Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step

Percentage Accurate: 78.3% → 98.6%

Time: 10.5s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 313.0×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. wj = -1.563604157325326e+179
  2. x = -5.2672243310769966e+194

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))

C

double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}

Python

def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))

Julia

function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end

Wolfram

code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Initial Program: 78.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))

C

double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}

Python

def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))

Julia

function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end

Wolfram

code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Alternative 1: 98.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ \mathbf{if}\;wj + \frac{x - t\_0}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-16}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - wj \cdot \left(x \cdot 2 + wj \cdot \left(wj + -1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj + \frac{wj - x \cdot e^{-wj}}{-1 - wj}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj))))
   (if (<= (+ wj (/ (- x t_0) (+ (exp wj) t_0))) 2e-16)
     (- x (* wj (+ (* x 2.0) (* wj (+ wj -1.0)))))
     (+ wj (/ (- wj (* x (exp (- wj)))) (- -1.0 wj))))))

C

double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	double tmp;
	if ((wj + ((x - t_0) / (exp(wj) + t_0))) <= 2e-16) {
		tmp = x - (wj * ((x * 2.0) + (wj * (wj + -1.0))));
	} else {
		tmp = wj + ((wj - (x * exp(-wj))) / (-1.0 - wj));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    if ((wj + ((x - t_0) / (exp(wj) + t_0))) <= 2d-16) then
        tmp = x - (wj * ((x * 2.0d0) + (wj * (wj + (-1.0d0)))))
    else
        tmp = wj + ((wj - (x * exp(-wj))) / ((-1.0d0) - wj))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	double tmp;
	if ((wj + ((x - t_0) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0))) <= 2e-16) {
		tmp = x - (wj * ((x * 2.0) + (wj * (wj + -1.0))));
	} else {
		tmp = wj + ((wj - (x * Math.exp(-wj))) / (-1.0 - wj));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	tmp = 0
	if (wj + ((x - t_0) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))) <= 2e-16:
		tmp = x - (wj * ((x * 2.0) + (wj * (wj + -1.0))))
	else:
		tmp = wj + ((wj - (x * math.exp(-wj))) / (-1.0 - wj))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(wj + Float64(Float64(x - t_0) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0))) <= 2e-16)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(wj * Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) + Float64(wj * Float64(wj + -1.0)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(wj + Float64(Float64(wj - Float64(x * exp(Float64(-wj)))) / Float64(-1.0 - wj)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((wj + ((x - t_0) / (exp(wj) + t_0))) <= 2e-16)
		tmp = x - (wj * ((x * 2.0) + (wj * (wj + -1.0))));
	else
		tmp = wj + ((wj - (x * exp(-wj))) / (-1.0 - wj));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(wj + N[(N[(x - t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 2e-16], N[(x - N[(wj * N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(wj * N[(wj + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(wj + N[(N[(wj - N[(x * N[Exp[(-wj)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(-1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj))))) < 2e-16

   1. Initial program 65.5%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt1-in 65.5%

         \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

      2. associate-/l/ 65.4%

         \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]

      3. div-sub 65.4%

         \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}}{wj + 1} \]

      4. associate-/l* 65.4%

         \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj \cdot \frac{e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

      5. *-inverses 65.4%

         \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

      6. *-rgt-identity 65.4%

         \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

   3. Simplified 65.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj - \frac{wj - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in wj around 0 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right) + 0.6666666666666666 \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.4%

      \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(\color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot wj\right)} - 2 \cdot x\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-wj\right)}\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - wj\right)} - 2 \cdot x\right) \]

   8. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(\color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(1 - wj\right)} - 2 \cdot x\right) \]

   if 2e-16 < (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)))))

   1. Initial program 96.3%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt1-in 98.7%

         \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

      2. associate-/l/ 98.7%

         \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]

      3. div-sub 96.3%

         \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}}{wj + 1} \]

      4. associate-/l* 96.3%

         \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj \cdot \frac{e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

      5. *-inverses 99.9%

         \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

      6. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj - \frac{wj - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 99.7%

         \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{e^{wj}}{x}}}}{wj + 1} \]

      2. associate-/r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{wj}} \cdot x}}{wj + 1} \]

      3. rec-exp 99.9%

         \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj - \color{blue}{e^{-wj}} \cdot x}{wj + 1} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj - \color{blue}{e^{-wj} \cdot x}}{wj + 1} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj + \frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-16}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - wj \cdot \left(x \cdot 2 + wj \cdot \left(wj + -1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj + \frac{wj - x \cdot e^{-wj}}{-1 - wj}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.3% accurate, 7.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := x \cdot -4 + x \cdot 1.5\\ x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + wj \cdot \left(-1 - \left(x \cdot -3 + \left(-2 \cdot t\_0 + x \cdot 0.6666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\right) - t\_0\right) - x \cdot 2\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (* x -4.0) (* x 1.5))))
   (+
    x
    (*
     wj
     (-
      (*
       wj
       (-
        (+
         1.0
         (*
          wj
          (- -1.0 (+ (* x -3.0) (+ (* -2.0 t_0) (* x 0.6666666666666666))))))
        t_0))
      (* x 2.0))))))

C

double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = (x * -4.0) + (x * 1.5);
	return x + (wj * ((wj * ((1.0 + (wj * (-1.0 - ((x * -3.0) + ((-2.0 * t_0) + (x * 0.6666666666666666)))))) - t_0)) - (x * 2.0)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (x * (-4.0d0)) + (x * 1.5d0)
    code = x + (wj * ((wj * ((1.0d0 + (wj * ((-1.0d0) - ((x * (-3.0d0)) + (((-2.0d0) * t_0) + (x * 0.6666666666666666d0)))))) - t_0)) - (x * 2.0d0)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = (x * -4.0) + (x * 1.5);
	return x + (wj * ((wj * ((1.0 + (wj * (-1.0 - ((x * -3.0) + ((-2.0 * t_0) + (x * 0.6666666666666666)))))) - t_0)) - (x * 2.0)));
}

Python

def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = (x * -4.0) + (x * 1.5)
	return x + (wj * ((wj * ((1.0 + (wj * (-1.0 - ((x * -3.0) + ((-2.0 * t_0) + (x * 0.6666666666666666)))))) - t_0)) - (x * 2.0)))

Julia

function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(x * -4.0) + Float64(x * 1.5))
	return Float64(x + Float64(wj * Float64(Float64(wj * Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(wj * Float64(-1.0 - Float64(Float64(x * -3.0) + Float64(Float64(-2.0 * t_0) + Float64(x * 0.6666666666666666)))))) - t_0)) - Float64(x * 2.0))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = (x * -4.0) + (x * 1.5);
	tmp = x + (wj * ((wj * ((1.0 + (wj * (-1.0 - ((x * -3.0) + ((-2.0 * t_0) + (x * 0.6666666666666666)))))) - t_0)) - (x * 2.0)));
end

Wolfram

code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(x * -4.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 1.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(x + N[(wj * N[(N[(wj * N[(N[(1.0 + N[(wj * N[(-1.0 - N[(N[(x * -3.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(-2.0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 0.6666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Initial program 75.4%

   \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-rgt1-in 76.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

   2. associate-/l/ 76.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]

   3. div-sub 75.3%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}}{wj + 1} \]

   4. associate-/l* 75.3%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj \cdot \frac{e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

   5. *-inverses 76.5%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

   6. *-rgt-identity 76.5%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

3. Simplified 76.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj - \frac{wj - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in wj around 0 97.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right) + 0.6666666666666666 \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]

6. Final simplification 97.3%

   \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + wj \cdot \left(-1 - \left(x \cdot -3 + \left(-2 \cdot \left(x \cdot -4 + x \cdot 1.5\right) + x \cdot 0.6666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(x \cdot -4 + x \cdot 1.5\right)\right) - x \cdot 2\right) \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 95.9% accurate, 20.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - x \cdot -2.5\right) + x \cdot -2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* wj (+ (* wj (- 1.0 (* x -2.5))) (* x -2.0)))))

C

double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x + (wj * ((wj * (1.0 - (x * -2.5))) + (x * -2.0)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = x + (wj * ((wj * (1.0d0 - (x * (-2.5d0)))) + (x * (-2.0d0))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x + (wj * ((wj * (1.0 - (x * -2.5))) + (x * -2.0)));
}

Python

def code(wj, x):
	return x + (wj * ((wj * (1.0 - (x * -2.5))) + (x * -2.0)))

Julia

function code(wj, x)
	return Float64(x + Float64(wj * Float64(Float64(wj * Float64(1.0 - Float64(x * -2.5))) + Float64(x * -2.0))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(wj, x)
	tmp = x + (wj * ((wj * (1.0 - (x * -2.5))) + (x * -2.0)));
end

Wolfram

code[wj_, x_] := N[(x + N[(wj * N[(N[(wj * N[(1.0 - N[(x * -2.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 75.4%

   \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-rgt1-in 76.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

   2. associate-/l/ 76.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]

   3. div-sub 75.3%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}}{wj + 1} \]

   4. associate-/l* 75.3%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj \cdot \frac{e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

   5. *-inverses 76.5%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

   6. *-rgt-identity 76.5%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

3. Simplified 76.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj - \frac{wj - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in wj around 0 97.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. cancel-sign-sub-inv 97.2%

      \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right) + \left(-2\right) \cdot x\right)} \]

   2. distribute-rgt-out 97.2%

      \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-4 + 1.5\right)}\right) + \left(-2\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   3. metadata-eval 97.2%

      \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - x \cdot \color{blue}{-2.5}\right) + \left(-2\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 97.2%

      \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - x \cdot -2.5\right) + \color{blue}{-2} \cdot x\right) \]

   5. *-commutative 97.2%

      \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - x \cdot -2.5\right) + \color{blue}{x \cdot -2}\right) \]

7. Simplified 97.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - x \cdot -2.5\right) + x \cdot -2\right)} \]

8. Final simplification 97.2%

   \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - x \cdot -2.5\right) + x \cdot -2\right) \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 95.7% accurate, 34.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + wj \cdot \left(wj + x \cdot -2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (+ x (* wj (+ wj (* x -2.0)))))

C

double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x + (wj * (wj + (x * -2.0)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = x + (wj * (wj + (x * (-2.0d0))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x + (wj * (wj + (x * -2.0)));
}

Python

def code(wj, x):
	return x + (wj * (wj + (x * -2.0)))

Julia

function code(wj, x)
	return Float64(x + Float64(wj * Float64(wj + Float64(x * -2.0))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(wj, x)
	tmp = x + (wj * (wj + (x * -2.0)));
end

Wolfram

code[wj_, x_] := N[(x + N[(wj * N[(wj + N[(x * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 75.4%

   \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-rgt1-in 76.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

   2. associate-/l/ 76.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]

   3. div-sub 75.3%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}}{wj + 1} \]

   4. associate-/l* 75.3%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj \cdot \frac{e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

   5. *-inverses 76.5%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

   6. *-rgt-identity 76.5%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

3. Simplified 76.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj - \frac{wj - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in wj around 0 97.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. cancel-sign-sub-inv 97.2%

      \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right) + \left(-2\right) \cdot x\right)} \]

   2. distribute-rgt-out 97.2%

      \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-4 + 1.5\right)}\right) + \left(-2\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   3. metadata-eval 97.2%

      \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - x \cdot \color{blue}{-2.5}\right) + \left(-2\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 97.2%

      \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - x \cdot -2.5\right) + \color{blue}{-2} \cdot x\right) \]

   5. *-commutative 97.2%

      \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - x \cdot -2.5\right) + \color{blue}{x \cdot -2}\right) \]

7. Simplified 97.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - x \cdot -2.5\right) + x \cdot -2\right)} \]

8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.0%

   \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(\color{blue}{wj} + x \cdot -2\right) \]

9. Final simplification 97.0%

   \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(wj + x \cdot -2\right) \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 85.0% accurate, 44.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (+ x (* -2.0 (* wj x))))

C

double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x + (-2.0 * (wj * x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = x + ((-2.0d0) * (wj * x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x + (-2.0 * (wj * x));
}

Python

def code(wj, x):
	return x + (-2.0 * (wj * x))

Julia

function code(wj, x)
	return Float64(x + Float64(-2.0 * Float64(wj * x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(wj, x)
	tmp = x + (-2.0 * (wj * x));
end

Wolfram

code[wj_, x_] := N[(x + N[(-2.0 * N[(wj * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 75.4%

   \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-rgt1-in 76.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

   2. associate-/l/ 76.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]

   3. div-sub 75.3%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}}{wj + 1} \]

   4. associate-/l* 75.3%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj \cdot \frac{e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

   5. *-inverses 76.5%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

   6. *-rgt-identity 76.5%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

3. Simplified 76.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj - \frac{wj - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in wj around 0 83.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 83.8%

      \[\leadsto x + -2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot wj\right)} \]

7. Simplified 83.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -2 \cdot \left(x \cdot wj\right)} \]

8. Final simplification 83.8%

   \[\leadsto x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 85.1% accurate, 44.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{x}{1 + wj \cdot 2} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (/ x (+ 1.0 (* wj 2.0))))

C

double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x / (1.0 + (wj * 2.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = x / (1.0d0 + (wj * 2.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x / (1.0 + (wj * 2.0));
}

Python

def code(wj, x):
	return x / (1.0 + (wj * 2.0))

Julia

function code(wj, x)
	return Float64(x / Float64(1.0 + Float64(wj * 2.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(wj, x)
	tmp = x / (1.0 + (wj * 2.0));
end

Wolfram

code[wj_, x_] := N[(x / N[(1.0 + N[(wj * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 75.4%

   \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-rgt1-in 76.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

   2. associate-/l/ 76.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]

   3. div-sub 75.3%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}}{wj + 1} \]

   4. associate-/l* 75.3%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj \cdot \frac{e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

   5. *-inverses 76.5%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

   6. *-rgt-identity 76.5%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

3. Simplified 76.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj - \frac{wj - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 85.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{e^{wj} \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{e^{wj} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right)}} \]

7. Simplified 85.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{e^{wj} \cdot \left(wj + 1\right)}} \]

8. Taylor expanded in wj around 0 83.9%

   \[\leadsto \frac{x}{\color{blue}{1 + 2 \cdot wj}} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 83.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{1 + \color{blue}{wj \cdot 2}} \]

10. Simplified 83.9%

    \[\leadsto \frac{x}{\color{blue}{1 + wj \cdot 2}} \]

11. Final simplification 83.9%

    \[\leadsto \frac{x}{1 + wj \cdot 2} \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 4.4% accurate, 313.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 wj)

C

double code(double wj, double x) {
	return wj;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = wj
end function

Java

public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	return wj;
}

Python

def code(wj, x):
	return wj

Julia

function code(wj, x)
	return wj
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(wj, x)
	tmp = wj;
end

Wolfram

code[wj_, x_] := wj

Derivation

1. Initial program 75.4%

   \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-rgt1-in 76.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

   2. associate-/l/ 76.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]

   3. div-sub 75.3%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}}{wj + 1} \]

   4. associate-/l* 75.3%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj \cdot \frac{e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

   5. *-inverses 76.5%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

   6. *-rgt-identity 76.5%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

3. Simplified 76.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj - \frac{wj - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in wj around inf 4.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj} \]

6. Final simplification 4.0%

   \[\leadsto wj \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 84.5% accurate, 313.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(wj, x):
	return x

Julia

function code(wj, x)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(wj, x)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[wj_, x_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 75.4%

   \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-rgt1-in 76.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

   2. associate-/l/ 76.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]

   3. div-sub 75.3%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}}{wj + 1} \]

   4. associate-/l* 75.3%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj \cdot \frac{e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

   5. *-inverses 76.5%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

   6. *-rgt-identity 76.5%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]

3. Simplified 76.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj - \frac{wj - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in wj around 0 83.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

6. Final simplification 83.4%

   \[\leadsto x \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 79.2% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1.0)) (/ x (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj)))))))

C

double code(double wj, double x) {
	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0d0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (Math.exp(wj) + (wj * Math.exp(wj)))));
}

Python

def code(wj, x):
	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (math.exp(wj) + (wj * math.exp(wj)))))

Julia

function code(wj, x)
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(wj / Float64(wj + 1.0)) - Float64(x / Float64(exp(wj) + Float64(wj * exp(wj))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(wj, x)
	tmp = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
end

Wolfram

code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj - N[(N[(wj / N[(wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024059 
(FPCore (wj x)
  :name "Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1.0)) (/ x (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj))))))

  (- wj (/ (- (* wj (exp wj)) x) (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj))))))