Falkner and Boettcher, Appendix A

Percentage Accurate: 90.3% → 99.7%

Time: 12.1s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.5% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. a = -1.9999999999999999e-154
  2. k = 0.0
  3. m = -2.00000000000000007e154

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = (a * (k ** m)) / ((1.0d0 + (10.0d0 * k)) + (k * k))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * Math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return (a * math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(Float64(a * (k ^ m)) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)) + Float64(k * k)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = (a * (k ^ m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 90.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = (a * (k ** m)) / ((1.0d0 + (10.0d0 * k)) + (k * k))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * Math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return (a * math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(Float64(a * (k ^ m)) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)) + Float64(k * k)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = (a * (k ^ m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.7% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ t_1 := \frac{1}{t\_0}\\ \mathbf{if}\;k \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-26}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{k \cdot \left(10 \cdot t\_1 + \frac{k}{t\_0}\right) + t\_1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* a (pow k m))) (t_1 (/ 1.0 t_0)))
   (if (<= k 5e-26) t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ (* k (+ (* 10.0 t_1) (/ k t_0))) t_1)))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * pow(k, m);
	double t_1 = 1.0 / t_0;
	double tmp;
	if (k <= 5e-26) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / ((k * ((10.0 * t_1) + (k / t_0))) + t_1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = a * (k ** m)
    t_1 = 1.0d0 / t_0
    if (k <= 5d-26) then
        tmp = t_0
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 / ((k * ((10.0d0 * t_1) + (k / t_0))) + t_1)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * Math.pow(k, m);
	double t_1 = 1.0 / t_0;
	double tmp;
	if (k <= 5e-26) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / ((k * ((10.0 * t_1) + (k / t_0))) + t_1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	t_0 = a * math.pow(k, m)
	t_1 = 1.0 / t_0
	tmp = 0
	if k <= 5e-26:
		tmp = t_0
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 / ((k * ((10.0 * t_1) + (k / t_0))) + t_1)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = Float64(a * (k ^ m))
	t_1 = Float64(1.0 / t_0)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (k <= 5e-26)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(k * Float64(Float64(10.0 * t_1) + Float64(k / t_0))) + t_1));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = a * (k ^ m);
	t_1 = 1.0 / t_0;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (k <= 5e-26)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = 1.0 / ((k * ((10.0 * t_1) + (k / t_0))) + t_1);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(1.0 / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[k, 5e-26], t$95$0, N[(1.0 / N[(N[(k * N[(N[(10.0 * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if k < 5.00000000000000019e-26

   1. Initial program 94.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 94.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 94.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 94.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 94.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 94.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 94.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 94.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 94.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 94.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 94.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{{k}^{m}} \]

   if 5.00000000000000019e-26 < k

   1. Initial program 87.9%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 87.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 87.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 87.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 87.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 87.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 87.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 87.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 87.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 87.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 87.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 87.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

      2. clear-num 87.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}{a \cdot {k}^{m}}}} \]

      3. +-commutative 87.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{\color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right) + 1}}{a \cdot {k}^{m}}} \]

      4. fma-define 87.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, 10 + k, 1\right)}}{a \cdot {k}^{m}}} \]

      5. +-commutative 87.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, \color{blue}{k + 10}, 1\right)}{a \cdot {k}^{m}}} \]

      6. *-commutative 87.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}{\color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a}}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 87.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}{{k}^{m} \cdot a}}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around 0 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 \cdot \frac{1}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} + \frac{k}{a \cdot {k}^{m}}\right) + \frac{1}{a \cdot {k}^{m}}}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 97.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \mathbf{if}\;\frac{t\_0}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+175}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* a (pow k m))))
   (if (<= (/ t_0 (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))) 2e+175)
     (* a (/ (pow k m) (+ 1.0 (* k (+ 10.0 k)))))
     t_0)))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * pow(k, m);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))) <= 2e+175) {
		tmp = a * (pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * (10.0 + k))));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = a * (k ** m)
    if ((t_0 / ((1.0d0 + (10.0d0 * k)) + (k * k))) <= 2d+175) then
        tmp = a * ((k ** m) / (1.0d0 + (k * (10.0d0 + k))))
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * Math.pow(k, m);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))) <= 2e+175) {
		tmp = a * (Math.pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * (10.0 + k))));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	t_0 = a * math.pow(k, m)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_0 / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))) <= 2e+175:
		tmp = a * (math.pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * (10.0 + k))))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = Float64(a * (k ^ m))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t_0 / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)) + Float64(k * k))) <= 2e+175)
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64((k ^ m) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(10.0 + k)))));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = a * (k ^ m);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_0 / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))) <= 2e+175)
		tmp = a * ((k ^ m) / (1.0 + (k * (10.0 + k))));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t$95$0 / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 2e+175], N[(a * N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(10.0 + k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 1 (*.f64 10 k)) (*.f64 k k))) < 1.9999999999999999e175

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 1.9999999999999999e175 < (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 1 (*.f64 10 k)) (*.f64 k k)))

   1. Initial program 66.7%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 66.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 66.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 66.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 66.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 66.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 66.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 66.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 66.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 66.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 66.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{{k}^{m}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -0.28:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;m \leq 0.0014:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{k \cdot \left(\frac{10}{a} + \frac{k}{a}\right) + \frac{1}{a}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* a (pow k m))))
   (if (<= m -0.28)
     t_0
     (if (<= m 0.0014)
       (/ 1.0 (+ (* k (+ (/ 10.0 a) (/ k a))) (/ 1.0 a)))
       t_0))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * pow(k, m);
	double tmp;
	if (m <= -0.28) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (m <= 0.0014) {
		tmp = 1.0 / ((k * ((10.0 / a) + (k / a))) + (1.0 / a));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = a * (k ** m)
    if (m <= (-0.28d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (m <= 0.0014d0) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / ((k * ((10.0d0 / a) + (k / a))) + (1.0d0 / a))
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * Math.pow(k, m);
	double tmp;
	if (m <= -0.28) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (m <= 0.0014) {
		tmp = 1.0 / ((k * ((10.0 / a) + (k / a))) + (1.0 / a));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	t_0 = a * math.pow(k, m)
	tmp = 0
	if m <= -0.28:
		tmp = t_0
	elif m <= 0.0014:
		tmp = 1.0 / ((k * ((10.0 / a) + (k / a))) + (1.0 / a))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = Float64(a * (k ^ m))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= -0.28)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (m <= 0.0014)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(k * Float64(Float64(10.0 / a) + Float64(k / a))) + Float64(1.0 / a)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = a * (k ^ m);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= -0.28)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (m <= 0.0014)
		tmp = 1.0 / ((k * ((10.0 / a) + (k / a))) + (1.0 / a));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[m, -0.28], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[m, 0.0014], N[(1.0 / N[(N[(k * N[(N[(10.0 / a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < -0.28000000000000003 or 0.00139999999999999999 < m

   1. Initial program 89.7%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 89.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 89.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 89.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 89.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 89.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 89.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 89.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 89.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 89.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 89.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{{k}^{m}} \]

   if -0.28000000000000003 < m < 0.00139999999999999999

   1. Initial program 95.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 95.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 95.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 95.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 95.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 95.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 95.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 95.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 95.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 95.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 95.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

      2. clear-num 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}{a \cdot {k}^{m}}}} \]

      3. +-commutative 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{\color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right) + 1}}{a \cdot {k}^{m}}} \]

      4. fma-define 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, 10 + k, 1\right)}}{a \cdot {k}^{m}}} \]

      5. +-commutative 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, \color{blue}{k + 10}, 1\right)}{a \cdot {k}^{m}}} \]

      6. *-commutative 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}{\color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a}}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}{{k}^{m} \cdot a}}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 \cdot \frac{1}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} + \frac{k}{a \cdot {k}^{m}}\right) + \frac{1}{a \cdot {k}^{m}}}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in m around 0 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{k \cdot \left(10 \cdot \frac{1}{a} + \frac{k}{a}\right) + \frac{1}{a}}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{10}{a}} + \frac{k}{a}\right) + \frac{1}{a}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 37.2% accurate, 4.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(99 \cdot k\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.2:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + 10 \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;m \leq 2.95 \cdot 10^{+194}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;m \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+232}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ a (* a (* k (* 99.0 k))))))
   (if (<= m 2.2)
     (/ a (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)))
     (if (<= m 2.95e+194) t_0 (if (<= m 1.15e+232) (* -10.0 (* a k)) t_0)))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a + (a * (k * (99.0 * k)));
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.2) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (10.0 * k));
	} else if (m <= 2.95e+194) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (m <= 1.15e+232) {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = a + (a * (k * (99.0d0 * k)))
    if (m <= 2.2d0) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (10.0d0 * k))
    else if (m <= 2.95d+194) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (m <= 1.15d+232) then
        tmp = (-10.0d0) * (a * k)
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a + (a * (k * (99.0 * k)));
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.2) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (10.0 * k));
	} else if (m <= 2.95e+194) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (m <= 1.15e+232) {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	t_0 = a + (a * (k * (99.0 * k)))
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.2:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (10.0 * k))
	elif m <= 2.95e+194:
		tmp = t_0
	elif m <= 1.15e+232:
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k)
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = Float64(a + Float64(a * Float64(k * Float64(99.0 * k))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.2)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)));
	elseif (m <= 2.95e+194)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (m <= 1.15e+232)
		tmp = Float64(-10.0 * Float64(a * k));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = a + (a * (k * (99.0 * k)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.2)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (10.0 * k));
	elseif (m <= 2.95e+194)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (m <= 1.15e+232)
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(a + N[(a * N[(k * N[(99.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[m, 2.2], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[m, 2.95e+194], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[m, 1.15e+232], N[(-10.0 * N[(a * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if m < 2.2000000000000002

   1. Initial program 97.2%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 97.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 48.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{10 \cdot k}} \]

   if 2.2000000000000002 < m < 2.94999999999999986e194 or 1.15000000000000003e232 < m

   1. Initial program 79.5%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 79.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 79.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 79.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 79.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 79.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 79.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 79.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 79.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 79.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 79.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 2.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 21.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) - 10 \cdot a\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 27.6%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(99 \cdot k - 10\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in k around inf 27.6%

      \[\leadsto a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(99 \cdot k\right)}\right) \]

   if 2.94999999999999986e194 < m < 1.15000000000000003e232

   1. Initial program 93.8%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 93.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 93.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 93.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 93.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 93.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 93.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 93.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 93.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 93.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 93.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 81.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-10 \cdot \left(k \cdot {k}^{m}\right) + {k}^{m}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around 0 4.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + -10 \cdot k\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around inf 38.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 53.7% accurate, 4.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(99 \cdot k\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.8:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;m \leq 6 \cdot 10^{+194}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;m \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{+225}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ a (* a (* k (* 99.0 k))))))
   (if (<= m 1.8)
     (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k (+ 10.0 k))))
     (if (<= m 6e+194) t_0 (if (<= m 1.95e+225) (* -10.0 (* a k)) t_0)))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a + (a * (k * (99.0 * k)));
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.8) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (10.0 + k)));
	} else if (m <= 6e+194) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (m <= 1.95e+225) {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = a + (a * (k * (99.0d0 * k)))
    if (m <= 1.8d0) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * (10.0d0 + k)))
    else if (m <= 6d+194) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (m <= 1.95d+225) then
        tmp = (-10.0d0) * (a * k)
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a + (a * (k * (99.0 * k)));
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.8) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (10.0 + k)));
	} else if (m <= 6e+194) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (m <= 1.95e+225) {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	t_0 = a + (a * (k * (99.0 * k)))
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.8:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (10.0 + k)))
	elif m <= 6e+194:
		tmp = t_0
	elif m <= 1.95e+225:
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k)
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = Float64(a + Float64(a * Float64(k * Float64(99.0 * k))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.8)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(10.0 + k))));
	elseif (m <= 6e+194)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (m <= 1.95e+225)
		tmp = Float64(-10.0 * Float64(a * k));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = a + (a * (k * (99.0 * k)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.8)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (10.0 + k)));
	elseif (m <= 6e+194)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (m <= 1.95e+225)
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(a + N[(a * N[(k * N[(99.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[m, 1.8], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(10.0 + k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[m, 6e+194], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[m, 1.95e+225], N[(-10.0 * N[(a * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if m < 1.80000000000000004

   1. Initial program 97.2%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 97.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   if 1.80000000000000004 < m < 6.0000000000000006e194 or 1.95000000000000012e225 < m

   1. Initial program 79.5%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 79.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 79.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 79.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 79.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 79.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 79.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 79.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 79.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 79.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 79.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 2.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 21.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) - 10 \cdot a\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 27.6%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(99 \cdot k - 10\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in k around inf 27.6%

      \[\leadsto a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(99 \cdot k\right)}\right) \]

   if 6.0000000000000006e194 < m < 1.95000000000000012e225

   1. Initial program 93.8%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 93.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 93.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 93.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 93.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 93.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 93.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 93.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 93.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 93.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 93.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 81.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-10 \cdot \left(k \cdot {k}^{m}\right) + {k}^{m}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around 0 4.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + -10 \cdot k\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around inf 38.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 53.7% accurate, 4.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(99 \cdot k\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.1:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{k \cdot \left(\frac{10}{a} + \frac{k}{a}\right) + \frac{1}{a}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;m \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{+194}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;m \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{+225}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ a (* a (* k (* 99.0 k))))))
   (if (<= m 2.1)
     (/ 1.0 (+ (* k (+ (/ 10.0 a) (/ k a))) (/ 1.0 a)))
     (if (<= m 1.45e+194) t_0 (if (<= m 1.95e+225) (* -10.0 (* a k)) t_0)))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a + (a * (k * (99.0 * k)));
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.1) {
		tmp = 1.0 / ((k * ((10.0 / a) + (k / a))) + (1.0 / a));
	} else if (m <= 1.45e+194) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (m <= 1.95e+225) {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = a + (a * (k * (99.0d0 * k)))
    if (m <= 2.1d0) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / ((k * ((10.0d0 / a) + (k / a))) + (1.0d0 / a))
    else if (m <= 1.45d+194) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (m <= 1.95d+225) then
        tmp = (-10.0d0) * (a * k)
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a + (a * (k * (99.0 * k)));
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.1) {
		tmp = 1.0 / ((k * ((10.0 / a) + (k / a))) + (1.0 / a));
	} else if (m <= 1.45e+194) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (m <= 1.95e+225) {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	t_0 = a + (a * (k * (99.0 * k)))
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.1:
		tmp = 1.0 / ((k * ((10.0 / a) + (k / a))) + (1.0 / a))
	elif m <= 1.45e+194:
		tmp = t_0
	elif m <= 1.95e+225:
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k)
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = Float64(a + Float64(a * Float64(k * Float64(99.0 * k))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.1)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(k * Float64(Float64(10.0 / a) + Float64(k / a))) + Float64(1.0 / a)));
	elseif (m <= 1.45e+194)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (m <= 1.95e+225)
		tmp = Float64(-10.0 * Float64(a * k));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = a + (a * (k * (99.0 * k)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.1)
		tmp = 1.0 / ((k * ((10.0 / a) + (k / a))) + (1.0 / a));
	elseif (m <= 1.45e+194)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (m <= 1.95e+225)
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(a + N[(a * N[(k * N[(99.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[m, 2.1], N[(1.0 / N[(N[(k * N[(N[(10.0 / a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[m, 1.45e+194], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[m, 1.95e+225], N[(-10.0 * N[(a * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if m < 2.10000000000000009

   1. Initial program 97.2%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 97.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 97.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

      2. clear-num 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}{a \cdot {k}^{m}}}} \]

      3. +-commutative 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{\color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right) + 1}}{a \cdot {k}^{m}}} \]

      4. fma-define 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, 10 + k, 1\right)}}{a \cdot {k}^{m}}} \]

      5. +-commutative 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, \color{blue}{k + 10}, 1\right)}{a \cdot {k}^{m}}} \]

      6. *-commutative 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}{\color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a}}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}{{k}^{m} \cdot a}}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around 0 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 \cdot \frac{1}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} + \frac{k}{a \cdot {k}^{m}}\right) + \frac{1}{a \cdot {k}^{m}}}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in m around 0 73.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{k \cdot \left(10 \cdot \frac{1}{a} + \frac{k}{a}\right) + \frac{1}{a}}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0 73.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{10}{a}} + \frac{k}{a}\right) + \frac{1}{a}} \]

   if 2.10000000000000009 < m < 1.45e194 or 1.95000000000000012e225 < m

   1. Initial program 79.5%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 79.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 79.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 79.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 79.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 79.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 79.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 79.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 79.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 79.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 79.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 2.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 21.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) - 10 \cdot a\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 27.6%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(99 \cdot k - 10\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in k around inf 27.6%

      \[\leadsto a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(99 \cdot k\right)}\right) \]

   if 1.45e194 < m < 1.95000000000000012e225

   1. Initial program 93.8%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 93.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 93.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 93.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 93.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 93.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 93.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 93.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 93.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 93.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 93.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 81.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-10 \cdot \left(k \cdot {k}^{m}\right) + {k}^{m}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around 0 4.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + -10 \cdot k\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around inf 38.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 33.8% accurate, 9.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3700:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + 10 \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 3700.0) (/ a (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k))) (* -10.0 (* a k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3700.0) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (10.0 * k));
	} else {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 3700.0d0) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (10.0d0 * k))
    else
        tmp = (-10.0d0) * (a * k)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3700.0) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (10.0 * k));
	} else {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 3700.0:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (10.0 * k))
	else:
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 3700.0)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-10.0 * Float64(a * k));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 3700.0)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (10.0 * k));
	else
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 3700.0], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(-10.0 * N[(a * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 3700

   1. Initial program 97.2%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 97.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 72.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 48.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{10 \cdot k}} \]

   if 3700 < m

   1. Initial program 81.8%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 81.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 81.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 81.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 81.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 81.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 81.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 81.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 81.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 81.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 81.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 79.5%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-10 \cdot \left(k \cdot {k}^{m}\right) + {k}^{m}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around 0 7.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + -10 \cdot k\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around inf 23.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 25.1% accurate, 11.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1700:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 1700.0) a (* -10.0 (* a k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1700.0) {
		tmp = a;
	} else {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1700.0d0) then
        tmp = a
    else
        tmp = (-10.0d0) * (a * k)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1700.0) {
		tmp = a;
	} else {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1700.0:
		tmp = a
	else:
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1700.0)
		tmp = a;
	else
		tmp = Float64(-10.0 * Float64(a * k));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1700.0)
		tmp = a;
	else
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1700.0], a, N[(-10.0 * N[(a * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1700

   1. Initial program 97.2%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 97.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 72.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 33.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]

   if 1700 < m

   1. Initial program 81.8%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 81.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 81.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 81.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 81.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 81.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 81.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 81.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 81.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 81.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 81.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 79.5%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-10 \cdot \left(k \cdot {k}^{m}\right) + {k}^{m}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around 0 7.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + -10 \cdot k\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around inf 23.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 19.6% accurate, 114.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m) :precision binary64 a)

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = a
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return a

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return a
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = a;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := a

Derivation

1. Initial program 91.9%

   \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 91.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 91.9%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-frac-neg2 91.9%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

   4. distribute-neg-frac2 91.9%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 91.9%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   6. sqr-neg 91.9%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

   7. associate-+l+ 91.9%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

   8. sqr-neg 91.9%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

   9. distribute-rgt-out 91.9%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 91.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 48.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 23.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024050 -o generate:simplify
(FPCore (a k m)
  :name "Falkner and Boettcher, Appendix A"
  :precision binary64
  (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))