Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:cubForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, B

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%

Time: 5.0s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* (* x 3.0) y) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x * 3.0d0) * y) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 3.0) * y) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* (* x 3.0) y) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x * 3.0d0) * y) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 3.0) * y) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* (* x 3.0) y) z))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x * 3.0d0) * y) - z
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 3.0) * y) - z)
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 76.9% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+84}:\\ \;\;\;\;3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_0 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-70}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (* x 3.0) y)))
   (if (<= t_0 -2e+84) (* 3.0 (* x y)) (if (<= t_0 5e-70) (- z) t_0))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (x * 3.0) * y;
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= -2e+84) {
		tmp = 3.0 * (x * y);
	} else if (t_0 <= 5e-70) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (x * 3.0d0) * y
    if (t_0 <= (-2d+84)) then
        tmp = 3.0d0 * (x * y)
    else if (t_0 <= 5d-70) then
        tmp = -z
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (x * 3.0) * y;
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= -2e+84) {
		tmp = 3.0 * (x * y);
	} else if (t_0 <= 5e-70) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (x * 3.0) * y
	tmp = 0
	if t_0 <= -2e+84:
		tmp = 3.0 * (x * y)
	elif t_0 <= 5e-70:
		tmp = -z
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(x * 3.0) * y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= -2e+84)
		tmp = Float64(3.0 * Float64(x * y));
	elseif (t_0 <= 5e-70)
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (x * 3.0) * y;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_0 <= -2e+84)
		tmp = 3.0 * (x * y);
	elseif (t_0 <= 5e-70)
		tmp = -z;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, -2e+84], N[(3.0 * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$0, 5e-70], (-z), t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 x 3) y) < -2.00000000000000012e84

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 87.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(3 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{z} - 1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 89.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -2.00000000000000012e84 < (*.f64 (*.f64 x 3) y) < 4.9999999999999998e-70

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 79.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 79.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   7. Simplified 79.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   if 4.9999999999999998e-70 < (*.f64 (*.f64 x 3) y)

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 88.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(3 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{z} - 1\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 88.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(3 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{z}{x \cdot y}}} - 1\right) \]

      2. un-div-inv 88.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{3}{\frac{z}{x \cdot y}}} - 1\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 88.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\frac{3}{\frac{z}{\color{blue}{y \cdot x}}} - 1\right) \]

      4. associate-/r* 83.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\frac{3}{\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{z}{y}}{x}}} - 1\right) \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 83.4%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{3}{\frac{\frac{z}{y}}{x}}} - 1\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 83.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 83.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(3 \cdot x\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. *-commutative 83.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 3\right)} \cdot y \]

   10. Simplified 83.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+84}:\\ \;\;\;\;3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-70}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 71.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.88 \cdot 10^{-93} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.75 \cdot 10^{+16}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.88e-93) (not (<= y 1.75e+16))) (* 3.0 (* x y)) (- z)))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.88e-93) || !(y <= 1.75e+16)) {
		tmp = 3.0 * (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.88d-93)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.75d+16))) then
        tmp = 3.0d0 * (x * y)
    else
        tmp = -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.88e-93) || !(y <= 1.75e+16)) {
		tmp = 3.0 * (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.88e-93) or not (y <= 1.75e+16):
		tmp = 3.0 * (x * y)
	else:
		tmp = -z
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.88e-93) || !(y <= 1.75e+16))
		tmp = Float64(3.0 * Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.88e-93) || ~((y <= 1.75e+16)))
		tmp = 3.0 * (x * y);
	else
		tmp = -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.88e-93], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.75e+16]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(3.0 * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], (-z)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.88000000000000001e-93 or 1.75e16 < y

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 90.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(3 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{z} - 1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 71.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -1.88000000000000001e-93 < y < 1.75e16

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 76.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 76.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   7. Simplified 76.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.88 \cdot 10^{-93} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.75 \cdot 10^{+16}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ 3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* 3.0 (* x y)) z))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (3.0 * (x * y)) - z;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (3.0d0 * (x * y)) - z
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (3.0 * (x * y)) - z;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return (3.0 * (x * y)) - z

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(3.0 * Float64(x * y)) - z)
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (3.0 * (x * y)) - z;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(3.0 * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} - z \]

6. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right) - z \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 50.1% accurate, 3.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ -z \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- z))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = -z
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return -z

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(-z)
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = -z;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := (-z)

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 50.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 50.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

7. Simplified 50.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

8. Final simplification 50.2%

   \[\leadsto -z \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x (* 3.0 y)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (3.0 * y)) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (3.0d0 * y)) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (3.0 * y)) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (3.0 * y)) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(3.0 * y)) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (3.0 * y)) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(3.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024055 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:cubForm  from diagrams-solve-0.1, B"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (- (* x (* 3.0 y)) z)

  (- (* (* x 3.0) y) z))