Linear.V3:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, B

Percentage Accurate: 97.8% → 98.9%

Time: 7.3s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 0.4×

• 32.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (fma x y (fma z t (* a b))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return fma(x, y, fma(z, t, (a * b)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return fma(x, y, fma(z, t, Float64(a * b)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(x * y + N[(z * t + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.5%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. fma-define 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (fma a b (fma x y (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return fma(a, b, fma(x, y, (z * t)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return fma(a, b, fma(x, y, Float64(z * t)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(a * b + N[(x * y + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.5%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} \]

   3. fma-define 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

3. Simplified 97.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 97.7%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.2% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot b + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (* a b) (fma x y (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (a * b) + fma(x, y, (z * t));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(a * b) + fma(x, y, Float64(z * t)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.5%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-define 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + a \cdot b \]

3. Simplified 97.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 97.3%

   \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 47.3% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+110}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -3.2 \cdot 10^{-242}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{-278}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-277}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-219}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-147}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.8e+110)
   (* z t)
   (if (<= z -3.2e-242)
     (* a b)
     (if (<= z -4.8e-278)
       (* x y)
       (if (<= z 2.1e-277)
         (* a b)
         (if (<= z 3.4e-219) (* x y) (if (<= z 3.2e-147) (* a b) (* z t))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.8e+110) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if (z <= -3.2e-242) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if (z <= -4.8e-278) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (z <= 2.1e-277) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if (z <= 3.4e-219) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (z <= 3.2e-147) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.8d+110)) then
        tmp = z * t
    else if (z <= (-3.2d-242)) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if (z <= (-4.8d-278)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (z <= 2.1d-277) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if (z <= 3.4d-219) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (z <= 3.2d-147) then
        tmp = a * b
    else
        tmp = z * t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.8e+110) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if (z <= -3.2e-242) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if (z <= -4.8e-278) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (z <= 2.1e-277) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if (z <= 3.4e-219) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (z <= 3.2e-147) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.8e+110:
		tmp = z * t
	elif z <= -3.2e-242:
		tmp = a * b
	elif z <= -4.8e-278:
		tmp = x * y
	elif z <= 2.1e-277:
		tmp = a * b
	elif z <= 3.4e-219:
		tmp = x * y
	elif z <= 3.2e-147:
		tmp = a * b
	else:
		tmp = z * t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.8e+110)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	elseif (z <= -3.2e-242)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (z <= -4.8e-278)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (z <= 2.1e-277)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (z <= 3.4e-219)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (z <= 3.2e-147)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.8e+110)
		tmp = z * t;
	elseif (z <= -3.2e-242)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif (z <= -4.8e-278)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (z <= 2.1e-277)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif (z <= 3.4e-219)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (z <= 3.2e-147)
		tmp = a * b;
	else
		tmp = z * t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.8e+110], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, -3.2e-242], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, -4.8e-278], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 2.1e-277], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 3.4e-219], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 3.2e-147], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -1.7999999999999998e110 or 3.19999999999999979e-147 < z

   1. Initial program 94.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 56.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -1.7999999999999998e110 < z < -3.19999999999999999e-242 or -4.8e-278 < z < 2.09999999999999995e-277 or 3.3999999999999999e-219 < z < 3.19999999999999979e-147

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 52.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if -3.19999999999999999e-242 < z < -4.8e-278 or 2.09999999999999995e-277 < z < 3.3999999999999999e-219

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 61.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 56.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+110}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -3.2 \cdot 10^{-242}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{-278}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-277}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-219}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-147}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 98.5% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t)))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (* a b))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = a * b
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = a * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 56.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 80.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{+161} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 5.1 \cdot 10^{+150}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -3.4e+161) (not (<= (* x y) 5.1e+150)))
   (* x y)
   (+ (* a b) (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -3.4e+161) || !((x * y) <= 5.1e+150)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-3.4d+161)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 5.1d+150))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -3.4e+161) || !((x * y) <= 5.1e+150)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -3.4e+161) or not ((x * y) <= 5.1e+150):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -3.4e+161) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 5.1e+150))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -3.4e+161) || ~(((x * y) <= 5.1e+150)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -3.4e+161], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 5.1e+150]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -3.39999999999999993e161 or 5.1000000000000001e150 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 88.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 77.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -3.39999999999999993e161 < (*.f64 x y) < 5.1000000000000001e150

   1. Initial program 99.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 87.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{+161} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 5.1 \cdot 10^{+150}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 84.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.76 \cdot 10^{+50} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 3.7 \cdot 10^{+85}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -1.76e+50) (not (<= (* x y) 3.7e+85)))
   (+ (* a b) (* x y))
   (+ (* a b) (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1.76e+50) || !((x * y) <= 3.7e+85)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-1.76d+50)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 3.7d+85))) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (x * y)
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1.76e+50) || !((x * y) <= 3.7e+85)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -1.76e+50) or not ((x * y) <= 3.7e+85):
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y)
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -1.76e+50) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 3.7e+85))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -1.76e+50) || ~(((x * y) <= 3.7e+85)))
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.76e+50], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 3.7e+85]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.7600000000000001e50 or 3.7000000000000002e85 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 91.6%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 84.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.7600000000000001e50 < (*.f64 x y) < 3.7000000000000002e85

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.76 \cdot 10^{+50} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 3.7 \cdot 10^{+85}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 47.3% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8.8 \cdot 10^{+111} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-147}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -8.8e+111) (not (<= z 3.2e-147))) (* z t) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -8.8e+111) || !(z <= 3.2e-147)) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-8.8d+111)) .or. (.not. (z <= 3.2d-147))) then
        tmp = z * t
    else
        tmp = a * b
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -8.8e+111) || !(z <= 3.2e-147)) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -8.8e+111) or not (z <= 3.2e-147):
		tmp = z * t
	else:
		tmp = a * b
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -8.8e+111) || !(z <= 3.2e-147))
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -8.8e+111) || ~((z <= 3.2e-147)))
		tmp = z * t;
	else
		tmp = a * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -8.8e+111], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 3.2e-147]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -8.79999999999999994e111 or 3.19999999999999979e-147 < z

   1. Initial program 94.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 56.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -8.79999999999999994e111 < z < 3.19999999999999979e-147

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 48.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 52.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8.8 \cdot 10^{+111} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-147}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 35.0% accurate, 3.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (* a b))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * b;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = a * b
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * b;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return a * b

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(a * b)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = a * b;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.5%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 37.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

4. Final simplification 37.6%

   \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024053 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Linear.V3:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))