Statistics.Distribution.Poisson.Internal:probability from math-functions-0.1.5.2

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 4.6s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.0×

• 57.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (exp (- (+ x (* y (log y))) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return Math.exp(((x + (y * Math.log(y))) - z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return math.exp(((x + (y * math.log(y))) - z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return exp(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * log(y))) - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[Exp[N[(N[(x + N[(y * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (exp (- (+ x (* y (log y))) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return Math.exp(((x + (y * Math.log(y))) - z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return math.exp(((x + (y * math.log(y))) - z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return exp(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * log(y))) - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[Exp[N[(N[(x + N[(y * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (exp (- (+ x (* y (log y))) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return Math.exp(((x + (y * Math.log(y))) - z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return math.exp(((x + (y * math.log(y))) - z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return exp(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * log(y))) - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[Exp[N[(N[(x + N[(y * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 94.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := y \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq 400:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{{y}^{y}}{e^{z - x}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{t\_0 - z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* y (log y))))
   (if (<= t_0 400.0) (/ (pow y y) (exp (- z x))) (exp (- t_0 z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * log(y);
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= 400.0) {
		tmp = pow(y, y) / exp((z - x));
	} else {
		tmp = exp((t_0 - z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = y * log(y)
    if (t_0 <= 400.0d0) then
        tmp = (y ** y) / exp((z - x))
    else
        tmp = exp((t_0 - z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * Math.log(y);
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= 400.0) {
		tmp = Math.pow(y, y) / Math.exp((z - x));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.exp((t_0 - z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = y * math.log(y)
	tmp = 0
	if t_0 <= 400.0:
		tmp = math.pow(y, y) / math.exp((z - x))
	else:
		tmp = math.exp((t_0 - z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(y * log(y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= 400.0)
		tmp = Float64((y ^ y) / exp(Float64(z - x)));
	else
		tmp = exp(Float64(t_0 - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = y * log(y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_0 <= 400.0)
		tmp = (y ^ y) / exp((z - x));
	else
		tmp = exp((t_0 - z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(y * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, 400.0], N[(N[Power[y, y], $MachinePrecision] / N[Exp[N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Exp[N[(t$95$0 - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 y (log.f64 y)) < 400

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x + \left(y \cdot \log y - z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \log y - z\right) + x}} \]

      3. exp-sum 86.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{y \cdot \log y - z} \cdot e^{x}} \]

      4. exp-diff 86.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{e^{y \cdot \log y}}{e^{z}}} \cdot e^{x} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 86.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{e^{y \cdot \log y}}{\frac{e^{z}}{e^{x}}}} \]

      6. *-commutative 86.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log y \cdot y}}}{\frac{e^{z}}{e^{x}}} \]

      7. exp-to-pow 86.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{y}^{y}}}{\frac{e^{z}}{e^{x}}} \]

      8. div-exp 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{{y}^{y}}{\color{blue}{e^{z - x}}} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{y}^{y}}{e^{z - x}}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 400 < (*.f64 y (log.f64 y))

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 89.1%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{y \cdot \log y - z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot \log y \leq 400:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{{y}^{y}}{e^{z - x}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{y \cdot \log y - z}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 94.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := y \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq 400:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{e^{z - x}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{t\_0 - z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* y (log y))))
   (if (<= t_0 400.0) (/ 1.0 (exp (- z x))) (exp (- t_0 z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * log(y);
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= 400.0) {
		tmp = 1.0 / exp((z - x));
	} else {
		tmp = exp((t_0 - z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = y * log(y)
    if (t_0 <= 400.0d0) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / exp((z - x))
    else
        tmp = exp((t_0 - z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * Math.log(y);
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= 400.0) {
		tmp = 1.0 / Math.exp((z - x));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.exp((t_0 - z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = y * math.log(y)
	tmp = 0
	if t_0 <= 400.0:
		tmp = 1.0 / math.exp((z - x))
	else:
		tmp = math.exp((t_0 - z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(y * log(y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= 400.0)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / exp(Float64(z - x)));
	else
		tmp = exp(Float64(t_0 - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = y * log(y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_0 <= 400.0)
		tmp = 1.0 / exp((z - x));
	else
		tmp = exp((t_0 - z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(y * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, 400.0], N[(1.0 / N[Exp[N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Exp[N[(t$95$0 - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 y (log.f64 y)) < 400

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x + \left(y \cdot \log y - z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \log y - z\right) + x}} \]

      3. exp-sum 86.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{y \cdot \log y - z} \cdot e^{x}} \]

      4. exp-diff 86.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{e^{y \cdot \log y}}{e^{z}}} \cdot e^{x} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 86.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{e^{y \cdot \log y}}{\frac{e^{z}}{e^{x}}}} \]

      6. *-commutative 86.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log y \cdot y}}}{\frac{e^{z}}{e^{x}}} \]

      7. exp-to-pow 86.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{y}^{y}}}{\frac{e^{z}}{e^{x}}} \]

      8. div-exp 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{{y}^{y}}{\color{blue}{e^{z - x}}} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{y}^{y}}{e^{z - x}}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{z - x}}} \]

   if 400 < (*.f64 y (log.f64 y))

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 89.1%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{y \cdot \log y - z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot \log y \leq 400:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{e^{z - x}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{y \cdot \log y - z}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 74.4% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -480 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6.6 \cdot 10^{+68}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{-z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{x}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -480.0) (not (<= z 6.6e+68))) (exp (- z)) (exp x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -480.0) || !(z <= 6.6e+68)) {
		tmp = exp(-z);
	} else {
		tmp = exp(x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-480.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 6.6d+68))) then
        tmp = exp(-z)
    else
        tmp = exp(x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -480.0) || !(z <= 6.6e+68)) {
		tmp = Math.exp(-z);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.exp(x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -480.0) or not (z <= 6.6e+68):
		tmp = math.exp(-z)
	else:
		tmp = math.exp(x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -480.0) || !(z <= 6.6e+68))
		tmp = exp(Float64(-z));
	else
		tmp = exp(x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -480.0) || ~((z <= 6.6e+68)))
		tmp = exp(-z);
	else
		tmp = exp(x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -480.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 6.6e+68]], $MachinePrecision]], N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision], N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -480 or 6.6000000000000001e68 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 88.6%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 88.6%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-z}} \]

   5. Simplified 88.6%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-z}} \]

   if -480 < z < 6.6000000000000001e68

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 73.1%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -480 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6.6 \cdot 10^{+68}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{-z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{x}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 89.8% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+136}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{e^{z - x}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{y}^{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1.1e+136) (/ 1.0 (exp (- z x))) (pow y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.1e+136) {
		tmp = 1.0 / exp((z - x));
	} else {
		tmp = pow(y, y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.1d+136) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / exp((z - x))
    else
        tmp = y ** y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.1e+136) {
		tmp = 1.0 / Math.exp((z - x));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow(y, y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.1e+136:
		tmp = 1.0 / math.exp((z - x))
	else:
		tmp = math.pow(y, y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.1e+136)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / exp(Float64(z - x)));
	else
		tmp = y ^ y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.1e+136)
		tmp = 1.0 / exp((z - x));
	else
		tmp = y ^ y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.1e+136], N[(1.0 / N[Exp[N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[y, y], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.1e136

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x + \left(y \cdot \log y - z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \log y - z\right) + x}} \]

      3. exp-sum 81.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{y \cdot \log y - z} \cdot e^{x}} \]

      4. exp-diff 76.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{e^{y \cdot \log y}}{e^{z}}} \cdot e^{x} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 76.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{e^{y \cdot \log y}}{\frac{e^{z}}{e^{x}}}} \]

      6. *-commutative 76.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log y \cdot y}}}{\frac{e^{z}}{e^{x}}} \]

      7. exp-to-pow 76.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{y}^{y}}}{\frac{e^{z}}{e^{x}}} \]

      8. div-exp 86.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{{y}^{y}}{\color{blue}{e^{z - x}}} \]

   3. Simplified 86.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{y}^{y}}{e^{z - x}}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 91.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{z - x}}} \]

   if 1.1e136 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x + \left(y \cdot \log y - z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \log y - z\right) + x}} \]

      3. exp-sum 69.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{y \cdot \log y - z} \cdot e^{x}} \]

      4. exp-diff 50.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{e^{y \cdot \log y}}{e^{z}}} \cdot e^{x} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 50.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{e^{y \cdot \log y}}{\frac{e^{z}}{e^{x}}}} \]

      6. *-commutative 50.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log y \cdot y}}}{\frac{e^{z}}{e^{x}}} \]

      7. exp-to-pow 50.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{y}^{y}}}{\frac{e^{z}}{e^{x}}} \]

      8. div-exp 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{{y}^{y}}{\color{blue}{e^{z - x}}} \]

   3. Simplified 63.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{y}^{y}}{e^{z - x}}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 63.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{y}^{y}}{e^{-x}}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-neg 63.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{{y}^{y}}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{x}}}} \]

      2. associate-/r/ 63.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{y}^{y}}{1} \cdot e^{x}} \]

      3. /-rgt-identity 63.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{y}} \cdot e^{x} \]

   7. Simplified 63.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{y} \cdot e^{x}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 90.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+136}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{e^{z - x}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{y}^{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 53.2% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{x} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (exp x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return exp(x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = exp(x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return Math.exp(x);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return math.exp(x)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return exp(x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = exp(x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 56.3%

   \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x}} \]

4. Final simplification 56.3%

   \[\leadsto e^{x} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{\left(x - z\right) + \log y \cdot y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (exp (+ (- x z) (* (log y) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return exp(((x - z) + (log(y) * y)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = exp(((x - z) + (log(y) * y)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return Math.exp(((x - z) + (Math.log(y) * y)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return math.exp(((x - z) + (math.log(y) * y)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return exp(Float64(Float64(x - z) + Float64(log(y) * y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = exp(((x - z) + (log(y) * y)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[Exp[N[(N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024066 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Statistics.Distribution.Poisson.Internal:probability from math-functions-0.1.5.2"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (exp (+ (- x z) (* (log y) y)))

  (exp (- (+ x (* y (log y))) z)))