Graphics.Rasterific.Svg.PathConverter:segmentToBezier from rasterific-svg-0.2.3.1, C

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 8.0s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ x (sin y)) (* z (cos y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + sin(y)) + (z * cos(y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + sin(y)) + (z * cos(y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + Math.sin(y)) + (z * Math.cos(y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + math.sin(y)) + (z * math.cos(y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + sin(y)) + Float64(z * cos(y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + sin(y)) + (z * cos(y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ x (sin y)) (* z (cos y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + sin(y)) + (z * cos(y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + sin(y)) + (z * cos(y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + Math.sin(y)) + (z * Math.cos(y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + math.sin(y)) + (z * math.cos(y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + sin(y)) + Float64(z * cos(y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + sin(y)) + (z * cos(y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot \cos y + \left(x + \sin y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* z (cos y)) (+ x (sin y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (z * cos(y)) + (x + sin(y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (z * cos(y)) + (x + sin(y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (z * Math.cos(y)) + (x + Math.sin(y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (z * math.cos(y)) + (x + math.sin(y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(z * cos(y)) + Float64(x + sin(y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (z * cos(y)) + (x + sin(y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(z * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto z \cdot \cos y + \left(x + \sin y\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 83.7% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := z \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{+83}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{-35}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \sin y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* z (cos y))))
   (if (<= z -2.7e+83)
     t_0
     (if (<= z -1.25e-35) (+ x z) (if (<= z 2.8e+31) (+ x (sin y)) t_0)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = z * cos(y);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.7e+83) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= -1.25e-35) {
		tmp = x + z;
	} else if (z <= 2.8e+31) {
		tmp = x + sin(y);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = z * cos(y)
    if (z <= (-2.7d+83)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z <= (-1.25d-35)) then
        tmp = x + z
    else if (z <= 2.8d+31) then
        tmp = x + sin(y)
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = z * Math.cos(y);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.7e+83) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= -1.25e-35) {
		tmp = x + z;
	} else if (z <= 2.8e+31) {
		tmp = x + Math.sin(y);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = z * math.cos(y)
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -2.7e+83:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z <= -1.25e-35:
		tmp = x + z
	elif z <= 2.8e+31:
		tmp = x + math.sin(y)
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(z * cos(y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2.7e+83)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= -1.25e-35)
		tmp = Float64(x + z);
	elseif (z <= 2.8e+31)
		tmp = Float64(x + sin(y));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = z * cos(y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -2.7e+83)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= -1.25e-35)
		tmp = x + z;
	elseif (z <= 2.8e+31)
		tmp = x + sin(y);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(z * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -2.7e+83], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[z, -1.25e-35], N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 2.8e+31], N[(x + N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -2.70000000000000007e83 or 2.80000000000000017e31 < z

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 81.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y} \]

   if -2.70000000000000007e83 < z < -1.24999999999999991e-35

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + x} \]

   5. Simplified 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + x} \]

   if -1.24999999999999991e-35 < z < 2.80000000000000017e31

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \sin y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sin y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sin y + x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{+83}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{-35}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \sin y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \cos y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 95.1% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -9 \cdot 10^{-36} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 0.14\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \sin y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -9e-36) (not (<= z 0.14))) (+ x (* z (cos y))) (+ x (sin y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -9e-36) || !(z <= 0.14)) {
		tmp = x + (z * cos(y));
	} else {
		tmp = x + sin(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-9d-36)) .or. (.not. (z <= 0.14d0))) then
        tmp = x + (z * cos(y))
    else
        tmp = x + sin(y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -9e-36) || !(z <= 0.14)) {
		tmp = x + (z * Math.cos(y));
	} else {
		tmp = x + Math.sin(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -9e-36) or not (z <= 0.14):
		tmp = x + (z * math.cos(y))
	else:
		tmp = x + math.sin(y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -9e-36) || !(z <= 0.14))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * cos(y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + sin(y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -9e-36) || ~((z <= 0.14)))
		tmp = x + (z * cos(y));
	else
		tmp = x + sin(y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -9e-36], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 0.14]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(z * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -9.00000000000000047e-36 or 0.14000000000000001 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + z \cdot \cos y \]

   if -9.00000000000000047e-36 < z < 0.14000000000000001

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 92.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \sin y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sin y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 92.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sin y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -9 \cdot 10^{-36} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 0.14\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \sin y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 72.6% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{+81} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.06 \cdot 10^{+133}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.2e+81) (not (<= z 2.06e+133))) (* z (cos y)) (+ x z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.2e+81) || !(z <= 2.06e+133)) {
		tmp = z * cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2.2d+81)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.06d+133))) then
        tmp = z * cos(y)
    else
        tmp = x + z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.2e+81) || !(z <= 2.06e+133)) {
		tmp = z * Math.cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2.2e+81) or not (z <= 2.06e+133):
		tmp = z * math.cos(y)
	else:
		tmp = x + z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.2e+81) || !(z <= 2.06e+133))
		tmp = Float64(z * cos(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2.2e+81) || ~((z <= 2.06e+133)))
		tmp = z * cos(y);
	else
		tmp = x + z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.2e+81], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.06e+133]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.19999999999999987e81 or 2.06e133 < z

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 85.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y} \]

   if -2.19999999999999987e81 < z < 2.06e133

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 74.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 74.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + x} \]

   5. Simplified 74.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{+81} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.06 \cdot 10^{+133}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 70.6% accurate, 7.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -14000000000000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 30\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z + y \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5 + y \cdot -0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -14000000000000.0) (not (<= y 30.0)))
   (+ x z)
   (+ x (+ z (* y (+ 1.0 (* y (+ (* z -0.5) (* y -0.16666666666666666)))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -14000000000000.0) || !(y <= 30.0)) {
		tmp = x + z;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z + (y * (1.0 + (y * ((z * -0.5) + (y * -0.16666666666666666))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-14000000000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 30.0d0))) then
        tmp = x + z
    else
        tmp = x + (z + (y * (1.0d0 + (y * ((z * (-0.5d0)) + (y * (-0.16666666666666666d0)))))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -14000000000000.0) || !(y <= 30.0)) {
		tmp = x + z;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z + (y * (1.0 + (y * ((z * -0.5) + (y * -0.16666666666666666))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -14000000000000.0) or not (y <= 30.0):
		tmp = x + z
	else:
		tmp = x + (z + (y * (1.0 + (y * ((z * -0.5) + (y * -0.16666666666666666))))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -14000000000000.0) || !(y <= 30.0))
		tmp = Float64(x + z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z + Float64(y * Float64(1.0 + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * -0.5) + Float64(y * -0.16666666666666666)))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -14000000000000.0) || ~((y <= 30.0)))
		tmp = x + z;
	else
		tmp = x + (z + (y * (1.0 + (y * ((z * -0.5) + (y * -0.16666666666666666))))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -14000000000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 30.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z + N[(y * N[(1.0 + N[(y * N[(N[(z * -0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * -0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.4e13 or 30 < y

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 46.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 46.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + x} \]

   5. Simplified 46.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + x} \]

   if -1.4e13 < y < 30

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(z + y \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot z + -0.16666666666666666 \cdot y\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -14000000000000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 30\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z + y \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5 + y \cdot -0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 70.6% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -15500000000000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 30\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + z\right) + y \cdot \left(1 + -0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -15500000000000.0) (not (<= y 30.0)))
   (+ x z)
   (+ (+ x z) (* y (+ 1.0 (* -0.5 (* y z)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -15500000000000.0) || !(y <= 30.0)) {
		tmp = x + z;
	} else {
		tmp = (x + z) + (y * (1.0 + (-0.5 * (y * z))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-15500000000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 30.0d0))) then
        tmp = x + z
    else
        tmp = (x + z) + (y * (1.0d0 + ((-0.5d0) * (y * z))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -15500000000000.0) || !(y <= 30.0)) {
		tmp = x + z;
	} else {
		tmp = (x + z) + (y * (1.0 + (-0.5 * (y * z))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -15500000000000.0) or not (y <= 30.0):
		tmp = x + z
	else:
		tmp = (x + z) + (y * (1.0 + (-0.5 * (y * z))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -15500000000000.0) || !(y <= 30.0))
		tmp = Float64(x + z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + z) + Float64(y * Float64(1.0 + Float64(-0.5 * Float64(y * z)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -15500000000000.0) || ~((y <= 30.0)))
		tmp = x + z;
	else
		tmp = (x + z) + (y * (1.0 + (-0.5 * (y * z))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -15500000000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 30.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(1.0 + N[(-0.5 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.55e13 or 30 < y

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 46.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 46.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + x} \]

   5. Simplified 46.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + x} \]

   if -1.55e13 < y < 30

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(z + y \cdot \left(1 + -0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right) + y \cdot \left(1 + -0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} + y \cdot \left(1 + -0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(z + x\right) + y \cdot \left(1 + -0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right) + y \cdot \left(1 + -0.5 \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -15500000000000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 30\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + z\right) + y \cdot \left(1 + -0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 70.4% accurate, 13.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+16} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+17}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + \left(x + y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -4e+16) (not (<= y 1.8e+17))) (+ x z) (+ z (+ x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -4e+16) || !(y <= 1.8e+17)) {
		tmp = x + z;
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x + y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-4d+16)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.8d+17))) then
        tmp = x + z
    else
        tmp = z + (x + y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -4e+16) || !(y <= 1.8e+17)) {
		tmp = x + z;
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x + y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -4e+16) or not (y <= 1.8e+17):
		tmp = x + z
	else:
		tmp = z + (x + y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -4e+16) || !(y <= 1.8e+17))
		tmp = Float64(x + z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x + y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -4e+16) || ~((y <= 1.8e+17)))
		tmp = x + z;
	else
		tmp = z + (x + y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -4e+16], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.8e+17]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -4e16 or 1.8e17 < y

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 46.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 46.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + x} \]

   5. Simplified 46.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + x} \]

   if -4e16 < y < 1.8e17

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 96.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-+l+ 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(y + x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 96.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(y + x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+16} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+17}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + \left(x + y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 54.8% accurate, 18.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 4.05 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -9e+14) x (if (<= x 4.05e+15) z x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -9e+14) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 4.05e+15) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-9d+14)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 4.05d+15) then
        tmp = z
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -9e+14) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 4.05e+15) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -9e+14:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 4.05e+15:
		tmp = z
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -9e+14)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 4.05e+15)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -9e+14)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 4.05e+15)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -9e+14], x, If[LessEqual[x, 4.05e+15], z, x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -9e14 or 4.05e15 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y + \left(x + \sin y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos y \cdot z} + \left(x + \sin y\right) \]

      3. add-cube-cbrt 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\sqrt[3]{\cos y} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\cos y}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\cos y}\right)} \cdot z + \left(x + \sin y\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{\cos y} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\cos y}\right) \cdot \left(\sqrt[3]{\cos y} \cdot z\right)} + \left(x + \sin y\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\sqrt[3]{\cos y} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\cos y}, \sqrt[3]{\cos y} \cdot z, x + \sin y\right)} \]

      6. pow2 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\cos y}\right)}^{2}}, \sqrt[3]{\cos y} \cdot z, x + \sin y\right) \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left({\left(\sqrt[3]{\cos y}\right)}^{2}, \sqrt[3]{\cos y} \cdot z, x + \sin y\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 73.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -9e14 < x < 4.05e15

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 52.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(z + y \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot z + -0.16666666666666666 \cdot y\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 45.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + y \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot z + -0.16666666666666666 \cdot y\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 45.6%

      \[\leadsto z + y \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)}\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 45.6%

         \[\leadsto z + y \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -0.5}\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 45.6%

         \[\leadsto z + y \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot -0.5\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 45.6%

         \[\leadsto z + y \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5\right)}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 45.6%

      \[\leadsto z + y \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5\right)}\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around 0 39.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 57.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 4.05 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 66.1% accurate, 69.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 67.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 67.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + x} \]

5. Simplified 67.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + x} \]

6. Final simplification 67.5%

   \[\leadsto x + z \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 42.6% accurate, 207.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y + \left(x + \sin y\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos y \cdot z} + \left(x + \sin y\right) \]

   3. add-cube-cbrt 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\sqrt[3]{\cos y} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\cos y}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\cos y}\right)} \cdot z + \left(x + \sin y\right) \]

   4. associate-*l* 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{\cos y} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\cos y}\right) \cdot \left(\sqrt[3]{\cos y} \cdot z\right)} + \left(x + \sin y\right) \]

   5. fma-define 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\sqrt[3]{\cos y} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\cos y}, \sqrt[3]{\cos y} \cdot z, x + \sin y\right)} \]

   6. pow2 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\cos y}\right)}^{2}}, \sqrt[3]{\cos y} \cdot z, x + \sin y\right) \]

4. Applied egg-rr 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left({\left(\sqrt[3]{\cos y}\right)}^{2}, \sqrt[3]{\cos y} \cdot z, x + \sin y\right)} \]

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 42.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

6. Final simplification 42.8%

   \[\leadsto x \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024071 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.Svg.PathConverter:segmentToBezier from rasterific-svg-0.2.3.1, C"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ x (sin y)) (* z (cos y))))