Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quadForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, B

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%

Time: 7.2s

Alternatives: 3

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (/ 1.0 2.0) (+ x (* y (sqrt z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (1.0 / 2.0) * (x + (y * sqrt(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (1.0d0 / 2.0d0) * (x + (y * sqrt(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (1.0 / 2.0) * (x + (y * Math.sqrt(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (1.0 / 2.0) * (x + (y * math.sqrt(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 / 2.0) * Float64(x + Float64(y * sqrt(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (1.0 / 2.0) * (x + (y * sqrt(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(1.0 / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(x + N[(y * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (/ 1.0 2.0) (+ x (* y (sqrt z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (1.0 / 2.0) * (x + (y * sqrt(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (1.0d0 / 2.0d0) * (x + (y * sqrt(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (1.0 / 2.0) * (x + (y * Math.sqrt(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (1.0 / 2.0) * (x + (y * math.sqrt(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 / 2.0) * Float64(x + Float64(y * sqrt(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (1.0 / 2.0) * (x + (y * sqrt(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(1.0 / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(x + N[(y * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \cdot \left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* 0.5 (+ x (* y (sqrt z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 0.5 * (x + (y * sqrt(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 0.5d0 * (x + (y * sqrt(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 0.5 * (x + (y * Math.sqrt(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return 0.5 * (x + (y * math.sqrt(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(0.5 * Float64(x + Float64(y * sqrt(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.5 * (x + (y * sqrt(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(0.5 * N[(x + N[(y * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5} \cdot \left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 72.6% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{+61} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+51}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -2.05e+61) (not (<= y 1.4e+51)))
   (* 0.5 (* y (sqrt z)))
   (* 0.5 x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.05e+61) || !(y <= 1.4e+51)) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (y * sqrt(z));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-2.05d+61)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.4d+51))) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * (y * sqrt(z))
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0 * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.05e+61) || !(y <= 1.4e+51)) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (y * Math.sqrt(z));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -2.05e+61) or not (y <= 1.4e+51):
		tmp = 0.5 * (y * math.sqrt(z))
	else:
		tmp = 0.5 * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -2.05e+61) || !(y <= 1.4e+51))
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(y * sqrt(z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -2.05e+61) || ~((y <= 1.4e+51)))
		tmp = 0.5 * (y * sqrt(z));
	else
		tmp = 0.5 * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -2.05e+61], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.4e+51]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(0.5 * N[(y * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2.04999999999999986e61 or 1.40000000000000002e51 < y

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. metadata-eval 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5} \cdot \left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \sqrt{z} + x\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\sqrt{z} \cdot y} + x\right) \]

      3. add-sqr-sqrt 99.2%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{z}} \cdot \sqrt{\sqrt{z}}\right)} \cdot y + x\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 99.1%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\sqrt{\sqrt{z}} \cdot \left(\sqrt{\sqrt{z}} \cdot y\right)} + x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{z}}, \sqrt{\sqrt{z}} \cdot y, x\right)} \]

      6. pow1/2 99.2%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{{z}^{0.5}}}, \sqrt{\sqrt{z}} \cdot y, x\right) \]

      7. sqrt-pow1 99.4%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{{z}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}}, \sqrt{\sqrt{z}} \cdot y, x\right) \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.4%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left({z}^{\color{blue}{0.25}}, \sqrt{\sqrt{z}} \cdot y, x\right) \]

      9. pow1/2 99.4%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left({z}^{0.25}, \sqrt{\color{blue}{{z}^{0.5}}} \cdot y, x\right) \]

      10. sqrt-pow1 99.3%

          \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left({z}^{0.25}, \color{blue}{{z}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}} \cdot y, x\right) \]

      11. metadata-eval 99.3%

          \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left({z}^{0.25}, {z}^{\color{blue}{0.25}} \cdot y, x\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 99.3%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left({z}^{0.25}, {z}^{0.25} \cdot y, x\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 81.0%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]

   if -2.04999999999999986e61 < y < 1.40000000000000002e51

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5} \cdot \left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 70.1%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{+61} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+51}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 50.9% accurate, 36.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* 0.5 x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 0.5 * x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 0.5d0 * x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 0.5 * x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return 0.5 * x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(0.5 * x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.5 * x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(0.5 * x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5} \cdot \left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 48.1%

   \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

6. Final simplification 48.1%

   \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot x \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024053 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quadForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, B"
  :precision binary64
  (* (/ 1.0 2.0) (+ x (* y (sqrt z)))))