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 210000000.0:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (math.sqrt(y) * math.sqrt(z))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 210000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) + Float64(y * z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(y) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 210000000.0)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(y) * sqrt(z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 210000000.0], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.1e8

   1. Initial program 71.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

      2. *-commutative 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 71.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]

   if 2.1e8 < y

   1. Initial program 61.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      10. +-commutative 61.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

      11. +-commutative 61.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]

      12. *-commutative 61.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]

      13. associate-+l+ 61.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      14. +-commutative 61.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      15. distribute-rgt-in 61.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 61.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 30.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 30.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}} \]

      2. sqrt-prod 47.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 47.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 210000000:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 71.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-294}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + 1\right)\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.2e-294)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z))))
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y (* z (+ (/ x y) 1.0)))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.2e-294) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * (z * ((x / y) + 1.0))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.2d-294) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * (z * ((x / y) + 1.0d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.2e-294) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * (z * ((x / y) + 1.0))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.2e-294:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * (z * ((x / y) + 1.0))))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.2e-294)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(Float64(x / y) + 1.0)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.2e-294)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * (z * ((x / y) + 1.0))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.2e-294], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.2e-294

   1. Initial program 68.3%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      10. +-commutative 68.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

      11. +-commutative 68.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]

      12. *-commutative 68.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]

      13. associate-+l+ 68.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      14. +-commutative 68.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      15. distribute-rgt-in 68.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 68.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 42.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]

   if 2.2e-294 < y

   1. Initial program 70.2%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 70.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

      2. *-commutative 70.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 70.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 64.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \left(z + \frac{x \cdot z}{y}\right)\right)}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 64.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot \left(x + \left(z + \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot x}}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 64.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \left(z + \frac{z \cdot x}{y}\right)\right)}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around inf 39.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x}{y}\right)\right)}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 41.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-294}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + 1\right)\right)}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 70.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-294}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.2e-294) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z)))) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.2e-294) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.2d-294) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.2e-294) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.2e-294:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * z))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.2e-294)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.2e-294)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.2e-294], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.2e-294

   1. Initial program 68.3%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      10. +-commutative 68.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

      11. +-commutative 68.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]

      12. *-commutative 68.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]

      13. associate-+l+ 68.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      14. +-commutative 68.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      15. distribute-rgt-in 68.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 68.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 42.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]

   if 2.2e-294 < y

   1. Initial program 70.2%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      10. +-commutative 70.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

      11. +-commutative 70.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]

      12. *-commutative 70.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]

      13. associate-+l+ 70.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      14. +-commutative 70.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      15. distribute-rgt-in 70.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 70.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 27.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 35.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-294}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 71.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-294}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -2e-294) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z)))) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* z (+ y x))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2e-294) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-2d-294)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2e-294) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -2e-294:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((z * (y + x)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -2e-294)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(z * Float64(y + x))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -2e-294)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -2e-294], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2.00000000000000003e-294

   1. Initial program 68.2%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 68.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 68.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 68.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 68.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 68.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 68.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 68.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 68.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 68.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      10. +-commutative 68.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

      11. +-commutative 68.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]

      12. *-commutative 68.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]

      13. associate-+l+ 68.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      14. +-commutative 68.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      15. distribute-rgt-in 68.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 68.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 41.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]

   if -2.00000000000000003e-294 < y

   1. Initial program 70.2%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      10. +-commutative 70.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

      11. +-commutative 70.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]

      12. *-commutative 70.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]

      13. associate-+l+ 70.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      14. +-commutative 70.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      15. distribute-rgt-in 70.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 70.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 48.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 48.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}} \]

   7. Simplified 48.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 44.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-294}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 70.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ 2 \cdot {\left(y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)}^{0.5} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (pow (+ (* y x) (* z (+ y x))) 0.5)))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * pow(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))), 0.5);
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * (((y * x) + (z * (y + x))) ** 0.5d0)
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.pow(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))), 0.5);
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.pow(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))), 0.5)

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * (Float64(Float64(y * x) + Float64(z * Float64(y + x))) ^ 0.5))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * (((y * x) + (z * (y + x))) ^ 0.5);
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Power[N[(N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 0.5], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 69.2%

   \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

   2. *-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

   3. *-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

   4. *-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

   5. +-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

   6. +-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

   7. associate-+l+ 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

   8. *-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

   9. *-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

   10. +-commutative 69.2%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

   11. +-commutative 69.2%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]

   12. *-commutative 69.2%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]

   13. associate-+l+ 69.2%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

   14. +-commutative 69.2%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

   15. distribute-rgt-in 69.2%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 69.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. pow1/2 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)}^{0.5}} \]

   2. +-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right)}^{0.5} \]

   3. fma-undefine 69.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}}^{0.5} \]

6. Applied egg-rr 69.4%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}^{0.5}} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-undefine 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)}}^{0.5} \]

   2. +-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}\right)}^{0.5} \]

   3. +-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(y + x\right) + x \cdot y\right)}}^{0.5} \]

   4. +-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + x \cdot y\right)}^{0.5} \]

8. Applied egg-rr 69.2%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(x + y\right) + x \cdot y\right)}}^{0.5} \]

9. Final simplification 69.2%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)}^{0.5} \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 70.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* y x) (* z (+ y x))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))))

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(y * x) + Float64(z * Float64(y + x)))))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 69.2%

   \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

   2. *-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

   3. *-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

   4. *-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

   5. +-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

   6. +-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

   7. associate-+l+ 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

   8. *-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

   9. *-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

   10. +-commutative 69.2%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

   11. +-commutative 69.2%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]

   12. *-commutative 69.2%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]

   13. associate-+l+ 69.2%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

   14. +-commutative 69.2%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

   15. distribute-rgt-in 69.2%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 69.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 69.2%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 70.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* y z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)));
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)))

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) + Float64(y * z))))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 69.2%

   \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-lft-out 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

   2. *-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]

4. Applied egg-rr 69.2%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]

5. Final simplification 69.2%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 69.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-309}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1e-309) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y x))) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1e-309) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1d-309)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * x))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1e-309) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * x));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1e-309:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * x))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * z))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1e-309)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * x)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1e-309)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1e-309], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.000000000000002e-309

   1. Initial program 68.3%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 68.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      10. +-commutative 68.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

      11. +-commutative 68.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]

      12. *-commutative 68.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]

      13. associate-+l+ 68.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      14. +-commutative 68.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      15. distribute-rgt-in 68.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 68.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 20.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 20.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x}} \]

   7. Simplified 20.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot x}} \]

   if -1.000000000000002e-309 < y

   1. Initial program 70.2%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      10. +-commutative 70.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

      11. +-commutative 70.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]

      12. *-commutative 70.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]

      13. associate-+l+ 70.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      14. +-commutative 70.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      15. distribute-rgt-in 70.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 70.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 26.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 23.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-309}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 36.2% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y x))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * x))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * x));
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * x))

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * x)))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 69.2%

   \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

   2. *-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

   3. *-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

   4. *-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

   5. +-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

   6. +-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

   7. associate-+l+ 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

   8. *-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

   9. *-commutative 69.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

   10. +-commutative 69.2%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

   11. +-commutative 69.2%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]

   12. *-commutative 69.2%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]

   13. associate-+l+ 69.2%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

   14. +-commutative 69.2%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

   15. distribute-rgt-in 69.2%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 69.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 22.0%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot y}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 22.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x}} \]

7. Simplified 22.0%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot x}} \]

8. Final simplification 22.0%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 83.1% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := 0.25 \cdot \left(\left({y}^{-0.75} \cdot \left({z}^{-0.75} \cdot x\right)\right) \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) + {z}^{0.25} \cdot {y}^{0.25}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < 7.636950090573675 \cdot 10^{+176}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x + y\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(t\_0 \cdot t\_0\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (+
          (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z)))
          (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25)))))
   (if (< z 7.636950090573675e+176)
     (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* x y))))
     (* (* t_0 t_0) 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (0.25 * ((pow(y, -0.75) * (pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (pow(z, 0.25) * pow(y, 0.25));
	double tmp;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (0.25d0 * (((y ** (-0.75d0)) * ((z ** (-0.75d0)) * x)) * (y + z))) + ((z ** 0.25d0) * (y ** 0.25d0))
    if (z < 7.636950090573675d+176) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)))
    else
        tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (0.25 * ((Math.pow(y, -0.75) * (Math.pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (Math.pow(z, 0.25) * Math.pow(y, 0.25));
	double tmp;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (0.25 * ((math.pow(y, -0.75) * (math.pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (math.pow(z, 0.25) * math.pow(y, 0.25))
	tmp = 0
	if z < 7.636950090573675e+176:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)))
	else:
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(0.25 * Float64(Float64((y ^ -0.75) * Float64((z ^ -0.75) * x)) * Float64(y + z))) + Float64((z ^ 0.25) * (y ^ 0.25)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) * z) + Float64(x * y))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (0.25 * (((y ^ -0.75) * ((z ^ -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + ((z ^ 0.25) * (y ^ 0.25));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	else
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(0.25 * N[(N[(N[Power[y, -0.75], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Power[z, -0.75], $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Power[z, 0.25], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[y, 0.25], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, 7.636950090573675e+176], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024072 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.TwoD.Apollonian:descartes from diagrams-contrib-1.3.0.5"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (if (< z 7.636950090573675e+176) (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* x y)))) (* (* (+ (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z))) (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25))) (+ (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z))) (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25)))) 2.0))

  (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))