Numeric.SpecFunctions:logBeta from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%

Time: 18.0s

Alternatives: 17

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ (* x (log y)) z) t) a) (* (- b 0.5) (log c))) (* y i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((((x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * log(c))) + (y * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((((x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5d0) * log(c))) + (y * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((((x * Math.log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * Math.log(c))) + (y * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((((x * math.log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * math.log(c))) + (y * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + Float64(Float64(b - 0.5) * log(c))) + Float64(y * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((((x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * log(c))) + (y * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] + a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ (* x (log y)) z) t) a) (* (- b 0.5) (log c))) (* y i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((((x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * log(c))) + (y * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((((x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5d0) * log(c))) + (y * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((((x * Math.log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * Math.log(c))) + (y * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((((x * math.log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * math.log(c))) + (y * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + Float64(Float64(b - 0.5) * log(c))) + Float64(y * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((((x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * log(c))) + (y * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] + a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (fma x (log y) z) (+ t a)) (+ (* (+ b -0.5) (log c)) (* y i))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (fma(x, log(y), z) + (t + a)) + (((b + -0.5) * log(c)) + (y * i));
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(fma(x, log(y), z) + Float64(t + a)) + Float64(Float64(Float64(b + -0.5) * log(c)) + Float64(y * i)))
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t + a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[(b + -0.5), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   3. fma-define 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   4. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   5. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 88.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+229}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+164}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(a + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(a + t\_1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (log c) (- b 0.5))))
   (if (<= t_1 -1e+229)
     (+ (* y i) t_1)
     (if (<= t_1 2e+164)
       (+ (* y i) (+ a (+ z (* x (log y)))))
       (+ (* y i) (+ a t_1))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = log(c) * (b - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -1e+229) {
		tmp = (y * i) + t_1;
	} else if (t_1 <= 2e+164) {
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + (z + (x * log(y))));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + t_1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = log(c) * (b - 0.5d0)
    if (t_1 <= (-1d+229)) then
        tmp = (y * i) + t_1
    else if (t_1 <= 2d+164) then
        tmp = (y * i) + (a + (z + (x * log(y))))
    else
        tmp = (y * i) + (a + t_1)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = Math.log(c) * (b - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -1e+229) {
		tmp = (y * i) + t_1;
	} else if (t_1 <= 2e+164) {
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + (z + (x * Math.log(y))));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + t_1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= -1e+229:
		tmp = (y * i) + t_1
	elif t_1 <= 2e+164:
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + (z + (x * math.log(y))))
	else:
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + t_1)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(log(c) * Float64(b - 0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= -1e+229)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + t_1);
	elseif (t_1 <= 2e+164)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(a + Float64(z + Float64(x * log(y)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(a + t_1));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = log(c) * (b - 0.5);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= -1e+229)
		tmp = (y * i) + t_1;
	elseif (t_1 <= 2e+164)
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + (z + (x * log(y))));
	else
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + t_1);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, -1e+229], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 2e+164], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a + N[(z + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (-.f64 b #s(literal 1/2 binary64)) (log.f64 c)) < -9.9999999999999999e228

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{a} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)} \]

   if -9.9999999999999999e228 < (*.f64 (-.f64 b #s(literal 1/2 binary64)) (log.f64 c)) < 2e164

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{i \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 94.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   7. Simplified 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in t around 0 77.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)} + y \cdot i \]

   if 2e164 < (*.f64 (-.f64 b #s(literal 1/2 binary64)) (log.f64 c))

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 63.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{a} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right) \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+229}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right) \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+164}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(a + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(a + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ y \cdot i + \left(\left(a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right) + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* y i) (+ (+ a (+ t (+ z (* x (log y))))) (* (log c) (- b 0.5)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (y * i) + ((a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))))) + (log(c) * (b - 0.5)));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (y * i) + ((a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))))) + (log(c) * (b - 0.5d0)))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (y * i) + ((a + (t + (z + (x * Math.log(y))))) + (Math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)));
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (y * i) + ((a + (t + (z + (x * math.log(y))))) + (math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)))

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + Float64(x * log(y))))) + Float64(log(c) * Float64(b - 0.5))))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (y * i) + ((a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))))) + (log(c) * (b - 0.5)));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot i + \left(\left(a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right) + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 98.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ y \cdot i + \left(\left(a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right) + b \cdot \log c\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* y i) (+ (+ a (+ t (+ z (* x (log y))))) (* b (log c)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (y * i) + ((a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))))) + (b * log(c)));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (y * i) + ((a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))))) + (b * log(c)))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (y * i) + ((a + (t + (z + (x * Math.log(y))))) + (b * Math.log(c)));
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (y * i) + ((a + (t + (z + (x * math.log(y))))) + (b * math.log(c)))

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + Float64(x * log(y))))) + Float64(b * log(c))))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (y * i) + ((a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))))) + (b * log(c)));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in b around inf 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

5. Simplified 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

6. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot i + \left(\left(a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right) + b \cdot \log c\right) \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 95.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{+132}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + y \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+113}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right) + \left(a + \left(z + t\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(a + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -7.2e+132)
   (+ (+ (fma x (log y) z) (+ t a)) (* y i))
   (if (<= x 3.3e+113)
     (+ (* y i) (+ (* (log c) (- b 0.5)) (+ a (+ z t))))
     (+ (* y i) (+ a (+ z (* x (log y))))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -7.2e+132) {
		tmp = (fma(x, log(y), z) + (t + a)) + (y * i);
	} else if (x <= 3.3e+113) {
		tmp = (y * i) + ((log(c) * (b - 0.5)) + (a + (z + t)));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + (z + (x * log(y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -7.2e+132)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(fma(x, log(y), z) + Float64(t + a)) + Float64(y * i));
	elseif (x <= 3.3e+113)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(Float64(log(c) * Float64(b - 0.5)) + Float64(a + Float64(z + t))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(a + Float64(z + Float64(x * log(y)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[x, -7.2e+132], N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t + a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 3.3e+113], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a + N[(z + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a + N[(z + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -7.20000000000000031e132

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 89.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{i \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 89.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   7. Simplified 89.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   if -7.20000000000000031e132 < x < 3.3000000000000003e113

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\color{blue}{z} + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   if 3.3000000000000003e113 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{i \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   7. Simplified 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in t around 0 78.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)} + y \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{+132}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + y \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+113}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right) + \left(a + \left(z + t\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(a + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 94.9% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.2 \cdot 10^{+134} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+114}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(a + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right) + \left(a + \left(z + t\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -3.2e+134) (not (<= x 1.25e+114)))
   (+ (* y i) (+ a (+ z (* x (log y)))))
   (+ (* y i) (+ (* (log c) (- b 0.5)) (+ a (+ z t))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.2e+134) || !(x <= 1.25e+114)) {
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + (z + (x * log(y))));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * i) + ((log(c) * (b - 0.5)) + (a + (z + t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-3.2d+134)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.25d+114))) then
        tmp = (y * i) + (a + (z + (x * log(y))))
    else
        tmp = (y * i) + ((log(c) * (b - 0.5d0)) + (a + (z + t)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.2e+134) || !(x <= 1.25e+114)) {
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + (z + (x * Math.log(y))));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * i) + ((Math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)) + (a + (z + t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -3.2e+134) or not (x <= 1.25e+114):
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + (z + (x * math.log(y))))
	else:
		tmp = (y * i) + ((math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)) + (a + (z + t)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -3.2e+134) || !(x <= 1.25e+114))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(a + Float64(z + Float64(x * log(y)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(Float64(log(c) * Float64(b - 0.5)) + Float64(a + Float64(z + t))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -3.2e+134) || ~((x <= 1.25e+114)))
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + (z + (x * log(y))));
	else
		tmp = (y * i) + ((log(c) * (b - 0.5)) + (a + (z + t)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -3.2e+134], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.25e+114]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a + N[(z + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a + N[(z + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -3.2000000000000001e134 or 1.25e114 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{i \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   7. Simplified 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in t around 0 78.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)} + y \cdot i \]

   if -3.2000000000000001e134 < x < 1.25e114

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\color{blue}{z} + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.2 \cdot 10^{+134} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+114}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(a + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right) + \left(a + \left(z + t\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 93.3% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+132} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{+113}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(a + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(b \cdot \log c + \left(a + \left(z + t\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -3.5e+132) (not (<= x 3.8e+113)))
   (+ (* y i) (+ a (+ z (* x (log y)))))
   (+ (* y i) (+ (* b (log c)) (+ a (+ z t))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.5e+132) || !(x <= 3.8e+113)) {
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + (z + (x * log(y))));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * i) + ((b * log(c)) + (a + (z + t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-3.5d+132)) .or. (.not. (x <= 3.8d+113))) then
        tmp = (y * i) + (a + (z + (x * log(y))))
    else
        tmp = (y * i) + ((b * log(c)) + (a + (z + t)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.5e+132) || !(x <= 3.8e+113)) {
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + (z + (x * Math.log(y))));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * i) + ((b * Math.log(c)) + (a + (z + t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -3.5e+132) or not (x <= 3.8e+113):
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + (z + (x * math.log(y))))
	else:
		tmp = (y * i) + ((b * math.log(c)) + (a + (z + t)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -3.5e+132) || !(x <= 3.8e+113))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(a + Float64(z + Float64(x * log(y)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(Float64(b * log(c)) + Float64(a + Float64(z + t))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -3.5e+132) || ~((x <= 3.8e+113)))
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + (z + (x * log(y))));
	else
		tmp = (y * i) + ((b * log(c)) + (a + (z + t)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -3.5e+132], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 3.8e+113]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a + N[(z + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(b * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a + N[(z + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -3.5000000000000002e132 or 3.8000000000000003e113 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{i \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   7. Simplified 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in t around 0 78.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)} + y \cdot i \]

   if -3.5000000000000002e132 < x < 3.8000000000000003e113

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around inf 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\color{blue}{z} + t\right) + a\right) + \log c \cdot b\right) + y \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+132} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{+113}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(a + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(b \cdot \log c + \left(a + \left(z + t\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 73.4% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b - 0.5 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+192} \lor \neg \left(b - 0.5 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+212}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(t + \left(z + a\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (- b 0.5) -1e+192) (not (<= (- b 0.5) 2e+212)))
   (+ a (* (log c) (- b 0.5)))
   (+ (* y i) (+ t (+ z a)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((b - 0.5) <= -1e+192) || !((b - 0.5) <= 2e+212)) {
		tmp = a + (log(c) * (b - 0.5));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * i) + (t + (z + a));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((b - 0.5d0) <= (-1d+192)) .or. (.not. ((b - 0.5d0) <= 2d+212))) then
        tmp = a + (log(c) * (b - 0.5d0))
    else
        tmp = (y * i) + (t + (z + a))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((b - 0.5) <= -1e+192) || !((b - 0.5) <= 2e+212)) {
		tmp = a + (Math.log(c) * (b - 0.5));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * i) + (t + (z + a));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((b - 0.5) <= -1e+192) or not ((b - 0.5) <= 2e+212):
		tmp = a + (math.log(c) * (b - 0.5))
	else:
		tmp = (y * i) + (t + (z + a))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(b - 0.5) <= -1e+192) || !(Float64(b - 0.5) <= 2e+212))
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(log(c) * Float64(b - 0.5)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(t + Float64(z + a)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((b - 0.5) <= -1e+192) || ~(((b - 0.5) <= 2e+212)))
		tmp = a + (log(c) * (b - 0.5));
	else
		tmp = (y * i) + (t + (z + a));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision], -1e+192], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision], 2e+212]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a + N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t + N[(z + a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 b #s(literal 1/2 binary64)) < -1.00000000000000004e192 or 1.9999999999999998e212 < (-.f64 b #s(literal 1/2 binary64))

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 72.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{a} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 69.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)} \]

   if -1.00000000000000004e192 < (-.f64 b #s(literal 1/2 binary64)) < 1.9999999999999998e212

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{i \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   7. Simplified 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 76.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right)} + y \cdot i \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 76.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a + t\right) + z\right)} + y \cdot i \]

      2. +-commutative 76.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(t + a\right)} + z\right) + y \cdot i \]

      3. associate-+l+ 76.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(a + z\right)\right)} + y \cdot i \]

   10. Simplified 76.1%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(a + z\right)\right)} + y \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 75.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b - 0.5 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+192} \lor \neg \left(b - 0.5 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+212}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(t + \left(z + a\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 73.4% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b - 0.5 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+192}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b - 0.5 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+212}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(t + \left(z + a\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + \left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (- b 0.5) -1e+192)
   (+ a (* (log c) (- b 0.5)))
   (if (<= (- b 0.5) 2e+212)
     (+ (* y i) (+ t (+ z a)))
     (+ z (* (+ b -0.5) (log c))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((b - 0.5) <= -1e+192) {
		tmp = a + (log(c) * (b - 0.5));
	} else if ((b - 0.5) <= 2e+212) {
		tmp = (y * i) + (t + (z + a));
	} else {
		tmp = z + ((b + -0.5) * log(c));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((b - 0.5d0) <= (-1d+192)) then
        tmp = a + (log(c) * (b - 0.5d0))
    else if ((b - 0.5d0) <= 2d+212) then
        tmp = (y * i) + (t + (z + a))
    else
        tmp = z + ((b + (-0.5d0)) * log(c))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((b - 0.5) <= -1e+192) {
		tmp = a + (Math.log(c) * (b - 0.5));
	} else if ((b - 0.5) <= 2e+212) {
		tmp = (y * i) + (t + (z + a));
	} else {
		tmp = z + ((b + -0.5) * Math.log(c));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (b - 0.5) <= -1e+192:
		tmp = a + (math.log(c) * (b - 0.5))
	elif (b - 0.5) <= 2e+212:
		tmp = (y * i) + (t + (z + a))
	else:
		tmp = z + ((b + -0.5) * math.log(c))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(b - 0.5) <= -1e+192)
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(log(c) * Float64(b - 0.5)));
	elseif (Float64(b - 0.5) <= 2e+212)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(t + Float64(z + a)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(Float64(b + -0.5) * log(c)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((b - 0.5) <= -1e+192)
		tmp = a + (log(c) * (b - 0.5));
	elseif ((b - 0.5) <= 2e+212)
		tmp = (y * i) + (t + (z + a));
	else
		tmp = z + ((b + -0.5) * log(c));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision], -1e+192], N[(a + N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision], 2e+212], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t + N[(z + a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + N[(N[(b + -0.5), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (-.f64 b #s(literal 1/2 binary64)) < -1.00000000000000004e192

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 70.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{a} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 67.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)} \]

   if -1.00000000000000004e192 < (-.f64 b #s(literal 1/2 binary64)) < 1.9999999999999998e212

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{i \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   7. Simplified 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 76.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right)} + y \cdot i \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 76.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a + t\right) + z\right)} + y \cdot i \]

      2. +-commutative 76.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(t + a\right)} + z\right) + y \cdot i \]

      3. associate-+l+ 76.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(a + z\right)\right)} + y \cdot i \]

   10. Simplified 76.1%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(a + z\right)\right)} + y \cdot i \]

   if 1.9999999999999998e212 < (-.f64 b #s(literal 1/2 binary64))

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 47.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(i + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)}{y}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 47.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + y \cdot \left(i + \frac{\log c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)}}{y}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 47.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + y \cdot \left(i + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right)}{y}\right) \]

      3. associate-/l* 47.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + y \cdot \left(i + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot \frac{b + -0.5}{y}}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 47.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + y \cdot \left(i + \log c \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-0.5 + b}}{y}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 47.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(i + \log c \cdot \frac{-0.5 + b}{y}\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around inf 44.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} + y \cdot \left(i + \log c \cdot \frac{-0.5 + b}{y}\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in y around 0 82.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. +-commutative 82.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right) + z} \]

       2. sub-neg 82.0%

          \[\leadsto \log c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} + z \]

       3. metadata-eval 82.0%

          \[\leadsto \log c \cdot \left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) + z \]

   11. Simplified 82.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log c \cdot \left(b + -0.5\right) + z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 75.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b - 0.5 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+192}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b - 0.5 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+212}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(t + \left(z + a\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + \left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 77.5% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{+98}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(t + \left(z + a\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(a + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -4.8e+98)
   (+ (* y i) (+ t (+ z a)))
   (+ (* y i) (+ a (* (log c) (- b 0.5))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -4.8e+98) {
		tmp = (y * i) + (t + (z + a));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + (log(c) * (b - 0.5)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-4.8d+98)) then
        tmp = (y * i) + (t + (z + a))
    else
        tmp = (y * i) + (a + (log(c) * (b - 0.5d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -4.8e+98) {
		tmp = (y * i) + (t + (z + a));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + (Math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -4.8e+98:
		tmp = (y * i) + (t + (z + a))
	else:
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + (math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -4.8e+98)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(t + Float64(z + a)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(a + Float64(log(c) * Float64(b - 0.5))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -4.8e+98)
		tmp = (y * i) + (t + (z + a));
	else
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + (log(c) * (b - 0.5)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[z, -4.8e+98], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t + N[(z + a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a + N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -4.7999999999999997e98

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 90.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{i \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   7. Simplified 90.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 77.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right)} + y \cdot i \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 77.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a + t\right) + z\right)} + y \cdot i \]

      2. +-commutative 77.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(t + a\right)} + z\right) + y \cdot i \]

      3. associate-+l+ 77.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(a + z\right)\right)} + y \cdot i \]

   10. Simplified 77.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(a + z\right)\right)} + y \cdot i \]

   if -4.7999999999999997e98 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 55.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{a} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 58.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{+98}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(t + \left(z + a\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(a + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 71.8% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+191} \lor \neg \left(b \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{+213}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \log c\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(t + \left(z + a\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= b -5.5e+191) (not (<= b 5.8e+213)))
   (* b (log c))
   (+ (* y i) (+ t (+ z a)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((b <= -5.5e+191) || !(b <= 5.8e+213)) {
		tmp = b * log(c);
	} else {
		tmp = (y * i) + (t + (z + a));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((b <= (-5.5d+191)) .or. (.not. (b <= 5.8d+213))) then
        tmp = b * log(c)
    else
        tmp = (y * i) + (t + (z + a))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((b <= -5.5e+191) || !(b <= 5.8e+213)) {
		tmp = b * Math.log(c);
	} else {
		tmp = (y * i) + (t + (z + a));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (b <= -5.5e+191) or not (b <= 5.8e+213):
		tmp = b * math.log(c)
	else:
		tmp = (y * i) + (t + (z + a))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((b <= -5.5e+191) || !(b <= 5.8e+213))
		tmp = Float64(b * log(c));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(t + Float64(z + a)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((b <= -5.5e+191) || ~((b <= 5.8e+213)))
		tmp = b * log(c);
	else
		tmp = (y * i) + (t + (z + a));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[b, -5.5e+191], N[Not[LessEqual[b, 5.8e+213]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(b * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t + N[(z + a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < -5.5000000000000002e191 or 5.8000000000000006e213 < b

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 72.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{a} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around inf 64.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 64.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b} \]

   6. Simplified 64.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b} \]

   if -5.5000000000000002e191 < b < 5.8000000000000006e213

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{i \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   7. Simplified 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 76.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right)} + y \cdot i \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 76.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a + t\right) + z\right)} + y \cdot i \]

      2. +-commutative 76.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(t + a\right)} + z\right) + y \cdot i \]

      3. associate-+l+ 76.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(a + z\right)\right)} + y \cdot i \]

   10. Simplified 76.1%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(a + z\right)\right)} + y \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+191} \lor \neg \left(b \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{+213}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \log c\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(t + \left(z + a\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 38.5% accurate, 9.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -4.7 \cdot 10^{-220}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-96}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{+119}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a -4.7e-220)
   z
   (if (<= a 1.15e-96)
     (* y i)
     (if (<= a 5.4e-5) z (if (<= a 1.65e+119) (* y i) a)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -4.7e-220) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (a <= 1.15e-96) {
		tmp = y * i;
	} else if (a <= 5.4e-5) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (a <= 1.65e+119) {
		tmp = y * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-4.7d-220)) then
        tmp = z
    else if (a <= 1.15d-96) then
        tmp = y * i
    else if (a <= 5.4d-5) then
        tmp = z
    else if (a <= 1.65d+119) then
        tmp = y * i
    else
        tmp = a
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -4.7e-220) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (a <= 1.15e-96) {
		tmp = y * i;
	} else if (a <= 5.4e-5) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (a <= 1.65e+119) {
		tmp = y * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -4.7e-220:
		tmp = z
	elif a <= 1.15e-96:
		tmp = y * i
	elif a <= 5.4e-5:
		tmp = z
	elif a <= 1.65e+119:
		tmp = y * i
	else:
		tmp = a
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -4.7e-220)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (a <= 1.15e-96)
		tmp = Float64(y * i);
	elseif (a <= 5.4e-5)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (a <= 1.65e+119)
		tmp = Float64(y * i);
	else
		tmp = a;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -4.7e-220)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (a <= 1.15e-96)
		tmp = y * i;
	elseif (a <= 5.4e-5)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (a <= 1.65e+119)
		tmp = y * i;
	else
		tmp = a;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[a, -4.7e-220], z, If[LessEqual[a, 1.15e-96], N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, 5.4e-5], z, If[LessEqual[a, 1.65e+119], N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision], a]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if a < -4.7000000000000003e-220 or 1.15e-96 < a < 5.3999999999999998e-5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 88.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(i + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)}{y}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 88.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + y \cdot \left(i + \frac{\log c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)}}{y}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 88.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + y \cdot \left(i + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right)}{y}\right) \]

      3. associate-/l* 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + y \cdot \left(i + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot \frac{b + -0.5}{y}}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + y \cdot \left(i + \log c \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-0.5 + b}}{y}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 88.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(i + \log c \cdot \frac{-0.5 + b}{y}\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around inf 54.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} + y \cdot \left(i + \log c \cdot \frac{-0.5 + b}{y}\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around inf 22.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -4.7000000000000003e-220 < a < 1.15e-96 or 5.3999999999999998e-5 < a < 1.6500000000000001e119

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 43.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{a} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 25.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot y} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 25.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   6. Simplified 25.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   if 1.6500000000000001e119 < a

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 68.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{a} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around inf 41.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 26.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -4.7 \cdot 10^{-220}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-96}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{+119}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 53.9% accurate, 21.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.9 \cdot 10^{+160}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + y \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -4.9e+160) z (+ a (* y i))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -4.9e+160) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-4.9d+160)) then
        tmp = z
    else
        tmp = a + (y * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -4.9e+160) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -4.9e+160:
		tmp = z
	else:
		tmp = a + (y * i)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -4.9e+160)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(y * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -4.9e+160)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[z, -4.9e+160], z, N[(a + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -4.9000000000000002e160

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 86.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(i + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)}{y}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 86.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + y \cdot \left(i + \frac{\log c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)}}{y}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 86.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + y \cdot \left(i + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right)}{y}\right) \]

      3. associate-/l* 86.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + y \cdot \left(i + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot \frac{b + -0.5}{y}}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 86.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + y \cdot \left(i + \log c \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-0.5 + b}}{y}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 86.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(i + \log c \cdot \frac{-0.5 + b}{y}\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around inf 65.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} + y \cdot \left(i + \log c \cdot \frac{-0.5 + b}{y}\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around inf 54.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -4.9000000000000002e160 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 82.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{i \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 82.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   7. Simplified 82.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around inf 54.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 + \left(\frac{a}{z} + \left(\frac{t}{z} + \frac{x \cdot \log y}{z}\right)\right)\right)} + y \cdot i \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around inf 39.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} + y \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 40.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.9 \cdot 10^{+160}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + y \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 60.1% accurate, 21.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 1.38 \cdot 10^{+76}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + y \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a 1.38e+76) (+ z (* y i)) (+ a (* y i))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 1.38e+76) {
		tmp = z + (y * i);
	} else {
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= 1.38d+76) then
        tmp = z + (y * i)
    else
        tmp = a + (y * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 1.38e+76) {
		tmp = z + (y * i);
	} else {
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= 1.38e+76:
		tmp = z + (y * i)
	else:
		tmp = a + (y * i)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= 1.38e+76)
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(y * i));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(y * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= 1.38e+76)
		tmp = z + (y * i);
	else
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[a, 1.38e+76], N[(z + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < 1.3800000000000001e76

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 82.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{i \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 82.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   7. Simplified 82.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around inf 42.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} + y \cdot i \]

   if 1.3800000000000001e76 < a

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 92.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{i \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 92.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   7. Simplified 92.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around inf 45.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 + \left(\frac{a}{z} + \left(\frac{t}{z} + \frac{x \cdot \log y}{z}\right)\right)\right)} + y \cdot i \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around inf 60.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} + y \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 45.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 1.38 \cdot 10^{+76}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + y \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 67.1% accurate, 24.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ y \cdot i + \left(t + \left(z + a\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (+ (* y i) (+ t (+ z a))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (y * i) + (t + (z + a));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (y * i) + (t + (z + a))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (y * i) + (t + (z + a));
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (y * i) + (t + (z + a))

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(t + Float64(z + a)))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (y * i) + (t + (z + a));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t + N[(z + a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   3. fma-define 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   4. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   5. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 84.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{i \cdot y} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 84.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

7. Simplified 84.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 67.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right)} + y \cdot i \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+r+ 67.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a + t\right) + z\right)} + y \cdot i \]

   2. +-commutative 67.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(t + a\right)} + z\right) + y \cdot i \]

   3. associate-+l+ 67.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(a + z\right)\right)} + y \cdot i \]

10. Simplified 67.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(a + z\right)\right)} + y \cdot i \]

11. Final simplification 67.5%

    \[\leadsto y \cdot i + \left(t + \left(z + a\right)\right) \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 16: 38.8% accurate, 36.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{+76}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (if (<= a 4.4e+76) z a))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 4.4e+76) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= 4.4d+76) then
        tmp = z
    else
        tmp = a
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 4.4e+76) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= 4.4e+76:
		tmp = z
	else:
		tmp = a
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= 4.4e+76)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = a;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= 4.4e+76)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = a;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[a, 4.4e+76], z, a]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < 4.4000000000000001e76

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 86.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(i + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)}{y}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 86.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + y \cdot \left(i + \frac{\log c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)}}{y}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 86.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + y \cdot \left(i + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right)}{y}\right) \]

      3. associate-/l* 86.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + y \cdot \left(i + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot \frac{b + -0.5}{y}}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 86.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + y \cdot \left(i + \log c \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-0.5 + b}}{y}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 86.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(i + \log c \cdot \frac{-0.5 + b}{y}\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around inf 50.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} + y \cdot \left(i + \log c \cdot \frac{-0.5 + b}{y}\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around inf 19.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if 4.4000000000000001e76 < a

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 67.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{a} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around inf 41.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 23.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{+76}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 17: 23.2% accurate, 219.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ a \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 a)

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = a
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return a

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return a
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = a;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := a

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 52.7%

   \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{a} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

4. Taylor expanded in a around inf 15.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]

5. Final simplification 15.3%

   \[\leadsto a \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024071 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:logBeta from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ (* x (log y)) z) t) a) (* (- b 0.5) (log c))) (* y i)))