Statistics.Distribution.Beta:$cdensity from math-functions-0.1.5.2

Percentage Accurate: 88.5% → 99.8%

Time: 21.1s

Alternatives: 16

Speedup: 1.9×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* (- x 1.0) (log y)) (* (- z 1.0) (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x - 1.0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x - 1.0d0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0d0) * log((1.0d0 - y)))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x - 1.0) * Math.log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * Math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x - 1.0) * math.log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x - 1.0) * log(y)) + Float64(Float64(z - 1.0) * log(Float64(1.0 - y)))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x - 1.0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 88.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* (- x 1.0) (log y)) (* (- z 1.0) (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x - 1.0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x - 1.0d0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0d0) * log((1.0d0 - y)))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x - 1.0) * Math.log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * Math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x - 1.0) * math.log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x - 1.0) * log(y)) + Float64(Float64(z - 1.0) * log(Float64(1.0 - y)))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x - 1.0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (fma (+ x -1.0) (log y) (* (log1p (- y)) (+ -1.0 z))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma((x + -1.0), log(y), (log1p(-y) * (-1.0 + z))) - t;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(fma(Float64(x + -1.0), log(y), Float64(log1p(Float64(-y)) * Float64(-1.0 + z))) - t)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(x + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Log[1 + (-y)], $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.4%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-define 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. sub-neg 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   3. metadata-eval 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   4. sub-neg 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   5. metadata-eval 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   6. sub-neg 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   7. log1p-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right) - t \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.7% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\left(-1 + z\right) \cdot -0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(-1 + z\right) \cdot -0.3333333333333333 + -0.25 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right)\right)\right) + \left(1 - z\right)\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (+
   (* (+ x -1.0) (log y))
   (*
    y
    (+
     (*
      y
      (+
       (* (+ -1.0 z) -0.5)
       (*
        y
        (+ (* (+ -1.0 z) -0.3333333333333333) (* -0.25 (* y (+ -1.0 z)))))))
     (- 1.0 z))))
  t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x + -1.0) * log(y)) + (y * ((y * (((-1.0 + z) * -0.5) + (y * (((-1.0 + z) * -0.3333333333333333) + (-0.25 * (y * (-1.0 + z))))))) + (1.0 - z)))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x + (-1.0d0)) * log(y)) + (y * ((y * ((((-1.0d0) + z) * (-0.5d0)) + (y * ((((-1.0d0) + z) * (-0.3333333333333333d0)) + ((-0.25d0) * (y * ((-1.0d0) + z))))))) + (1.0d0 - z)))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x + -1.0) * Math.log(y)) + (y * ((y * (((-1.0 + z) * -0.5) + (y * (((-1.0 + z) * -0.3333333333333333) + (-0.25 * (y * (-1.0 + z))))))) + (1.0 - z)))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x + -1.0) * math.log(y)) + (y * ((y * (((-1.0 + z) * -0.5) + (y * (((-1.0 + z) * -0.3333333333333333) + (-0.25 * (y * (-1.0 + z))))))) + (1.0 - z)))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + -1.0) * log(y)) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(-1.0 + z) * -0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(-1.0 + z) * -0.3333333333333333) + Float64(-0.25 * Float64(y * Float64(-1.0 + z))))))) + Float64(1.0 - z)))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x + -1.0) * log(y)) + (y * ((y * (((-1.0 + z) * -0.5) + (y * (((-1.0 + z) * -0.3333333333333333) + (-0.25 * (y * (-1.0 + z))))))) + (1.0 - z)))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(-1.0 + z), $MachinePrecision] * -0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(N[(-1.0 + z), $MachinePrecision] * -0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-0.25 * N[(y * N[(-1.0 + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.4%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + -0.25 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\left(-1 + z\right) \cdot -0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(-1 + z\right) \cdot -0.3333333333333333 + -0.25 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right)\right)\right) + \left(1 - z\right)\right)\right) - t \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.7% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-1 + z\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.25 - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (+
   (* (+ x -1.0) (log y))
   (*
    (+ -1.0 z)
    (* y (+ -1.0 (* y (- (* y (- (* y -0.25) 0.3333333333333333)) 0.5))))))
  t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x + -1.0) * log(y)) + ((-1.0 + z) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5)))))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x + (-1.0d0)) * log(y)) + (((-1.0d0) + z) * (y * ((-1.0d0) + (y * ((y * ((y * (-0.25d0)) - 0.3333333333333333d0)) - 0.5d0)))))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x + -1.0) * Math.log(y)) + ((-1.0 + z) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5)))))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x + -1.0) * math.log(y)) + ((-1.0 + z) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5)))))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + -1.0) * log(y)) + Float64(Float64(-1.0 + z) * Float64(y * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5)))))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x + -1.0) * log(y)) + ((-1.0 + z) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5)))))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(-1.0 + z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * N[(N[(y * N[(N[(y * -0.25), $MachinePrecision] - 0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.4%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot y - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-1 + z\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.25 - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right) - t \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 95.4% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + -1 \leq -200000 \lor \neg \left(x + -1 \leq -1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - \log y\right) - t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (+ x -1.0) -200000.0) (not (<= (+ x -1.0) -1.0)))
   (- (* (+ x -1.0) (log y)) t)
   (- (- (* y (- 1.0 z)) (log y)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x + -1.0) <= -200000.0) || !((x + -1.0) <= -1.0)) {
		tmp = ((x + -1.0) * log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = ((y * (1.0 - z)) - log(y)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x + (-1.0d0)) <= (-200000.0d0)) .or. (.not. ((x + (-1.0d0)) <= (-1.0d0)))) then
        tmp = ((x + (-1.0d0)) * log(y)) - t
    else
        tmp = ((y * (1.0d0 - z)) - log(y)) - t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x + -1.0) <= -200000.0) || !((x + -1.0) <= -1.0)) {
		tmp = ((x + -1.0) * Math.log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = ((y * (1.0 - z)) - Math.log(y)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x + -1.0) <= -200000.0) or not ((x + -1.0) <= -1.0):
		tmp = ((x + -1.0) * math.log(y)) - t
	else:
		tmp = ((y * (1.0 - z)) - math.log(y)) - t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x + -1.0) <= -200000.0) || !(Float64(x + -1.0) <= -1.0))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x + -1.0) * log(y)) - t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z)) - log(y)) - t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x + -1.0) <= -200000.0) || ~(((x + -1.0) <= -1.0)))
		tmp = ((x + -1.0) * log(y)) - t;
	else
		tmp = ((y * (1.0 - z)) - log(y)) - t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x + -1.0), $MachinePrecision], -200000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x + -1.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(N[(x + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 x #s(literal 1 binary64)) < -2e5 or -1 < (-.f64 x #s(literal 1 binary64))

   1. Initial program 92.4%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 92.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 92.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 92.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      4. sub-neg 92.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      5. metadata-eval 92.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      6. sub-neg 92.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      7. log1p-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 91.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) - t} \]

   if -2e5 < (-.f64 x #s(literal 1 binary64)) < -1

   1. Initial program 88.5%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

      4. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

      5. mul-1-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, \color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)}\right) - t \]

      6. fma-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right) - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

      7. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + x\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

      8. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      9. metadata-eval 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

      10. +-commutative 99.7%

          \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - t \]

   5. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \log y} - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right) - t \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)} - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right) - t \]

   8. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)} - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right) - t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + -1 \leq -200000 \lor \neg \left(x + -1 \leq -1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - \log y\right) - t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 99.6% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-1 + z\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.3333333333333333 - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (+
   (* (+ x -1.0) (log y))
   (* (+ -1.0 z) (* y (+ -1.0 (* y (- (* y -0.3333333333333333) 0.5))))))
  t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x + -1.0) * log(y)) + ((-1.0 + z) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5)))))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x + (-1.0d0)) * log(y)) + (((-1.0d0) + z) * (y * ((-1.0d0) + (y * ((y * (-0.3333333333333333d0)) - 0.5d0)))))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x + -1.0) * Math.log(y)) + ((-1.0 + z) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5)))))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x + -1.0) * math.log(y)) + ((-1.0 + z) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5)))))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + -1.0) * log(y)) + Float64(Float64(-1.0 + z) * Float64(y * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5)))))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x + -1.0) * log(y)) + ((-1.0 + z) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5)))))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(-1.0 + z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * N[(N[(y * -0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision] - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.4%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot y - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-1 + z\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.3333333333333333 - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right) - t \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 99.5% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-1 + z\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* (+ x -1.0) (log y)) (* (+ -1.0 z) (* y (+ -1.0 (* y -0.5))))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x + -1.0) * log(y)) + ((-1.0 + z) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5))))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x + (-1.0d0)) * log(y)) + (((-1.0d0) + z) * (y * ((-1.0d0) + (y * (-0.5d0)))))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x + -1.0) * Math.log(y)) + ((-1.0 + z) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5))))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x + -1.0) * math.log(y)) + ((-1.0 + z) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5))))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + -1.0) * log(y)) + Float64(Float64(-1.0 + z) * Float64(y * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * -0.5))))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x + -1.0) * log(y)) + ((-1.0 + z) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5))))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(-1.0 + z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.4%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot y - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Final simplification 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-1 + z\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right)\right) - t \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 76.4% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2700 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{+28}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2700.0) (not (<= x 1.85e+28)))
   (- (* x (log y)) t)
   (- (* y (- 1.0 z)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2700.0) || !(x <= 1.85e+28)) {
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (y * (1.0 - z)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2700.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.85d+28))) then
        tmp = (x * log(y)) - t
    else
        tmp = (y * (1.0d0 - z)) - t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2700.0) || !(x <= 1.85e+28)) {
		tmp = (x * Math.log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (y * (1.0 - z)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2700.0) or not (x <= 1.85e+28):
		tmp = (x * math.log(y)) - t
	else:
		tmp = (y * (1.0 - z)) - t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2700.0) || !(x <= 1.85e+28))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z)) - t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2700.0) || ~((x <= 1.85e+28)))
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - t;
	else
		tmp = (y * (1.0 - z)) - t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2700.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.85e+28]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2700 or 1.85e28 < x

   1. Initial program 93.0%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      4. sub-neg 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      5. metadata-eval 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      6. sub-neg 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      7. log1p-define 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 72.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(\frac{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)}{t} + \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right) \cdot \left(z - 1\right)}{t}\right) - 1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 71.4%

      \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot \log y}{t}} + \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right) \cdot \left(z - 1\right)}{t}\right) - 1\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 71.4%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{\log y}{t}} + \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right) \cdot \left(z - 1\right)}{t}\right) - 1\right) \]

   8. Simplified 71.4%

      \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{\log y}{t}} + \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right) \cdot \left(z - 1\right)}{t}\right) - 1\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in y around 0 70.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\frac{x \cdot \log y}{t} - 1\right)} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in t around 0 90.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot t + x \cdot \log y} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. neg-mul-1 90.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-t\right)} + x \cdot \log y \]

       2. +-commutative 90.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y + \left(-t\right)} \]

       3. unsub-neg 90.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - t} \]

       4. *-commutative 90.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} - t \]

   12. Simplified 90.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x - t} \]

   if -2700 < x < 1.85e28

   1. Initial program 88.2%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

      4. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

      5. mul-1-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, \color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)}\right) - t \]

      6. fma-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right) - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

      7. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + x\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

      8. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      9. metadata-eval 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

      10. +-commutative 99.7%

          \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - t \]

   5. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 62.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} - t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 75.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2700 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{+28}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 65.7% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{+19} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.7 \cdot 10^{+105}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.15e+19) (not (<= x 4.7e+105)))
   (* x (log y))
   (- (* y (- 1.0 z)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.15e+19) || !(x <= 4.7e+105)) {
		tmp = x * log(y);
	} else {
		tmp = (y * (1.0 - z)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.15d+19)) .or. (.not. (x <= 4.7d+105))) then
        tmp = x * log(y)
    else
        tmp = (y * (1.0d0 - z)) - t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.15e+19) || !(x <= 4.7e+105)) {
		tmp = x * Math.log(y);
	} else {
		tmp = (y * (1.0 - z)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.15e+19) or not (x <= 4.7e+105):
		tmp = x * math.log(y)
	else:
		tmp = (y * (1.0 - z)) - t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.15e+19) || !(x <= 4.7e+105))
		tmp = Float64(x * log(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z)) - t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.15e+19) || ~((x <= 4.7e+105)))
		tmp = x * log(y);
	else
		tmp = (y * (1.0 - z)) - t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.15e+19], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 4.7e+105]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.15e19 or 4.70000000000000004e105 < x

   1. Initial program 93.9%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      4. sub-neg 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      5. metadata-eval 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      6. sub-neg 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      7. log1p-define 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 69.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(\frac{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)}{t} + \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right) \cdot \left(z - 1\right)}{t}\right) - 1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 75.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 75.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} \]

   8. Simplified 75.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} \]

   if -1.15e19 < x < 4.70000000000000004e105

   1. Initial program 88.2%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

      4. fma-define 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

      5. mul-1-neg 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, \color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)}\right) - t \]

      6. fma-neg 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right) - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

      7. +-commutative 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + x\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

      8. sub-neg 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      9. metadata-eval 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

      10. +-commutative 99.3%

          \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - t \]

   5. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 62.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} - t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{+19} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.7 \cdot 10^{+105}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 85.5% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 8 \cdot 10^{-37}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 8e-37) (- (* (+ x -1.0) (log y)) t) (- (* y (- 1.0 z)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 8e-37) {
		tmp = ((x + -1.0) * log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (y * (1.0 - z)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 8d-37) then
        tmp = ((x + (-1.0d0)) * log(y)) - t
    else
        tmp = (y * (1.0d0 - z)) - t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 8e-37) {
		tmp = ((x + -1.0) * Math.log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (y * (1.0 - z)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 8e-37:
		tmp = ((x + -1.0) * math.log(y)) - t
	else:
		tmp = (y * (1.0 - z)) - t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 8e-37)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x + -1.0) * log(y)) - t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z)) - t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 8e-37)
		tmp = ((x + -1.0) * log(y)) - t;
	else
		tmp = (y * (1.0 - z)) - t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 8e-37], N[(N[(N[(x + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 8.00000000000000053e-37

   1. Initial program 93.3%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      4. sub-neg 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      5. metadata-eval 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      6. sub-neg 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      7. log1p-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 93.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) - t} \]

   if 8.00000000000000053e-37 < y

   1. Initial program 64.4%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 93.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

      4. fma-define 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

      5. mul-1-neg 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, \color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)}\right) - t \]

      6. fma-neg 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right) - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

      7. +-commutative 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + x\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

      8. sub-neg 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      9. metadata-eval 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

      10. +-commutative 93.3%

          \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - t \]

   5. Simplified 93.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 73.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} - t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 8 \cdot 10^{-37}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 99.1% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y - y \cdot z\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (- (* (+ x -1.0) (log y)) (* y z)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x + -1.0) * log(y)) - (y * z)) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x + (-1.0d0)) * log(y)) - (y * z)) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x + -1.0) * Math.log(y)) - (y * z)) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x + -1.0) * math.log(y)) - (y * z)) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + -1.0) * log(y)) - Float64(y * z)) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x + -1.0) * log(y)) - (y * z)) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.4%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. sub-neg 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   3. metadata-eval 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   4. fma-define 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

   5. mul-1-neg 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, \color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)}\right) - t \]

   6. fma-neg 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right) - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

   7. +-commutative 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + x\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

   8. sub-neg 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   9. metadata-eval 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

   10. +-commutative 99.2%

       \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - t \]

5. Simplified 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - t \]

6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - \color{blue}{y \cdot z}\right) - t \]

7. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y - y \cdot z\right) - t \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 43.4% accurate, 14.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -6600000 \lor \neg \left(t \leq 2100000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -6600000.0) (not (<= t 2100000.0))) (- t) (* y (- 1.0 z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -6600000.0) || !(t <= 2100000.0)) {
		tmp = -t;
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-6600000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (t <= 2100000.0d0))) then
        tmp = -t
    else
        tmp = y * (1.0d0 - z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -6600000.0) || !(t <= 2100000.0)) {
		tmp = -t;
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -6600000.0) or not (t <= 2100000.0):
		tmp = -t
	else:
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -6600000.0) || !(t <= 2100000.0))
		tmp = Float64(-t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -6600000.0) || ~((t <= 2100000.0)))
		tmp = -t;
	else
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -6600000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 2100000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], (-t), N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -6.6e6 or 2.1e6 < t

   1. Initial program 95.8%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      4. sub-neg 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      5. metadata-eval 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      6. sub-neg 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      7. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot t} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 75.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

   7. Simplified 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

   if -6.6e6 < t < 2.1e6

   1. Initial program 85.0%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

      4. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

      5. mul-1-neg 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, \color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)}\right) - t \]

      6. fma-neg 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right) - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

      7. +-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + x\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

      8. sub-neg 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      9. metadata-eval 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

      10. +-commutative 99.4%

          \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - t \]

   5. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 1 - z, \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 1 - z, \log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 1 - z, \log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

   8. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 1 - z, \log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right)\right)} - t \]

   9. Taylor expanded in y around inf 17.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 46.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -6600000 \lor \neg \left(t \leq 2100000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 43.1% accurate, 15.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -22000000 \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1600000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -22000000.0) (not (<= t 1600000000.0))) (- t) (* y (- z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -22000000.0) || !(t <= 1600000000.0)) {
		tmp = -t;
	} else {
		tmp = y * -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-22000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (t <= 1600000000.0d0))) then
        tmp = -t
    else
        tmp = y * -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -22000000.0) || !(t <= 1600000000.0)) {
		tmp = -t;
	} else {
		tmp = y * -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -22000000.0) or not (t <= 1600000000.0):
		tmp = -t
	else:
		tmp = y * -z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -22000000.0) || !(t <= 1600000000.0))
		tmp = Float64(-t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(-z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -22000000.0) || ~((t <= 1600000000.0)))
		tmp = -t;
	else
		tmp = y * -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -22000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 1600000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], (-t), N[(y * (-z)), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -2.2e7 or 1.6e9 < t

   1. Initial program 95.8%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      4. sub-neg 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      5. metadata-eval 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      6. sub-neg 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      7. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot t} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 75.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

   7. Simplified 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

   if -2.2e7 < t < 1.6e9

   1. Initial program 85.0%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

      4. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

      5. mul-1-neg 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, \color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)}\right) - t \]

      6. fma-neg 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right) - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

      7. +-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + x\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

      8. sub-neg 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      9. metadata-eval 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

      10. +-commutative 99.4%

          \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - t \]

   5. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 1 - z, \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 1 - z, \log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 1 - z, \log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

   8. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 1 - z, \log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right)\right)} - t \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around inf 17.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. mul-1-neg 17.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y \cdot z} \]

       2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 17.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   11. Simplified 17.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 45.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -22000000 \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1600000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 46.5% accurate, 30.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* y (- 1.0 z)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (1.0 - z)) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (y * (1.0d0 - z)) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (1.0 - z)) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (y * (1.0 - z)) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z)) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (y * (1.0 - z)) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.4%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. sub-neg 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   3. metadata-eval 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   4. fma-define 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

   5. mul-1-neg 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, \color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)}\right) - t \]

   6. fma-neg 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right) - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

   7. +-commutative 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + x\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

   8. sub-neg 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   9. metadata-eval 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

   10. +-commutative 99.2%

       \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - t \]

5. Simplified 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - t \]

6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 48.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} - t \]

7. Final simplification 48.4%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - t \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 46.3% accurate, 35.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-t\right) - y \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (- t) (* y z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t - (y * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = -t - (y * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t - (y * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return -t - (y * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(-t) - Float64(y * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = -t - (y * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[((-t) - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.4%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. sub-neg 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   3. metadata-eval 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   4. fma-define 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

   5. mul-1-neg 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, \color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)}\right) - t \]

   6. fma-neg 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right) - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

   7. +-commutative 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + x\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

   8. sub-neg 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   9. metadata-eval 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

   10. +-commutative 99.2%

       \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - t \]

5. Simplified 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - t \]

6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 48.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} - t \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 48.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} - t \]

   2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 48.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} - t \]

8. Simplified 48.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} - t \]

9. Final simplification 48.2%

   \[\leadsto \left(-t\right) - y \cdot z \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 35.3% accurate, 107.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = -t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return -t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(-t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = -t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := (-t)

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.4%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-define 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. sub-neg 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   3. metadata-eval 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   4. sub-neg 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   5. metadata-eval 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   6. sub-neg 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   7. log1p-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 38.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot t} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 38.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

7. Simplified 38.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

8. Final simplification 38.7%

   \[\leadsto -t \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 16: 2.2% accurate, 215.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 t)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return t
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := t

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.4%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-define 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. sub-neg 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   3. metadata-eval 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   4. sub-neg 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   5. metadata-eval 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   6. sub-neg 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   7. log1p-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 77.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(\log y + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\log y}{x} + \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right) \cdot \left(z - 1\right)}{x}\right)\right) - \frac{t}{x}\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 26.3%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{t}{x}\right)} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 26.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{t}{x}\right)} \]

   2. distribute-frac-neg2 26.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{t}{-x}} \]

8. Simplified 26.3%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{t}{-x}} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r/ 33.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot t}{-x}} \]

   2. add-sqr-sqrt 18.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x \cdot t}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{-x} \cdot \sqrt{-x}}} \]

   3. sqrt-unprod 13.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x \cdot t}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)}}} \]

   4. sqr-neg 13.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x \cdot t}{\sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot x}}} \]

   5. sqrt-unprod 1.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x \cdot t}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{x} \cdot \sqrt{x}}} \]

   6. add-sqr-sqrt 2.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x \cdot t}{\color{blue}{x}} \]

10. Applied egg-rr 2.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot t}{x}} \]
11. Step-by-step derivation

    1. associate-*r/ 2.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{t}{x}} \]

12. Simplified 2.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{t}{x}} \]

13. Taylor expanded in x around 0 2.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]

14. Final simplification 2.4%

    \[\leadsto t \]
15. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024059 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Statistics.Distribution.Beta:$cdensity from math-functions-0.1.5.2"
  :precision binary64
  (- (+ (* (- x 1.0) (log y)) (* (- z 1.0) (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))