a parameter of renormalized beta distribution

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%

Time: 9.0s

Alternatives: 11

Speedup: N/A×

• 42.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

\[\left(0 < m \land 0 < v\right) \land v < 0.25\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) m))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * m
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * m), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) m))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * m
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * m), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m \cdot \left(\frac{1 - m}{\frac{v}{m}} + -1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* m (+ (/ (- 1.0 m) (/ v m)) -1.0)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (((1.0 - m) / (v / m)) + -1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m * (((1.0d0 - m) / (v / m)) + (-1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (((1.0 - m) / (v / m)) + -1.0);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m * (((1.0 - m) / (v / m)) + -1.0)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m * Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) / Float64(v / m)) + -1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m * (((1.0 - m) / (v / m)) + -1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m * N[(N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] / N[(v / m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 99.8%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{m}{v} + \frac{1}{v}\right)} + -1\right) \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{v} + -1 \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)} + -1\right) \]

   2. distribute-rgt-in 70.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{v} \cdot m + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot m\right)} + -1\right) \]

   3. associate-/r/ 71.0%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{v}{m}}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot m\right) + -1\right) \]

   4. neg-mul-1 71.0%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{\frac{v}{m}} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{m}{v}\right)} \cdot m\right) + -1\right) \]

   5. distribute-lft-neg-out 71.0%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{\frac{v}{m}} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{m}{v} \cdot m\right)}\right) + -1\right) \]

   6. associate-/r/ 71.0%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{\frac{v}{m}} + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m}}}\right)\right) + -1\right) \]

   7. sub-neg 71.0%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{\frac{v}{m}} - \frac{m}{\frac{v}{m}}\right)} + -1\right) \]

   8. div-sub 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{\frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

7. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{\frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

8. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{1 - m}{\frac{v}{m}} + -1\right) \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 37.7% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-156} \lor \neg \left(m \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= m 2e-156) (not (<= m 1.0))) (- m) (* m (/ m v))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= 2e-156) || !(m <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = -m;
	} else {
		tmp = m * (m / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((m <= 2d-156) .or. (.not. (m <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = -m
    else
        tmp = m * (m / v)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= 2e-156) || !(m <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = -m;
	} else {
		tmp = m * (m / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if (m <= 2e-156) or not (m <= 1.0):
		tmp = -m
	else:
		tmp = m * (m / v)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((m <= 2e-156) || !(m <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(-m);
	else
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(m / v));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((m <= 2e-156) || ~((m <= 1.0)))
		tmp = -m;
	else
		tmp = m * (m / v);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[Or[LessEqual[m, 2e-156], N[Not[LessEqual[m, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], (-m), N[(m * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.00000000000000008e-156 or 1 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 29.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 29.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

   7. Simplified 29.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

   if 2.00000000000000008e-156 < m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.6%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.6%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.6%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 93.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{v}} + -1\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 93.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m + -1 \cdot v}{v}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 93.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{m + \color{blue}{\left(-v\right)}}{v} \]

      2. unsub-neg 93.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{m - v}}{v} \]

   8. Simplified 93.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m - v}{v}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in m around inf 66.6%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 38.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-156} \lor \neg \left(m \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 37.7% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{-146} \lor \neg \left(m \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= m 1.45e-146) (not (<= m 1.0))) (- m) (/ m (/ v m))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= 1.45e-146) || !(m <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = -m;
	} else {
		tmp = m / (v / m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((m <= 1.45d-146) .or. (.not. (m <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = -m
    else
        tmp = m / (v / m)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= 1.45e-146) || !(m <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = -m;
	} else {
		tmp = m / (v / m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if (m <= 1.45e-146) or not (m <= 1.0):
		tmp = -m
	else:
		tmp = m / (v / m)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((m <= 1.45e-146) || !(m <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(-m);
	else
		tmp = Float64(m / Float64(v / m));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((m <= 1.45e-146) || ~((m <= 1.0)))
		tmp = -m;
	else
		tmp = m / (v / m);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[Or[LessEqual[m, 1.45e-146], N[Not[LessEqual[m, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], (-m), N[(m / N[(v / m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.45000000000000005e-146 or 1 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 29.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 29.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

   7. Simplified 29.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

   if 1.45000000000000005e-146 < m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.6%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.6%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.6%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 93.7%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{v}} + -1\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 93.7%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m + -1 \cdot v}{v}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 93.7%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{m + \color{blue}{\left(-v\right)}}{v} \]

      2. unsub-neg 93.7%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{m - v}}{v} \]

   8. Simplified 93.7%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m - v}{v}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in m around inf 67.1%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. clear-num 67.0%

          \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{v}{m}}} \]

       2. div-inv 67.1%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m}}} \]

   11. Applied egg-rr 67.1%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m}}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 38.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{-146} \lor \neg \left(m \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m}}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 97.6% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \frac{m - v}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 - m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.0) (* m (/ (- m v) v)) (* m (- -1.0 (* m (/ m v))))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * ((m - v) / v);
	} else {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 - (m * (m / v)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = m * ((m - v) / v)
    else
        tmp = m * ((-1.0d0) - (m * (m / v)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * ((m - v) / v);
	} else {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 - (m * (m / v)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.0:
		tmp = m * ((m - v) / v)
	else:
		tmp = m * (-1.0 - (m * (m / v)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(Float64(m - v) / v));
	else
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 - Float64(m * Float64(m / v))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = m * ((m - v) / v);
	else
		tmp = m * (-1.0 - (m * (m / v)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.0], N[(m * N[(N[(m - v), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(m * N[(-1.0 - N[(m * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.7%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 96.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{v}} + -1\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 96.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m + -1 \cdot v}{v}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{m + \color{blue}{\left(-v\right)}}{v} \]

      2. unsub-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{m - v}}{v} \]

   8. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m - v}{v}} \]

   if 1 < m

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around inf 98.4%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)} + -1\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 98.4%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{m}{v}\right)} + -1\right) \]

      2. distribute-neg-frac2 98.4%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m}{-v}} + -1\right) \]

   7. Simplified 98.4%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m}{-v}} + -1\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \frac{m - v}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 - m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 51.1% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 1.0) (* m (+ -1.0 (/ m v))) (- m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = -m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = m * ((-1.0d0) + (m / v))
    else
        tmp = -m
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = -m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.0:
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v))
	else:
		tmp = -m
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-m);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	else
		tmp = -m;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.0], N[(m * N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], (-m)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.7%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   if 1 < m

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 5.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 5.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

   7. Simplified 5.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 49.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 51.1% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \frac{m - v}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 1.0) (* m (/ (- m v) v)) (- m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * ((m - v) / v);
	} else {
		tmp = -m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = m * ((m - v) / v)
    else
        tmp = -m
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * ((m - v) / v);
	} else {
		tmp = -m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.0:
		tmp = m * ((m - v) / v)
	else:
		tmp = -m
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(Float64(m - v) / v));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-m);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = m * ((m - v) / v);
	else
		tmp = -m;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.0], N[(m * N[(N[(m - v), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], (-m)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.7%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 96.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{v}} + -1\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 96.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m + -1 \cdot v}{v}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{m + \color{blue}{\left(-v\right)}}{v} \]

      2. unsub-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{m - v}}{v} \]

   8. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m - v}{v}} \]

   if 1 < m

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 5.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 5.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

   7. Simplified 5.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 49.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \frac{m - v}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 87.3% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \frac{m - v}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \frac{v - m}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.0) (* m (/ (- m v) v)) (* m (/ (- v m) v))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * ((m - v) / v);
	} else {
		tmp = m * ((v - m) / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = m * ((m - v) / v)
    else
        tmp = m * ((v - m) / v)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * ((m - v) / v);
	} else {
		tmp = m * ((v - m) / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.0:
		tmp = m * ((m - v) / v)
	else:
		tmp = m * ((v - m) / v)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(Float64(m - v) / v));
	else
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(Float64(v - m) / v));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = m * ((m - v) / v);
	else
		tmp = m * ((v - m) / v);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.0], N[(m * N[(N[(m - v), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(m * N[(N[(v - m), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.7%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 96.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{v}} + -1\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 96.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m + -1 \cdot v}{v}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{m + \color{blue}{\left(-v\right)}}{v} \]

      2. unsub-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{m - v}}{v} \]

   8. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m - v}{v}} \]

   if 1 < m

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 0.1%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{v}} + -1\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 0.1%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m + -1 \cdot v}{v}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 0.1%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{m + \color{blue}{\left(-v\right)}}{v} \]

      2. unsub-neg 0.1%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{m - v}}{v} \]

   8. Simplified 0.1%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m - v}{v}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. frac-2neg 0.1%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{-\left(m - v\right)}{-v}} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(-\left(m - v\right)\right)}{-v}} \]

      3. sub-neg 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(m + \left(-v\right)\right)}\right)}{-v} \]

      4. distribute-neg-in 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-m\right) + \left(-\left(-v\right)\right)\right)}}{-v} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \left(\left(-m\right) + \color{blue}{v}\right)}{-v} \]

      6. add-sqr-sqrt 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \left(\left(-m\right) + v\right)}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{-v} \cdot \sqrt{-v}}} \]

      7. sqrt-unprod 84.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \left(\left(-m\right) + v\right)}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-v\right) \cdot \left(-v\right)}}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 84.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \left(\left(-m\right) + v\right)}{\sqrt{\color{blue}{v \cdot v}}} \]

      9. sqrt-unprod 84.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \left(\left(-m\right) + v\right)}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{v} \cdot \sqrt{v}}} \]

      10. add-sqr-sqrt 84.2%

          \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \left(\left(-m\right) + v\right)}{\color{blue}{v}} \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 84.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(\left(-m\right) + v\right)}{v}} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-/l* 84.2%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{\left(-m\right) + v}{v}} \]

       2. +-commutative 84.2%

          \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{v + \left(-m\right)}}{v} \]

       3. unsub-neg 84.2%

          \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{v - m}}{v} \]

   12. Simplified 84.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{v - m}{v}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \frac{m - v}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \frac{v - m}{v}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 87.3% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \frac{m - v}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 - \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.0) (* m (/ (- m v) v)) (* m (- -1.0 (/ m v)))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * ((m - v) / v);
	} else {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 - (m / v));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = m * ((m - v) / v)
    else
        tmp = m * ((-1.0d0) - (m / v))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * ((m - v) / v);
	} else {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 - (m / v));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.0:
		tmp = m * ((m - v) / v)
	else:
		tmp = m * (-1.0 - (m / v))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(Float64(m - v) / v));
	else
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 - Float64(m / v)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = m * ((m - v) / v);
	else
		tmp = m * (-1.0 - (m / v));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.0], N[(m * N[(N[(m - v), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(m * N[(-1.0 - N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.7%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 96.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{v}} + -1\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 96.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m + -1 \cdot v}{v}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{m + \color{blue}{\left(-v\right)}}{v} \]

      2. unsub-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{m - v}}{v} \]

   8. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m - v}{v}} \]

   if 1 < m

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 0.1%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{v}} + -1\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. un-div-inv 0.1%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} + -1\right) \]

      2. clear-num 0.1%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

      3. frac-2neg 0.1%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-1}{-\frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 0.1%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-1}}{-\frac{v}{m}} + -1\right) \]

      5. distribute-neg-frac 0.1%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{\color{blue}{\frac{-v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

      6. add-sqr-sqrt 0.0%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{\frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt{-v} \cdot \sqrt{-v}}}{m}} + -1\right) \]

      7. sqrt-unprod 84.2%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{\frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-v\right) \cdot \left(-v\right)}}}{m}} + -1\right) \]

      8. sqr-neg 84.2%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{\frac{\sqrt{\color{blue}{v \cdot v}}}{m}} + -1\right) \]

      9. sqrt-unprod 84.2%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{\frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt{v} \cdot \sqrt{v}}}{m}} + -1\right) \]

      10. add-sqr-sqrt 84.2%

          \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{\frac{\color{blue}{v}}{m}} + -1\right) \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 84.2%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-1}{\frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r/ 84.2%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-1}{v} \cdot m} + -1\right) \]

      2. associate-*l/ 84.2%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot m}{v}} + -1\right) \]

      3. associate-*r/ 84.2%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{m}{v}} + -1\right) \]

      4. mul-1-neg 84.2%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\frac{m}{v}\right)} + -1\right) \]

      5. distribute-neg-frac2 84.2%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{-v}} + -1\right) \]

   9. Simplified 84.2%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{-v}} + -1\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \frac{m - v}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 - \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m \cdot \left(-1 + m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* m (+ -1.0 (* m (/ (- 1.0 m) v)))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m * ((-1.0d0) + (m * ((1.0d0 - m) / v)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)));
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)))

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m * Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) / v))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)));
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m * N[(-1.0 + N[(m * N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(-1 + m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 27.2% accurate, 5.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -m \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (- m))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return -m;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = -m
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return -m;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return -m

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(-m)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = -m;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := (-m)

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 28.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 28.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

7. Simplified 28.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

8. Final simplification 28.2%

   \[\leadsto -m \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 3.0% accurate, 11.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 m)

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return m
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := m

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 46.6%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{v}} + -1\right) \]

6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 46.6%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m + -1 \cdot v}{v}} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 46.6%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{m + \color{blue}{\left(-v\right)}}{v} \]

   2. unsub-neg 46.6%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{m - v}}{v} \]

8. Simplified 46.6%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m - v}{v}} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r/ 31.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(m - v\right)}{v}} \]

   2. sub-neg 31.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m + \left(-v\right)\right)}}{v} \]

   3. add-sqr-sqrt 0.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \left(m + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-v} \cdot \sqrt{-v}}\right)}{v} \]

   4. sqrt-unprod 17.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \left(m + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-v\right) \cdot \left(-v\right)}}\right)}{v} \]

   5. sqr-neg 17.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \left(m + \sqrt{\color{blue}{v \cdot v}}\right)}{v} \]

   6. sqrt-unprod 17.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \left(m + \color{blue}{\sqrt{v} \cdot \sqrt{v}}\right)}{v} \]

   7. add-sqr-sqrt 17.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \left(m + \color{blue}{v}\right)}{v} \]

10. Applied egg-rr 17.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(m + v\right)}{v}} \]

11. Taylor expanded in m around 0 3.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m} \]

12. Final simplification 3.0%

    \[\leadsto m \]
13. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024067 
(FPCore (m v)
  :name "a parameter of renormalized beta distribution"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (< 0.0 m) (< 0.0 v)) (< v 0.25))
  (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) m))