Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, B

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 7.2s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

• 26.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\left(x + y\right) - z}{t \cdot 2} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (/ (- (+ x y) z) (* t 2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x + y) - z) / (t * 2.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((x + y) - z) / (t * 2.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x + y) - z) / (t * 2.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((x + y) - z) / (t * 2.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) - z) / Float64(t * 2.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((x + y) - z) / (t * 2.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\left(x + y\right) - z}{t \cdot 2} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (/ (- (+ x y) z) (* t 2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x + y) - z) / (t * 2.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((x + y) - z) / (t * 2.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x + y) - z) / (t * 2.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((x + y) - z) / (t * 2.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) - z) / Float64(t * 2.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((x + y) - z) / (t * 2.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\left(x + y\right) - z}{t \cdot 2} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (/ (- (+ x y) z) (* t 2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x + y) - z) / (t * 2.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((x + y) - z) / (t * 2.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x + y) - z) / (t * 2.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((x + y) - z) / (t * 2.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) - z) / Float64(t * 2.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((x + y) - z) / (t * 2.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\frac{\left(x + y\right) - z}{t \cdot 2} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + y\right) - z}{t \cdot 2} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 46.6% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \frac{z \cdot -0.5}{t}\\ t_2 := 0.5 \cdot \frac{x}{t}\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.1 \cdot 10^{-164}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{-297}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-209}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+70}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y \cdot 0.5}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (/ (* z -0.5) t)) (t_2 (* 0.5 (/ x t))))
   (if (<= y -3.1e-164)
     t_2
     (if (<= y -1.1e-297)
       t_1
       (if (<= y 4e-209) t_2 (if (<= y 7.2e+70) t_1 (/ (* y 0.5) t)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (z * -0.5) / t;
	double t_2 = 0.5 * (x / t);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.1e-164) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (y <= -1.1e-297) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= 4e-209) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (y <= 7.2e+70) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (y * 0.5) / t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (z * (-0.5d0)) / t
    t_2 = 0.5d0 * (x / t)
    if (y <= (-3.1d-164)) then
        tmp = t_2
    else if (y <= (-1.1d-297)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (y <= 4d-209) then
        tmp = t_2
    else if (y <= 7.2d+70) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = (y * 0.5d0) / t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (z * -0.5) / t;
	double t_2 = 0.5 * (x / t);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.1e-164) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (y <= -1.1e-297) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= 4e-209) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (y <= 7.2e+70) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (y * 0.5) / t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = (z * -0.5) / t
	t_2 = 0.5 * (x / t)
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -3.1e-164:
		tmp = t_2
	elif y <= -1.1e-297:
		tmp = t_1
	elif y <= 4e-209:
		tmp = t_2
	elif y <= 7.2e+70:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = (y * 0.5) / t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(z * -0.5) / t)
	t_2 = Float64(0.5 * Float64(x / t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -3.1e-164)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (y <= -1.1e-297)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= 4e-209)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (y <= 7.2e+70)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * 0.5) / t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = (z * -0.5) / t;
	t_2 = 0.5 * (x / t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -3.1e-164)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (y <= -1.1e-297)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= 4e-209)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (y <= 7.2e+70)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = (y * 0.5) / t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(z * -0.5), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(0.5 * N[(x / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -3.1e-164], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[y, -1.1e-297], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[y, 4e-209], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[y, 7.2e+70], t$95$1, N[(N[(y * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -3.1000000000000001e-164 or -1.0999999999999999e-297 < y < 4.0000000000000002e-209

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\left(x + y\right) - z}{t \cdot 2} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 38.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \frac{x}{t}} \]

   if -3.1000000000000001e-164 < y < -1.0999999999999999e-297 or 4.0000000000000002e-209 < y < 7.1999999999999999e70

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\left(x + y\right) - z}{t \cdot 2} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 47.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 47.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z}{t} \cdot -0.5} \]

      2. associate-*l/ 47.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot -0.5}{t}} \]

   5. Simplified 47.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot -0.5}{t}} \]

   if 7.1999999999999999e70 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\left(x + y\right) - z}{t \cdot 2} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 72.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \frac{y}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 72.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot y}{t}} \]

   5. Simplified 72.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot y}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 48.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.1 \cdot 10^{-164}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \frac{x}{t}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{-297}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{z \cdot -0.5}{t}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-209}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \frac{x}{t}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+70}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{z \cdot -0.5}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y \cdot 0.5}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 81.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{+162} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+85}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{z \cdot -0.5}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.7e+162) (not (<= z 9e+85)))
   (/ (* z -0.5) t)
   (* (+ x y) (/ 0.5 t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.7e+162) || !(z <= 9e+85)) {
		tmp = (z * -0.5) / t;
	} else {
		tmp = (x + y) * (0.5 / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2.7d+162)) .or. (.not. (z <= 9d+85))) then
        tmp = (z * (-0.5d0)) / t
    else
        tmp = (x + y) * (0.5d0 / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.7e+162) || !(z <= 9e+85)) {
		tmp = (z * -0.5) / t;
	} else {
		tmp = (x + y) * (0.5 / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2.7e+162) or not (z <= 9e+85):
		tmp = (z * -0.5) / t
	else:
		tmp = (x + y) * (0.5 / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.7e+162) || !(z <= 9e+85))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z * -0.5) / t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(0.5 / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2.7e+162) || ~((z <= 9e+85)))
		tmp = (z * -0.5) / t;
	else
		tmp = (x + y) * (0.5 / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.7e+162], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 9e+85]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(z * -0.5), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(0.5 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.7000000000000002e162 or 9.00000000000000013e85 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\left(x + y\right) - z}{t \cdot 2} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 82.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 82.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z}{t} \cdot -0.5} \]

      2. associate-*l/ 82.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot -0.5}{t}} \]

   5. Simplified 82.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot -0.5}{t}} \]

   if -2.7000000000000002e162 < z < 9.00000000000000013e85

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\left(x + y\right) - z}{t \cdot 2} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \frac{x + y}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 84.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot \left(x + y\right)}{t}} \]

      2. associate-*l/ 84.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.5}{t} \cdot \left(x + y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 84.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}} \]

      4. +-commutative 84.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} \cdot \frac{0.5}{t} \]

   5. Simplified 84.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{+162} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+85}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{z \cdot -0.5}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 77.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-56}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x - z\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{+117}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{0.5 \cdot \left(y - z\right)}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.9e-56)
   (* (- x z) (/ 0.5 t))
   (if (<= y 7.8e+117) (/ (* 0.5 (- y z)) t) (* (+ x y) (/ 0.5 t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.9e-56) {
		tmp = (x - z) * (0.5 / t);
	} else if (y <= 7.8e+117) {
		tmp = (0.5 * (y - z)) / t;
	} else {
		tmp = (x + y) * (0.5 / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.9d-56) then
        tmp = (x - z) * (0.5d0 / t)
    else if (y <= 7.8d+117) then
        tmp = (0.5d0 * (y - z)) / t
    else
        tmp = (x + y) * (0.5d0 / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.9e-56) {
		tmp = (x - z) * (0.5 / t);
	} else if (y <= 7.8e+117) {
		tmp = (0.5 * (y - z)) / t;
	} else {
		tmp = (x + y) * (0.5 / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.9e-56:
		tmp = (x - z) * (0.5 / t)
	elif y <= 7.8e+117:
		tmp = (0.5 * (y - z)) / t
	else:
		tmp = (x + y) * (0.5 / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.9e-56)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x - z) * Float64(0.5 / t));
	elseif (y <= 7.8e+117)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(0.5 * Float64(y - z)) / t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(0.5 / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.9e-56)
		tmp = (x - z) * (0.5 / t);
	elseif (y <= 7.8e+117)
		tmp = (0.5 * (y - z)) / t;
	else
		tmp = (x + y) * (0.5 / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.9e-56], N[(N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(0.5 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 7.8e+117], N[(N[(0.5 * N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(0.5 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < 2.89999999999999991e-56

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\left(x + y\right) - z}{t \cdot 2} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \frac{x - z}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 74.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x - z}{t} \cdot 0.5} \]

      2. associate-*l/ 74.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(x - z\right) \cdot 0.5}{t}} \]

      3. associate-/l* 74.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - z\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}} \]

   5. Simplified 74.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - z\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}} \]

   if 2.89999999999999991e-56 < y < 7.79999999999999981e117

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\frac{\left(x + y\right) - z}{t \cdot 2} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 72.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \frac{y - z}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 72.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot \left(y - z\right)}{t}} \]

   5. Simplified 72.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot \left(y - z\right)}{t}} \]

   if 7.79999999999999981e117 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\left(x + y\right) - z}{t \cdot 2} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \frac{x + y}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot \left(x + y\right)}{t}} \]

      2. associate-*l/ 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.5}{t} \cdot \left(x + y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}} \]

      4. +-commutative 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} \cdot \frac{0.5}{t} \]

   5. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-56}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x - z\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{+117}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{0.5 \cdot \left(y - z\right)}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 77.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+70}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x - z\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 7.2e+70) (* (- x z) (/ 0.5 t)) (* (+ x y) (/ 0.5 t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 7.2e+70) {
		tmp = (x - z) * (0.5 / t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x + y) * (0.5 / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 7.2d+70) then
        tmp = (x - z) * (0.5d0 / t)
    else
        tmp = (x + y) * (0.5d0 / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 7.2e+70) {
		tmp = (x - z) * (0.5 / t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x + y) * (0.5 / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 7.2e+70:
		tmp = (x - z) * (0.5 / t)
	else:
		tmp = (x + y) * (0.5 / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 7.2e+70)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x - z) * Float64(0.5 / t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(0.5 / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 7.2e+70)
		tmp = (x - z) * (0.5 / t);
	else
		tmp = (x + y) * (0.5 / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 7.2e+70], N[(N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(0.5 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(0.5 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 7.1999999999999999e70

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\left(x + y\right) - z}{t \cdot 2} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \frac{x - z}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 75.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x - z}{t} \cdot 0.5} \]

      2. associate-*l/ 75.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(x - z\right) \cdot 0.5}{t}} \]

      3. associate-/l* 75.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - z\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}} \]

   5. Simplified 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - z\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}} \]

   if 7.1999999999999999e70 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\left(x + y\right) - z}{t \cdot 2} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 92.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \frac{x + y}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 92.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot \left(x + y\right)}{t}} \]

      2. associate-*l/ 92.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.5}{t} \cdot \left(x + y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 92.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}} \]

      4. +-commutative 92.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} \cdot \frac{0.5}{t} \]

   5. Simplified 92.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+70}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x - z\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 46.1% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-56}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \frac{x}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1.9e-56) (* 0.5 (/ x t)) (* y (/ 0.5 t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.9e-56) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (x / t);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (0.5 / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.9d-56) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * (x / t)
    else
        tmp = y * (0.5d0 / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.9e-56) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (x / t);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (0.5 / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.9e-56:
		tmp = 0.5 * (x / t)
	else:
		tmp = y * (0.5 / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.9e-56)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(x / t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(0.5 / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.9e-56)
		tmp = 0.5 * (x / t);
	else
		tmp = y * (0.5 / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.9e-56], N[(0.5 * N[(x / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(0.5 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.9000000000000001e-56

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\left(x + y\right) - z}{t \cdot 2} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 43.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \frac{x}{t}} \]

   if 1.9000000000000001e-56 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\left(x + y\right) - z}{t \cdot 2} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. div-sub 94.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x + y}{t \cdot 2} - \frac{z}{t \cdot 2}} \]

      2. div-inv 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot 2}} - \frac{z}{t \cdot 2} \]

      3. *-commutative 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot t}} - \frac{z}{t \cdot 2} \]

      4. associate-/r* 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{2}}{t}} - \frac{z}{t \cdot 2} \]

      5. metadata-eval 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{0.5}}{t} - \frac{z}{t \cdot 2} \]

      6. div-inv 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t} - \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot 2}} \]

      7. *-commutative 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t} - z \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot t}} \]

      8. associate-/r* 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t} - z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{2}}{t}} \]

      9. metadata-eval 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t} - z \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{0.5}}{t} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{t} - z \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 59.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \frac{y}{t}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 59.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot y}{t}} \]

      2. associate-*l/ 59.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.5}{t} \cdot y} \]

      3. *-commutative 59.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}} \]

   7. Simplified 59.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 48.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-56}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \frac{x}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \frac{0.5}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 46.1% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-56}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \frac{x}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y \cdot 0.5}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1.9e-56) (* 0.5 (/ x t)) (/ (* y 0.5) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.9e-56) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (x / t);
	} else {
		tmp = (y * 0.5) / t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.9d-56) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * (x / t)
    else
        tmp = (y * 0.5d0) / t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.9e-56) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (x / t);
	} else {
		tmp = (y * 0.5) / t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.9e-56:
		tmp = 0.5 * (x / t)
	else:
		tmp = (y * 0.5) / t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.9e-56)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(x / t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * 0.5) / t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.9e-56)
		tmp = 0.5 * (x / t);
	else
		tmp = (y * 0.5) / t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.9e-56], N[(0.5 * N[(x / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.9000000000000001e-56

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\left(x + y\right) - z}{t \cdot 2} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 43.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \frac{x}{t}} \]

   if 1.9000000000000001e-56 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\left(x + y\right) - z}{t \cdot 2} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 59.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \frac{y}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 59.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot y}{t}} \]

   5. Simplified 59.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot y}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 48.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-56}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \frac{x}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y \cdot 0.5}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 37.7% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \cdot \frac{x}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (* 0.5 (/ x t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return 0.5 * (x / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = 0.5d0 * (x / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return 0.5 * (x / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return 0.5 * (x / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(0.5 * Float64(x / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.5 * (x / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(0.5 * N[(x / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\frac{\left(x + y\right) - z}{t \cdot 2} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 40.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \frac{x}{t}} \]

4. Final simplification 40.7%

   \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \frac{x}{t} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024053 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, B"
  :precision binary64
  (/ (- (+ x y) z) (* t 2.0)))