Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, H

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 5.8s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (1.0d0 - z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(1.0 - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (1.0d0 - z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(1.0 - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - z\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (- 1.0 z) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (1.0 - z) * (x + y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (1.0d0 - z) * (x + y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (1.0 - z) * (x + y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (1.0 - z) * (x + y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) * Float64(x + y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (1.0 - z) * (x + y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 - z\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 75.4% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := x \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -66:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 0.085:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+44}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* x (- z))))
   (if (<= z -66.0)
     t_0
     (if (<= z 0.085) (+ x y) (if (<= z 2.4e+44) (* y (- 1.0 z)) t_0)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x * -z;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -66.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 0.085) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else if (z <= 2.4e+44) {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = x * -z
    if (z <= (-66.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z <= 0.085d0) then
        tmp = x + y
    else if (z <= 2.4d+44) then
        tmp = y * (1.0d0 - z)
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x * -z;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -66.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 0.085) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else if (z <= 2.4e+44) {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = x * -z
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -66.0:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z <= 0.085:
		tmp = x + y
	elif z <= 2.4e+44:
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z)
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(x * Float64(-z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -66.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 0.085)
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	elseif (z <= 2.4e+44)
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = x * -z;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -66.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 0.085)
		tmp = x + y;
	elseif (z <= 2.4e+44)
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(x * (-z)), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -66.0], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[z, 0.085], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 2.4e+44], N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -66 or 2.40000000000000013e44 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot 1 + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

      4. *-un-lft-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 59.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 59.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 59.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. neg-mul-1 59.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \cdot z \]

   8. Simplified 59.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -66 < z < 0.0850000000000000061

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   if 0.0850000000000000061 < z < 2.40000000000000013e44

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 43.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -66:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 0.085:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+44}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 97.8% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;1 - z \leq -1000000 \lor \neg \left(1 - z \leq 2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) - y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (- 1.0 z) -1000000.0) (not (<= (- 1.0 z) 2.0)))
   (* z (- (- x) y))
   (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((1.0 - z) <= -1000000.0) || !((1.0 - z) <= 2.0)) {
		tmp = z * (-x - y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((1.0d0 - z) <= (-1000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. ((1.0d0 - z) <= 2.0d0))) then
        tmp = z * (-x - y)
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((1.0 - z) <= -1000000.0) || !((1.0 - z) <= 2.0)) {
		tmp = z * (-x - y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if ((1.0 - z) <= -1000000.0) or not ((1.0 - z) <= 2.0):
		tmp = z * (-x - y)
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(1.0 - z) <= -1000000.0) || !(Float64(1.0 - z) <= 2.0))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(Float64(-x) - y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((1.0 - z) <= -1000000.0) || ~(((1.0 - z) <= 2.0)))
		tmp = z * (-x - y);
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision], -1000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision], 2.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[((-x) - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 1 z) < -1e6 or 2 < (-.f64 1 z)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z \cdot \left(x + y\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

   5. Simplified 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   if -1e6 < (-.f64 1 z) < 2

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;1 - z \leq -1000000 \lor \neg \left(1 - z \leq 2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) - y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 75.2% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := x \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -70:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 8 \cdot 10^{+44}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* x (- z))))
   (if (<= z -70.0)
     t_0
     (if (<= z 1.0) (+ x y) (if (<= z 8e+44) (* y (- z)) t_0)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x * -z;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -70.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 1.0) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else if (z <= 8e+44) {
		tmp = y * -z;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = x * -z
    if (z <= (-70.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = x + y
    else if (z <= 8d+44) then
        tmp = y * -z
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x * -z;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -70.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 1.0) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else if (z <= 8e+44) {
		tmp = y * -z;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = x * -z
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -70.0:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z <= 1.0:
		tmp = x + y
	elif z <= 8e+44:
		tmp = y * -z
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(x * Float64(-z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -70.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	elseif (z <= 8e+44)
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(-z));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = x * -z;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -70.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 1.0)
		tmp = x + y;
	elseif (z <= 8e+44)
		tmp = y * -z;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(x * (-z)), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -70.0], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[z, 1.0], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 8e+44], N[(y * (-z)), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -70 or 8.0000000000000007e44 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot 1 + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

      4. *-un-lft-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 59.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 59.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 59.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. neg-mul-1 59.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \cdot z \]

   8. Simplified 59.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -70 < z < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   if 1 < z < 8.0000000000000007e44

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} \]

      3. distribute-lft-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y + \left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y + \left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 90.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} + \left(1 - z\right) \cdot x \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 90.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} + \left(1 - z\right) \cdot x \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 90.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} + \left(1 - z\right) \cdot x \]

   7. Simplified 90.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} + \left(1 - z\right) \cdot x \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 37.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 37.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 37.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

   10. Simplified 37.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -70:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 8 \cdot 10^{+44}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 74.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -35 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -35.0) (not (<= z 1.0))) (* x (- z)) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -35.0) || !(z <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = x * -z;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-35.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = x * -z
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -35.0) || !(z <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = x * -z;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -35.0) or not (z <= 1.0):
		tmp = x * -z
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -35.0) || !(z <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(-z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -35.0) || ~((z <= 1.0)))
		tmp = x * -z;
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -35.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * (-z)), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -35 or 1 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot 1 + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

      4. *-un-lft-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 59.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 58.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 58.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. neg-mul-1 58.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \cdot z \]

   8. Simplified 58.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -35 < z < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -35 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 62.4% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-90}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1e-90) (* x (- 1.0 z)) (* y (- 1.0 z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1e-90) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1d-90)) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    else
        tmp = y * (1.0d0 - z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1e-90) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1e-90:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	else:
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1e-90)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1e-90)
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	else
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1e-90], N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -9.99999999999999995e-91

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 73.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 73.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   5. Simplified 73.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -9.99999999999999995e-91 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 60.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-90}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 32.2% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{-84}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (if (<= x -1.6e-84) x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.6e-84) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.6d-84)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.6e-84) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.6e-84:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.6e-84)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.6e-84)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.6e-84], x, y]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.6e-84

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 74.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 74.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   5. Simplified 74.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 33.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.6e-84 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 60.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 34.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 34.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{-84}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 50.5% accurate, 2.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 51.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 51.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

5. Simplified 51.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

6. Final simplification 51.2%

   \[\leadsto x + y \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 26.0% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 54.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 54.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

5. Simplified 54.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 26.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

7. Final simplification 26.0%

   \[\leadsto x \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024055 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, H"
  :precision binary64
  (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))