Statistics.Distribution.Beta:$cdensity from math-functions-0.1.5.2

Percentage Accurate: 89.4% → 99.8%

Time: 20.5s

Alternatives: 15

Speedup: 1.9×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* (- x 1.0) (log y)) (* (- z 1.0) (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x - 1.0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x - 1.0d0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0d0) * log((1.0d0 - y)))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x - 1.0) * Math.log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * Math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x - 1.0) * math.log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x - 1.0) * log(y)) + Float64(Float64(z - 1.0) * log(Float64(1.0 - y)))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x - 1.0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 89.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* (- x 1.0) (log y)) (* (- z 1.0) (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x - 1.0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x - 1.0d0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0d0) * log((1.0d0 - y)))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x - 1.0) * Math.log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * Math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x - 1.0) * math.log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x - 1.0) * log(y)) + Float64(Float64(z - 1.0) * log(Float64(1.0 - y)))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x - 1.0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (fma (+ z -1.0) (log1p (- y)) (* (log y) (+ -1.0 x))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma((z + -1.0), log1p(-y), (log(y) * (-1.0 + x))) - t;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(fma(Float64(z + -1.0), log1p(Float64(-y)), Float64(log(y) * Float64(-1.0 + x))) - t)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[1 + (-y)], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.9%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 88.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   2. fma-define 88.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   3. sub-neg 88.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   4. metadata-eval 88.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   5. sub-neg 88.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   6. log1p-define 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   7. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   8. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right)\right) - t \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.7% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.25 - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right)\right)\right) \cdot \left(z + -1\right) + \log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (+
   (*
    (* y (+ -1.0 (* y (- (* y (- (* y -0.25) 0.3333333333333333)) 0.5))))
    (+ z -1.0))
   (* (log y) (+ -1.0 x)))
  t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5)))) * (z + -1.0)) + (log(y) * (-1.0 + x))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((y * ((-1.0d0) + (y * ((y * ((y * (-0.25d0)) - 0.3333333333333333d0)) - 0.5d0)))) * (z + (-1.0d0))) + (log(y) * ((-1.0d0) + x))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5)))) * (z + -1.0)) + (Math.log(y) * (-1.0 + x))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5)))) * (z + -1.0)) + (math.log(y) * (-1.0 + x))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(y * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5)))) * Float64(z + -1.0)) + Float64(log(y) * Float64(-1.0 + x))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5)))) * (z + -1.0)) + (log(y) * (-1.0 + x))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(y * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * N[(N[(y * N[(N[(y * -0.25), $MachinePrecision] - 0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.9%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot y - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.25 - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right)\right)\right) \cdot \left(z + -1\right) + \log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right)\right) - t \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 87.6% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-1 + x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(-1 + x \leq 10^{+27}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - \log y\right) - t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (+ -1.0 x) -1.0) (not (<= (+ -1.0 x) 1e+27)))
   (- (* (log y) (+ -1.0 x)) t)
   (- (- (* y (- 1.0 z)) (log y)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((-1.0 + x) <= -1.0) || !((-1.0 + x) <= 1e+27)) {
		tmp = (log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = ((y * (1.0 - z)) - log(y)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((((-1.0d0) + x) <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (((-1.0d0) + x) <= 1d+27))) then
        tmp = (log(y) * ((-1.0d0) + x)) - t
    else
        tmp = ((y * (1.0d0 - z)) - log(y)) - t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((-1.0 + x) <= -1.0) || !((-1.0 + x) <= 1e+27)) {
		tmp = (Math.log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = ((y * (1.0 - z)) - Math.log(y)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if ((-1.0 + x) <= -1.0) or not ((-1.0 + x) <= 1e+27):
		tmp = (math.log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) - t
	else:
		tmp = ((y * (1.0 - z)) - math.log(y)) - t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(-1.0 + x) <= -1.0) || !(Float64(-1.0 + x) <= 1e+27))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(log(y) * Float64(-1.0 + x)) - t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z)) - log(y)) - t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((-1.0 + x) <= -1.0) || ~(((-1.0 + x) <= 1e+27)))
		tmp = (log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) - t;
	else
		tmp = ((y * (1.0 - z)) - log(y)) - t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision], 1e+27]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 x #s(literal 1 binary64)) < -1 or 1e27 < (-.f64 x #s(literal 1 binary64))

   1. Initial program 89.3%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 89.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      2. fma-define 89.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      3. sub-neg 89.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      4. metadata-eval 89.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      5. sub-neg 89.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      6. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      7. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 88.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) - t} \]

   if -1 < (-.f64 x #s(literal 1 binary64)) < 1e27

   1. Initial program 77.1%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. flip-- 77.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot x - 1 \cdot 1}{x + 1}} \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      2. metadata-eval 77.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{x \cdot x - \color{blue}{1}}{x + 1} \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 77.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{x \cdot x - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot -1}}{x + 1} \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      4. associate-*l/ 77.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\left(x \cdot x - -1 \cdot -1\right) \cdot \log y}{x + 1}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      5. metadata-eval 77.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\left(x \cdot x - \color{blue}{1}\right) \cdot \log y}{x + 1} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      6. fma-neg 77.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)} \cdot \log y}{x + 1} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      7. metadata-eval 77.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y}{x + 1} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      8. +-commutative 77.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right) \cdot \log y}{\color{blue}{1 + x}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right) \cdot \log y}{1 + x}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 56.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \log y + \log \left(1 - y\right) \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 56.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(1 - y\right) \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + -1 \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      2. mul-1-neg 56.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log \left(1 - y\right) \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)}\right) - t \]

      3. sub-neg 56.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(1 - y\right) \cdot \left(z - 1\right) - \log y\right)} - t \]

      4. *-commutative 56.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)} - \log y\right) - t \]

      5. sub-neg 56.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} - \log y\right) - t \]

      6. log1p-undefine 79.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - \log y\right) - t \]

      7. sub-neg 79.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) - \log y\right) - t \]

      8. metadata-eval 79.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) - \log y\right) - t \]

      9. +-commutative 79.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) - \log y\right) - t \]

   7. Simplified 79.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-1 + z\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) - \log y\right)} - t \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around 0 79.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - \log y\right)} - t \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 79.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - \log y\right) - t \]

      2. metadata-eval 79.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - \log y\right) - t \]

      3. +-commutative 79.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - \log y\right) - t \]

      4. neg-mul-1 79.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - \log y\right) - t \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 79.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - \log y\right) - t \]

      6. distribute-neg-in 79.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(--1\right) + \left(-z\right)\right)} - \log y\right) - t \]

      7. metadata-eval 79.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{1} + \left(-z\right)\right) - \log y\right) - t \]

      8. sub-neg 79.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} - \log y\right) - t \]

   10. Simplified 79.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - \log y\right)} - t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-1 + x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(-1 + x \leq 10^{+27}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - \log y\right) - t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.6% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.3333333333333333 - 0.5\right)\right)\right) \cdot \left(z + -1\right) + \log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (+
   (* (* y (+ -1.0 (* y (- (* y -0.3333333333333333) 0.5)))) (+ z -1.0))
   (* (log y) (+ -1.0 x)))
  t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5)))) * (z + -1.0)) + (log(y) * (-1.0 + x))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((y * ((-1.0d0) + (y * ((y * (-0.3333333333333333d0)) - 0.5d0)))) * (z + (-1.0d0))) + (log(y) * ((-1.0d0) + x))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5)))) * (z + -1.0)) + (Math.log(y) * (-1.0 + x))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5)))) * (z + -1.0)) + (math.log(y) * (-1.0 + x))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(y * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5)))) * Float64(z + -1.0)) + Float64(log(y) * Float64(-1.0 + x))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5)))) * (z + -1.0)) + (log(y) * (-1.0 + x))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(y * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * N[(N[(y * -0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision] - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.9%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot y - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.3333333333333333 - 0.5\right)\right)\right) \cdot \left(z + -1\right) + \log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right)\right) - t \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 99.5% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right) \cdot \left(z + -1\right) + \log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* (* y (+ -1.0 (* y -0.5))) (+ z -1.0)) (* (log y) (+ -1.0 x))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((y * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5))) * (z + -1.0)) + (log(y) * (-1.0 + x))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((y * ((-1.0d0) + (y * (-0.5d0)))) * (z + (-1.0d0))) + (log(y) * ((-1.0d0) + x))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((y * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5))) * (z + -1.0)) + (Math.log(y) * (-1.0 + x))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((y * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5))) * (z + -1.0)) + (math.log(y) * (-1.0 + x))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(y * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * -0.5))) * Float64(z + -1.0)) + Float64(log(y) * Float64(-1.0 + x))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((y * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5))) * (z + -1.0)) + (log(y) * (-1.0 + x))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(y * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.9%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot y - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right) \cdot \left(z + -1\right) + \log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right)\right) - t \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 87.4% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1600 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-\log y\right) - t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1600.0) (not (<= x 1.0)))
   (- (* x (log y)) t)
   (- (- (log y)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1600.0) || !(x <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = -log(y) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1600.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = (x * log(y)) - t
    else
        tmp = -log(y) - t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1600.0) || !(x <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = (x * Math.log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = -Math.log(y) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1600.0) or not (x <= 1.0):
		tmp = (x * math.log(y)) - t
	else:
		tmp = -math.log(y) - t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1600.0) || !(x <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-log(y)) - t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1600.0) || ~((x <= 1.0)))
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - t;
	else
		tmp = -log(y) - t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1600.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], N[((-N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]) - t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1600 or 1 < x

   1. Initial program 92.6%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot y - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} - t \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} - t \]

   6. Simplified 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} - t \]

   if -1600 < x < 1

   1. Initial program 85.8%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 85.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      2. fma-define 85.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      3. sub-neg 85.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      4. metadata-eval 85.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      5. sub-neg 85.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      6. log1p-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      7. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      8. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 83.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) - t} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 82.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \log y} - t \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)} - t \]

   8. Simplified 82.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)} - t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1600 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-\log y\right) - t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 60.0% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.2 \cdot 10^{+168}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.3333333333333333 - 0.5\right)\right)\right) - t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+152}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-\log y\right) - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right) - t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -3.2e+168)
   (- (* y (* z (+ -1.0 (* y (- (* y -0.3333333333333333) 0.5))))) t)
   (if (<= z 2.5e+152)
     (- (- (log y)) t)
     (- (* y (* z (+ -1.0 (* y -0.5)))) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.2e+168) {
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) - t;
	} else if (z <= 2.5e+152) {
		tmp = -log(y) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-3.2d+168)) then
        tmp = (y * (z * ((-1.0d0) + (y * ((y * (-0.3333333333333333d0)) - 0.5d0))))) - t
    else if (z <= 2.5d+152) then
        tmp = -log(y) - t
    else
        tmp = (y * (z * ((-1.0d0) + (y * (-0.5d0))))) - t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.2e+168) {
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) - t;
	} else if (z <= 2.5e+152) {
		tmp = -Math.log(y) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -3.2e+168:
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) - t
	elif z <= 2.5e+152:
		tmp = -math.log(y) - t
	else:
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -3.2e+168)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) - t);
	elseif (z <= 2.5e+152)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-log(y)) - t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * -0.5)))) - t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -3.2e+168)
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) - t;
	elseif (z <= 2.5e+152)
		tmp = -log(y) - t;
	else
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -3.2e+168], N[(N[(y * N[(z * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * N[(N[(y * -0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision] - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 2.5e+152], N[((-N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]) - t), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * N[(z * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -3.2000000000000001e168

   1. Initial program 46.8%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot y - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot y - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

   if -3.2000000000000001e168 < z < 2.5e152

   1. Initial program 98.1%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      2. fma-define 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      3. sub-neg 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      4. metadata-eval 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      5. sub-neg 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      6. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      7. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) - t} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 61.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \log y} - t \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 61.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)} - t \]

   8. Simplified 61.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)} - t \]

   if 2.5e152 < z

   1. Initial program 67.7%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot y - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 52.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot y - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.2 \cdot 10^{+168}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.3333333333333333 - 0.5\right)\right)\right) - t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+152}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-\log y\right) - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right) - t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 99.2% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(z + -1\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (- (* (log y) (+ -1.0 x)) (* y (+ z -1.0))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) - (y * (z + -1.0))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((log(y) * ((-1.0d0) + x)) - (y * (z + (-1.0d0)))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((Math.log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) - (y * (z + -1.0))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((math.log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) - (y * (z + -1.0))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(log(y) * Float64(-1.0 + x)) - Float64(y * Float64(z + -1.0))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) - (y * (z + -1.0))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.9%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. sub-neg 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   3. metadata-eval 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   4. fma-define 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

   5. mul-1-neg 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, \color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)}\right) - t \]

   6. fma-neg 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right) - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

   7. +-commutative 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + x\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

   8. sub-neg 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   9. metadata-eval 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

   10. +-commutative 99.0%

       \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - t \]

5. Simplified 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - t \]

6. Final simplification 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(z + -1\right)\right) - t \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 88.7% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+177}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.3333333333333333 - 0.5\right)\right)\right) - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -5.2e+177)
   (- (* y (* z (+ -1.0 (* y (- (* y -0.3333333333333333) 0.5))))) t)
   (- (* (log y) (+ -1.0 x)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.2e+177) {
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-5.2d+177)) then
        tmp = (y * (z * ((-1.0d0) + (y * ((y * (-0.3333333333333333d0)) - 0.5d0))))) - t
    else
        tmp = (log(y) * ((-1.0d0) + x)) - t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.2e+177) {
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (Math.log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -5.2e+177:
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) - t
	else:
		tmp = (math.log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) - t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -5.2e+177)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) - t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(log(y) * Float64(-1.0 + x)) - t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -5.2e+177)
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) - t;
	else
		tmp = (log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) - t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -5.2e+177], N[(N[(y * N[(z * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * N[(N[(y * -0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision] - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.19999999999999959e177

   1. Initial program 46.4%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot y - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 77.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot y - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

   if -5.19999999999999959e177 < z

   1. Initial program 93.7%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 93.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      2. fma-define 93.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      3. sub-neg 93.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      4. metadata-eval 93.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      5. sub-neg 93.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      6. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      7. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) - t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+177}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.3333333333333333 - 0.5\right)\right)\right) - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 99.1% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - z \cdot y\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (- (* (log y) (+ -1.0 x)) (* z y)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) - (z * y)) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((log(y) * ((-1.0d0) + x)) - (z * y)) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((Math.log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) - (z * y)) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((math.log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) - (z * y)) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(log(y) * Float64(-1.0 + x)) - Float64(z * y)) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) - (z * y)) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.9%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. sub-neg 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   3. metadata-eval 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   4. fma-define 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

   5. mul-1-neg 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, \color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)}\right) - t \]

   6. fma-neg 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right) - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

   7. +-commutative 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + x\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

   8. sub-neg 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   9. metadata-eval 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

   10. +-commutative 99.0%

       \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - t \]

5. Simplified 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - t \]

6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - \color{blue}{y \cdot z}\right) - t \]

7. Final simplification 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - z \cdot y\right) - t \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 45.7% accurate, 14.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.3333333333333333 - 0.5\right)\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (* y (* z (+ -1.0 (* y (- (* y -0.3333333333333333) 0.5))))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (y * (z * ((-1.0d0) + (y * ((y * (-0.3333333333333333d0)) - 0.5d0))))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(y * N[(z * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * N[(N[(y * -0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision] - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.9%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot y - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 43.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot y - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

5. Final simplification 43.8%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.3333333333333333 - 0.5\right)\right)\right) - t \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 45.6% accurate, 19.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* y (* z (+ -1.0 (* y -0.5)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (y * (z * ((-1.0d0) + (y * (-0.5d0))))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * -0.5)))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(y * N[(z * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.9%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot y - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 43.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot y - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

5. Final simplification 43.7%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right) - t \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 45.5% accurate, 30.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* y (- 1.0 z)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (1.0 - z)) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (y * (1.0d0 - z)) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (1.0 - z)) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (y * (1.0 - z)) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z)) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (y * (1.0 - z)) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.9%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. sub-neg 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   3. metadata-eval 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   4. fma-define 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

   5. mul-1-neg 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, \color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)}\right) - t \]

   6. fma-neg 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right) - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

   7. +-commutative 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + x\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

   8. sub-neg 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   9. metadata-eval 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

   10. +-commutative 99.0%

       \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - t \]

5. Simplified 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - t \]

6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 43.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} - t \]

7. Final simplification 43.4%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - t \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 45.3% accurate, 35.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot \left(-y\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* z (- y)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (z * -y) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (z * -y) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (z * -y) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (z * -y) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(z * Float64(-y)) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (z * -y) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(z * (-y)), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.9%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot y - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 43.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot y - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 43.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} - t \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 43.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} - t \]

   2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 43.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} - t \]

7. Simplified 43.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} - t \]

8. Final simplification 43.2%

   \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(-y\right) - t \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 35.1% accurate, 107.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = -t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return -t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(-t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = -t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := (-t)

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.9%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 88.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   2. fma-define 88.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   3. sub-neg 88.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   4. metadata-eval 88.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   5. sub-neg 88.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   6. log1p-define 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   7. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   8. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 31.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot t} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 31.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

7. Simplified 31.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

8. Final simplification 31.9%

   \[\leadsto -t \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024066 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Statistics.Distribution.Beta:$cdensity from math-functions-0.1.5.2"
  :precision binary64
  (- (+ (* (- x 1.0) (log y)) (* (- z 1.0) (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))