Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendOutside from plot-0.2.3.4, C

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 100.0%

Time: 5.9s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.7% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) + Float64(z * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) + Float64(z * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma z 5.0 (* x (+ z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(z, 5.0, (x * (z + y)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(z, 5.0, Float64(x * Float64(z + y)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z * 5.0 + N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + y, z \cdot 5\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma x (+ z y) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(x, (z + y), (z * 5.0));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(x, Float64(z + y), Float64(z * 5.0))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-define 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + z, z \cdot 5\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + z, z \cdot 5\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + y, z \cdot 5\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 62.0% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{+160}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -4.3 \cdot 10^{+141}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -5.3 \cdot 10^{+88}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{-8}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{-28}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -7.2e+160)
   (* z x)
   (if (<= x -4.3e+141)
     (* x y)
     (if (<= x -5.3e+88)
       (* z x)
       (if (<= x -8.5e-8)
         (* x y)
         (if (<= x 4.8e-28) (* z 5.0) (if (<= x 7.8e+49) (* x y) (* z x))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -7.2e+160) {
		tmp = z * x;
	} else if (x <= -4.3e+141) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= -5.3e+88) {
		tmp = z * x;
	} else if (x <= -8.5e-8) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= 4.8e-28) {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	} else if (x <= 7.8e+49) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-7.2d+160)) then
        tmp = z * x
    else if (x <= (-4.3d+141)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (x <= (-5.3d+88)) then
        tmp = z * x
    else if (x <= (-8.5d-8)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (x <= 4.8d-28) then
        tmp = z * 5.0d0
    else if (x <= 7.8d+49) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = z * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -7.2e+160) {
		tmp = z * x;
	} else if (x <= -4.3e+141) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= -5.3e+88) {
		tmp = z * x;
	} else if (x <= -8.5e-8) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= 4.8e-28) {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	} else if (x <= 7.8e+49) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -7.2e+160:
		tmp = z * x
	elif x <= -4.3e+141:
		tmp = x * y
	elif x <= -5.3e+88:
		tmp = z * x
	elif x <= -8.5e-8:
		tmp = x * y
	elif x <= 4.8e-28:
		tmp = z * 5.0
	elif x <= 7.8e+49:
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = z * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -7.2e+160)
		tmp = Float64(z * x);
	elseif (x <= -4.3e+141)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (x <= -5.3e+88)
		tmp = Float64(z * x);
	elseif (x <= -8.5e-8)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (x <= 4.8e-28)
		tmp = Float64(z * 5.0);
	elseif (x <= 7.8e+49)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -7.2e+160)
		tmp = z * x;
	elseif (x <= -4.3e+141)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (x <= -5.3e+88)
		tmp = z * x;
	elseif (x <= -8.5e-8)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (x <= 4.8e-28)
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	elseif (x <= 7.8e+49)
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = z * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -7.2e+160], N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, -4.3e+141], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, -5.3e+88], N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, -8.5e-8], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 4.8e-28], N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 7.8e+49], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -7.20000000000000042e160 or -4.2999999999999999e141 < x < -5.29999999999999987e88 or 7.8000000000000002e49 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z + y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 63.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z} \]

   if -7.20000000000000042e160 < x < -4.2999999999999999e141 or -5.29999999999999987e88 < x < -8.49999999999999935e-8 or 4.8000000000000004e-28 < x < 7.8000000000000002e49

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 70.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -8.49999999999999935e-8 < x < 4.8000000000000004e-28

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 73.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{+160}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -4.3 \cdot 10^{+141}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -5.3 \cdot 10^{+88}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{-8}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{-28}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 98.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+15} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5 + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -9e+15) (not (<= x 4.2e-7)))
   (* x (+ z y))
   (+ (* z 5.0) (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -9e+15) || !(x <= 4.2e-7)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = (z * 5.0) + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-9d+15)) .or. (.not. (x <= 4.2d-7))) then
        tmp = x * (z + y)
    else
        tmp = (z * 5.0d0) + (x * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -9e+15) || !(x <= 4.2e-7)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = (z * 5.0) + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -9e+15) or not (x <= 4.2e-7):
		tmp = x * (z + y)
	else:
		tmp = (z * 5.0) + (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -9e+15) || !(x <= 4.2e-7))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z * 5.0) + Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -9e+15) || ~((x <= 4.2e-7)))
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	else
		tmp = (z * 5.0) + (x * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -9e+15], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 4.2e-7]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -9e15 or 4.2e-7 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z + y\right)} \]

   if -9e15 < x < 4.2e-7

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \left(5 \cdot \frac{z}{y} + \frac{x \cdot z}{y}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 87.9%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \left(5 \cdot \frac{z}{y} + \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{z}{y}}\right)\right) \]

      2. distribute-rgt-out 88.2%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{\frac{z}{y} \cdot \left(5 + x\right)}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \frac{z}{y} \cdot \left(5 + x\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 87.8%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{5 \cdot \frac{z}{y}}\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+15} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5 + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 84.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{-8} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{-68}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -5.5e-8) (not (<= x 1.02e-68))) (* x (+ z y)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.5e-8) || !(x <= 1.02e-68)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-5.5d-8)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.02d-68))) then
        tmp = x * (z + y)
    else
        tmp = z * 5.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.5e-8) || !(x <= 1.02e-68)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -5.5e-8) or not (x <= 1.02e-68):
		tmp = x * (z + y)
	else:
		tmp = z * 5.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -5.5e-8) || !(x <= 1.02e-68))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * 5.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -5.5e-8) || ~((x <= 1.02e-68)))
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	else
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -5.5e-8], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.02e-68]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -5.5000000000000003e-8 or 1.01999999999999997e-68 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z + y\right)} \]

   if -5.5000000000000003e-8 < x < 1.01999999999999997e-68

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 75.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{-8} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{-68}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 84.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -180 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{-68}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(5 + x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -180.0) (not (<= x 1.02e-68))) (* x (+ z y)) (* z (+ 5.0 x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -180.0) || !(x <= 1.02e-68)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (5.0 + x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-180.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.02d-68))) then
        tmp = x * (z + y)
    else
        tmp = z * (5.0d0 + x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -180.0) || !(x <= 1.02e-68)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (5.0 + x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -180.0) or not (x <= 1.02e-68):
		tmp = x * (z + y)
	else:
		tmp = z * (5.0 + x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -180.0) || !(x <= 1.02e-68))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(5.0 + x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -180.0) || ~((x <= 1.02e-68)))
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	else
		tmp = z * (5.0 + x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -180.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.02e-68]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(5.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -180 or 1.01999999999999997e-68 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z + y\right)} \]

   if -180 < x < 1.01999999999999997e-68

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 75.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z + x \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt-in 75.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(5 + x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 75.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(5 + x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -180 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{-68}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(5 + x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 61.2% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{-8} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{-29}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -5.5e-8) (not (<= x 5.5e-29))) (* x y) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.5e-8) || !(x <= 5.5e-29)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-5.5d-8)) .or. (.not. (x <= 5.5d-29))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = z * 5.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.5e-8) || !(x <= 5.5e-29)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -5.5e-8) or not (x <= 5.5e-29):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = z * 5.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -5.5e-8) || !(x <= 5.5e-29))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * 5.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -5.5e-8) || ~((x <= 5.5e-29)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -5.5e-8], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 5.5e-29]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -5.5000000000000003e-8 or 5.4999999999999999e-29 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 53.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -5.5000000000000003e-8 < x < 5.4999999999999999e-29

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 73.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 61.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{-8} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{-29}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(z + y\right) + z \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (+ z y)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(z + y)) + Float64(z * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(z + y\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 36.6% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* z 5.0))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z * 5.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z * 5.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z * 5.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z * 5.0

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z * 5.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z * 5.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 33.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z} \]

4. Final simplification 33.2%

   \[\leadsto z \cdot 5 \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 97.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + 5\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* (+ x 5.0) z) (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x + 5.0d0) * z) + (x * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + 5.0) * z) + Float64(x * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x + 5.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024071 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendOutside from plot-0.2.3.4, C"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (+ (* (+ x 5.0) z) (* x y))

  (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* z 5.0)))