Diagrams.Color.HSV:lerp from diagrams-contrib-1.3.0.5

Percentage Accurate: 97.5% → 100.0%

Time: 4.8s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.3×

• 21.0% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* (- 1.0 x) y) (* x z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((1.0 - x) * y) + (x * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((1.0d0 - x) * y) + (x * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((1.0 - x) * y) + (x * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((1.0 - x) * y) + (x * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 - x) * y) + Float64(x * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((1.0 - x) * y) + (x * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* (- 1.0 x) y) (* x z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((1.0 - x) * y) + (x * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((1.0d0 - x) * y) + (x * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((1.0 - x) * y) + (x * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((1.0 - x) * y) + (x * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 - x) * y) + Float64(x * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((1.0 - x) * y) + (x * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y - x \cdot \left(y - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- y (* x (- y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y - (x * (y - z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y - (x * (y - z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y - (x * (y - z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y - (x * (y - z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(y - Float64(x * Float64(y - z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y - (x * (y - z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y - N[(x * N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.4%

   \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. remove-double-neg 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y\right)\right)} + x \cdot z \]

   2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(1 - x\right) \cdot \left(-y\right)}\right) + x \cdot z \]

   3. neg-sub0 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(1 - x\right) \cdot \left(-y\right)\right)} + x \cdot z \]

   4. neg-sub0 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\left(1 - x\right) \cdot \left(-y\right)\right)} + x \cdot z \]

   5. *-commutative 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(1 - x\right)}\right) + x \cdot z \]

   6. distribute-lft-neg-in 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-y\right)\right) \cdot \left(1 - x\right)} + x \cdot z \]

   7. remove-double-neg 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \cdot \left(1 - x\right) + x \cdot z \]

   8. distribute-rgt-out-- 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot y - x \cdot y\right)} + x \cdot z \]

   9. *-lft-identity 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y} - x \cdot y\right) + x \cdot z \]

   10. associate-+l- 98.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y - \left(x \cdot y - x \cdot z\right)} \]

   11. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

       \[\leadsto y - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y - z\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y - x \cdot \left(y - z\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto y - x \cdot \left(y - z\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 61.2% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+133}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{+114}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.35 \cdot 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 10^{+183}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* x (- y))))
   (if (<= x -3.5e+133)
     t_0
     (if (<= x -1.7e+114)
       (* x z)
       (if (<= x -1.0)
         t_0
         (if (<= x 2.35e-7) y (if (<= x 1e+183) (* x z) t_0)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x * -y;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -3.5e+133) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= -1.7e+114) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else if (x <= -1.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= 2.35e-7) {
		tmp = y;
	} else if (x <= 1e+183) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = x * -y
    if (x <= (-3.5d+133)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (x <= (-1.7d+114)) then
        tmp = x * z
    else if (x <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (x <= 2.35d-7) then
        tmp = y
    else if (x <= 1d+183) then
        tmp = x * z
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x * -y;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -3.5e+133) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= -1.7e+114) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else if (x <= -1.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= 2.35e-7) {
		tmp = y;
	} else if (x <= 1e+183) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = x * -y
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -3.5e+133:
		tmp = t_0
	elif x <= -1.7e+114:
		tmp = x * z
	elif x <= -1.0:
		tmp = t_0
	elif x <= 2.35e-7:
		tmp = y
	elif x <= 1e+183:
		tmp = x * z
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(x * Float64(-y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -3.5e+133)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= -1.7e+114)
		tmp = Float64(x * z);
	elseif (x <= -1.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= 2.35e-7)
		tmp = y;
	elseif (x <= 1e+183)
		tmp = Float64(x * z);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = x * -y;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -3.5e+133)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= -1.7e+114)
		tmp = x * z;
	elseif (x <= -1.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= 2.35e-7)
		tmp = y;
	elseif (x <= 1e+183)
		tmp = x * z;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(x * (-y)), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -3.5e+133], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[x, -1.7e+114], N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, -1.0], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[x, 2.35e-7], y, If[LessEqual[x, 1e+183], N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -3.4999999999999998e133 or -1.7e114 < x < -1 or 9.99999999999999947e182 < x

   1. Initial program 94.9%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z + -1 \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 98.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 98.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z - y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z - y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 63.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 63.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 63.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 63.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   if -3.4999999999999998e133 < x < -1.7e114 or 2.35e-7 < x < 9.99999999999999947e182

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 67.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z} \]

   if -1 < x < 2.35e-7

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 71.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+133}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{+114}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.35 \cdot 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 10^{+183}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 85.1% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-24} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.12 \cdot 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z - y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.3e-24) (not (<= x 1.12e-6))) (* x (- z y)) y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.3e-24) || !(x <= 1.12e-6)) {
		tmp = x * (z - y);
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.3d-24)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.12d-6))) then
        tmp = x * (z - y)
    else
        tmp = y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.3e-24) || !(x <= 1.12e-6)) {
		tmp = x * (z - y);
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.3e-24) or not (x <= 1.12e-6):
		tmp = x * (z - y)
	else:
		tmp = y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.3e-24) || !(x <= 1.12e-6))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z - y));
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.3e-24) || ~((x <= 1.12e-6)))
		tmp = x * (z - y);
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.3e-24], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.12e-6]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], y]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.3e-24 or 1.12000000000000008e-6 < x

   1. Initial program 96.9%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 95.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z + -1 \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 95.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 95.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z - y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 95.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z - y\right)} \]

   if -1.3e-24 < x < 1.12000000000000008e-6

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 73.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-24} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.12 \cdot 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z - y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 84.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{+18} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2200000000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z - y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.8e+18) (not (<= x 2200000000000.0)))
   (* x (- z y))
   (* y (- 1.0 x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.8e+18) || !(x <= 2200000000000.0)) {
		tmp = x * (z - y);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2.8d+18)) .or. (.not. (x <= 2200000000000.0d0))) then
        tmp = x * (z - y)
    else
        tmp = y * (1.0d0 - x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.8e+18) || !(x <= 2200000000000.0)) {
		tmp = x * (z - y);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2.8e+18) or not (x <= 2200000000000.0):
		tmp = x * (z - y)
	else:
		tmp = y * (1.0 - x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.8e+18) || !(x <= 2200000000000.0))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z - y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2.8e+18) || ~((x <= 2200000000000.0)))
		tmp = x * (z - y);
	else
		tmp = y * (1.0 - x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.8e+18], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 2200000000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.8e18 or 2.2e12 < x

   1. Initial program 96.5%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z + -1 \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z - y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z - y\right)} \]

   if -2.8e18 < x < 2.2e12

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 73.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{+18} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2200000000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z - y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 99.0% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z - y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y + x \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.0) (not (<= x 1.0))) (* x (- z y)) (+ y (* x z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = x * (z - y);
	} else {
		tmp = y + (x * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = x * (z - y)
    else
        tmp = y + (x * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = x * (z - y);
	} else {
		tmp = y + (x * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.0) or not (x <= 1.0):
		tmp = x * (z - y)
	else:
		tmp = y + (x * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z - y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y + Float64(x * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || ~((x <= 1.0)))
		tmp = x * (z - y);
	else
		tmp = y + (x * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1 or 1 < x

   1. Initial program 96.7%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z + -1 \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 97.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 97.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z - y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z - y\right)} \]

   if -1 < x < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y\right)\right)} + x \cdot z \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(1 - x\right) \cdot \left(-y\right)}\right) + x \cdot z \]

      3. neg-sub0 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(1 - x\right) \cdot \left(-y\right)\right)} + x \cdot z \]

      4. neg-sub0 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\left(1 - x\right) \cdot \left(-y\right)\right)} + x \cdot z \]

      5. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(1 - x\right)}\right) + x \cdot z \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-y\right)\right) \cdot \left(1 - x\right)} + x \cdot z \]

      7. remove-double-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \cdot \left(1 - x\right) + x \cdot z \]

      8. distribute-rgt-out-- 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot y - x \cdot y\right)} + x \cdot z \]

      9. *-lft-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y} - x \cdot y\right) + x \cdot z \]

      10. associate-+l- 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y - \left(x \cdot y - x \cdot z\right)} \]

      11. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

          \[\leadsto y - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y - z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y - x \cdot \left(y - z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.2%

      \[\leadsto y - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 98.2%

         \[\leadsto y - \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 98.2%

         \[\leadsto y - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 98.2%

      \[\leadsto y - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z - y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y + x \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 62.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.12 \cdot 10^{-17} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.12e-17) (not (<= x 3e-7))) (* x z) y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.12e-17) || !(x <= 3e-7)) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.12d-17)) .or. (.not. (x <= 3d-7))) then
        tmp = x * z
    else
        tmp = y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.12e-17) || !(x <= 3e-7)) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.12e-17) or not (x <= 3e-7):
		tmp = x * z
	else:
		tmp = y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.12e-17) || !(x <= 3e-7))
		tmp = Float64(x * z);
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.12e-17) || ~((x <= 3e-7)))
		tmp = x * z;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.12e-17], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 3e-7]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision], y]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.12000000000000005e-17 or 2.9999999999999999e-7 < x

   1. Initial program 96.9%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 49.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z} \]

   if -1.12000000000000005e-17 < x < 2.9999999999999999e-7

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 73.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 61.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.12 \cdot 10^{-17} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 36.1% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 y)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return y
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := y

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.4%

   \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 38.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]

4. Final simplification 38.2%

   \[\leadsto y \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 100.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y - x \cdot \left(y - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- y (* x (- y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y - (x * (y - z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y - (x * (y - z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y - (x * (y - z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y - (x * (y - z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(y - Float64(x * Float64(y - z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y - (x * (y - z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y - N[(x * N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024067 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.Color.HSV:lerp  from diagrams-contrib-1.3.0.5"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (- y (* x (- y z)))

  (+ (* (- 1.0 x) y) (* x z)))