Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B

Percentage Accurate: 85.3% → 99.8%

Time: 14.5s

Alternatives: 13

Speedup: 1.9×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* x (log y)) (* z (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x * log(y)) + (z * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((x * log(y)) + (z * log((1.0d0 - y)))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x * Math.log(y)) + (z * Math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((x * math.log(y)) + (z * math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) + Float64(z * log(Float64(1.0 - y)))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((x * log(y)) + (z * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Log[N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 85.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* x (log y)) (* z (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x * log(y)) + (z * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((x * log(y)) + (z * log((1.0d0 - y)))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x * Math.log(y)) + (z * Math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((x * math.log(y)) + (z * math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) + Float64(z * log(Float64(1.0 - y)))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((x * log(y)) + (z * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Log[N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (fma z (log1p (- y)) (- (* x (log y)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(z, log1p(-y), ((x * log(y)) - t));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(z, log1p(Float64(-y)), Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - t))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(z * N[Log[1 + (-y)], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 84.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + x \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   2. associate--l+ 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]

   3. fma-define 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \log \left(1 - y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]

   4. sub-neg 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, x \cdot \log y - t\right) \]

   5. log1p-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, x \cdot \log y - t\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 76.6% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{+123}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{-41}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.25 - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right)\right)\right) - t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+22} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{+73}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-t\right) - z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* x (log y))))
   (if (<= x -4.2e+123)
     t_1
     (if (<= x 2.7e-41)
       (-
        (*
         y
         (* z (+ -1.0 (* y (- (* y (- (* y -0.25) 0.3333333333333333)) 0.5)))))
        t)
       (if (or (<= x 5e+22) (not (<= x 3.2e+73))) t_1 (- (- t) (* z y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x * log(y);
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -4.2e+123) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (x <= 2.7e-41) {
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t;
	} else if ((x <= 5e+22) || !(x <= 3.2e+73)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = -t - (z * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = x * log(y)
    if (x <= (-4.2d+123)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (x <= 2.7d-41) then
        tmp = (y * (z * ((-1.0d0) + (y * ((y * ((y * (-0.25d0)) - 0.3333333333333333d0)) - 0.5d0))))) - t
    else if ((x <= 5d+22) .or. (.not. (x <= 3.2d+73))) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = -t - (z * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x * Math.log(y);
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -4.2e+123) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (x <= 2.7e-41) {
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t;
	} else if ((x <= 5e+22) || !(x <= 3.2e+73)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = -t - (z * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = x * math.log(y)
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -4.2e+123:
		tmp = t_1
	elif x <= 2.7e-41:
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t
	elif (x <= 5e+22) or not (x <= 3.2e+73):
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = -t - (z * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x * log(y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -4.2e+123)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (x <= 2.7e-41)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t);
	elseif ((x <= 5e+22) || !(x <= 3.2e+73))
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-t) - Float64(z * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = x * log(y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -4.2e+123)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (x <= 2.7e-41)
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t;
	elseif ((x <= 5e+22) || ~((x <= 3.2e+73)))
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = -t - (z * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -4.2e+123], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[x, 2.7e-41], N[(N[(y * N[(z * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * N[(N[(y * N[(N[(y * -0.25), $MachinePrecision] - 0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[x, 5e+22], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 3.2e+73]], $MachinePrecision]], t$95$1, N[((-t) - N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -4.19999999999999988e123 or 2.7e-41 < x < 4.9999999999999996e22 or 3.19999999999999982e73 < x

   1. Initial program 97.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + x \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      2. associate--l+ 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]

      3. fma-define 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \log \left(1 - y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]

      4. sub-neg 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, x \cdot \log y - t\right) \]

      5. log1p-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, x \cdot \log y - t\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 73.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(\log \left(1 - y\right) + \frac{x \cdot \log y}{z}\right) - \frac{t}{z}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 76.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} \]

   if -4.19999999999999988e123 < x < 2.7e-41

   1. Initial program 78.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 65.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)} - t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 65.2%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. log1p-define 86.2%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

   5. Simplified 86.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot z + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot z + y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot z + -0.25 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot y - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

   if 4.9999999999999996e22 < x < 3.19999999999999982e73

   1. Initial program 70.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. mul-1-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)}\right) - t \]

      3. unsub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y \cdot z\right)} - t \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y \cdot z\right)} - t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 85.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} - t \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 85.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} - t \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-in 85.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} - t \]

      3. *-commutative 85.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} - t \]

   8. Simplified 85.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} - t \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{+123}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{-41}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.25 - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right)\right)\right) - t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+22} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{+73}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-t\right) - z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.6% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot \log y + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.3333333333333333 - 0.5\right)\right) - z\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (+ (* x (log y)) (* y (- (* y (* z (- (* y -0.3333333333333333) 0.5))) z)))
  t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x * log(y)) + (y * ((y * (z * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))) - z))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((x * log(y)) + (y * ((y * (z * ((y * (-0.3333333333333333d0)) - 0.5d0))) - z))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x * Math.log(y)) + (y * ((y * (z * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))) - z))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((x * math.log(y)) + (y * ((y * (z * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))) - z))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))) - z))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((x * log(y)) + (y * ((y * (z * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))) - z))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[(y * -0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision] - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 84.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot z + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot z + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot \log y + y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot z + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot y - 0.5\right)\right)}\right)\right) - t \]

5. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot \log y + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.3333333333333333 - 0.5\right)\right) - z\right)\right) - t \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 90.5% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.16 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-71}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) - t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.16) (not (<= x 2.9e-71)))
   (- (* x (log y)) t)
   (- (* z (log1p (- y))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.16) || !(x <= 2.9e-71)) {
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (z * log1p(-y)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.16) || !(x <= 2.9e-71)) {
		tmp = (x * Math.log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (z * Math.log1p(-y)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.16) or not (x <= 2.9e-71):
		tmp = (x * math.log(y)) - t
	else:
		tmp = (z * math.log1p(-y)) - t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.16) || !(x <= 2.9e-71))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z * log1p(Float64(-y))) - t);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.16], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 2.9e-71]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(z * N[Log[1 + (-y)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.15999999999999992 or 2.8999999999999999e-71 < x

   1. Initial program 92.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + x \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      2. associate--l+ 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]

      3. fma-define 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \log \left(1 - y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]

      4. sub-neg 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, x \cdot \log y - t\right) \]

      5. log1p-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, x \cdot \log y - t\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 92.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - t} \]

   if -1.15999999999999992 < x < 2.8999999999999999e-71

   1. Initial program 74.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 69.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)} - t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 69.5%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. log1p-define 94.2%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

   5. Simplified 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.16 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-71}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) - t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 90.3% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.16 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{-72}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.25 - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right)\right)\right) - t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.16) (not (<= x 3.3e-72)))
   (- (* x (log y)) t)
   (-
    (* y (* z (+ -1.0 (* y (- (* y (- (* y -0.25) 0.3333333333333333)) 0.5)))))
    t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.16) || !(x <= 3.3e-72)) {
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.16d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 3.3d-72))) then
        tmp = (x * log(y)) - t
    else
        tmp = (y * (z * ((-1.0d0) + (y * ((y * ((y * (-0.25d0)) - 0.3333333333333333d0)) - 0.5d0))))) - t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.16) || !(x <= 3.3e-72)) {
		tmp = (x * Math.log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.16) or not (x <= 3.3e-72):
		tmp = (x * math.log(y)) - t
	else:
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.16) || !(x <= 3.3e-72))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.16) || ~((x <= 3.3e-72)))
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - t;
	else
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.16], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 3.3e-72]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * N[(z * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * N[(N[(y * N[(N[(y * -0.25), $MachinePrecision] - 0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.15999999999999992 or 3.3e-72 < x

   1. Initial program 92.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + x \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      2. associate--l+ 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]

      3. fma-define 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \log \left(1 - y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]

      4. sub-neg 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, x \cdot \log y - t\right) \]

      5. log1p-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, x \cdot \log y - t\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 92.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - t} \]

   if -1.15999999999999992 < x < 3.3e-72

   1. Initial program 74.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 69.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)} - t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 69.5%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. log1p-define 94.2%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

   5. Simplified 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 93.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot z + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot z + y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot z + -0.25 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 93.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot y - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.16 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{-72}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.25 - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right)\right)\right) - t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 99.4% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* x (log y)) (* z (* y (+ -1.0 (* y -0.5))))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x * log(y)) + (z * (y * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5))))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((x * log(y)) + (z * (y * ((-1.0d0) + (y * (-0.5d0)))))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x * Math.log(y)) + (z * (y * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5))))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((x * math.log(y)) + (z * (y * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5))))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) + Float64(z * Float64(y * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * -0.5))))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((x * log(y)) + (z * (y * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5))))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(y * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 84.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot y - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Final simplification 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right)\right) - t \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 99.1% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot \log y - z \cdot y\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (- (* x (log y)) (* z y)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x * log(y)) - (z * y)) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((x * log(y)) - (z * y)) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x * Math.log(y)) - (z * y)) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((x * math.log(y)) - (z * y)) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - Float64(z * y)) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((x * log(y)) - (z * y)) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 84.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. mul-1-neg 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)}\right) - t \]

   3. unsub-neg 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y \cdot z\right)} - t \]

5. Simplified 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y \cdot z\right)} - t \]

6. Final simplification 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot \log y - z \cdot y\right) - t \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 58.1% accurate, 10.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5 + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.25 - 0.3333333333333333\right)\right)\right) - z\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (*
   y
   (- (* y (+ (* z -0.5) (* y (* z (- (* y -0.25) 0.3333333333333333))))) z))
  t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * ((y * ((z * -0.5) + (y * (z * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333))))) - z)) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (y * ((y * ((z * (-0.5d0)) + (y * (z * ((y * (-0.25d0)) - 0.3333333333333333d0))))) - z)) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * ((y * ((z * -0.5) + (y * (z * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333))))) - z)) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (y * ((y * ((z * -0.5) + (y * (z * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333))))) - z)) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * -0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333))))) - z)) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (y * ((y * ((z * -0.5) + (y * (z * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333))))) - z)) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(y * N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * -0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[(y * -0.25), $MachinePrecision] - 0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 84.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 48.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)} - t \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 48.3%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. log1p-define 62.6%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

5. Simplified 62.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 62.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot z + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot z + y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot z + -0.25 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 62.3%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot z + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot z + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot y - 0.3333333333333333\right)\right)}\right)\right) - t \]

8. Final simplification 62.3%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5 + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.25 - 0.3333333333333333\right)\right)\right) - z\right) - t \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 58.0% accurate, 11.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.25 - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right)\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (* y (* z (+ -1.0 (* y (- (* y (- (* y -0.25) 0.3333333333333333)) 0.5)))))
  t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (y * (z * ((-1.0d0) + (y * ((y * ((y * (-0.25d0)) - 0.3333333333333333d0)) - 0.5d0))))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(y * N[(z * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * N[(N[(y * N[(N[(y * -0.25), $MachinePrecision] - 0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 84.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 48.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)} - t \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 48.3%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. log1p-define 62.6%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

5. Simplified 62.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 62.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot z + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot z + y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot z + -0.25 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 62.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot y - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

8. Final simplification 62.3%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.25 - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right)\right)\right) - t \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 57.9% accurate, 19.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* y (* z (+ -1.0 (* y -0.5)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (y * (z * ((-1.0d0) + (y * (-0.5d0))))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * -0.5)))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(y * N[(z * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 84.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 48.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)} - t \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 48.3%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. log1p-define 62.6%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

5. Simplified 62.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 62.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot z + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot z + y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot z + -0.25 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

7. Taylor expanded in y around 0 62.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot z + -0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} - t \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 62.2%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + -1 \cdot z\right)} - t \]

   2. associate-*r* 62.2%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} + -1 \cdot z\right) - t \]

   3. distribute-rgt-out 62.2%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot y + -1\right)\right)} - t \]

9. Simplified 62.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot y + -1\right)\right)} - t \]

10. Final simplification 62.2%

    \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right) - t \]
11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 57.5% accurate, 35.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-t\right) - z \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (- t) (* z y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t - (z * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = -t - (z * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t - (z * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return -t - (z * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(-t) - Float64(z * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = -t - (z * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[((-t) - N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 84.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. mul-1-neg 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)}\right) - t \]

   3. unsub-neg 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y \cdot z\right)} - t \]

5. Simplified 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y \cdot z\right)} - t \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 61.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} - t \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 61.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} - t \]

   2. distribute-lft-neg-in 61.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} - t \]

   3. *-commutative 61.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} - t \]

8. Simplified 61.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} - t \]

9. Final simplification 61.7%

   \[\leadsto \left(-t\right) - z \cdot y \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 43.1% accurate, 105.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = -t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return -t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(-t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = -t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := (-t)

Derivation

1. Initial program 84.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + x \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   2. associate--l+ 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]

   3. fma-define 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \log \left(1 - y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]

   4. sub-neg 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, x \cdot \log y - t\right) \]

   5. log1p-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, x \cdot \log y - t\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 46.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot t} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 46.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

7. Simplified 46.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

8. Final simplification 46.9%

   \[\leadsto -t \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 2.2% accurate, 211.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 t)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return t
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := t

Derivation

1. Initial program 84.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + x \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   2. associate--l+ 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]

   3. fma-define 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \log \left(1 - y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]

   4. sub-neg 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, x \cdot \log y - t\right) \]

   5. log1p-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, x \cdot \log y - t\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 66.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(\log \left(1 - y\right) + \frac{x \cdot \log y}{z}\right) - \frac{t}{z}\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 35.8%

   \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{t}{z}\right)} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 35.8%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{t}{z}\right)} \]

   2. distribute-neg-frac2 35.8%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{t}{-z}} \]

8. Simplified 35.8%

   \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{t}{-z}} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. clear-num 35.8%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{-z}{t}}} \]

   2. un-div-inv 36.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{-z}{t}}} \]

   3. add-sqr-sqrt 13.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{z}{\frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt{-z} \cdot \sqrt{-z}}}{t}} \]

   4. sqrt-unprod 9.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{z}{\frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-z\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}}}{t}} \]

   5. sqr-neg 9.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{z}{\frac{\sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot z}}}{t}} \]

   6. sqrt-unprod 1.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{z}{\frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{z}}}{t}} \]

   7. add-sqr-sqrt 2.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{z}{\frac{\color{blue}{z}}{t}} \]

10. Applied egg-rr 2.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{z}{t}}} \]
11. Step-by-step derivation

    1. associate-/r/ 2.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z}{z} \cdot t} \]

    2. *-inverses 2.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \cdot t \]

    3. *-lft-identity 2.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]

12. Simplified 2.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]

13. Final simplification 2.0%

    \[\leadsto t \]
14. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 99.6% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-z\right) \cdot \left(\left(0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot y\right) + y\right) + \frac{0.3333333333333333}{1 \cdot \left(1 \cdot 1\right)} \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot y\right)\right)\right) - \left(t - x \cdot \log y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (*
   (- z)
   (+
    (+ (* 0.5 (* y y)) y)
    (* (/ 0.3333333333333333 (* 1.0 (* 1.0 1.0))) (* y (* y y)))))
  (- t (* x (log y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (-z * (((0.5 * (y * y)) + y) + ((0.3333333333333333 / (1.0 * (1.0 * 1.0))) * (y * (y * y))))) - (t - (x * log(y)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (-z * (((0.5d0 * (y * y)) + y) + ((0.3333333333333333d0 / (1.0d0 * (1.0d0 * 1.0d0))) * (y * (y * y))))) - (t - (x * log(y)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (-z * (((0.5 * (y * y)) + y) + ((0.3333333333333333 / (1.0 * (1.0 * 1.0))) * (y * (y * y))))) - (t - (x * Math.log(y)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (-z * (((0.5 * (y * y)) + y) + ((0.3333333333333333 / (1.0 * (1.0 * 1.0))) * (y * (y * y))))) - (t - (x * math.log(y)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(-z) * Float64(Float64(Float64(0.5 * Float64(y * y)) + y) + Float64(Float64(0.3333333333333333 / Float64(1.0 * Float64(1.0 * 1.0))) * Float64(y * Float64(y * y))))) - Float64(t - Float64(x * log(y))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (-z * (((0.5 * (y * y)) + y) + ((0.3333333333333333 / (1.0 * (1.0 * 1.0))) * (y * (y * y))))) - (t - (x * log(y)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[((-z) * N[(N[(N[(0.5 * N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(0.3333333333333333 / N[(1.0 * N[(1.0 * 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t - N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024055 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (- (* (- z) (+ (+ (* 0.5 (* y y)) y) (* (/ 0.3333333333333333 (* 1.0 (* 1.0 1.0))) (* y (* y y))))) (- t (* x (log y))))

  (- (+ (* x (log y)) (* z (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))