Octave 3.8, jcobi/4

Percentage Accurate: 16.3% → 82.2%
Time: 19.9s
Alternatives: 6
Speedup: 53.0×

Specification

?
\[\left(\alpha > -1 \land \beta > -1\right) \land i > 1\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\\ t_1 := \left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\\ t_2 := t\_1 \cdot t\_1\\ \frac{\frac{t\_0 \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + t\_0\right)}{t\_2}}{t\_2 - 1} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* i (+ (+ alpha beta) i)))
        (t_1 (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i)))
        (t_2 (* t_1 t_1)))
   (/ (/ (* t_0 (+ (* beta alpha) t_0)) t_2) (- t_2 1.0))))
double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = i * ((alpha + beta) + i);
	double t_1 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return ((t_0 * ((beta * alpha) + t_0)) / t_2) / (t_2 - 1.0);
}
real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    t_0 = i * ((alpha + beta) + i)
    t_1 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0d0 * i)
    t_2 = t_1 * t_1
    code = ((t_0 * ((beta * alpha) + t_0)) / t_2) / (t_2 - 1.0d0)
end function
public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = i * ((alpha + beta) + i);
	double t_1 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return ((t_0 * ((beta * alpha) + t_0)) / t_2) / (t_2 - 1.0);
}
def code(alpha, beta, i):
	t_0 = i * ((alpha + beta) + i)
	t_1 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i)
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1
	return ((t_0 * ((beta * alpha) + t_0)) / t_2) / (t_2 - 1.0)
function code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = Float64(i * Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + i))
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + Float64(2.0 * i))
	t_2 = Float64(t_1 * t_1)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(t_0 * Float64(Float64(beta * alpha) + t_0)) / t_2) / Float64(t_2 - 1.0))
end
function tmp = code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = i * ((alpha + beta) + i);
	t_1 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	tmp = ((t_0 * ((beta * alpha) + t_0)) / t_2) / (t_2 - 1.0);
end
code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(i * N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(t$95$1 * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(N[(t$95$0 * N[(N[(beta * alpha), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$2 - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\\
t_1 := \left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\\
t_2 := t\_1 \cdot t\_1\\
\frac{\frac{t\_0 \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + t\_0\right)}{t\_2}}{t\_2 - 1}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 6 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 16.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\\ t_1 := \left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\\ t_2 := t\_1 \cdot t\_1\\ \frac{\frac{t\_0 \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + t\_0\right)}{t\_2}}{t\_2 - 1} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* i (+ (+ alpha beta) i)))
        (t_1 (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i)))
        (t_2 (* t_1 t_1)))
   (/ (/ (* t_0 (+ (* beta alpha) t_0)) t_2) (- t_2 1.0))))
double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = i * ((alpha + beta) + i);
	double t_1 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return ((t_0 * ((beta * alpha) + t_0)) / t_2) / (t_2 - 1.0);
}
real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    t_0 = i * ((alpha + beta) + i)
    t_1 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0d0 * i)
    t_2 = t_1 * t_1
    code = ((t_0 * ((beta * alpha) + t_0)) / t_2) / (t_2 - 1.0d0)
end function
public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = i * ((alpha + beta) + i);
	double t_1 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return ((t_0 * ((beta * alpha) + t_0)) / t_2) / (t_2 - 1.0);
}
def code(alpha, beta, i):
	t_0 = i * ((alpha + beta) + i)
	t_1 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i)
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1
	return ((t_0 * ((beta * alpha) + t_0)) / t_2) / (t_2 - 1.0)
function code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = Float64(i * Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + i))
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + Float64(2.0 * i))
	t_2 = Float64(t_1 * t_1)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(t_0 * Float64(Float64(beta * alpha) + t_0)) / t_2) / Float64(t_2 - 1.0))
end
function tmp = code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = i * ((alpha + beta) + i);
	t_1 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	tmp = ((t_0 * ((beta * alpha) + t_0)) / t_2) / (t_2 - 1.0);
end
code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(i * N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(t$95$1 * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(N[(t$95$0 * N[(N[(beta * alpha), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$2 - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\\
t_1 := \left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\\
t_2 := t\_1 \cdot t\_1\\
\frac{\frac{t\_0 \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + t\_0\right)}{t\_2}}{t\_2 - 1}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 82.2% accurate, 0.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [alpha, beta, i] = \mathsf{sort}([alpha, beta, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta + \alpha\right)\\ t_1 := \beta + \left(i + \alpha\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\beta \leq 4.75 \cdot 10^{+142}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{i \cdot t\_1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t\_0, t\_0, -1\right)} \cdot \frac{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, t\_1, \beta \cdot \alpha\right)}{t\_0}}{t\_0}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\beta \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+200}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{i \cdot \frac{i + \alpha}{\beta}}{\beta + \alpha}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (fma i 2.0 (+ beta alpha))) (t_1 (+ beta (+ i alpha))))
   (if (<= beta 2.6e+111)
     0.0625
     (if (<= beta 4.75e+142)
       (*
        (/ (* i t_1) (fma t_0 t_0 -1.0))
        (/ (/ (fma i t_1 (* beta alpha)) t_0) t_0))
       (if (<= beta 1.05e+200)
         0.0625
         (/ (* i (/ (+ i alpha) beta)) (+ beta alpha)))))))
assert(alpha < beta && beta < i);
double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = fma(i, 2.0, (beta + alpha));
	double t_1 = beta + (i + alpha);
	double tmp;
	if (beta <= 2.6e+111) {
		tmp = 0.0625;
	} else if (beta <= 4.75e+142) {
		tmp = ((i * t_1) / fma(t_0, t_0, -1.0)) * ((fma(i, t_1, (beta * alpha)) / t_0) / t_0);
	} else if (beta <= 1.05e+200) {
		tmp = 0.0625;
	} else {
		tmp = (i * ((i + alpha) / beta)) / (beta + alpha);
	}
	return tmp;
}
alpha, beta, i = sort([alpha, beta, i])
function code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = fma(i, 2.0, Float64(beta + alpha))
	t_1 = Float64(beta + Float64(i + alpha))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (beta <= 2.6e+111)
		tmp = 0.0625;
	elseif (beta <= 4.75e+142)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(i * t_1) / fma(t_0, t_0, -1.0)) * Float64(Float64(fma(i, t_1, Float64(beta * alpha)) / t_0) / t_0));
	elseif (beta <= 1.05e+200)
		tmp = 0.0625;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(i * Float64(Float64(i + alpha) / beta)) / Float64(beta + alpha));
	end
	return tmp
end
NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(i * 2.0 + N[(beta + alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(beta + N[(i + alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[beta, 2.6e+111], 0.0625, If[LessEqual[beta, 4.75e+142], N[(N[(N[(i * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0 + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[(i * t$95$1 + N[(beta * alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[beta, 1.05e+200], 0.0625, N[(N[(i * N[(N[(i + alpha), $MachinePrecision] / beta), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(beta + alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]
\begin{array}{l}
[alpha, beta, i] = \mathsf{sort}([alpha, beta, i])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta + \alpha\right)\\
t_1 := \beta + \left(i + \alpha\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.0625\\

\mathbf{elif}\;\beta \leq 4.75 \cdot 10^{+142}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{i \cdot t\_1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t\_0, t\_0, -1\right)} \cdot \frac{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, t\_1, \beta \cdot \alpha\right)}{t\_0}}{t\_0}\\

\mathbf{elif}\;\beta \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+200}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.0625\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{i \cdot \frac{i + \alpha}{\beta}}{\beta + \alpha}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if beta < 2.5999999999999999e111 or 4.75e142 < beta < 1.04999999999999999e200

    1. Initial program 19.7%

      \[\frac{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \]
    2. Simplified44.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), \alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), -1\right)} \cdot \frac{i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}{\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right)}\right)} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in i around inf 83.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0625} \]

    if 2.5999999999999999e111 < beta < 4.75e142

    1. Initial program 21.0%

      \[\frac{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-/l/1.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)\right)}} \]
      2. times-frac59.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \cdot \frac{\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified59.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{i \cdot \left(\beta + \left(i + \alpha\right)\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right), -1\right)} \cdot \frac{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, \beta + \left(i + \alpha\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing

    if 1.04999999999999999e200 < beta

    1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\frac{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \]
    2. Simplified0.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), \alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), -1\right)} \cdot \frac{i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}{\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right)}\right)} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 29.1%

      \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\alpha + i}{\beta}} \cdot \frac{i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}{\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right)}\right) \]
    5. Taylor expanded in i around 0 47.3%

      \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(\frac{\alpha + i}{\beta} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\alpha + \beta}}\right) \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. pow147.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(i \cdot \left(\frac{\alpha + i}{\beta} \cdot \frac{1}{\alpha + \beta}\right)\right)}^{1}} \]
      2. un-div-inv47.4%

        \[\leadsto {\left(i \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\alpha + i}{\beta}}{\alpha + \beta}}\right)}^{1} \]
      3. +-commutative47.4%

        \[\leadsto {\left(i \cdot \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{i + \alpha}}{\beta}}{\alpha + \beta}\right)}^{1} \]
      4. +-commutative47.4%

        \[\leadsto {\left(i \cdot \frac{\frac{i + \alpha}{\beta}}{\color{blue}{\beta + \alpha}}\right)}^{1} \]
    7. Applied egg-rr47.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(i \cdot \frac{\frac{i + \alpha}{\beta}}{\beta + \alpha}\right)}^{1}} \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. unpow147.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \frac{\frac{i + \alpha}{\beta}}{\beta + \alpha}} \]
      2. associate-*r/78.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{i \cdot \frac{i + \alpha}{\beta}}{\beta + \alpha}} \]
      3. +-commutative78.4%

        \[\leadsto \frac{i \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\alpha + i}}{\beta}}{\beta + \alpha} \]
      4. +-commutative78.4%

        \[\leadsto \frac{i \cdot \frac{\alpha + i}{\beta}}{\color{blue}{\alpha + \beta}} \]
    9. Simplified78.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{i \cdot \frac{\alpha + i}{\beta}}{\alpha + \beta}} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification82.4%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\beta \leq 4.75 \cdot 10^{+142}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{i \cdot \left(\beta + \left(i + \alpha\right)\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta + \alpha\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta + \alpha\right), -1\right)} \cdot \frac{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, \beta + \left(i + \alpha\right), \beta \cdot \alpha\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta + \alpha\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta + \alpha\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\beta \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+200}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{i \cdot \frac{i + \alpha}{\beta}}{\beta + \alpha}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 82.2% accurate, 0.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [alpha, beta, i] = \mathsf{sort}([alpha, beta, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := i + \left(\beta + \alpha\right)\\ t_1 := \alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\beta \leq 3.65 \cdot 10^{+142}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, t\_0, \beta \cdot \alpha\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t\_1, t\_1, -1\right)} \cdot \frac{t\_0}{t\_1 \cdot t\_1}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\beta \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+200}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{i \cdot \frac{i + \alpha}{\beta}}{\beta + \alpha}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ i (+ beta alpha))) (t_1 (+ alpha (fma i 2.0 beta))))
   (if (<= beta 7e+111)
     0.0625
     (if (<= beta 3.65e+142)
       (*
        i
        (*
         (/ (fma i t_0 (* beta alpha)) (fma t_1 t_1 -1.0))
         (/ t_0 (* t_1 t_1))))
       (if (<= beta 1.05e+200)
         0.0625
         (/ (* i (/ (+ i alpha) beta)) (+ beta alpha)))))))
assert(alpha < beta && beta < i);
double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = i + (beta + alpha);
	double t_1 = alpha + fma(i, 2.0, beta);
	double tmp;
	if (beta <= 7e+111) {
		tmp = 0.0625;
	} else if (beta <= 3.65e+142) {
		tmp = i * ((fma(i, t_0, (beta * alpha)) / fma(t_1, t_1, -1.0)) * (t_0 / (t_1 * t_1)));
	} else if (beta <= 1.05e+200) {
		tmp = 0.0625;
	} else {
		tmp = (i * ((i + alpha) / beta)) / (beta + alpha);
	}
	return tmp;
}
alpha, beta, i = sort([alpha, beta, i])
function code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = Float64(i + Float64(beta + alpha))
	t_1 = Float64(alpha + fma(i, 2.0, beta))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (beta <= 7e+111)
		tmp = 0.0625;
	elseif (beta <= 3.65e+142)
		tmp = Float64(i * Float64(Float64(fma(i, t_0, Float64(beta * alpha)) / fma(t_1, t_1, -1.0)) * Float64(t_0 / Float64(t_1 * t_1))));
	elseif (beta <= 1.05e+200)
		tmp = 0.0625;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(i * Float64(Float64(i + alpha) / beta)) / Float64(beta + alpha));
	end
	return tmp
end
NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(i + N[(beta + alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(alpha + N[(i * 2.0 + beta), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[beta, 7e+111], 0.0625, If[LessEqual[beta, 3.65e+142], N[(i * N[(N[(N[(i * t$95$0 + N[(beta * alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$1 * t$95$1 + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(t$95$0 / N[(t$95$1 * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[beta, 1.05e+200], 0.0625, N[(N[(i * N[(N[(i + alpha), $MachinePrecision] / beta), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(beta + alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]
\begin{array}{l}
[alpha, beta, i] = \mathsf{sort}([alpha, beta, i])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := i + \left(\beta + \alpha\right)\\
t_1 := \alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.0625\\

\mathbf{elif}\;\beta \leq 3.65 \cdot 10^{+142}:\\
\;\;\;\;i \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, t\_0, \beta \cdot \alpha\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t\_1, t\_1, -1\right)} \cdot \frac{t\_0}{t\_1 \cdot t\_1}\right)\\

\mathbf{elif}\;\beta \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+200}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.0625\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{i \cdot \frac{i + \alpha}{\beta}}{\beta + \alpha}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if beta < 7.0000000000000004e111 or 3.64999999999999994e142 < beta < 1.04999999999999999e200

    1. Initial program 19.7%

      \[\frac{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \]
    2. Simplified44.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), \alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), -1\right)} \cdot \frac{i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}{\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right)}\right)} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in i around inf 83.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0625} \]

    if 7.0000000000000004e111 < beta < 3.64999999999999994e142

    1. Initial program 21.0%

      \[\frac{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \]
    2. Simplified58.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), \alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), -1\right)} \cdot \frac{i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}{\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right)}\right)} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing

    if 1.04999999999999999e200 < beta

    1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\frac{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \]
    2. Simplified0.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), \alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), -1\right)} \cdot \frac{i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}{\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right)}\right)} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 29.1%

      \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\alpha + i}{\beta}} \cdot \frac{i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}{\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right)}\right) \]
    5. Taylor expanded in i around 0 47.3%

      \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(\frac{\alpha + i}{\beta} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\alpha + \beta}}\right) \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. pow147.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(i \cdot \left(\frac{\alpha + i}{\beta} \cdot \frac{1}{\alpha + \beta}\right)\right)}^{1}} \]
      2. un-div-inv47.4%

        \[\leadsto {\left(i \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\alpha + i}{\beta}}{\alpha + \beta}}\right)}^{1} \]
      3. +-commutative47.4%

        \[\leadsto {\left(i \cdot \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{i + \alpha}}{\beta}}{\alpha + \beta}\right)}^{1} \]
      4. +-commutative47.4%

        \[\leadsto {\left(i \cdot \frac{\frac{i + \alpha}{\beta}}{\color{blue}{\beta + \alpha}}\right)}^{1} \]
    7. Applied egg-rr47.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(i \cdot \frac{\frac{i + \alpha}{\beta}}{\beta + \alpha}\right)}^{1}} \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. unpow147.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \frac{\frac{i + \alpha}{\beta}}{\beta + \alpha}} \]
      2. associate-*r/78.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{i \cdot \frac{i + \alpha}{\beta}}{\beta + \alpha}} \]
      3. +-commutative78.4%

        \[\leadsto \frac{i \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\alpha + i}}{\beta}}{\beta + \alpha} \]
      4. +-commutative78.4%

        \[\leadsto \frac{i \cdot \frac{\alpha + i}{\beta}}{\color{blue}{\alpha + \beta}} \]
    9. Simplified78.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{i \cdot \frac{\alpha + i}{\beta}}{\alpha + \beta}} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification82.4%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\beta \leq 3.65 \cdot 10^{+142}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, i + \left(\beta + \alpha\right), \beta \cdot \alpha\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), \alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), -1\right)} \cdot \frac{i + \left(\beta + \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right)}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\beta \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+200}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{i \cdot \frac{i + \alpha}{\beta}}{\beta + \alpha}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 75.9% accurate, 2.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [alpha, beta, i] = \mathsf{sort}([alpha, beta, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 3.9 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\beta \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+160} \lor \neg \left(\beta \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{+200}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot \left(\frac{i + \alpha}{\beta} \cdot \frac{1}{\beta}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= beta 3.9e+111)
   0.0625
   (if (or (<= beta 2.6e+160) (not (<= beta 2.55e+200)))
     (* i (* (/ (+ i alpha) beta) (/ 1.0 beta)))
     0.0625)))
assert(alpha < beta && beta < i);
double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (beta <= 3.9e+111) {
		tmp = 0.0625;
	} else if ((beta <= 2.6e+160) || !(beta <= 2.55e+200)) {
		tmp = i * (((i + alpha) / beta) * (1.0 / beta));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.0625;
	}
	return tmp;
}
NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (beta <= 3.9d+111) then
        tmp = 0.0625d0
    else if ((beta <= 2.6d+160) .or. (.not. (beta <= 2.55d+200))) then
        tmp = i * (((i + alpha) / beta) * (1.0d0 / beta))
    else
        tmp = 0.0625d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
assert alpha < beta && beta < i;
public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (beta <= 3.9e+111) {
		tmp = 0.0625;
	} else if ((beta <= 2.6e+160) || !(beta <= 2.55e+200)) {
		tmp = i * (((i + alpha) / beta) * (1.0 / beta));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.0625;
	}
	return tmp;
}
[alpha, beta, i] = sort([alpha, beta, i])
def code(alpha, beta, i):
	tmp = 0
	if beta <= 3.9e+111:
		tmp = 0.0625
	elif (beta <= 2.6e+160) or not (beta <= 2.55e+200):
		tmp = i * (((i + alpha) / beta) * (1.0 / beta))
	else:
		tmp = 0.0625
	return tmp
alpha, beta, i = sort([alpha, beta, i])
function code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (beta <= 3.9e+111)
		tmp = 0.0625;
	elseif ((beta <= 2.6e+160) || !(beta <= 2.55e+200))
		tmp = Float64(i * Float64(Float64(Float64(i + alpha) / beta) * Float64(1.0 / beta)));
	else
		tmp = 0.0625;
	end
	return tmp
end
alpha, beta, i = num2cell(sort([alpha, beta, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (beta <= 3.9e+111)
		tmp = 0.0625;
	elseif ((beta <= 2.6e+160) || ~((beta <= 2.55e+200)))
		tmp = i * (((i + alpha) / beta) * (1.0 / beta));
	else
		tmp = 0.0625;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := If[LessEqual[beta, 3.9e+111], 0.0625, If[Or[LessEqual[beta, 2.6e+160], N[Not[LessEqual[beta, 2.55e+200]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(i * N[(N[(N[(i + alpha), $MachinePrecision] / beta), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 / beta), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 0.0625]]
\begin{array}{l}
[alpha, beta, i] = \mathsf{sort}([alpha, beta, i])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 3.9 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.0625\\

\mathbf{elif}\;\beta \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+160} \lor \neg \left(\beta \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{+200}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;i \cdot \left(\frac{i + \alpha}{\beta} \cdot \frac{1}{\beta}\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.0625\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if beta < 3.89999999999999979e111 or 2.6e160 < beta < 2.5499999999999999e200

    1. Initial program 19.7%

      \[\frac{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \]
    2. Simplified44.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), \alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), -1\right)} \cdot \frac{i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}{\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right)}\right)} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in i around inf 83.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0625} \]

    if 3.89999999999999979e111 < beta < 2.6e160 or 2.5499999999999999e200 < beta

    1. Initial program 3.5%

      \[\frac{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \]
    2. Simplified9.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), \alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), -1\right)} \cdot \frac{i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}{\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right)}\right)} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 33.7%

      \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\alpha + i}{\beta}} \cdot \frac{i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}{\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right)}\right) \]
    5. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 48.2%

      \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(\frac{\alpha + i}{\beta} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\beta}}\right) \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification79.5%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 3.9 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\beta \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+160} \lor \neg \left(\beta \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{+200}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot \left(\frac{i + \alpha}{\beta} \cdot \frac{1}{\beta}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 82.1% accurate, 2.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [alpha, beta, i] = \mathsf{sort}([alpha, beta, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\beta \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+161} \lor \neg \left(\beta \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+200}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{i \cdot \frac{i + \alpha}{\beta}}{\beta + \alpha}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= beta 5.4e+111)
   0.0625
   (if (or (<= beta 2.5e+161) (not (<= beta 7.2e+200)))
     (/ (* i (/ (+ i alpha) beta)) (+ beta alpha))
     0.0625)))
assert(alpha < beta && beta < i);
double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (beta <= 5.4e+111) {
		tmp = 0.0625;
	} else if ((beta <= 2.5e+161) || !(beta <= 7.2e+200)) {
		tmp = (i * ((i + alpha) / beta)) / (beta + alpha);
	} else {
		tmp = 0.0625;
	}
	return tmp;
}
NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (beta <= 5.4d+111) then
        tmp = 0.0625d0
    else if ((beta <= 2.5d+161) .or. (.not. (beta <= 7.2d+200))) then
        tmp = (i * ((i + alpha) / beta)) / (beta + alpha)
    else
        tmp = 0.0625d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
assert alpha < beta && beta < i;
public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (beta <= 5.4e+111) {
		tmp = 0.0625;
	} else if ((beta <= 2.5e+161) || !(beta <= 7.2e+200)) {
		tmp = (i * ((i + alpha) / beta)) / (beta + alpha);
	} else {
		tmp = 0.0625;
	}
	return tmp;
}
[alpha, beta, i] = sort([alpha, beta, i])
def code(alpha, beta, i):
	tmp = 0
	if beta <= 5.4e+111:
		tmp = 0.0625
	elif (beta <= 2.5e+161) or not (beta <= 7.2e+200):
		tmp = (i * ((i + alpha) / beta)) / (beta + alpha)
	else:
		tmp = 0.0625
	return tmp
alpha, beta, i = sort([alpha, beta, i])
function code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (beta <= 5.4e+111)
		tmp = 0.0625;
	elseif ((beta <= 2.5e+161) || !(beta <= 7.2e+200))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(i * Float64(Float64(i + alpha) / beta)) / Float64(beta + alpha));
	else
		tmp = 0.0625;
	end
	return tmp
end
alpha, beta, i = num2cell(sort([alpha, beta, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (beta <= 5.4e+111)
		tmp = 0.0625;
	elseif ((beta <= 2.5e+161) || ~((beta <= 7.2e+200)))
		tmp = (i * ((i + alpha) / beta)) / (beta + alpha);
	else
		tmp = 0.0625;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := If[LessEqual[beta, 5.4e+111], 0.0625, If[Or[LessEqual[beta, 2.5e+161], N[Not[LessEqual[beta, 7.2e+200]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(i * N[(N[(i + alpha), $MachinePrecision] / beta), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(beta + alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 0.0625]]
\begin{array}{l}
[alpha, beta, i] = \mathsf{sort}([alpha, beta, i])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.0625\\

\mathbf{elif}\;\beta \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+161} \lor \neg \left(\beta \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+200}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{i \cdot \frac{i + \alpha}{\beta}}{\beta + \alpha}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.0625\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if beta < 5.3999999999999998e111 or 2.4999999999999998e161 < beta < 7.1999999999999995e200

    1. Initial program 19.8%

      \[\frac{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \]
    2. Simplified44.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), \alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), -1\right)} \cdot \frac{i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}{\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right)}\right)} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in i around inf 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0625} \]

    if 5.3999999999999998e111 < beta < 2.4999999999999998e161 or 7.1999999999999995e200 < beta

    1. Initial program 3.4%

      \[\frac{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \]
    2. Simplified9.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), \alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), -1\right)} \cdot \frac{i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}{\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right)}\right)} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 32.9%

      \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\alpha + i}{\beta}} \cdot \frac{i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}{\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right)}\right) \]
    5. Taylor expanded in i around 0 46.9%

      \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(\frac{\alpha + i}{\beta} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\alpha + \beta}}\right) \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. pow146.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(i \cdot \left(\frac{\alpha + i}{\beta} \cdot \frac{1}{\alpha + \beta}\right)\right)}^{1}} \]
      2. un-div-inv47.0%

        \[\leadsto {\left(i \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\alpha + i}{\beta}}{\alpha + \beta}}\right)}^{1} \]
      3. +-commutative47.0%

        \[\leadsto {\left(i \cdot \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{i + \alpha}}{\beta}}{\alpha + \beta}\right)}^{1} \]
      4. +-commutative47.0%

        \[\leadsto {\left(i \cdot \frac{\frac{i + \alpha}{\beta}}{\color{blue}{\beta + \alpha}}\right)}^{1} \]
    7. Applied egg-rr47.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(i \cdot \frac{\frac{i + \alpha}{\beta}}{\beta + \alpha}\right)}^{1}} \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. unpow147.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \frac{\frac{i + \alpha}{\beta}}{\beta + \alpha}} \]
      2. associate-*r/71.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{i \cdot \frac{i + \alpha}{\beta}}{\beta + \alpha}} \]
      3. +-commutative71.0%

        \[\leadsto \frac{i \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\alpha + i}}{\beta}}{\beta + \alpha} \]
      4. +-commutative71.0%

        \[\leadsto \frac{i \cdot \frac{\alpha + i}{\beta}}{\color{blue}{\alpha + \beta}} \]
    9. Simplified71.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{i \cdot \frac{\alpha + i}{\beta}}{\alpha + \beta}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification82.5%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\beta \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+161} \lor \neg \left(\beta \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+200}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{i \cdot \frac{i + \alpha}{\beta}}{\beta + \alpha}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 76.2% accurate, 3.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [alpha, beta, i] = \mathsf{sort}([alpha, beta, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 6 \cdot 10^{+200}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot \frac{\frac{i}{\beta}}{\beta + \alpha}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= beta 6e+200) 0.0625 (* i (/ (/ i beta) (+ beta alpha)))))
assert(alpha < beta && beta < i);
double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (beta <= 6e+200) {
		tmp = 0.0625;
	} else {
		tmp = i * ((i / beta) / (beta + alpha));
	}
	return tmp;
}
NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (beta <= 6d+200) then
        tmp = 0.0625d0
    else
        tmp = i * ((i / beta) / (beta + alpha))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
assert alpha < beta && beta < i;
public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (beta <= 6e+200) {
		tmp = 0.0625;
	} else {
		tmp = i * ((i / beta) / (beta + alpha));
	}
	return tmp;
}
[alpha, beta, i] = sort([alpha, beta, i])
def code(alpha, beta, i):
	tmp = 0
	if beta <= 6e+200:
		tmp = 0.0625
	else:
		tmp = i * ((i / beta) / (beta + alpha))
	return tmp
alpha, beta, i = sort([alpha, beta, i])
function code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (beta <= 6e+200)
		tmp = 0.0625;
	else
		tmp = Float64(i * Float64(Float64(i / beta) / Float64(beta + alpha)));
	end
	return tmp
end
alpha, beta, i = num2cell(sort([alpha, beta, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (beta <= 6e+200)
		tmp = 0.0625;
	else
		tmp = i * ((i / beta) / (beta + alpha));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := If[LessEqual[beta, 6e+200], 0.0625, N[(i * N[(N[(i / beta), $MachinePrecision] / N[(beta + alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
[alpha, beta, i] = \mathsf{sort}([alpha, beta, i])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 6 \cdot 10^{+200}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.0625\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;i \cdot \frac{\frac{i}{\beta}}{\beta + \alpha}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if beta < 5.99999999999999982e200

    1. Initial program 19.7%

      \[\frac{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \]
    2. Simplified44.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), \alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), -1\right)} \cdot \frac{i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}{\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right)}\right)} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in i around inf 82.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0625} \]

    if 5.99999999999999982e200 < beta

    1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\frac{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \]
    2. Simplified0.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), \alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), -1\right)} \cdot \frac{i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}{\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right)}\right)} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 29.1%

      \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\alpha + i}{\beta}} \cdot \frac{i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}{\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right)}\right) \]
    5. Taylor expanded in i around 0 47.3%

      \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(\frac{\alpha + i}{\beta} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\alpha + \beta}}\right) \]
    6. Taylor expanded in i around inf 29.1%

      \[\leadsto i \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{i}{\beta \cdot \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}} \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-/r*39.8%

        \[\leadsto i \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{i}{\beta}}{\alpha + \beta}} \]
    8. Simplified39.8%

      \[\leadsto i \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{i}{\beta}}{\alpha + \beta}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification78.5%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 6 \cdot 10^{+200}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot \frac{\frac{i}{\beta}}{\beta + \alpha}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 70.7% accurate, 53.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [alpha, beta, i] = \mathsf{sort}([alpha, beta, i])\\ \\ 0.0625 \end{array} \]
NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (alpha beta i) :precision binary64 0.0625)
assert(alpha < beta && beta < i);
double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	return 0.0625;
}
NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 0.0625d0
end function
assert alpha < beta && beta < i;
public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	return 0.0625;
}
[alpha, beta, i] = sort([alpha, beta, i])
def code(alpha, beta, i):
	return 0.0625
alpha, beta, i = sort([alpha, beta, i])
function code(alpha, beta, i)
	return 0.0625
end
alpha, beta, i = num2cell(sort([alpha, beta, i])){:}
function tmp = code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0625;
end
NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := 0.0625
\begin{array}{l}
[alpha, beta, i] = \mathsf{sort}([alpha, beta, i])\\
\\
0.0625
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 17.8%

    \[\frac{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \]
  2. Simplified40.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), \alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), -1\right)} \cdot \frac{i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}{\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right)}\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in i around inf 75.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0625} \]
  5. Final simplification75.8%

    \[\leadsto 0.0625 \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024062 
(FPCore (alpha beta i)
  :name "Octave 3.8, jcobi/4"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (> alpha -1.0) (> beta -1.0)) (> i 1.0))
  (/ (/ (* (* i (+ (+ alpha beta) i)) (+ (* beta alpha) (* i (+ (+ alpha beta) i)))) (* (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i)) (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i)))) (- (* (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i)) (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i))) 1.0)))