Falkner and Boettcher, Appendix A

Percentage Accurate: 90.0% → 98.4%

Time: 12.3s

Alternatives: 12

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.3% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. a = -1.9999999999999999e-154
  2. k = 0.0
  3. m = -2.00000000000000007e154

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = (a * (k ** m)) / ((1.0d0 + (10.0d0 * k)) + (k * k))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * Math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return (a * math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(Float64(a * (k ^ m)) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)) + Float64(k * k)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = (a * (k ^ m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 90.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = (a * (k ** m)) / ((1.0d0 + (10.0d0 * k)) + (k * k))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * Math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return (a * math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(Float64(a * (k ^ m)) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)) + Float64(k * k)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = (a * (k ^ m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.4% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \mathbf{if}\;\frac{t\_0}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+180}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{{k}^{m}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)} \cdot \frac{a}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* a (pow k m))))
   (if (<= (/ t_0 (+ (+ 1.0 (* k 10.0)) (* k k))) 4e+180)
     (* (/ (pow k m) (hypot 1.0 k)) (/ a (hypot 1.0 k)))
     t_0)))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * pow(k, m);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 / ((1.0 + (k * 10.0)) + (k * k))) <= 4e+180) {
		tmp = (pow(k, m) / hypot(1.0, k)) * (a / hypot(1.0, k));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * Math.pow(k, m);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 / ((1.0 + (k * 10.0)) + (k * k))) <= 4e+180) {
		tmp = (Math.pow(k, m) / Math.hypot(1.0, k)) * (a / Math.hypot(1.0, k));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	t_0 = a * math.pow(k, m)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_0 / ((1.0 + (k * 10.0)) + (k * k))) <= 4e+180:
		tmp = (math.pow(k, m) / math.hypot(1.0, k)) * (a / math.hypot(1.0, k))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = Float64(a * (k ^ m))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t_0 / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * 10.0)) + Float64(k * k))) <= 4e+180)
		tmp = Float64(Float64((k ^ m) / hypot(1.0, k)) * Float64(a / hypot(1.0, k)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = a * (k ^ m);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_0 / ((1.0 + (k * 10.0)) + (k * k))) <= 4e+180)
		tmp = ((k ^ m) / hypot(1.0, k)) * (a / hypot(1.0, k));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t$95$0 / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(k * 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 4e+180], N[(N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] / N[Sqrt[1.0 ^ 2 + k ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(a / N[Sqrt[1.0 ^ 2 + k ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 #s(literal 10 binary64) k)) (*.f64 k k))) < 4e180

   1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   3. Simplified 96.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 95.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1} + k \cdot k} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a}}{1 + k \cdot k} \]

      2. add-sqr-sqrt 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{{k}^{m} \cdot a}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k} \cdot \sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}}} \]

      3. times-frac 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}} \cdot \frac{a}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}}} \]

      4. hypot-1-def 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}} \cdot \frac{a}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}} \]

      5. hypot-1-def 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{{k}^{m}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)} \cdot \frac{a}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)} \cdot \frac{a}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}} \]

   if 4e180 < (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 #s(literal 10 binary64) k)) (*.f64 k k)))

   1. Initial program 54.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 54.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 54.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 54.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 54.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 54.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 54.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 54.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 54.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 54.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 54.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+180}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{{k}^{m}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)} \cdot \frac{a}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 97.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ t_1 := \frac{t\_0}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+180}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* a (pow k m))) (t_1 (/ t_0 (+ (+ 1.0 (* k 10.0)) (* k k)))))
   (if (<= t_1 4e+180) t_1 t_0)))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * pow(k, m);
	double t_1 = t_0 / ((1.0 + (k * 10.0)) + (k * k));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 4e+180) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = a * (k ** m)
    t_1 = t_0 / ((1.0d0 + (k * 10.0d0)) + (k * k))
    if (t_1 <= 4d+180) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * Math.pow(k, m);
	double t_1 = t_0 / ((1.0 + (k * 10.0)) + (k * k));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 4e+180) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	t_0 = a * math.pow(k, m)
	t_1 = t_0 / ((1.0 + (k * 10.0)) + (k * k))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= 4e+180:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = Float64(a * (k ^ m))
	t_1 = Float64(t_0 / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * 10.0)) + Float64(k * k)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= 4e+180)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = a * (k ^ m);
	t_1 = t_0 / ((1.0 + (k * 10.0)) + (k * k));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= 4e+180)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(t$95$0 / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(k * 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 4e+180], t$95$1, t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 #s(literal 10 binary64) k)) (*.f64 k k))) < 4e180

   1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 4e180 < (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 #s(literal 10 binary64) k)) (*.f64 k k)))

   1. Initial program 54.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 54.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 54.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 54.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 54.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 54.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 54.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 54.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 54.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 54.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 54.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+180}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 97.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.4:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 3.4) (* a (/ (pow k m) (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0))))) (* a (pow k m))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.4) {
		tmp = a * (pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0))));
	} else {
		tmp = a * pow(k, m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 3.4d0) then
        tmp = a * ((k ** m) / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0))))
    else
        tmp = a * (k ** m)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.4) {
		tmp = a * (Math.pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0))));
	} else {
		tmp = a * Math.pow(k, m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 3.4:
		tmp = a * (math.pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0))))
	else:
		tmp = a * math.pow(k, m)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 3.4)
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64((k ^ m) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * (k ^ m));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 3.4)
		tmp = a * ((k ^ m) / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0))));
	else
		tmp = a * (k ^ m);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 3.4], N[(a * N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 3.39999999999999991

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 95.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 95.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 95.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 95.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 95.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 95.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 95.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 95.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 3.39999999999999991 < m

   1. Initial program 72.6%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 72.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 72.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.4:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 96.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 0.002:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{t\_0}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* a (pow k m)))) (if (<= m 0.002) (/ t_0 (+ 1.0 (* k k))) t_0)))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * pow(k, m);
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 0.002) {
		tmp = t_0 / (1.0 + (k * k));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = a * (k ** m)
    if (m <= 0.002d0) then
        tmp = t_0 / (1.0d0 + (k * k))
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * Math.pow(k, m);
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 0.002) {
		tmp = t_0 / (1.0 + (k * k));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	t_0 = a * math.pow(k, m)
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 0.002:
		tmp = t_0 / (1.0 + (k * k))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = Float64(a * (k ^ m))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 0.002)
		tmp = Float64(t_0 / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * k)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = a * (k ^ m);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 0.002)
		tmp = t_0 / (1.0 + (k * k));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[m, 0.002], N[(t$95$0 / N[(1.0 + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2e-3

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   3. Simplified 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 95.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1} + k \cdot k} \]

   if 2e-3 < m

   1. Initial program 72.6%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 72.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 72.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 0.002:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 96.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{-15} \lor \neg \left(m \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-12}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= m -4.2e-15) (not (<= m 2.9e-12)))
   (* a (pow k m))
   (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= -4.2e-15) || !(m <= 2.9e-12)) {
		tmp = a * pow(k, m);
	} else {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((m <= (-4.2d-15)) .or. (.not. (m <= 2.9d-12))) then
        tmp = a * (k ** m)
    else
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= -4.2e-15) || !(m <= 2.9e-12)) {
		tmp = a * Math.pow(k, m);
	} else {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if (m <= -4.2e-15) or not (m <= 2.9e-12):
		tmp = a * math.pow(k, m)
	else:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((m <= -4.2e-15) || !(m <= 2.9e-12))
		tmp = Float64(a * (k ^ m));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((m <= -4.2e-15) || ~((m <= 2.9e-12)))
		tmp = a * (k ^ m);
	else
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[Or[LessEqual[m, -4.2e-15], N[Not[LessEqual[m, 2.9e-12]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < -4.19999999999999962e-15 or 2.9000000000000002e-12 < m

   1. Initial program 86.2%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 86.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 86.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 86.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 86.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 86.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 86.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 86.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 86.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 86.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 86.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   7. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   if -4.19999999999999962e-15 < m < 2.9000000000000002e-12

   1. Initial program 92.2%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 92.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 92.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 92.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 92.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 92.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 92.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 92.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 92.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 92.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 92.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 92.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{-15} \lor \neg \left(m \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-12}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 54.7% accurate, 7.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.75:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(k \cdot 99 - 10\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.75)
   (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0))))
   (+ a (* a (* k (- (* k 99.0) 10.0))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.75) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.75d0) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0d0) - 10.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.75) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.75:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)))
	else:
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.75)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(a * Float64(k * Float64(Float64(k * 99.0) - 10.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.75)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	else
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.75], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(a * N[(k * N[(N[(k * 99.0), $MachinePrecision] - 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.75

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 95.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 95.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 95.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 95.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 95.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 95.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 95.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 95.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 70.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   if 1.75 < m

   1. Initial program 72.6%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 72.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 72.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 3.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 30.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) - 10 \cdot a\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv 30.7%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval 30.7%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{-10} \cdot a\right) \]

      3. mul-1-neg 30.7%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right)} + -10 \cdot a\right) \]

      4. distribute-rgt1-in 30.7%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-100 + 1\right) \cdot a\right)}\right) + -10 \cdot a\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 30.7%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-99} \cdot a\right)\right) + -10 \cdot a\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 30.7%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot -10}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 30.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right)\right) + a \cdot -10\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in k around 0 30.7%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(-10 \cdot a + 99 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\right)} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in a around 0 36.2%

       \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(99 \cdot k - 10\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 59.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.75:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(k \cdot 99 - 10\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 52.4% accurate, 8.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.3:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + k \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(k \cdot 99\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 2.3) (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k k))) (+ a (* k (* a (* k 99.0))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.3) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (k * (a * (k * 99.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.3d0) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * k))
    else
        tmp = a + (k * (a * (k * 99.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.3) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (k * (a * (k * 99.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.3:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k))
	else:
		tmp = a + (k * (a * (k * 99.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.3)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * k)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(k * Float64(a * Float64(k * 99.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.3)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k));
	else
		tmp = a + (k * (a * (k * 99.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 2.3], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(k * N[(a * N[(k * 99.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.2999999999999998

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   3. Simplified 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 95.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1} + k \cdot k} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around 0 69.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{a}}{1 + k \cdot k} \]

   if 2.2999999999999998 < m

   1. Initial program 72.6%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 72.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 72.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 3.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 30.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) - 10 \cdot a\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv 30.7%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval 30.7%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{-10} \cdot a\right) \]

      3. mul-1-neg 30.7%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right)} + -10 \cdot a\right) \]

      4. distribute-rgt1-in 30.7%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-100 + 1\right) \cdot a\right)}\right) + -10 \cdot a\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 30.7%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-99} \cdot a\right)\right) + -10 \cdot a\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 30.7%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot -10}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 30.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right)\right) + a \cdot -10\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in k around inf 30.7%

      \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(99 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 30.7%

          \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot k\right) \cdot 99\right)} \]

       2. associate-*l* 30.7%

          \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(k \cdot 99\right)\right)} \]

   11. Simplified 30.7%

       \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(k \cdot 99\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 56.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.3:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + k \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(k \cdot 99\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 53.2% accurate, 8.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.95:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + k \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(k \cdot 99\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.95) (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0)))) (+ a (* k (* a (* k 99.0))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.95) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (k * (a * (k * 99.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.95d0) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = a + (k * (a * (k * 99.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.95) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (k * (a * (k * 99.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.95:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)))
	else:
		tmp = a + (k * (a * (k * 99.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.95)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(k * Float64(a * Float64(k * 99.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.95)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	else
		tmp = a + (k * (a * (k * 99.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.95], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(k * N[(a * N[(k * 99.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.94999999999999996

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 95.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 95.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 95.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 95.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 95.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 95.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 95.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 95.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 70.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   if 1.94999999999999996 < m

   1. Initial program 72.6%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 72.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 72.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 72.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 3.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 30.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) - 10 \cdot a\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv 30.7%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval 30.7%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{-10} \cdot a\right) \]

      3. mul-1-neg 30.7%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right)} + -10 \cdot a\right) \]

      4. distribute-rgt1-in 30.7%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-100 + 1\right) \cdot a\right)}\right) + -10 \cdot a\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 30.7%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-99} \cdot a\right)\right) + -10 \cdot a\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 30.7%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot -10}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 30.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right)\right) + a \cdot -10\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in k around inf 30.7%

      \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(99 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 30.7%

          \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot k\right) \cdot 99\right)} \]

       2. associate-*l* 30.7%

          \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(k \cdot 99\right)\right)} \]

   11. Simplified 30.7%

       \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(k \cdot 99\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 57.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.95:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + k \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(k \cdot 99\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 34.9% accurate, 9.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot 10}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 3.3e+22) (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k 10.0))) (* -10.0 (* a k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.3e+22) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * 10.0));
	} else {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 3.3d+22) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * 10.0d0))
    else
        tmp = (-10.0d0) * (a * k)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.3e+22) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * 10.0));
	} else {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 3.3e+22:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * 10.0))
	else:
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 3.3e+22)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * 10.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-10.0 * Float64(a * k));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 3.3e+22)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * 10.0));
	else
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 3.3e+22], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(-10.0 * N[(a * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 3.2999999999999998e22

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 96.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 96.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 96.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 96.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 96.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 96.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 96.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 96.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 83.0%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{10 \cdot k}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 83.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   7. Simplified 83.0%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in m around 0 45.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + 10 \cdot k}} \]

   if 3.2999999999999998e22 < m

   1. Initial program 72.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 72.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 3.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 10.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + -10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around inf 23.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 38.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot 10}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 49.7% accurate, 9.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 3.3e+22) (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k k))) (* -10.0 (* a k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.3e+22) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k));
	} else {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 3.3d+22) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * k))
    else
        tmp = (-10.0d0) * (a * k)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.3e+22) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k));
	} else {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 3.3e+22:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k))
	else:
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 3.3e+22)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * k)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-10.0 * Float64(a * k));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 3.3e+22)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k));
	else
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 3.3e+22], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(-10.0 * N[(a * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 3.2999999999999998e22

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   3. Simplified 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 95.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1} + k \cdot k} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around 0 68.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{a}}{1 + k \cdot k} \]

   if 3.2999999999999998e22 < m

   1. Initial program 72.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 72.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 3.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 10.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + -10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around inf 23.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 54.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 26.0% accurate, 11.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+23}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 3.6e+23) a (* -10.0 (* a k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.6e+23) {
		tmp = a;
	} else {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 3.6d+23) then
        tmp = a
    else
        tmp = (-10.0d0) * (a * k)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.6e+23) {
		tmp = a;
	} else {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 3.6e+23:
		tmp = a
	else:
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 3.6e+23)
		tmp = a;
	else
		tmp = Float64(-10.0 * Float64(a * k));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 3.6e+23)
		tmp = a;
	else
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 3.6e+23], a, N[(-10.0 * N[(a * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 3.5999999999999998e23

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 96.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 96.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 96.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 96.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 96.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 96.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 96.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 96.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 76.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 76.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   7. Simplified 76.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in m around 0 32.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]

   if 3.5999999999999998e23 < m

   1. Initial program 72.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 72.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 3.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 10.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + -10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around inf 23.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 29.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+23}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 20.8% accurate, 114.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m) :precision binary64 a)

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = a
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return a

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return a
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = a;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := a

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.3%

   \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 88.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-frac-neg2 88.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

   4. distribute-neg-frac2 88.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 88.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   6. sqr-neg 88.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

   7. associate-+l+ 88.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

   8. sqr-neg 88.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

   9. distribute-rgt-out 88.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 88.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 84.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 84.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

7. Simplified 84.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

8. Taylor expanded in m around 0 23.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]

9. Final simplification 23.2%

   \[\leadsto a \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024072 
(FPCore (a k m)
  :name "Falkner and Boettcher, Appendix A"
  :precision binary64
  (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))