Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, G

Percentage Accurate: 84.7% → 95.4%

Time: 9.9s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 42.2×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (Math.exp((y * Math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (math.exp((y * math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(y * log(Float64(y / Float64(z + y))))) / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(y * N[Log[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 84.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (Math.exp((y * Math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (math.exp((y * math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(y * log(Float64(y / Float64(z + y))))) / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(y * N[Log[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 95.4% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+89}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1e+89)
   (+ x (/ (exp (- z)) y))
   (+ x (/ (pow (exp y) (log (/ y (+ y z)))) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1e+89) {
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (pow(exp(y), log((y / (y + z)))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1d+89)) then
        tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + ((exp(y) ** log((y / (y + z)))) / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1e+89) {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (Math.pow(Math.exp(y), Math.log((y / (y + z)))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1e+89:
		tmp = x + (math.exp(-z) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (math.pow(math.exp(y), math.log((y / (y + z)))) / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1e+89)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-z)) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64((exp(y) ^ log(Float64(y / Float64(y + z)))) / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1e+89)
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + ((exp(y) ^ log((y / (y + z)))) / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1e+89], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[Power[N[Exp[y], $MachinePrecision], N[Log[N[(y / N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -9.99999999999999995e88

   1. Initial program 77.2%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 77.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-to-pow 77.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. +-commutative 77.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 77.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot z}}}{y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-z}}}{y} \]

   if -9.99999999999999995e88 < y

   1. Initial program 83.0%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 95.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 95.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+89}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 86.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 10^{-141}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1e-141)
   (+ x (/ 1.0 y))
   (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ y z))))) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1e-141) {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (exp((y * log((y / (y + z))))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1d-141) then
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (exp((y * log((y / (y + z))))) / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1e-141) {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp((y * Math.log((y / (y + z))))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1e-141:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (math.exp((y * math.log((y / (y + z))))) / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1e-141)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(y * log(Float64(y / Float64(y + z))))) / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1e-141)
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (exp((y * log((y / (y + z))))) / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1e-141], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(y * N[Log[N[(y / N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1e-141

   1. Initial program 75.5%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 92.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 92.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 92.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 86.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{y} \]

   if 1e-141 < y

   1. Initial program 90.8%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 10^{-141}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 86.7% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-152}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 5e-152) (+ x (/ 1.0 y)) (+ x (/ (pow (/ y (+ y z)) y) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 5e-152) {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (pow((y / (y + z)), y) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 5d-152) then
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (((y / (y + z)) ** y) / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 5e-152) {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (Math.pow((y / (y + z)), y) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 5e-152:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (math.pow((y / (y + z)), y) / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 5e-152)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64((Float64(y / Float64(y + z)) ^ y) / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 5e-152)
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (((y / (y + z)) ^ y) / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 5e-152], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[Power[N[(y / N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], y], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 4.9999999999999997e-152

   1. Initial program 75.5%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 92.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 92.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 92.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 86.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{y} \]

   if 4.9999999999999997e-152 < y

   1. Initial program 90.8%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 90.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-to-pow 90.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. +-commutative 90.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 90.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-152}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 90.8% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-40}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2e-40) (+ x (/ 1.0 y)) (+ x (/ (exp (- z)) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2e-40) {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2d-40) then
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2e-40) {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(-z) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2e-40:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (math.exp(-z) / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2e-40)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-z)) / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2e-40)
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2e-40], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.9999999999999999e-40

   1. Initial program 78.4%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 93.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 93.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 93.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 88.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{y} \]

   if 1.9999999999999999e-40 < y

   1. Initial program 88.7%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 88.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-to-pow 88.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. +-commutative 88.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 88.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot z}}}{y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-z}}}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-40}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 85.2% accurate, 42.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{1}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (/ 1.0 y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (1.0 / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (1.0d0 / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (1.0 / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (1.0 / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 81.9%

   \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. exp-prod 92.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

   2. +-commutative 92.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

3. Simplified 92.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 86.8%

   \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{y} \]

6. Final simplification 86.8%

   \[\leadsto x + \frac{1}{y} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 49.3% accurate, 211.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 81.9%

   \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. exp-prod 92.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

   2. +-commutative 92.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

3. Simplified 92.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 86.8%

   \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{y} \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 47.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

7. Final simplification 47.7%

   \[\leadsto x \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 91.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y}{z + y} < 7.11541576 \cdot 10^{-315}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{\frac{-1}{z}}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{\log \left({\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (< (/ y (+ z y)) 7.11541576e-315)
   (+ x (/ (exp (/ -1.0 z)) y))
   (+ x (/ (exp (log (pow (/ y (+ y z)) y))) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315) {
		tmp = x + (exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (exp(log(pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576d-315) then
        tmp = x + (exp(((-1.0d0) / z)) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (exp(log(((y / (y + z)) ** y))) / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315) {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(Math.log(Math.pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315:
		tmp = x + (math.exp((-1.0 / z)) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (math.exp(math.log(math.pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y / Float64(z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-1.0 / z)) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(log((Float64(y / Float64(y + z)) ^ y))) / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315)
		tmp = x + (exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (exp(log(((y / (y + z)) ^ y))) / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Less[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 7.11541576e-315], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(-1.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[Log[N[Power[N[(y / N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], y], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024066 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, G"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (if (< (/ y (+ z y)) 7.11541576e-315) (+ x (/ (exp (/ -1.0 z)) y)) (+ x (/ (exp (log (pow (/ y (+ y z)) y))) y)))

  (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))