tan-example (used to crash)

Percentage Accurate: 80.0% → 99.7%

Time: 31.6s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

\[\left(\left(\left(x = 0 \lor 0.5884142 \leq x \land x \leq 505.5909\right) \land \left(-1.796658 \cdot 10^{+308} \leq y \land y \leq -9.425585 \cdot 10^{-310} \lor 1.284938 \cdot 10^{-309} \leq y \land y \leq 1.751224 \cdot 10^{+308}\right)\right) \land \left(-1.776707 \cdot 10^{+308} \leq z \land z \leq -8.599796 \cdot 10^{-310} \lor 3.293145 \cdot 10^{-311} \leq z \land z \leq 1.725154 \cdot 10^{+308}\right)\right) \land \left(-1.796658 \cdot 10^{+308} \leq a \land a \leq -9.425585 \cdot 10^{-310} \lor 1.284938 \cdot 10^{-309} \leq a \land a \leq 1.751224 \cdot 10^{+308}\right)\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z a) :precision binary64 (+ x (- (tan (+ y z)) (tan a))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x + (tan((y + z)) - tan(a));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, a)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    code = x + (tan((y + z)) - tan(a))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x + (Math.tan((y + z)) - Math.tan(a));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, a):
	return x + (math.tan((y + z)) - math.tan(a))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, a)
	return Float64(x + Float64(tan(Float64(y + z)) - tan(a)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, a)
	tmp = x + (tan((y + z)) - tan(a));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, a_] := N[(x + N[(N[Tan[N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tan[a], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 80.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z a) :precision binary64 (+ x (- (tan (+ y z)) (tan a))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x + (tan((y + z)) - tan(a));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, a)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    code = x + (tan((y + z)) - tan(a))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x + (Math.tan((y + z)) - Math.tan(a));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, a):
	return x + (math.tan((y + z)) - math.tan(a))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, a)
	return Float64(x + Float64(tan(Float64(y + z)) - tan(a)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, a)
	tmp = x + (tan((y + z)) - tan(a));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, a_] := N[(x + N[(N[Tan[N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tan[a], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.7% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(\left(\tan y + \tan z\right) \cdot \frac{1}{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z} - \tan a\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z a)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (- (* (+ (tan y) (tan z)) (/ 1.0 (- 1.0 (* (tan y) (tan z))))) (tan a))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x + (((tan(y) + tan(z)) * (1.0 / (1.0 - (tan(y) * tan(z))))) - tan(a));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, a)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    code = x + (((tan(y) + tan(z)) * (1.0d0 / (1.0d0 - (tan(y) * tan(z))))) - tan(a))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x + (((Math.tan(y) + Math.tan(z)) * (1.0 / (1.0 - (Math.tan(y) * Math.tan(z))))) - Math.tan(a));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, a):
	return x + (((math.tan(y) + math.tan(z)) * (1.0 / (1.0 - (math.tan(y) * math.tan(z))))) - math.tan(a))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, a)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(tan(y) + tan(z)) * Float64(1.0 / Float64(1.0 - Float64(tan(y) * tan(z))))) - tan(a)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, a)
	tmp = x + (((tan(y) + tan(z)) * (1.0 / (1.0 - (tan(y) * tan(z))))) - tan(a));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, a_] := N[(x + N[(N[(N[(N[Tan[y], $MachinePrecision] + N[Tan[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 / N[(1.0 - N[(N[Tan[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[Tan[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[Tan[a], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 76.0%

   \[x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. tan-sum 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\tan y + \tan z}{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z}} - \tan a\right) \]

   2. div-inv 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\tan y + \tan z\right) \cdot \frac{1}{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z}} - \tan a\right) \]

4. Applied egg-rr 99.5%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\tan y + \tan z\right) \cdot \frac{1}{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z}} - \tan a\right) \]

5. Final simplification 99.5%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\tan y + \tan z\right) \cdot \frac{1}{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z} - \tan a\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.7% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(\frac{\tan y + \tan z}{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z} - \tan a\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z a)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (- (/ (+ (tan y) (tan z)) (- 1.0 (* (tan y) (tan z)))) (tan a))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x + (((tan(y) + tan(z)) / (1.0 - (tan(y) * tan(z)))) - tan(a));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, a)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    code = x + (((tan(y) + tan(z)) / (1.0d0 - (tan(y) * tan(z)))) - tan(a))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x + (((Math.tan(y) + Math.tan(z)) / (1.0 - (Math.tan(y) * Math.tan(z)))) - Math.tan(a));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, a):
	return x + (((math.tan(y) + math.tan(z)) / (1.0 - (math.tan(y) * math.tan(z)))) - math.tan(a))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, a)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(tan(y) + tan(z)) / Float64(1.0 - Float64(tan(y) * tan(z)))) - tan(a)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, a)
	tmp = x + (((tan(y) + tan(z)) / (1.0 - (tan(y) * tan(z)))) - tan(a));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, a_] := N[(x + N[(N[(N[(N[Tan[y], $MachinePrecision] + N[Tan[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 - N[(N[Tan[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[Tan[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[Tan[a], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 76.0%

   \[x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. tan-sum 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\tan y + \tan z}{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z}} - \tan a\right) \]

   2. div-inv 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\tan y + \tan z\right) \cdot \frac{1}{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z}} - \tan a\right) \]

4. Applied egg-rr 99.5%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\tan y + \tan z\right) \cdot \frac{1}{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z}} - \tan a\right) \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r/ 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\left(\tan y + \tan z\right) \cdot 1}{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z}} - \tan a\right) \]

   2. *-rgt-identity 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\tan y + \tan z}}{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z} - \tan a\right) \]

6. Simplified 99.5%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\tan y + \tan z}{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z}} - \tan a\right) \]

7. Final simplification 99.5%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(\frac{\tan y + \tan z}{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z} - \tan a\right) \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 80.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z a) :precision binary64 (+ x (- (tan (+ y z)) (tan a))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x + (tan((y + z)) - tan(a));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, a)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    code = x + (tan((y + z)) - tan(a))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x + (Math.tan((y + z)) - Math.tan(a));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, a):
	return x + (math.tan((y + z)) - math.tan(a))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, a)
	return Float64(x + Float64(tan(Float64(y + z)) - tan(a)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, a)
	tmp = x + (tan((y + z)) - tan(a));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, a_] := N[(x + N[(N[Tan[N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tan[a], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 76.0%

   \[x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 76.0%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 61.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(\tan z - \tan a\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z a) :precision binary64 (+ x (- (tan z) (tan a))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x + (tan(z) - tan(a));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, a)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    code = x + (tan(z) - tan(a))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x + (Math.tan(z) - Math.tan(a));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, a):
	return x + (math.tan(z) - math.tan(a))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, a)
	return Float64(x + Float64(tan(z) - tan(a)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, a)
	tmp = x + (tan(z) - tan(a));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, a_] := N[(x + N[(N[Tan[z], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tan[a], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 76.0%

   \[x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 56.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + \frac{\sin z}{\cos z}\right) - \frac{\sin a}{\cos a}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. tan-quot 56.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + \frac{\sin z}{\cos z}\right) - \color{blue}{\tan a} \]

   2. tan-quot 56.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + \color{blue}{\tan z}\right) - \tan a \]

   3. associate--l+ 56.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\tan z - \tan a\right)} \]

5. Applied egg-rr 56.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\tan z - \tan a\right)} \]

6. Final simplification 56.4%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(\tan z - \tan a\right) \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 2.7% accurate, 207.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z a) :precision binary64 -1.0)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, a)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    code = -1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return -1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, a):
	return -1.0

Julia

function code(x, y, z, a)
	return -1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, a)
	tmp = -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, a_] := -1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 76.0%

   \[x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. expm1-log1p-u 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right)\right)\right)} \]

   2. expm1-undefine 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right)\right)} - 1} \]

   3. +-commutative 69.6%

      \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right) + x}\right)} - 1 \]

   4. associate-+l- 69.6%

      \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\tan \left(y + z\right) - \left(\tan a - x\right)}\right)} - 1 \]

4. Applied egg-rr 69.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \left(\tan a - x\right)\right)} - 1} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. expm1-define 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \left(\tan a - x\right)\right)\right)} \]

   2. associate--r- 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right) + x}\right)\right) \]

   3. +-commutative 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right)}\right)\right) \]

   4. associate-+r- 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(x + \tan \left(y + z\right)\right) - \tan a}\right)\right) \]

   5. +-commutative 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(x + \tan \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)}\right) - \tan a\right)\right) \]

6. Simplified 69.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(x + \tan \left(z + y\right)\right) - \tan a\right)\right)} \]

7. Taylor expanded in x around inf 20.1%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)}\right) \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 20.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{-\log \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)}\right) \]

   2. log-rec 20.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\log x\right)}\right) \]

   3. remove-double-neg 20.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\log x}\right) \]

9. Simplified 20.1%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\log x}\right) \]

10. Taylor expanded in x around 0 3.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

11. Final simplification 3.5%

    \[\leadsto -1 \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 31.9% accurate, 207.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z a) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, a)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, a):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, a)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, a)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, a_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 76.0%

   \[x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 29.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

4. Final simplification 29.5%

   \[\leadsto x \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024055 
(FPCore (x y z a)
  :name "tan-example (used to crash)"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (and (or (== x 0.0) (and (<= 0.5884142 x) (<= x 505.5909))) (or (and (<= -1.796658e+308 y) (<= y -9.425585e-310)) (and (<= 1.284938e-309 y) (<= y 1.751224e+308)))) (or (and (<= -1.776707e+308 z) (<= z -8.599796e-310)) (and (<= 3.293145e-311 z) (<= z 1.725154e+308)))) (or (and (<= -1.796658e+308 a) (<= a -9.425585e-310)) (and (<= 1.284938e-309 a) (<= a 1.751224e+308))))
  (+ x (- (tan (+ y z)) (tan a))))