NMSE Section 6.1 mentioned, A

Percentage Accurate: 73.1% → 98.8%
Time: 16.1s
Alternatives: 9
Speedup: 20.6×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x eps)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (-
   (* (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 eps)) (exp (- (* (- 1.0 eps) x))))
   (* (- (/ 1.0 eps) 1.0) (exp (- (* (+ 1.0 eps) x)))))
  2.0))
double code(double x, double eps) {
	return (((1.0 + (1.0 / eps)) * exp(-((1.0 - eps) * x))) - (((1.0 / eps) - 1.0) * exp(-((1.0 + eps) * x)))) / 2.0;
}
real(8) function code(x, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (((1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / eps)) * exp(-((1.0d0 - eps) * x))) - (((1.0d0 / eps) - 1.0d0) * exp(-((1.0d0 + eps) * x)))) / 2.0d0
end function
public static double code(double x, double eps) {
	return (((1.0 + (1.0 / eps)) * Math.exp(-((1.0 - eps) * x))) - (((1.0 / eps) - 1.0) * Math.exp(-((1.0 + eps) * x)))) / 2.0;
}
def code(x, eps):
	return (((1.0 + (1.0 / eps)) * math.exp(-((1.0 - eps) * x))) - (((1.0 / eps) - 1.0) * math.exp(-((1.0 + eps) * x)))) / 2.0
function code(x, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / eps)) * exp(Float64(-Float64(Float64(1.0 - eps) * x)))) - Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 / eps) - 1.0) * exp(Float64(-Float64(Float64(1.0 + eps) * x))))) / 2.0)
end
function tmp = code(x, eps)
	tmp = (((1.0 + (1.0 / eps)) * exp(-((1.0 - eps) * x))) - (((1.0 / eps) - 1.0) * exp(-((1.0 + eps) * x)))) / 2.0;
end
code[x_, eps_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / eps), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Exp[(-N[(N[(1.0 - eps), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision])], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(1.0 / eps), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Exp[(-N[(N[(1.0 + eps), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision])], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 9 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 73.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x eps)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (-
   (* (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 eps)) (exp (- (* (- 1.0 eps) x))))
   (* (- (/ 1.0 eps) 1.0) (exp (- (* (+ 1.0 eps) x)))))
  2.0))
double code(double x, double eps) {
	return (((1.0 + (1.0 / eps)) * exp(-((1.0 - eps) * x))) - (((1.0 / eps) - 1.0) * exp(-((1.0 + eps) * x)))) / 2.0;
}
real(8) function code(x, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (((1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / eps)) * exp(-((1.0d0 - eps) * x))) - (((1.0d0 / eps) - 1.0d0) * exp(-((1.0d0 + eps) * x)))) / 2.0d0
end function
public static double code(double x, double eps) {
	return (((1.0 + (1.0 / eps)) * Math.exp(-((1.0 - eps) * x))) - (((1.0 / eps) - 1.0) * Math.exp(-((1.0 + eps) * x)))) / 2.0;
}
def code(x, eps):
	return (((1.0 + (1.0 / eps)) * math.exp(-((1.0 - eps) * x))) - (((1.0 / eps) - 1.0) * math.exp(-((1.0 + eps) * x)))) / 2.0
function code(x, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / eps)) * exp(Float64(-Float64(Float64(1.0 - eps) * x)))) - Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 / eps) - 1.0) * exp(Float64(-Float64(Float64(1.0 + eps) * x))))) / 2.0)
end
function tmp = code(x, eps)
	tmp = (((1.0 + (1.0 / eps)) * exp(-((1.0 - eps) * x))) - (((1.0 / eps) - 1.0) * exp(-((1.0 + eps) * x)))) / 2.0;
end
code[x_, eps_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / eps), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Exp[(-N[(N[(1.0 - eps), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision])], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(1.0 / eps), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Exp[(-N[(N[(1.0 + eps), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision])], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} eps_m = \left|\varepsilon\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := e^{x \cdot \left(-1 + eps\_m\right)}\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 3.8:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{t\_0 + e^{x \cdot \left(-eps\_m\right)}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{t\_0 + e^{-x}}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
eps_m = (fabs.f64 eps)
(FPCore (x eps_m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (exp (* x (+ -1.0 eps_m)))))
   (if (<= x 3.8)
     (/ (+ t_0 (exp (* x (- eps_m)))) 2.0)
     (/ (+ t_0 (exp (- x))) 2.0))))
eps_m = fabs(eps);
double code(double x, double eps_m) {
	double t_0 = exp((x * (-1.0 + eps_m)));
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 3.8) {
		tmp = (t_0 + exp((x * -eps_m))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 + exp(-x)) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
eps_m = abs(eps)
real(8) function code(x, eps_m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps_m
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = exp((x * ((-1.0d0) + eps_m)))
    if (x <= 3.8d0) then
        tmp = (t_0 + exp((x * -eps_m))) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (t_0 + exp(-x)) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
eps_m = Math.abs(eps);
public static double code(double x, double eps_m) {
	double t_0 = Math.exp((x * (-1.0 + eps_m)));
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 3.8) {
		tmp = (t_0 + Math.exp((x * -eps_m))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 + Math.exp(-x)) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
eps_m = math.fabs(eps)
def code(x, eps_m):
	t_0 = math.exp((x * (-1.0 + eps_m)))
	tmp = 0
	if x <= 3.8:
		tmp = (t_0 + math.exp((x * -eps_m))) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = (t_0 + math.exp(-x)) / 2.0
	return tmp
eps_m = abs(eps)
function code(x, eps_m)
	t_0 = exp(Float64(x * Float64(-1.0 + eps_m)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= 3.8)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(t_0 + exp(Float64(x * Float64(-eps_m)))) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(t_0 + exp(Float64(-x))) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end
eps_m = abs(eps);
function tmp_2 = code(x, eps_m)
	t_0 = exp((x * (-1.0 + eps_m)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= 3.8)
		tmp = (t_0 + exp((x * -eps_m))) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (t_0 + exp(-x)) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
eps_m = N[Abs[eps], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, eps$95$m_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[Exp[N[(x * N[(-1.0 + eps$95$m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, 3.8], N[(N[(t$95$0 + N[Exp[N[(x * (-eps$95$m)), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(t$95$0 + N[Exp[(-x)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}
eps_m = \left|\varepsilon\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := e^{x \cdot \left(-1 + eps\_m\right)}\\
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq 3.8:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{t\_0 + e^{x \cdot \left(-eps\_m\right)}}{2}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{t\_0 + e^{-x}}{2}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if x < 3.7999999999999998

    1. Initial program 62.8%

      \[\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]
    2. Simplified46.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}, e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon + -1\right)}, {\left(e^{1 + \varepsilon}\right)}^{\left(-x\right)} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{-1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)}{2}} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(1 + \varepsilon\right)\right)} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}}{2} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon \cdot x\right)}} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}{2} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative99.1%

        \[\leadsto \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}{2} \]
    7. Simplified99.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}{2} \]
    8. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot x\right)}} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}{2} \]
    9. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r*99.1%

        \[\leadsto \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}{2} \]
      2. mul-1-neg99.1%

        \[\leadsto \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\left(-\varepsilon\right)} \cdot x} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}{2} \]
    10. Simplified99.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{e^{\left(-\varepsilon\right) \cdot x}} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}{2} \]

    if 3.7999999999999998 < x

    1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]
    2. Simplified98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}, e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon + -1\right)}, {\left(e^{1 + \varepsilon}\right)}^{\left(-x\right)} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{-1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)}{2}} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(1 + \varepsilon\right)\right)} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}}{2} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in eps around 0 70.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{x}} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}{2} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification91.7%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 3.8:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{x \cdot \left(-1 + \varepsilon\right)} + e^{x \cdot \left(-\varepsilon\right)}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{x \cdot \left(-1 + \varepsilon\right)} + e^{-x}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.2% accurate, 1.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} eps_m = \left|\varepsilon\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := e^{-x}\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{-282}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{x \cdot \left(-eps\_m\right)} + t\_0}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{x \cdot \left(-1 + eps\_m\right)} + t\_0}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
eps_m = (fabs.f64 eps)
(FPCore (x eps_m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (exp (- x))))
   (if (<= x -1.15e-282)
     (/ (+ (exp (* x (- eps_m))) t_0) 2.0)
     (/ (+ (exp (* x (+ -1.0 eps_m))) t_0) 2.0))))
eps_m = fabs(eps);
double code(double x, double eps_m) {
	double t_0 = exp(-x);
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.15e-282) {
		tmp = (exp((x * -eps_m)) + t_0) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (exp((x * (-1.0 + eps_m))) + t_0) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
eps_m = abs(eps)
real(8) function code(x, eps_m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps_m
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = exp(-x)
    if (x <= (-1.15d-282)) then
        tmp = (exp((x * -eps_m)) + t_0) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (exp((x * ((-1.0d0) + eps_m))) + t_0) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
eps_m = Math.abs(eps);
public static double code(double x, double eps_m) {
	double t_0 = Math.exp(-x);
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.15e-282) {
		tmp = (Math.exp((x * -eps_m)) + t_0) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (Math.exp((x * (-1.0 + eps_m))) + t_0) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
eps_m = math.fabs(eps)
def code(x, eps_m):
	t_0 = math.exp(-x)
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.15e-282:
		tmp = (math.exp((x * -eps_m)) + t_0) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = (math.exp((x * (-1.0 + eps_m))) + t_0) / 2.0
	return tmp
eps_m = abs(eps)
function code(x, eps_m)
	t_0 = exp(Float64(-x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.15e-282)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(x * Float64(-eps_m))) + t_0) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(x * Float64(-1.0 + eps_m))) + t_0) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end
eps_m = abs(eps);
function tmp_2 = code(x, eps_m)
	t_0 = exp(-x);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.15e-282)
		tmp = (exp((x * -eps_m)) + t_0) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (exp((x * (-1.0 + eps_m))) + t_0) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
eps_m = N[Abs[eps], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, eps$95$m_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[Exp[(-x)], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -1.15e-282], N[(N[(N[Exp[N[(x * (-eps$95$m)), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[Exp[N[(x * N[(-1.0 + eps$95$m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}
eps_m = \left|\varepsilon\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := e^{-x}\\
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{-282}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{e^{x \cdot \left(-eps\_m\right)} + t\_0}{2}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{e^{x \cdot \left(-1 + eps\_m\right)} + t\_0}{2}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if x < -1.1499999999999999e-282

    1. Initial program 65.7%

      \[\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]
    2. Simplified55.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}, e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon + -1\right)}, {\left(e^{1 + \varepsilon}\right)}^{\left(-x\right)} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{-1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)}{2}} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(1 + \varepsilon\right)\right)} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}}{2} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon \cdot x\right)}} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}{2} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative99.1%

        \[\leadsto \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}{2} \]
    7. Simplified99.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}{2} \]
    8. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot x\right)}} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}{2} \]
    9. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r*99.1%

        \[\leadsto \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}{2} \]
      2. mul-1-neg99.1%

        \[\leadsto \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\left(-\varepsilon\right)} \cdot x} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}{2} \]
    10. Simplified99.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{e^{\left(-\varepsilon\right) \cdot x}} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}{2} \]
    11. Taylor expanded in eps around 0 85.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{\left(-\varepsilon\right) \cdot x} + e^{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x}}}{2} \]
    12. Step-by-step derivation
      1. neg-mul-185.6%

        \[\leadsto \frac{e^{\left(-\varepsilon\right) \cdot x} + e^{\color{blue}{-x}}}{2} \]
    13. Simplified85.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{\left(-\varepsilon\right) \cdot x} + e^{\color{blue}{-x}}}{2} \]

    if -1.1499999999999999e-282 < x

    1. Initial program 78.2%

      \[\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]
    2. Simplified65.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}, e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon + -1\right)}, {\left(e^{1 + \varepsilon}\right)}^{\left(-x\right)} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{-1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)}{2}} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(1 + \varepsilon\right)\right)} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}}{2} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in eps around 0 81.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{x}} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}{2} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification83.4%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{-282}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{x \cdot \left(-\varepsilon\right)} + e^{-x}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{x \cdot \left(-1 + \varepsilon\right)} + e^{-x}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.8% accurate, 1.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} eps_m = \left|\varepsilon\right| \\ \frac{e^{x \cdot \left(-1 - eps\_m\right)} + e^{x \cdot \left(-1 + eps\_m\right)}}{2} \end{array} \]
eps_m = (fabs.f64 eps)
(FPCore (x eps_m)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (+ (exp (* x (- -1.0 eps_m))) (exp (* x (+ -1.0 eps_m)))) 2.0))
eps_m = fabs(eps);
double code(double x, double eps_m) {
	return (exp((x * (-1.0 - eps_m))) + exp((x * (-1.0 + eps_m)))) / 2.0;
}
eps_m = abs(eps)
real(8) function code(x, eps_m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps_m
    code = (exp((x * ((-1.0d0) - eps_m))) + exp((x * ((-1.0d0) + eps_m)))) / 2.0d0
end function
eps_m = Math.abs(eps);
public static double code(double x, double eps_m) {
	return (Math.exp((x * (-1.0 - eps_m))) + Math.exp((x * (-1.0 + eps_m)))) / 2.0;
}
eps_m = math.fabs(eps)
def code(x, eps_m):
	return (math.exp((x * (-1.0 - eps_m))) + math.exp((x * (-1.0 + eps_m)))) / 2.0
eps_m = abs(eps)
function code(x, eps_m)
	return Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(x * Float64(-1.0 - eps_m))) + exp(Float64(x * Float64(-1.0 + eps_m)))) / 2.0)
end
eps_m = abs(eps);
function tmp = code(x, eps_m)
	tmp = (exp((x * (-1.0 - eps_m))) + exp((x * (-1.0 + eps_m)))) / 2.0;
end
eps_m = N[Abs[eps], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, eps$95$m_] := N[(N[(N[Exp[N[(x * N[(-1.0 - eps$95$m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[N[(x * N[(-1.0 + eps$95$m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}
eps_m = \left|\varepsilon\right|

\\
\frac{e^{x \cdot \left(-1 - eps\_m\right)} + e^{x \cdot \left(-1 + eps\_m\right)}}{2}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 72.0%

    \[\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]
  2. Simplified60.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}, e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon + -1\right)}, {\left(e^{1 + \varepsilon}\right)}^{\left(-x\right)} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{-1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)}{2}} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 99.0%

    \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(1 + \varepsilon\right)\right)} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}}{2} \]
  5. Final simplification99.0%

    \[\leadsto \frac{e^{x \cdot \left(-1 - \varepsilon\right)} + e^{x \cdot \left(-1 + \varepsilon\right)}}{2} \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 87.5% accurate, 1.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} eps_m = \left|\varepsilon\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;eps\_m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2}{e^{x}}}{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;eps\_m \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+192} \lor \neg \left(eps\_m \leq 8.6 \cdot 10^{+252}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(eps\_m \cdot eps\_m\right)\right)}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2 + {\left(x \cdot eps\_m\right)}^{2}}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
eps_m = (fabs.f64 eps)
(FPCore (x eps_m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= eps_m 1.0)
   (/ (/ 2.0 (exp x)) 2.0)
   (if (or (<= eps_m 6.8e+192) (not (<= eps_m 8.6e+252)))
     (/ (+ 2.0 (* x (* x (* eps_m eps_m)))) 2.0)
     (/ (+ 2.0 (pow (* x eps_m) 2.0)) 2.0))))
eps_m = fabs(eps);
double code(double x, double eps_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (eps_m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = (2.0 / exp(x)) / 2.0;
	} else if ((eps_m <= 6.8e+192) || !(eps_m <= 8.6e+252)) {
		tmp = (2.0 + (x * (x * (eps_m * eps_m)))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 + pow((x * eps_m), 2.0)) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
eps_m = abs(eps)
real(8) function code(x, eps_m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps_m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (eps_m <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = (2.0d0 / exp(x)) / 2.0d0
    else if ((eps_m <= 6.8d+192) .or. (.not. (eps_m <= 8.6d+252))) then
        tmp = (2.0d0 + (x * (x * (eps_m * eps_m)))) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (2.0d0 + ((x * eps_m) ** 2.0d0)) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
eps_m = Math.abs(eps);
public static double code(double x, double eps_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (eps_m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = (2.0 / Math.exp(x)) / 2.0;
	} else if ((eps_m <= 6.8e+192) || !(eps_m <= 8.6e+252)) {
		tmp = (2.0 + (x * (x * (eps_m * eps_m)))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 + Math.pow((x * eps_m), 2.0)) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
eps_m = math.fabs(eps)
def code(x, eps_m):
	tmp = 0
	if eps_m <= 1.0:
		tmp = (2.0 / math.exp(x)) / 2.0
	elif (eps_m <= 6.8e+192) or not (eps_m <= 8.6e+252):
		tmp = (2.0 + (x * (x * (eps_m * eps_m)))) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = (2.0 + math.pow((x * eps_m), 2.0)) / 2.0
	return tmp
eps_m = abs(eps)
function code(x, eps_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (eps_m <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / exp(x)) / 2.0);
	elseif ((eps_m <= 6.8e+192) || !(eps_m <= 8.6e+252))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(x * Float64(x * Float64(eps_m * eps_m)))) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 + (Float64(x * eps_m) ^ 2.0)) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end
eps_m = abs(eps);
function tmp_2 = code(x, eps_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (eps_m <= 1.0)
		tmp = (2.0 / exp(x)) / 2.0;
	elseif ((eps_m <= 6.8e+192) || ~((eps_m <= 8.6e+252)))
		tmp = (2.0 + (x * (x * (eps_m * eps_m)))) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (2.0 + ((x * eps_m) ^ 2.0)) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
eps_m = N[Abs[eps], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, eps$95$m_] := If[LessEqual[eps$95$m, 1.0], N[(N[(2.0 / N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[eps$95$m, 6.8e+192], N[Not[LessEqual[eps$95$m, 8.6e+252]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(2.0 + N[(x * N[(x * N[(eps$95$m * eps$95$m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 + N[Power[N[(x * eps$95$m), $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}
eps_m = \left|\varepsilon\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;eps\_m \leq 1:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2}{e^{x}}}{2}\\

\mathbf{elif}\;eps\_m \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+192} \lor \neg \left(eps\_m \leq 8.6 \cdot 10^{+252}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{2 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(eps\_m \cdot eps\_m\right)\right)}{2}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{2 + {\left(x \cdot eps\_m\right)}^{2}}{2}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if eps < 1

    1. Initial program 61.4%

      \[\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]
    2. Simplified52.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}, e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon + -1\right)}, {\left(e^{1 + \varepsilon}\right)}^{\left(-x\right)} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{-1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)}{2}} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(1 + \varepsilon\right)\right)} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}}{2} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in eps around 0 77.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot e^{-1 \cdot x}}}{2} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. neg-mul-177.8%

        \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot e^{\color{blue}{-x}}}{2} \]
      2. exp-neg77.8%

        \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{x}}}}{2} \]
      3. associate-*r/77.8%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{e^{x}}}}{2} \]
      4. metadata-eval77.8%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{e^{x}}}{2} \]
    7. Simplified77.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{e^{x}}}}{2} \]

    if 1 < eps < 6.79999999999999992e192 or 8.6000000000000004e252 < eps

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]
    2. Simplified79.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}, e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon + -1\right)}, {\left(e^{1 + \varepsilon}\right)}^{\left(-x\right)} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{-1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)}{2}} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 76.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot \left(1 - \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot {\left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}^{2}\right) + 0.5 \cdot \left({\left(1 + \varepsilon\right)}^{2} \cdot \left(1 - \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)\right) + \left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)\right)\right)}}{2} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 76.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 + x \cdot \color{blue}{\left({\varepsilon}^{2} \cdot x\right)}}{2} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. unpow276.6%

        \[\leadsto \frac{2 + x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot x\right)}{2} \]
    7. Applied egg-rr76.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 + x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot x\right)}{2} \]

    if 6.79999999999999992e192 < eps < 8.6000000000000004e252

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]
    2. Simplified79.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}, e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon + -1\right)}, {\left(e^{1 + \varepsilon}\right)}^{\left(-x\right)} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{-1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)}{2}} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 77.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot \left(1 - \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot {\left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}^{2}\right) + 0.5 \cdot \left({\left(1 + \varepsilon\right)}^{2} \cdot \left(1 - \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)\right) + \left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)\right)\right)}}{2} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 77.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 + x \cdot \color{blue}{\left({\varepsilon}^{2} \cdot x\right)}}{2} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 76.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{{\varepsilon}^{2} \cdot {x}^{2}}}{2} \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative76.5%

        \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{{x}^{2} \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}}}{2} \]
      2. unpow276.5%

        \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot x\right)} \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}}{2} \]
      3. unpow276.5%

        \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \left(x \cdot x\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon \cdot \varepsilon\right)}}{2} \]
      4. swap-sqr94.5%

        \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \varepsilon\right) \cdot \left(x \cdot \varepsilon\right)}}{2} \]
      5. unpow294.5%

        \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{{\left(x \cdot \varepsilon\right)}^{2}}}{2} \]
    8. Simplified94.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{{\left(x \cdot \varepsilon\right)}^{2}}}{2} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification78.7%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\varepsilon \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2}{e^{x}}}{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\varepsilon \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+192} \lor \neg \left(\varepsilon \leq 8.6 \cdot 10^{+252}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot \varepsilon\right)\right)}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2 + {\left(x \cdot \varepsilon\right)}^{2}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 88.7% accurate, 2.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} eps_m = \left|\varepsilon\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;eps\_m \leq 1.3:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2}{e^{x}}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(eps\_m \cdot eps\_m\right)\right)}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
eps_m = (fabs.f64 eps)
(FPCore (x eps_m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= eps_m 1.3)
   (/ (/ 2.0 (exp x)) 2.0)
   (/ (+ 2.0 (* x (* x (* eps_m eps_m)))) 2.0)))
eps_m = fabs(eps);
double code(double x, double eps_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (eps_m <= 1.3) {
		tmp = (2.0 / exp(x)) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 + (x * (x * (eps_m * eps_m)))) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
eps_m = abs(eps)
real(8) function code(x, eps_m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps_m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (eps_m <= 1.3d0) then
        tmp = (2.0d0 / exp(x)) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (2.0d0 + (x * (x * (eps_m * eps_m)))) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
eps_m = Math.abs(eps);
public static double code(double x, double eps_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (eps_m <= 1.3) {
		tmp = (2.0 / Math.exp(x)) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 + (x * (x * (eps_m * eps_m)))) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
eps_m = math.fabs(eps)
def code(x, eps_m):
	tmp = 0
	if eps_m <= 1.3:
		tmp = (2.0 / math.exp(x)) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = (2.0 + (x * (x * (eps_m * eps_m)))) / 2.0
	return tmp
eps_m = abs(eps)
function code(x, eps_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (eps_m <= 1.3)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / exp(x)) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(x * Float64(x * Float64(eps_m * eps_m)))) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end
eps_m = abs(eps);
function tmp_2 = code(x, eps_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (eps_m <= 1.3)
		tmp = (2.0 / exp(x)) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (2.0 + (x * (x * (eps_m * eps_m)))) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
eps_m = N[Abs[eps], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, eps$95$m_] := If[LessEqual[eps$95$m, 1.3], N[(N[(2.0 / N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 + N[(x * N[(x * N[(eps$95$m * eps$95$m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
eps_m = \left|\varepsilon\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;eps\_m \leq 1.3:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2}{e^{x}}}{2}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{2 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(eps\_m \cdot eps\_m\right)\right)}{2}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if eps < 1.30000000000000004

    1. Initial program 61.4%

      \[\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]
    2. Simplified52.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}, e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon + -1\right)}, {\left(e^{1 + \varepsilon}\right)}^{\left(-x\right)} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{-1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)}{2}} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(1 + \varepsilon\right)\right)} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}}{2} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in eps around 0 77.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot e^{-1 \cdot x}}}{2} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. neg-mul-177.8%

        \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot e^{\color{blue}{-x}}}{2} \]
      2. exp-neg77.8%

        \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{x}}}}{2} \]
      3. associate-*r/77.8%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{e^{x}}}}{2} \]
      4. metadata-eval77.8%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{e^{x}}}{2} \]
    7. Simplified77.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{e^{x}}}}{2} \]

    if 1.30000000000000004 < eps

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]
    2. Simplified79.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}, e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon + -1\right)}, {\left(e^{1 + \varepsilon}\right)}^{\left(-x\right)} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{-1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)}{2}} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 76.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot \left(1 - \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot {\left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}^{2}\right) + 0.5 \cdot \left({\left(1 + \varepsilon\right)}^{2} \cdot \left(1 - \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)\right) + \left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)\right)\right)}}{2} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 76.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 + x \cdot \color{blue}{\left({\varepsilon}^{2} \cdot x\right)}}{2} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. unpow276.7%

        \[\leadsto \frac{2 + x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot x\right)}{2} \]
    7. Applied egg-rr76.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 + x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot x\right)}{2} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification77.5%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\varepsilon \leq 1.3:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2}{e^{x}}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot \varepsilon\right)\right)}{2}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 50.6% accurate, 16.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} eps_m = \left|\varepsilon\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 210:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x \cdot \left(-1 + eps\_m\right) + 2}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
eps_m = (fabs.f64 eps)
(FPCore (x eps_m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x 210.0) 1.0 (/ (+ (* x (+ -1.0 eps_m)) 2.0) 2.0)))
eps_m = fabs(eps);
double code(double x, double eps_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 210.0) {
		tmp = 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * (-1.0 + eps_m)) + 2.0) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
eps_m = abs(eps)
real(8) function code(x, eps_m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps_m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= 210.0d0) then
        tmp = 1.0d0
    else
        tmp = ((x * ((-1.0d0) + eps_m)) + 2.0d0) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
eps_m = Math.abs(eps);
public static double code(double x, double eps_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 210.0) {
		tmp = 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * (-1.0 + eps_m)) + 2.0) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
eps_m = math.fabs(eps)
def code(x, eps_m):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= 210.0:
		tmp = 1.0
	else:
		tmp = ((x * (-1.0 + eps_m)) + 2.0) / 2.0
	return tmp
eps_m = abs(eps)
function code(x, eps_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= 210.0)
		tmp = 1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * Float64(-1.0 + eps_m)) + 2.0) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end
eps_m = abs(eps);
function tmp_2 = code(x, eps_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= 210.0)
		tmp = 1.0;
	else
		tmp = ((x * (-1.0 + eps_m)) + 2.0) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
eps_m = N[Abs[eps], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, eps$95$m_] := If[LessEqual[x, 210.0], 1.0, N[(N[(N[(x * N[(-1.0 + eps$95$m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
eps_m = \left|\varepsilon\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq 210:\\
\;\;\;\;1\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{x \cdot \left(-1 + eps\_m\right) + 2}{2}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if x < 210

    1. Initial program 62.4%

      \[\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]
    2. Simplified62.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} + -1\right) \cdot e^{\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)}}{2}} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 60.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{2} \]

    if 210 < x

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]
    2. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}, e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon + -1\right)}, {\left(e^{1 + \varepsilon}\right)}^{\left(-x\right)} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{-1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)}{2}} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(1 + \varepsilon\right)\right)} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}}{2} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 62.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon \cdot x\right)}} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}{2} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative62.5%

        \[\leadsto \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}{2} \]
    7. Simplified62.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}{2} \]
    8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 25.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}{2} \]
    9. Taylor expanded in x around 0 13.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}{2} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification48.6%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 210:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x \cdot \left(-1 + \varepsilon\right) + 2}{2}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 75.6% accurate, 20.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} eps_m = \left|\varepsilon\right| \\ \frac{2 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(eps\_m \cdot eps\_m\right)\right)}{2} \end{array} \]
eps_m = (fabs.f64 eps)
(FPCore (x eps_m)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (+ 2.0 (* x (* x (* eps_m eps_m)))) 2.0))
eps_m = fabs(eps);
double code(double x, double eps_m) {
	return (2.0 + (x * (x * (eps_m * eps_m)))) / 2.0;
}
eps_m = abs(eps)
real(8) function code(x, eps_m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps_m
    code = (2.0d0 + (x * (x * (eps_m * eps_m)))) / 2.0d0
end function
eps_m = Math.abs(eps);
public static double code(double x, double eps_m) {
	return (2.0 + (x * (x * (eps_m * eps_m)))) / 2.0;
}
eps_m = math.fabs(eps)
def code(x, eps_m):
	return (2.0 + (x * (x * (eps_m * eps_m)))) / 2.0
eps_m = abs(eps)
function code(x, eps_m)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(x * Float64(x * Float64(eps_m * eps_m)))) / 2.0)
end
eps_m = abs(eps);
function tmp = code(x, eps_m)
	tmp = (2.0 + (x * (x * (eps_m * eps_m)))) / 2.0;
end
eps_m = N[Abs[eps], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, eps$95$m_] := N[(N[(2.0 + N[(x * N[(x * N[(eps$95$m * eps$95$m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}
eps_m = \left|\varepsilon\right|

\\
\frac{2 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(eps\_m \cdot eps\_m\right)\right)}{2}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 72.0%

    \[\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]
  2. Simplified60.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}, e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon + -1\right)}, {\left(e^{1 + \varepsilon}\right)}^{\left(-x\right)} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{-1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)}{2}} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 77.5%

    \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot \left(1 - \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot {\left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}^{2}\right) + 0.5 \cdot \left({\left(1 + \varepsilon\right)}^{2} \cdot \left(1 - \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)\right) + \left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)\right)\right)}}{2} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 77.9%

    \[\leadsto \frac{2 + x \cdot \color{blue}{\left({\varepsilon}^{2} \cdot x\right)}}{2} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. unpow277.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 + x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot x\right)}{2} \]
  7. Applied egg-rr77.9%

    \[\leadsto \frac{2 + x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot x\right)}{2} \]
  8. Final simplification77.9%

    \[\leadsto \frac{2 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot \varepsilon\right)\right)}{2} \]
  9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 57.0% accurate, 25.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} eps_m = \left|\varepsilon\right| \\ \frac{2 + x \cdot \left(x - 2\right)}{2} \end{array} \]
eps_m = (fabs.f64 eps)
(FPCore (x eps_m) :precision binary64 (/ (+ 2.0 (* x (- x 2.0))) 2.0))
eps_m = fabs(eps);
double code(double x, double eps_m) {
	return (2.0 + (x * (x - 2.0))) / 2.0;
}
eps_m = abs(eps)
real(8) function code(x, eps_m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps_m
    code = (2.0d0 + (x * (x - 2.0d0))) / 2.0d0
end function
eps_m = Math.abs(eps);
public static double code(double x, double eps_m) {
	return (2.0 + (x * (x - 2.0))) / 2.0;
}
eps_m = math.fabs(eps)
def code(x, eps_m):
	return (2.0 + (x * (x - 2.0))) / 2.0
eps_m = abs(eps)
function code(x, eps_m)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(x * Float64(x - 2.0))) / 2.0)
end
eps_m = abs(eps);
function tmp = code(x, eps_m)
	tmp = (2.0 + (x * (x - 2.0))) / 2.0;
end
eps_m = N[Abs[eps], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, eps$95$m_] := N[(N[(2.0 + N[(x * N[(x - 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}
eps_m = \left|\varepsilon\right|

\\
\frac{2 + x \cdot \left(x - 2\right)}{2}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 72.0%

    \[\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]
  2. Simplified60.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}, e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon + -1\right)}, {\left(e^{1 + \varepsilon}\right)}^{\left(-x\right)} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{-1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)}{2}} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 99.0%

    \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(1 + \varepsilon\right)\right)} + e^{x \cdot \left(\varepsilon - 1\right)}}}{2} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in eps around 0 71.2%

    \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot e^{-1 \cdot x}}}{2} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-171.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot e^{\color{blue}{-x}}}{2} \]
    2. exp-neg71.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{x}}}}{2} \]
    3. associate-*r/71.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{e^{x}}}}{2} \]
    4. metadata-eval71.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{e^{x}}}{2} \]
  7. Simplified71.2%

    \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{e^{x}}}}{2} \]
  8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 60.6%

    \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot \left(x - 2\right)}}{2} \]
  9. Final simplification60.6%

    \[\leadsto \frac{2 + x \cdot \left(x - 2\right)}{2} \]
  10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 43.4% accurate, 227.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} eps_m = \left|\varepsilon\right| \\ 1 \end{array} \]
eps_m = (fabs.f64 eps)
(FPCore (x eps_m) :precision binary64 1.0)
eps_m = fabs(eps);
double code(double x, double eps_m) {
	return 1.0;
}
eps_m = abs(eps)
real(8) function code(x, eps_m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps_m
    code = 1.0d0
end function
eps_m = Math.abs(eps);
public static double code(double x, double eps_m) {
	return 1.0;
}
eps_m = math.fabs(eps)
def code(x, eps_m):
	return 1.0
eps_m = abs(eps)
function code(x, eps_m)
	return 1.0
end
eps_m = abs(eps);
function tmp = code(x, eps_m)
	tmp = 1.0;
end
eps_m = N[Abs[eps], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, eps$95$m_] := 1.0
\begin{array}{l}
eps_m = \left|\varepsilon\right|

\\
1
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 72.0%

    \[\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]
  2. Simplified72.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} + -1\right) \cdot e^{\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)}}{2}} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 45.8%

    \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{2} \]
  5. Final simplification45.8%

    \[\leadsto 1 \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024060 
(FPCore (x eps)
  :name "NMSE Section 6.1 mentioned, A"
  :precision binary64
  (/ (- (* (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 eps)) (exp (- (* (- 1.0 eps) x)))) (* (- (/ 1.0 eps) 1.0) (exp (- (* (+ 1.0 eps) x))))) 2.0))