Logistic function from Lakshay Garg

Percentage Accurate: 53.9% → 100.0%

Time: 9.1s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 12.1×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) - 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 53.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) - 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -0.2:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\sqrt[3]{t\_0}\right)}^{3}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 0.01:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3} + \left(-0.05396825396825397 \cdot {x}^{7} + 0.13333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{5}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) -1.0)))
   (if (<= (* -2.0 x) -0.2)
     (pow (cbrt t_0) 3.0)
     (if (<= (* -2.0 x) 0.01)
       (+
        x
        (+
         (* -0.3333333333333333 (pow x 3.0))
         (+
          (* -0.05396825396825397 (pow x 7.0))
          (* 0.13333333333333333 (pow x 5.0)))))
       t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double t_0 = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -0.2) {
		tmp = pow(cbrt(t_0), 3.0);
	} else if ((-2.0 * x) <= 0.01) {
		tmp = x + ((-0.3333333333333333 * pow(x, 3.0)) + ((-0.05396825396825397 * pow(x, 7.0)) + (0.13333333333333333 * pow(x, 5.0))));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double t_0 = (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -0.2) {
		tmp = Math.pow(Math.cbrt(t_0), 3.0);
	} else if ((-2.0 * x) <= 0.01) {
		tmp = x + ((-0.3333333333333333 * Math.pow(x, 3.0)) + ((-0.05396825396825397 * Math.pow(x, 7.0)) + (0.13333333333333333 * Math.pow(x, 5.0))));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= -0.2)
		tmp = cbrt(t_0) ^ 3.0;
	elseif (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= 0.01)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0)) + Float64(Float64(-0.05396825396825397 * (x ^ 7.0)) + Float64(0.13333333333333333 * (x ^ 5.0)))));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], -0.2], N[Power[N[Power[t$95$0, 1/3], $MachinePrecision], 3.0], $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], 0.01], N[(x + N[(N[(-0.3333333333333333 * N[Power[x, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(-0.05396825396825397 * N[Power[x, 7.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(0.13333333333333333 * N[Power[x, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 -2 x) < -0.20000000000000001

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1}} \]

      2. pow3 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1}\right)}^{3}} \]

      3. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + \left(-1\right)}}\right)}^{3} \]

      4. exp-prod 100.0%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + \color{blue}{{\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x}}} + \left(-1\right)}\right)}^{3} \]

      5. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + {\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x}} + \color{blue}{-1}}\right)}^{3} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + {\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x}} + -1}\right)}^{3}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow-exp 100.0%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + \color{blue}{e^{-2 \cdot x}}} + -1}\right)}^{3} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{x \cdot -2}}} + -1}\right)}^{3} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + \color{blue}{e^{x \cdot -2}}} + -1}\right)}^{3} \]

   if -0.20000000000000001 < (*.f64 -2 x) < 0.0100000000000000002

   1. Initial program 7.1%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3} + \left(-0.05396825396825397 \cdot {x}^{7} + 0.13333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{5}\right)\right)} \]

   if 0.0100000000000000002 < (*.f64 -2 x)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -0.2:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1}\right)}^{3}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 0.01:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3} + \left(-0.05396825396825397 \cdot {x}^{7} + 0.13333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{5}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.9% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -0.2:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\sqrt[3]{t\_0}\right)}^{3}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 0.01:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3} + 0.13333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{5}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) -1.0)))
   (if (<= (* -2.0 x) -0.2)
     (pow (cbrt t_0) 3.0)
     (if (<= (* -2.0 x) 0.01)
       (+
        x
        (+
         (* -0.3333333333333333 (pow x 3.0))
         (* 0.13333333333333333 (pow x 5.0))))
       t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double t_0 = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -0.2) {
		tmp = pow(cbrt(t_0), 3.0);
	} else if ((-2.0 * x) <= 0.01) {
		tmp = x + ((-0.3333333333333333 * pow(x, 3.0)) + (0.13333333333333333 * pow(x, 5.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double t_0 = (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -0.2) {
		tmp = Math.pow(Math.cbrt(t_0), 3.0);
	} else if ((-2.0 * x) <= 0.01) {
		tmp = x + ((-0.3333333333333333 * Math.pow(x, 3.0)) + (0.13333333333333333 * Math.pow(x, 5.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= -0.2)
		tmp = cbrt(t_0) ^ 3.0;
	elseif (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= 0.01)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0)) + Float64(0.13333333333333333 * (x ^ 5.0))));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], -0.2], N[Power[N[Power[t$95$0, 1/3], $MachinePrecision], 3.0], $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], 0.01], N[(x + N[(N[(-0.3333333333333333 * N[Power[x, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(0.13333333333333333 * N[Power[x, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 -2 x) < -0.20000000000000001

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1}} \]

      2. pow3 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1}\right)}^{3}} \]

      3. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + \left(-1\right)}}\right)}^{3} \]

      4. exp-prod 100.0%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + \color{blue}{{\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x}}} + \left(-1\right)}\right)}^{3} \]

      5. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + {\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x}} + \color{blue}{-1}}\right)}^{3} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + {\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x}} + -1}\right)}^{3}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow-exp 100.0%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + \color{blue}{e^{-2 \cdot x}}} + -1}\right)}^{3} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{x \cdot -2}}} + -1}\right)}^{3} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + \color{blue}{e^{x \cdot -2}}} + -1}\right)}^{3} \]

   if -0.20000000000000001 < (*.f64 -2 x) < 0.0100000000000000002

   1. Initial program 7.1%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3} + 0.13333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{5}\right)} \]

   if 0.0100000000000000002 < (*.f64 -2 x)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -0.2:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1}\right)}^{3}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 0.01:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3} + 0.13333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{5}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 100.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -0.2 \lor \neg \left(-2 \cdot x \leq 0.01\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3} + 0.13333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{5}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* -2.0 x) -0.2) (not (<= (* -2.0 x) 0.01)))
   (+ (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) -1.0)
   (+
    x
    (+
     (* -0.3333333333333333 (pow x 3.0))
     (* 0.13333333333333333 (pow x 5.0))))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -0.2) || !((-2.0 * x) <= 0.01)) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((-0.3333333333333333 * pow(x, 3.0)) + (0.13333333333333333 * pow(x, 5.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((((-2.0d0) * x) <= (-0.2d0)) .or. (.not. (((-2.0d0) * x) <= 0.01d0))) then
        tmp = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) + (-1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (((-0.3333333333333333d0) * (x ** 3.0d0)) + (0.13333333333333333d0 * (x ** 5.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -0.2) || !((-2.0 * x) <= 0.01)) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((-0.3333333333333333 * Math.pow(x, 3.0)) + (0.13333333333333333 * Math.pow(x, 5.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -0.2) or not ((-2.0 * x) <= 0.01):
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0
	else:
		tmp = x + ((-0.3333333333333333 * math.pow(x, 3.0)) + (0.13333333333333333 * math.pow(x, 5.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(-2.0 * x) <= -0.2) || !(Float64(-2.0 * x) <= 0.01))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0)) + Float64(0.13333333333333333 * (x ^ 5.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -0.2) || ~(((-2.0 * x) <= 0.01)))
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	else
		tmp = x + ((-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0)) + (0.13333333333333333 * (x ^ 5.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], -0.2], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], 0.01]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(-0.3333333333333333 * N[Power[x, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(0.13333333333333333 * N[Power[x, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 -2 x) < -0.20000000000000001 or 0.0100000000000000002 < (*.f64 -2 x)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if -0.20000000000000001 < (*.f64 -2 x) < 0.0100000000000000002

   1. Initial program 7.1%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3} + 0.13333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{5}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -0.2 \lor \neg \left(-2 \cdot x \leq 0.01\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3} + 0.13333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{5}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.9% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -0.2 \lor \neg \left(-2 \cdot x \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-5}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* -2.0 x) -0.2) (not (<= (* -2.0 x) 2e-5)))
   (+ (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) -1.0)
   (+ x (* -0.3333333333333333 (pow x 3.0)))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -0.2) || !((-2.0 * x) <= 2e-5)) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * pow(x, 3.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((((-2.0d0) * x) <= (-0.2d0)) .or. (.not. (((-2.0d0) * x) <= 2d-5))) then
        tmp = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) + (-1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = x + ((-0.3333333333333333d0) * (x ** 3.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -0.2) || !((-2.0 * x) <= 2e-5)) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * Math.pow(x, 3.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -0.2) or not ((-2.0 * x) <= 2e-5):
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0
	else:
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * math.pow(x, 3.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(-2.0 * x) <= -0.2) || !(Float64(-2.0 * x) <= 2e-5))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -0.2) || ~(((-2.0 * x) <= 2e-5)))
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	else
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], -0.2], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], 2e-5]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(-0.3333333333333333 * N[Power[x, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 -2 x) < -0.20000000000000001 or 2.00000000000000016e-5 < (*.f64 -2 x)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if -0.20000000000000001 < (*.f64 -2 x) < 2.00000000000000016e-5

   1. Initial program 6.5%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -0.2 \lor \neg \left(-2 \cdot x \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-5}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 54.3% accurate, 12.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\frac{1}{x + 2}}{\frac{0.5}{x}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (/ (/ 1.0 (+ x 2.0)) (/ 0.5 x)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (1.0 / (x + 2.0)) / (0.5 / x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (1.0d0 / (x + 2.0d0)) / (0.5d0 / x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (1.0 / (x + 2.0)) / (0.5 / x);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (1.0 / (x + 2.0)) / (0.5 / x)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(x + 2.0)) / Float64(0.5 / x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (1.0 / (x + 2.0)) / (0.5 / x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(1.0 / N[(x + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(0.5 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 52.8%

   \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 6.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + x\right)} - 1 \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 6.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right)} - 1 \]

5. Simplified 6.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right)} - 1 \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. flip-- 5.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - 1 \cdot 1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1}} \]

   2. div-inv 5.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - 1 \cdot 1\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1}} \]

   3. metadata-eval 5.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - \color{blue}{1}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

   4. difference-of-sqr-1 5.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + 1\right) + 1\right) \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

   5. associate-+l+ 5.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(1 + 1\right)\right)} \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

   6. metadata-eval 5.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + \color{blue}{2}\right) \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

   7. associate--l+ 52.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(1 - 1\right)\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

   8. metadata-eval 52.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{0}\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

   9. +-rgt-identity 52.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

   10. associate-+l+ 52.9%

       \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{x + \left(1 + 1\right)}} \]

   11. metadata-eval 52.9%

       \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x\right) \cdot \frac{1}{x + \color{blue}{2}} \]

7. Applied egg-rr 52.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x\right) \cdot \frac{1}{x + 2}} \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 52.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{x + 2} \cdot \left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x\right)} \]

   2. associate-/r/ 52.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{x + 2}{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}}} \]

   3. div-inv 52.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}}} \]

   4. associate-/r* 52.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{x + 2}}{\frac{1}{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}}} \]

   5. *-commutative 52.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1}{x + 2}}{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(x + 2\right)}}} \]

9. Applied egg-rr 52.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{x + 2}}{\frac{1}{x \cdot \left(x + 2\right)}}} \]

10. Taylor expanded in x around 0 55.2%

    \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1}{x + 2}}{\color{blue}{\frac{0.5}{x}}} \]

11. Final simplification 55.2%

    \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1}{x + 2}}{\frac{0.5}{x}} \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 52.5% accurate, 109.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 52.8%

   \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 53.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

4. Final simplification 53.1%

   \[\leadsto x \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024043 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Logistic function from Lakshay Garg"
  :precision binary64
  (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))