Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle

Percentage Accurate: 60.3% → 99.4%

Time: 52.7s

Alternatives: 19

Speedup: 3.0×

• 31.7% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t\_0 \cdot t\_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Initial Program: 60.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t\_0 \cdot t\_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Alternative 1: 99.4% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (pow
   (sqrt
    (hypot
     (*
      (-
       (* (cos (* phi1 0.5)) (cos (* 0.5 phi2)))
       (expm1 (log1p (* (sin (* phi1 0.5)) (sin (* 0.5 phi2))))))
      (- lambda1 lambda2))
     (- phi1 phi2)))
   2.0)))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * pow(sqrt(hypot((((cos((phi1 * 0.5)) * cos((0.5 * phi2))) - expm1(log1p((sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * sin((0.5 * phi2)))))) * (lambda1 - lambda2)), (phi1 - phi2))), 2.0);
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.pow(Math.sqrt(Math.hypot((((Math.cos((phi1 * 0.5)) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi2))) - Math.expm1(Math.log1p((Math.sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * Math.sin((0.5 * phi2)))))) * (lambda1 - lambda2)), (phi1 - phi2))), 2.0);
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.pow(math.sqrt(math.hypot((((math.cos((phi1 * 0.5)) * math.cos((0.5 * phi2))) - math.expm1(math.log1p((math.sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * math.sin((0.5 * phi2)))))) * (lambda1 - lambda2)), (phi1 - phi2))), 2.0)

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * (sqrt(hypot(Float64(Float64(Float64(cos(Float64(phi1 * 0.5)) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2))) - expm1(log1p(Float64(sin(Float64(phi1 * 0.5)) * sin(Float64(0.5 * phi2)))))) * Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)), Float64(phi1 - phi2))) ^ 2.0))
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Power[N[Sqrt[N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(N[Cos[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(Exp[N[Log[1 + N[(N[Sin[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.7%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 93.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 93.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-sqr-sqrt 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)} \]

   2. pow2 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2}} \]

   3. *-commutative 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

   4. div-inv 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)} \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

   5. metadata-eval 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

6. Applied egg-rr 93.5%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2}} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)} \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

   2. distribute-rgt-in 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5 + \phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

   3. *-commutative 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(\color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \phi_1} + \phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

   4. cos-sum 99.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

   5. *-commutative 99.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

   6. *-commutative 99.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

8. Applied egg-rr 99.4%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. expm1-log1p-u 99.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)}\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

   2. *-commutative 99.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right)\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

10. Applied egg-rr 99.5%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

11. Final simplification 99.5%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) + \left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (pow
   (sqrt
    (hypot
     (+
      (* (* (cos (* phi1 0.5)) (cos (* 0.5 phi2))) (- lambda1 lambda2))
      (* (* (sin (* phi1 0.5)) (sin (* 0.5 phi2))) (- lambda2 lambda1)))
     (- phi1 phi2)))
   2.0)))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * pow(sqrt(hypot((((cos((phi1 * 0.5)) * cos((0.5 * phi2))) * (lambda1 - lambda2)) + ((sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * sin((0.5 * phi2))) * (lambda2 - lambda1))), (phi1 - phi2))), 2.0);
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.pow(Math.sqrt(Math.hypot((((Math.cos((phi1 * 0.5)) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi2))) * (lambda1 - lambda2)) + ((Math.sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * Math.sin((0.5 * phi2))) * (lambda2 - lambda1))), (phi1 - phi2))), 2.0);
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.pow(math.sqrt(math.hypot((((math.cos((phi1 * 0.5)) * math.cos((0.5 * phi2))) * (lambda1 - lambda2)) + ((math.sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * math.sin((0.5 * phi2))) * (lambda2 - lambda1))), (phi1 - phi2))), 2.0)

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * (sqrt(hypot(Float64(Float64(Float64(cos(Float64(phi1 * 0.5)) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2))) * Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)) + Float64(Float64(sin(Float64(phi1 * 0.5)) * sin(Float64(0.5 * phi2))) * Float64(lambda2 - lambda1))), Float64(phi1 - phi2))) ^ 2.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * (sqrt(hypot((((cos((phi1 * 0.5)) * cos((0.5 * phi2))) * (lambda1 - lambda2)) + ((sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * sin((0.5 * phi2))) * (lambda2 - lambda1))), (phi1 - phi2))) ^ 2.0);
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Power[N[Sqrt[N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(N[Cos[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[Sin[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(lambda2 - lambda1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.7%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 93.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 93.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-sqr-sqrt 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)} \]

   2. pow2 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2}} \]

   3. *-commutative 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

   4. div-inv 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)} \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

   5. metadata-eval 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

6. Applied egg-rr 93.5%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2}} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)} \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

   2. distribute-rgt-in 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5 + \phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

   3. *-commutative 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(\color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \phi_1} + \phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

   4. cos-sum 99.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

   5. *-commutative 99.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

   6. *-commutative 99.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

8. Applied egg-rr 99.4%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. expm1-log1p-u 99.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)}\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

   2. *-commutative 99.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right)\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

10. Applied egg-rr 99.5%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
11. Step-by-step derivation

    1. *-commutative 99.5%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

    2. sub-neg 99.5%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) + \left(-\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

    3. distribute-lft-in 99.5%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) + \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(-\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

    4. *-commutative 99.5%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right) + \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(-\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

    5. expm1-log1p-u 99.5%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) + \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

    6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.5%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) + \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

12. Applied egg-rr 99.5%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) + \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

13. Final simplification 99.5%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) + \left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
14. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (pow
   (sqrt
    (hypot
     (*
      (- lambda1 lambda2)
      (-
       (* (cos (* phi1 0.5)) (cos (* 0.5 phi2)))
       (* (sin (* phi1 0.5)) (sin (* 0.5 phi2)))))
     (- phi1 phi2)))
   2.0)))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * pow(sqrt(hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * ((cos((phi1 * 0.5)) * cos((0.5 * phi2))) - (sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * sin((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2))), 2.0);
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.pow(Math.sqrt(Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * ((Math.cos((phi1 * 0.5)) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi2))) - (Math.sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * Math.sin((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2))), 2.0);
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.pow(math.sqrt(math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * ((math.cos((phi1 * 0.5)) * math.cos((0.5 * phi2))) - (math.sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * math.sin((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2))), 2.0)

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * (sqrt(hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * Float64(Float64(cos(Float64(phi1 * 0.5)) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2))) - Float64(sin(Float64(phi1 * 0.5)) * sin(Float64(0.5 * phi2))))), Float64(phi1 - phi2))) ^ 2.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * (sqrt(hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * ((cos((phi1 * 0.5)) * cos((0.5 * phi2))) - (sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * sin((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2))) ^ 2.0);
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Power[N[Sqrt[N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[Cos[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Sin[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.7%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 93.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 93.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-sqr-sqrt 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)} \]

   2. pow2 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2}} \]

   3. *-commutative 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

   4. div-inv 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)} \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

   5. metadata-eval 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

6. Applied egg-rr 93.5%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2}} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)} \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

   2. distribute-rgt-in 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5 + \phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

   3. *-commutative 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(\color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \phi_1} + \phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

   4. cos-sum 99.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

   5. *-commutative 99.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

   6. *-commutative 99.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

8. Applied egg-rr 99.4%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

9. Final simplification 99.4%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 92.9% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -60000000:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -60000000.0)
   (* R (hypot (* (cos (* phi1 0.5)) (- lambda1 lambda2)) (- phi1 phi2)))
   (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi2))) (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -60000000.0) {
		tmp = R * hypot((cos((phi1 * 0.5)) * (lambda1 - lambda2)), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -60000000.0) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((Math.cos((phi1 * 0.5)) * (lambda1 - lambda2)), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -60000000.0:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((math.cos((phi1 * 0.5)) * (lambda1 - lambda2)), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -60000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(cos(Float64(phi1 * 0.5)) * Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -60000000.0)
		tmp = R * hypot((cos((phi1 * 0.5)) * (lambda1 - lambda2)), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -60000000.0], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[Cos[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -6e7

   1. Initial program 49.0%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 85.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 85.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 85.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   if -6e7 < phi1

   1. Initial program 68.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 97.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 95.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -60000000:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 80.3% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-107}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \lambda_1, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= lambda2 4e-107)
   (* R (hypot (* (cos (* phi1 0.5)) lambda1) (- phi1 phi2)))
   (* R (hypot (- lambda1 lambda2) (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 4e-107) {
		tmp = R * hypot((cos((phi1 * 0.5)) * lambda1), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 4e-107) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((Math.cos((phi1 * 0.5)) * lambda1), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if lambda2 <= 4e-107:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((math.cos((phi1 * 0.5)) * lambda1), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda2 <= 4e-107)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(cos(Float64(phi1 * 0.5)) * lambda1), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda2 <= 4e-107)
		tmp = R * hypot((cos((phi1 * 0.5)) * lambda1), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[lambda2, 4e-107], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[Cos[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * lambda1), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if lambda2 < 4e-107

   1. Initial program 66.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 95.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 91.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf 79.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 79.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   8. Simplified 79.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   if 4e-107 < lambda2

   1. Initial program 55.4%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 90.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 90.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 85.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 82.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_1 - \lambda_2}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-107}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \lambda_1, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 95.9% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0))) (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.7%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 93.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 93.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 93.9%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 90.5% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (* R (hypot (* (cos (* phi1 0.5)) (- lambda1 lambda2)) (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot((cos((phi1 * 0.5)) * (lambda1 - lambda2)), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot((Math.cos((phi1 * 0.5)) * (lambda1 - lambda2)), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot((math.cos((phi1 * 0.5)) * (lambda1 - lambda2)), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(cos(Float64(phi1 * 0.5)) * Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot((cos((phi1 * 0.5)) * (lambda1 - lambda2)), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[Cos[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.7%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 93.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 93.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 89.5%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

6. Final simplification 89.5%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 69.0% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-19}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(\frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1} + -1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -7e-19)
   (* R (* phi1 (+ (/ phi2 phi1) -1.0)))
   (* R (hypot phi2 (- lambda1 lambda2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -7e-19) {
		tmp = R * (phi1 * ((phi2 / phi1) + -1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -7e-19) {
		tmp = R * (phi1 * ((phi2 / phi1) + -1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -7e-19:
		tmp = R * (phi1 * ((phi2 / phi1) + -1.0))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -7e-19)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi1 * Float64(Float64(phi2 / phi1) + -1.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi2, Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -7e-19)
		tmp = R * (phi1 * ((phi2 / phi1) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -7e-19], N[(R * N[(phi1 * N[(N[(phi2 / phi1), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi2 ^ 2 + N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -7.00000000000000031e-19

   1. Initial program 51.5%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 86.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 56.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 56.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1 \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 56.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(-\left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)\right)} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 56.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(-\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]

      4. unsub-neg 56.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 56.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(-\left(1 - \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -7.00000000000000031e-19 < phi1

   1. Initial program 67.9%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 97.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 91.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 56.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 56.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 56.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      3. hypot-define 76.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 76.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-19}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(\frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1} + -1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 70.7% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-39}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -1.3e-39)
   (* R (hypot (- lambda1 lambda2) phi1))
   (* R (hypot phi2 (- lambda1 lambda2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -1.3e-39) {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -1.3e-39) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -1.3e-39:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi1)
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -1.3e-39)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2), phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi2, Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -1.3e-39)
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi1);
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -1.3e-39], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + phi1 ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi2 ^ 2 + N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -1.3e-39

   1. Initial program 52.7%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 86.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 86.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 78.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 45.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_1}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 45.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}}} \]

      2. unpow2 45.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} + {\phi_1}^{2}} \]

      3. unpow2 45.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) + \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1}} \]

      4. hypot-define 62.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 62.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1\right)} \]

   if -1.3e-39 < phi1

   1. Initial program 67.8%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 97.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 91.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 55.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 55.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 55.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      3. hypot-define 76.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 76.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-39}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 56.4% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-19}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(\frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1} + -1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -7e-19)
   (* R (* phi1 (+ (/ phi2 phi1) -1.0)))
   (* R (hypot phi2 lambda1))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -7e-19) {
		tmp = R * (phi1 * ((phi2 / phi1) + -1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, lambda1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -7e-19) {
		tmp = R * (phi1 * ((phi2 / phi1) + -1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi2, lambda1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -7e-19:
		tmp = R * (phi1 * ((phi2 / phi1) + -1.0))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi2, lambda1)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -7e-19)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi1 * Float64(Float64(phi2 / phi1) + -1.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi2, lambda1));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -7e-19)
		tmp = R * (phi1 * ((phi2 / phi1) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, lambda1);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -7e-19], N[(R * N[(phi1 * N[(N[(phi2 / phi1), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi2 ^ 2 + lambda1 ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -7.00000000000000031e-19

   1. Initial program 51.5%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 86.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 56.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 56.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1 \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 56.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(-\left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)\right)} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 56.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(-\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]

      4. unsub-neg 56.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 56.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(-\left(1 - \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -7.00000000000000031e-19 < phi1

   1. Initial program 67.9%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 97.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 91.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf 72.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 72.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   8. Simplified 72.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 42.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\lambda_1}^{2} + {\phi_2}^{2}}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. +-commutative 42.6%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\lambda_1}^{2}}} \]

       2. unpow2 42.6%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\lambda_1}^{2}} \]

       3. unpow2 42.6%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \lambda_1}} \]

       4. hypot-define 57.2%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1\right)} \]

   11. Simplified 57.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 57.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-19}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(\frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1} + -1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 85.4% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (* R (hypot (- lambda1 lambda2) (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.7%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 93.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 93.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 89.5%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 85.0%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_1 - \lambda_2}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

7. Final simplification 85.0%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 29.7% accurate, 20.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;R \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{+118}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_2 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(\frac{R}{\phi_1} - \frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= R 5.2e+118)
   (- (* R phi2) (* R phi1))
   (* phi2 (* phi1 (- (/ R phi1) (/ R phi2))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (R <= 5.2e+118) {
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = phi2 * (phi1 * ((R / phi1) - (R / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (r <= 5.2d+118) then
        tmp = (r * phi2) - (r * phi1)
    else
        tmp = phi2 * (phi1 * ((r / phi1) - (r / phi2)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (R <= 5.2e+118) {
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = phi2 * (phi1 * ((R / phi1) - (R / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if R <= 5.2e+118:
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1)
	else:
		tmp = phi2 * (phi1 * ((R / phi1) - (R / phi2)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (R <= 5.2e+118)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(R * phi2) - Float64(R * phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(phi2 * Float64(phi1 * Float64(Float64(R / phi1) - Float64(R / phi2))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (R <= 5.2e+118)
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1);
	else
		tmp = phi2 * (phi1 * ((R / phi1) - (R / phi2)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[R, 5.2e+118], N[(N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision] - N[(R * phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(phi2 * N[(phi1 * N[(N[(R / phi1), $MachinePrecision] - N[(R / phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if R < 5.20000000000000032e118

   1. Initial program 58.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 93.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 26.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 26.1%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)}{\phi_2}}\right) \]

      2. mul-1-neg 26.1%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{\color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 26.1%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{-\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 26.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{-\phi_1 \cdot R}{\phi_2}\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 28.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right) + R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 28.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 + -1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 28.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 28.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1} \]

      4. *-commutative 28.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} - R \cdot \phi_1 \]

      5. *-commutative 28.1%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot R - \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R} \]

   10. Simplified 28.1%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R - \phi_1 \cdot R} \]

   if 5.20000000000000032e118 < R

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 97.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 45.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 45.8%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)}{\phi_2}}\right) \]

      2. mul-1-neg 45.8%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{\color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 45.8%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{-\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 45.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{-\phi_1 \cdot R}{\phi_2}\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi1 around inf 45.5%

      \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{R}{\phi_2} + \frac{R}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 45.5%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)} + \frac{R}{\phi_1}\right)\right) \]

      2. distribute-frac-neg 45.5%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-R}{\phi_2}} + \frac{R}{\phi_1}\right)\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 45.5%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{R}{\phi_1} + \frac{-R}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 45.5%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(\frac{R}{\phi_1} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      5. unsub-neg 45.5%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{R}{\phi_1} - \frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

   10. Simplified 45.5%

       \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(\frac{R}{\phi_1} - \frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 30.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;R \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{+118}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_2 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(\frac{R}{\phi_1} - \frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 28.9% accurate, 23.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;R \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+114}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= R 3.5e+114)
   (- (* R phi2) (* R phi1))
   (* R (* phi2 (- 1.0 (/ phi1 phi2))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (R <= 3.5e+114) {
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 * (1.0 - (phi1 / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (r <= 3.5d+114) then
        tmp = (r * phi2) - (r * phi1)
    else
        tmp = r * (phi2 * (1.0d0 - (phi1 / phi2)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (R <= 3.5e+114) {
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 * (1.0 - (phi1 / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if R <= 3.5e+114:
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1)
	else:
		tmp = R * (phi2 * (1.0 - (phi1 / phi2)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (R <= 3.5e+114)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(R * phi2) - Float64(R * phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 * Float64(1.0 - Float64(phi1 / phi2))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (R <= 3.5e+114)
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1);
	else
		tmp = R * (phi2 * (1.0 - (phi1 / phi2)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[R, 3.5e+114], N[(N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision] - N[(R * phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[(phi2 * N[(1.0 - N[(phi1 / phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if R < 3.5000000000000001e114

   1. Initial program 58.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 93.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 26.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 26.2%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)}{\phi_2}}\right) \]

      2. mul-1-neg 26.2%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{\color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 26.2%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{-\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 26.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{-\phi_1 \cdot R}{\phi_2}\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 28.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right) + R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 28.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 + -1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 28.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 28.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1} \]

      4. *-commutative 28.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} - R \cdot \phi_1 \]

      5. *-commutative 28.2%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot R - \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R} \]

   10. Simplified 28.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R - \phi_1 \cdot R} \]

   if 3.5000000000000001e114 < R

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 38.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 38.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 38.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 38.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 29.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;R \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+114}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 29.2% accurate, 23.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;R \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+101}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1} - R\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= R 2e+101)
   (- (* R phi2) (* R phi1))
   (* phi1 (- (* R (/ phi2 phi1)) R))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (R <= 2e+101) {
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = phi1 * ((R * (phi2 / phi1)) - R);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (r <= 2d+101) then
        tmp = (r * phi2) - (r * phi1)
    else
        tmp = phi1 * ((r * (phi2 / phi1)) - r)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (R <= 2e+101) {
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = phi1 * ((R * (phi2 / phi1)) - R);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if R <= 2e+101:
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1)
	else:
		tmp = phi1 * ((R * (phi2 / phi1)) - R)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (R <= 2e+101)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(R * phi2) - Float64(R * phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(phi1 * Float64(Float64(R * Float64(phi2 / phi1)) - R));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (R <= 2e+101)
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1);
	else
		tmp = phi1 * ((R * (phi2 / phi1)) - R);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[R, 2e+101], N[(N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision] - N[(R * phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(phi1 * N[(N[(R * N[(phi2 / phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - R), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if R < 2e101

   1. Initial program 57.7%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 93.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 25.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 25.9%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)}{\phi_2}}\right) \]

      2. mul-1-neg 25.9%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{\color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 25.9%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{-\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 25.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{-\phi_1 \cdot R}{\phi_2}\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 27.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right) + R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 27.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 + -1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 27.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 27.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1} \]

      4. *-commutative 27.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} - R \cdot \phi_1 \]

      5. *-commutative 27.5%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot R - \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R} \]

   10. Simplified 27.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R - \phi_1 \cdot R} \]

   if 2e101 < R

   1. Initial program 97.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 97.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 45.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 45.0%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)}{\phi_2}}\right) \]

      2. mul-1-neg 45.0%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{\color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 45.0%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{-\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 45.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{-\phi_1 \cdot R}{\phi_2}\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi1 around inf 29.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot R + \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 29.8%

         \[\leadsto \phi_1 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-R\right)} + \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 29.8%

         \[\leadsto \phi_1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1} + \left(-R\right)\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 29.8%

         \[\leadsto \phi_1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1} - R\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 39.1%

         \[\leadsto \phi_1 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{R \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}} - R\right) \]

   10. Simplified 39.1%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1} - R\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 29.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;R \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+101}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1} - R\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 29.7% accurate, 23.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;R \leq 4.25 \cdot 10^{+114}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - \phi_1 \cdot \frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= R 4.25e+114)
   (- (* R phi2) (* R phi1))
   (* phi2 (- R (* phi1 (/ R phi2))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (R <= 4.25e+114) {
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (phi1 * (R / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (r <= 4.25d+114) then
        tmp = (r * phi2) - (r * phi1)
    else
        tmp = phi2 * (r - (phi1 * (r / phi2)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (R <= 4.25e+114) {
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (phi1 * (R / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if R <= 4.25e+114:
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1)
	else:
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (phi1 * (R / phi2)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (R <= 4.25e+114)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(R * phi2) - Float64(R * phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(phi2 * Float64(R - Float64(phi1 * Float64(R / phi2))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (R <= 4.25e+114)
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1);
	else
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (phi1 * (R / phi2)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[R, 4.25e+114], N[(N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision] - N[(R * phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(phi2 * N[(R - N[(phi1 * N[(R / phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if R < 4.2500000000000001e114

   1. Initial program 58.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 93.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 26.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 26.2%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)}{\phi_2}}\right) \]

      2. mul-1-neg 26.2%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{\color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 26.2%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{-\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 26.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{-\phi_1 \cdot R}{\phi_2}\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 28.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right) + R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 28.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 + -1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 28.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 28.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1} \]

      4. *-commutative 28.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} - R \cdot \phi_1 \]

      5. *-commutative 28.2%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot R - \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R} \]

   10. Simplified 28.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R - \phi_1 \cdot R} \]

   if 4.2500000000000001e114 < R

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 44.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 44.5%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 44.5%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(R - \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 44.5%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R - \frac{\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 44.3%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R - \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \frac{R}{\phi_2}}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 44.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - \phi_1 \cdot \frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 30.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;R \leq 4.25 \cdot 10^{+114}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - \phi_1 \cdot \frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 16: 29.9% accurate, 27.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{+34}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 -5.8e+34) (* R (- phi1)) (- (* R phi2) (* R phi1))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= -5.8e+34) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else {
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi2 <= (-5.8d+34)) then
        tmp = r * -phi1
    else
        tmp = (r * phi2) - (r * phi1)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= -5.8e+34) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else {
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= -5.8e+34:
		tmp = R * -phi1
	else:
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= -5.8e+34)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(R * phi2) - Float64(R * phi1));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= -5.8e+34)
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	else
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, -5.8e+34], N[(R * (-phi1)), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision] - N[(R * phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < -5.8000000000000003e34

   1. Initial program 56.8%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 92.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 17.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 17.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1} \]

      2. *-commutative 17.6%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 17.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 17.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   if -5.8000000000000003e34 < phi2

   1. Initial program 64.7%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 94.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 32.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 32.6%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)}{\phi_2}}\right) \]

      2. mul-1-neg 32.6%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{\color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 32.6%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{-\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 32.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{-\phi_1 \cdot R}{\phi_2}\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 35.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right) + R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 35.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 + -1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 35.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 35.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1} \]

      4. *-commutative 35.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} - R \cdot \phi_1 \]

      5. *-commutative 35.6%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot R - \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R} \]

   10. Simplified 35.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R - \phi_1 \cdot R} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 31.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{+34}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 17: 28.2% accurate, 36.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -3.2 \cdot 10^{-40}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -3.2e-40) (* R (- phi1)) (* R phi2)))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -3.2e-40) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi1 <= (-3.2d-40)) then
        tmp = r * -phi1
    else
        tmp = r * phi2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -3.2e-40) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -3.2e-40:
		tmp = R * -phi1
	else:
		tmp = R * phi2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -3.2e-40)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * phi2);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -3.2e-40)
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	else
		tmp = R * phi2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -3.2e-40], N[(R * (-phi1)), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -3.20000000000000002e-40

   1. Initial program 52.7%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 86.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 86.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 50.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 50.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1} \]

      2. *-commutative 50.3%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 50.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 50.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   if -3.20000000000000002e-40 < phi1

   1. Initial program 67.8%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 97.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 20.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 20.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

   7. Simplified 20.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 30.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -3.2 \cdot 10^{-40}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 18: 13.6% accurate, 109.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \lambda_1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2) :precision binary64 (* R lambda1))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * lambda1;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = r * lambda1
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * lambda1;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * lambda1

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * lambda1)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * lambda1;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * lambda1), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.7%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 93.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 93.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 89.5%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

6. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf 14.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \]

7. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 13.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \lambda_1} \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 13.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot R} \]

9. Simplified 13.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot R} \]

10. Final simplification 13.1%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \lambda_1 \]
11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 19: 17.7% accurate, 109.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \phi_2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2) :precision binary64 (* R phi2))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * phi2;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = r * phi2
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * phi2;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * phi2

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * phi2)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * phi2;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.7%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 93.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 93.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 16.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 16.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

7. Simplified 16.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

8. Final simplification 16.6%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \phi_2 \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024071 
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
  :name "Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle"
  :precision binary64
  (* R (sqrt (+ (* (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0))) (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2))))))