VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (6)

Percentage Accurate: 75.9% → 81.2%

Time: 36.0s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.0×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. F = 3.0304880938819216e+165
  2. l = -392600080829652.5

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (F l)
 :precision binary64
 (- (* PI l) (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan (* PI l)))))

C

double code(double F, double l) {
	return (((double) M_PI) * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((((double) M_PI) * l)));
}

Java

public static double code(double F, double l) {
	return (Math.PI * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * Math.tan((Math.PI * l)));
}

Python

def code(F, l):
	return (math.pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * math.tan((math.pi * l)))

Julia

function code(F, l)
	return Float64(Float64(pi * l) - Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(F * F)) * tan(Float64(pi * l))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(F, l)
	tmp = (pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((pi * l)));
end

Wolfram

code[F_, l_] := N[(N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(1.0 / N[(F * F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Tan[N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 75.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (F l)
 :precision binary64
 (- (* PI l) (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan (* PI l)))))

C

double code(double F, double l) {
	return (((double) M_PI) * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((((double) M_PI) * l)));
}

Java

public static double code(double F, double l) {
	return (Math.PI * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * Math.tan((Math.PI * l)));
}

Python

def code(F, l):
	return (math.pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * math.tan((math.pi * l)))

Julia

function code(F, l)
	return Float64(Float64(pi * l) - Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(F * F)) * tan(Float64(pi * l))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(F, l)
	tmp = (pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((pi * l)));
end

Wolfram

code[F_, l_] := N[(N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(1.0 / N[(F * F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Tan[N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 81.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot l\_m \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-9}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m - \frac{\pi}{F \cdot \frac{F}{l\_m}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot l\_m\right)}{F \cdot F}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (<= (* PI l_m) 5e-9)
    (- (* PI l_m) (/ PI (* F (/ F l_m))))
    (- (* PI l_m) (/ (tan (* PI l_m)) (* F F))))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((double) M_PI) * l_m) <= 5e-9) {
		tmp = (((double) M_PI) * l_m) - (((double) M_PI) / (F * (F / l_m)));
	} else {
		tmp = (((double) M_PI) * l_m) - (tan((((double) M_PI) * l_m)) / (F * F));
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.PI * l_m) <= 5e-9) {
		tmp = (Math.PI * l_m) - (Math.PI / (F * (F / l_m)));
	} else {
		tmp = (Math.PI * l_m) - (Math.tan((Math.PI * l_m)) / (F * F));
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.pi * l_m) <= 5e-9:
		tmp = (math.pi * l_m) - (math.pi / (F * (F / l_m)))
	else:
		tmp = (math.pi * l_m) - (math.tan((math.pi * l_m)) / (F * F))
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(pi * l_m) <= 5e-9)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(pi / Float64(F * Float64(F / l_m))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(tan(Float64(pi * l_m)) / Float64(F * F)));
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((pi * l_m) <= 5e-9)
		tmp = (pi * l_m) - (pi / (F * (F / l_m)));
	else
		tmp = (pi * l_m) - (tan((pi * l_m)) / (F * F));
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision], 5e-9], N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(Pi / N[(F * N[(F / l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Tan[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / N[(F * F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (PI.f64) l) < 5.0000000000000001e-9

   1. Initial program 78.0%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 78.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 78.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      3. associate-*r/ 78.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      4. sqr-neg 78.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      5. *-rgt-identity 78.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 78.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in l around 0 75.5%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 75.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell}}{F \cdot F} \]

      2. times-frac 84.1%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 84.1%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\ell}{F} \cdot \frac{\pi}{F}} \]

      2. clear-num 84.1%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{F}{\ell}}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{F} \]

      3. frac-times 84.1%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \pi}{\frac{F}{\ell} \cdot F}} \]

      4. *-un-lft-identity 84.1%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\pi}}{\frac{F}{\ell} \cdot F} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{\frac{F}{\ell} \cdot F}} \]

   if 5.0000000000000001e-9 < (*.f64 (PI.f64) l)

   1. Initial program 65.9%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 65.9%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 65.9%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      3. associate-*r/ 65.9%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      4. sqr-neg 65.9%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      5. *-rgt-identity 65.9%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 65.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot \ell \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-9}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\pi}{F \cdot \frac{F}{\ell}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 81.2% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \left(\pi \cdot l\_m + \frac{-1}{\frac{F}{\frac{\tan \left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\pi \cdot l\_m\right)\right)\right)}{F}}}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (* l_s (+ (* PI l_m) (/ -1.0 (/ F (/ (tan (expm1 (log1p (* PI l_m)))) F))))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	return l_s * ((((double) M_PI) * l_m) + (-1.0 / (F / (tan(expm1(log1p((((double) M_PI) * l_m)))) / F))));
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	return l_s * ((Math.PI * l_m) + (-1.0 / (F / (Math.tan(Math.expm1(Math.log1p((Math.PI * l_m)))) / F))));
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	return l_s * ((math.pi * l_m) + (-1.0 / (F / (math.tan(math.expm1(math.log1p((math.pi * l_m)))) / F))))

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	return Float64(l_s * Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) + Float64(-1.0 / Float64(F / Float64(tan(expm1(log1p(Float64(pi * l_m)))) / F)))))
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-1.0 / N[(F / N[(N[Tan[N[(Exp[N[Log[1 + N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]] - 1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 75.1%

   \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l/ 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

   2. *-un-lft-identity 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. associate-/r* 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

   4. clear-num 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{F}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}}} \]

4. Applied egg-rr 81.9%

   \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{F}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}}} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. expm1-log1p-u 70.8%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{\frac{F}{\frac{\tan \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)\right)\right)}}{F}}} \]

6. Applied egg-rr 70.8%

   \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{\frac{F}{\frac{\tan \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)\right)\right)}}{F}}} \]

7. Final simplification 70.8%

   \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell + \frac{-1}{\frac{F}{\frac{\tan \left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)\right)\right)}{F}}} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 81.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \left(\pi \cdot l\_m + \frac{-1}{\frac{F}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot l\_m\right)}{F}}}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (* l_s (+ (* PI l_m) (/ -1.0 (/ F (/ (tan (* PI l_m)) F))))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	return l_s * ((((double) M_PI) * l_m) + (-1.0 / (F / (tan((((double) M_PI) * l_m)) / F))));
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	return l_s * ((Math.PI * l_m) + (-1.0 / (F / (Math.tan((Math.PI * l_m)) / F))));
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	return l_s * ((math.pi * l_m) + (-1.0 / (F / (math.tan((math.pi * l_m)) / F))))

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	return Float64(l_s * Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) + Float64(-1.0 / Float64(F / Float64(tan(Float64(pi * l_m)) / F)))))
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = l_s * ((pi * l_m) + (-1.0 / (F / (tan((pi * l_m)) / F))));
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-1.0 / N[(F / N[(N[Tan[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 75.1%

   \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l/ 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

   2. *-un-lft-identity 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. associate-/r* 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

   4. clear-num 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{F}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}}} \]

4. Applied egg-rr 81.9%

   \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{F}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}}} \]

5. Final simplification 81.9%

   \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell + \frac{-1}{\frac{F}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 81.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \left(\pi \cdot l\_m - \frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot l\_m\right)}{F}}{F}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (* l_s (- (* PI l_m) (/ (/ (tan (* PI l_m)) F) F))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	return l_s * ((((double) M_PI) * l_m) - ((tan((((double) M_PI) * l_m)) / F) / F));
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	return l_s * ((Math.PI * l_m) - ((Math.tan((Math.PI * l_m)) / F) / F));
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	return l_s * ((math.pi * l_m) - ((math.tan((math.pi * l_m)) / F) / F))

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	return Float64(l_s * Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(Float64(tan(Float64(pi * l_m)) / F) / F)))
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = l_s * ((pi * l_m) - ((tan((pi * l_m)) / F) / F));
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[Tan[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 75.1%

   \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l/ 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

   2. *-un-lft-identity 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. associate-/r* 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

4. Applied egg-rr 81.9%

   \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

5. Final simplification 81.9%

   \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 74.3% accurate, 10.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \left(\pi \cdot l\_m - \frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{l\_m}{F}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (* l_s (- (* PI l_m) (* (/ PI F) (/ l_m F)))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	return l_s * ((((double) M_PI) * l_m) - ((((double) M_PI) / F) * (l_m / F)));
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	return l_s * ((Math.PI * l_m) - ((Math.PI / F) * (l_m / F)));
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	return l_s * ((math.pi * l_m) - ((math.pi / F) * (l_m / F)))

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	return Float64(l_s * Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(Float64(pi / F) * Float64(l_m / F))))
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = l_s * ((pi * l_m) - ((pi / F) * (l_m / F)));
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(Pi / F), $MachinePrecision] * N[(l$95$m / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 75.1%

   \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \]

   2. sqr-neg 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

   3. associate-*r/ 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

   4. sqr-neg 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

   5. *-rgt-identity 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

3. Simplified 75.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in l around 0 69.3%

   \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 69.3%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell}}{F \cdot F} \]

   2. times-frac 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}} \]

7. Applied egg-rr 75.9%

   \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}} \]

8. Final simplification 75.9%

   \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{\ell}{F} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 74.3% accurate, 10.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \left(\pi \cdot l\_m - \frac{\pi}{F \cdot \frac{F}{l\_m}}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (* l_s (- (* PI l_m) (/ PI (* F (/ F l_m))))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	return l_s * ((((double) M_PI) * l_m) - (((double) M_PI) / (F * (F / l_m))));
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	return l_s * ((Math.PI * l_m) - (Math.PI / (F * (F / l_m))));
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	return l_s * ((math.pi * l_m) - (math.pi / (F * (F / l_m))))

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	return Float64(l_s * Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(pi / Float64(F * Float64(F / l_m)))))
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = l_s * ((pi * l_m) - (pi / (F * (F / l_m))));
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(Pi / N[(F * N[(F / l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 75.1%

   \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \]

   2. sqr-neg 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

   3. associate-*r/ 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

   4. sqr-neg 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

   5. *-rgt-identity 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

3. Simplified 75.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in l around 0 69.3%

   \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 69.3%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell}}{F \cdot F} \]

   2. times-frac 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}} \]

7. Applied egg-rr 75.9%

   \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}} \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\ell}{F} \cdot \frac{\pi}{F}} \]

   2. clear-num 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{F}{\ell}}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{F} \]

   3. frac-times 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \pi}{\frac{F}{\ell} \cdot F}} \]

   4. *-un-lft-identity 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\pi}}{\frac{F}{\ell} \cdot F} \]

9. Applied egg-rr 75.9%

   \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{\frac{F}{\ell} \cdot F}} \]

10. Final simplification 75.9%

    \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\pi}{F \cdot \frac{F}{\ell}} \]
11. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024059 
(FPCore (F l)
  :name "VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (6)"
  :precision binary64
  (- (* PI l) (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan (* PI l)))))