Logistic function from Lakshay Garg

Percentage Accurate: 54.7% → 97.7%

Time: 6.2s

Alternatives: 4

Speedup: 18.1×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) - 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 54.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) - 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.7% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+20}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + {x}^{3} \cdot -0.3333333333333333\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* -2.0 x) -1e+20)
   (+ (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) -1.0)
   (if (<= (* -2.0 x) 1e-5) (+ x (* (pow x 3.0) -0.3333333333333333)) -1.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -1e+20) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else if ((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-5) {
		tmp = x + (pow(x, 3.0) * -0.3333333333333333);
	} else {
		tmp = -1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((-2.0d0) * x) <= (-1d+20)) then
        tmp = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) + (-1.0d0)
    else if (((-2.0d0) * x) <= 1d-5) then
        tmp = x + ((x ** 3.0d0) * (-0.3333333333333333d0))
    else
        tmp = -1.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -1e+20) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else if ((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-5) {
		tmp = x + (Math.pow(x, 3.0) * -0.3333333333333333);
	} else {
		tmp = -1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if (-2.0 * x) <= -1e+20:
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0
	elif (-2.0 * x) <= 1e-5:
		tmp = x + (math.pow(x, 3.0) * -0.3333333333333333)
	else:
		tmp = -1.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= -1e+20)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0);
	elseif (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= 1e-5)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64((x ^ 3.0) * -0.3333333333333333));
	else
		tmp = -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -1e+20)
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	elseif ((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-5)
		tmp = x + ((x ^ 3.0) * -0.3333333333333333);
	else
		tmp = -1.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], -1e+20], N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], 1e-5], N[(x + N[(N[Power[x, 3.0], $MachinePrecision] * -0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], -1.0]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x) < -1e20

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if -1e20 < (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x) < 1.00000000000000008e-5

   1. Initial program 6.1%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 6.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(2 + -1.3333333333333333 \cdot x\right) - 2\right)}} - 1 \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{2}\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 1 + x \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{2}\right)} \]

      2. *-rgt-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + x \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{2}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + x \cdot \color{blue}{\left({x}^{2} \cdot -0.3333333333333333\right)} \]

      4. associate-*r* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot {x}^{2}\right) \cdot -0.3333333333333333} \]

      5. unpow2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot x\right)}\right) \cdot -0.3333333333333333 \]

      6. cube-mult 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{{x}^{3}} \cdot -0.3333333333333333 \]

   6. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + {x}^{3} \cdot -0.3333333333333333} \]

   if 1.00000000000000008e-5 < (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + -2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   5. Simplified 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+20}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + {x}^{3} \cdot -0.3333333333333333\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 78.1% accurate, 7.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -0.66:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{1}{x + 2}}{\frac{0.5}{x}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -0.66) -1.0 (/ (/ 1.0 (+ x 2.0)) (/ 0.5 x))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -0.66) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 / (x + 2.0)) / (0.5 / x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-0.66d0)) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = (1.0d0 / (x + 2.0d0)) / (0.5d0 / x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -0.66) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 / (x + 2.0)) / (0.5 / x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -0.66:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = (1.0 / (x + 2.0)) / (0.5 / x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -0.66)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(x + 2.0)) / Float64(0.5 / x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -0.66)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = (1.0 / (x + 2.0)) / (0.5 / x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -0.66], -1.0, N[(N[(1.0 / N[(x + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(0.5 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -0.660000000000000031

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + -2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   5. Simplified 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if -0.660000000000000031 < x

   1. Initial program 36.5%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 5.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + x\right)} - 1 \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 5.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right)} - 1 \]

   5. Simplified 5.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right)} - 1 \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. flip-- 5.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - 1 \cdot 1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1}} \]

      2. div-inv 5.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - 1 \cdot 1\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1}} \]

      3. metadata-eval 5.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - \color{blue}{1}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      4. difference-of-sqr-1 5.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + 1\right) + 1\right) \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      5. associate-+l+ 5.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(1 + 1\right)\right)} \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      6. metadata-eval 5.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + \color{blue}{2}\right) \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      7. associate--l+ 69.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(1 - 1\right)\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      8. metadata-eval 69.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{0}\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      9. +-rgt-identity 69.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      10. associate-+l+ 69.2%

          \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{x + \left(1 + 1\right)}} \]

      11. metadata-eval 69.2%

          \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x\right) \cdot \frac{1}{x + \color{blue}{2}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 69.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x\right) \cdot \frac{1}{x + 2}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. div-inv 69.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}{x + 2}} \]

      2. clear-num 69.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{x + 2}{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}}} \]

      3. div-inv 69.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}}} \]

      4. associate-/r* 69.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{x + 2}}{\frac{1}{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}}} \]

      5. *-commutative 69.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1}{x + 2}}{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(x + 2\right)}}} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 69.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{x + 2}}{\frac{1}{x \cdot \left(x + 2\right)}}} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in x around 0 73.4%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1}{x + 2}}{\color{blue}{\frac{0.5}{x}}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -0.66:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{1}{x + 2}}{\frac{0.5}{x}}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 75.3% accurate, 18.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (if (<= x -1.0) -1.0 x))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.0) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.0) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.0:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.0)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.0)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.0], -1.0, x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + -2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   5. Simplified 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if -1 < x

   1. Initial program 36.5%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 69.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 27.3% accurate, 109.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 -1.0)

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = -1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return -1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return -1.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return -1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := -1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 52.3%

   \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 27.8%

   \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + -2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 27.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

5. Simplified 27.8%

   \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 27.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

7. Final simplification 27.4%

   \[\leadsto -1 \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024059 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Logistic function from Lakshay Garg"
  :precision binary64
  (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))