Diagrams.ThreeD.Shapes:frustum from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3, B

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 4.7s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (- y x) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y - x) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y - x) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y - x) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y - x) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y - x) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y - x) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (- y x) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y - x) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y - x) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y - x) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y - x) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y - x) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y - x) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y - x, z, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma (- y x) z x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma((y - x), z, x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(Float64(y - x), z, x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z + x} \]

   2. fma-define 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y - x, z, x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y - x, z, x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y - x, z, x\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 75.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{-7} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-34}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.9e-7) (not (<= x 1.5e-34))) (* x (- 1.0 z)) (* y z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.9e-7) || !(x <= 1.5e-34)) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.9d-7)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.5d-34))) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    else
        tmp = y * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.9e-7) || !(x <= 1.5e-34)) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.9e-7) or not (x <= 1.5e-34):
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	else:
		tmp = y * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.9e-7) || !(x <= 1.5e-34))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.9e-7) || ~((x <= 1.5e-34)))
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	else
		tmp = y * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.9e-7], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.5e-34]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.90000000000000007e-7 or 1.5e-34 < x

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 85.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 85.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 85.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 85.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]

   if -1.90000000000000007e-7 < x < 1.5e-34

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 90.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 90.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Simplified 90.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 90.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 67.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{-7} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-34}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 86.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{+78} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 78000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.25e+78) (not (<= x 78000.0))) (* x (- 1.0 z)) (+ x (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.25e+78) || !(x <= 78000.0)) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.25d+78)) .or. (.not. (x <= 78000.0d0))) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.25e+78) || !(x <= 78000.0)) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.25e+78) or not (x <= 78000.0):
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.25e+78) || !(x <= 78000.0))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.25e+78) || ~((x <= 78000.0)))
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.25e+78], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 78000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.24999999999999996e78 or 78000 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 92.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 92.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 92.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 92.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]

   if -1.24999999999999996e78 < x < 78000

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 88.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 88.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Simplified 88.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{+78} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 78000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 60.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.85 \cdot 10^{-64} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 7 \cdot 10^{-69}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.85e-64) (not (<= z 7e-69))) (* y z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.85e-64) || !(z <= 7e-69)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.85d-64)) .or. (.not. (z <= 7d-69))) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.85e-64) || !(z <= 7e-69)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.85e-64) or not (z <= 7e-69):
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.85e-64) || !(z <= 7e-69))
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.85e-64) || ~((z <= 7e-69)))
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.85e-64], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 7e-69]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.84999999999999999e-64 or 7.0000000000000003e-69 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 61.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 61.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Simplified 61.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 62.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 56.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -1.84999999999999999e-64 < z < 7.0000000000000003e-69

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.85 \cdot 10^{-64} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 7 \cdot 10^{-69}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (- y x) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y - x) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y - x) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y - x) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y - x) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y - x) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y - x) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 35.4% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 36.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

4. Final simplification 36.1%

   \[\leadsto x \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024050 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.ThreeD.Shapes:frustum from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ x (* (- y x) z)))