Diagrams.ThreeD.Transform:aboutY from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%

Time: 8.4s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (cos y)) (* z (sin y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * Math.cos(y)) + (z * Math.sin(y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * math.cos(y)) + (z * math.sin(y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * cos(y)) + Float64(z * sin(y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (cos y)) (* z (sin y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * Math.cos(y)) + (z * Math.sin(y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * math.cos(y)) + (z * math.sin(y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * cos(y)) + Float64(z * sin(y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \cos y, z \cdot \sin y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma x (cos y) (* z (sin y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(x, cos(y), (z * sin(y)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(x, cos(y), Float64(z * sin(y)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \cos y, z \cdot \sin y\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \cos y, z \cdot \sin y\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \cos y, z \cdot \sin y\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot \sin y + x \cdot \cos y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* z (sin y)) (* x (cos y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (z * sin(y)) + (x * cos(y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (z * sin(y)) + (x * cos(y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (z * Math.sin(y)) + (x * Math.cos(y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (z * math.sin(y)) + (x * math.cos(y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(z * sin(y)) + Float64(x * cos(y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (z * sin(y)) + (x * cos(y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(z * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto z \cdot \sin y + x \cdot \cos y \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 85.2% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{-115} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.75 \cdot 10^{+47}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \sin y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.8e-115) (not (<= z 1.75e+47)))
   (+ x (* z (sin y)))
   (* x (cos y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.8e-115) || !(z <= 1.75e+47)) {
		tmp = x + (z * sin(y));
	} else {
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5.8d-115)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.75d+47))) then
        tmp = x + (z * sin(y))
    else
        tmp = x * cos(y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.8e-115) || !(z <= 1.75e+47)) {
		tmp = x + (z * Math.sin(y));
	} else {
		tmp = x * Math.cos(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5.8e-115) or not (z <= 1.75e+47):
		tmp = x + (z * math.sin(y))
	else:
		tmp = x * math.cos(y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.8e-115) || !(z <= 1.75e+47))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * sin(y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * cos(y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5.8e-115) || ~((z <= 1.75e+47)))
		tmp = x + (z * sin(y));
	else
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.8e-115], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.75e+47]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(z * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.7999999999999996e-115 or 1.75000000000000008e47 < z

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 89.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + z \cdot \sin y \]

   if -5.7999999999999996e-115 < z < 1.75000000000000008e47

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 88.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \cos y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{-115} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.75 \cdot 10^{+47}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \sin y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 73.7% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -0.0045 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 0.095\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z + y \cdot \left(x \cdot -0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -0.0045) (not (<= y 0.095)))
   (* x (cos y))
   (+ x (* y (+ z (* y (* x -0.5)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -0.0045) || !(y <= 0.095)) {
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (z + (y * (x * -0.5))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-0.0045d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 0.095d0))) then
        tmp = x * cos(y)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (z + (y * (x * (-0.5d0)))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -0.0045) || !(y <= 0.095)) {
		tmp = x * Math.cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (z + (y * (x * -0.5))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -0.0045) or not (y <= 0.095):
		tmp = x * math.cos(y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (z + (y * (x * -0.5))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -0.0045) || !(y <= 0.095))
		tmp = Float64(x * cos(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z + Float64(y * Float64(x * -0.5)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -0.0045) || ~((y <= 0.095)))
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (z + (y * (x * -0.5))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -0.0045], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 0.095]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(z + N[(y * N[(x * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -0.00449999999999999966 or 0.095000000000000001 < y

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 52.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \cos y} \]

   if -0.00449999999999999966 < y < 0.095000000000000001

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(x \cdot {y}^{2}\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + -0.5 \cdot \left(x \cdot {y}^{2}\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot y} + -0.5 \cdot \left(x \cdot {y}^{2}\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot x\right) \cdot {y}^{2}}\right) \]

      4. unpow2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot y + \left(-0.5 \cdot x\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-*r* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.5 \cdot x\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot y}\right) \]

      6. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + \left(-0.5 \cdot x\right) \cdot y\right)} \]

      7. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot -0.5\right)} \cdot y\right) \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z + \left(x \cdot -0.5\right) \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -0.0045 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 0.095\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z + y \cdot \left(x \cdot -0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 74.8% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{+114} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+57}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \sin y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.6e+114) (not (<= z 9e+57))) (* z (sin y)) (* x (cos y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.6e+114) || !(z <= 9e+57)) {
		tmp = z * sin(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.6d+114)) .or. (.not. (z <= 9d+57))) then
        tmp = z * sin(y)
    else
        tmp = x * cos(y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.6e+114) || !(z <= 9e+57)) {
		tmp = z * Math.sin(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x * Math.cos(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.6e+114) or not (z <= 9e+57):
		tmp = z * math.sin(y)
	else:
		tmp = x * math.cos(y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.6e+114) || !(z <= 9e+57))
		tmp = Float64(z * sin(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * cos(y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.6e+114) || ~((z <= 9e+57)))
		tmp = z * sin(y);
	else
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.6e+114], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 9e+57]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.6e114 or 8.99999999999999991e57 < z

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \sin y} \]

   if -1.6e114 < z < 8.99999999999999991e57

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 82.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \cos y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{+114} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+57}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \sin y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 51.7% accurate, 41.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 49.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 49.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

5. Simplified 49.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

6. Final simplification 49.8%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot z \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 38.3% accurate, 207.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 49.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 49.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

5. Simplified 49.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 38.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

7. Final simplification 38.9%

   \[\leadsto x \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024047 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.ThreeD.Transform:aboutY from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* x (cos y)) (* z (sin y))))