Development.Shake.Progress:message from shake-0.15.5

Percentage Accurate: 99.4% → 99.7%

Time: 2.9s

Alternatives: 4

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{x \cdot 100}{x + y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (/ (* x 100.0) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (x * 100.0) / (x + y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (x * 100.0d0) / (x + y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (x * 100.0) / (x + y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (x * 100.0) / (x + y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 100.0) / Float64(x + y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (x * 100.0) / (x + y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(x * 100.0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{x \cdot 100}{x + y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (/ (* x 100.0) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (x * 100.0) / (x + y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (x * 100.0d0) / (x + y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (x * 100.0) / (x + y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (x * 100.0) / (x + y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 100.0) / Float64(x + y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (x * 100.0) / (x + y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(x * 100.0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 100 \cdot \frac{x}{x + y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (* 100.0 (/ x (+ x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return 100.0 * (x / (x + y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = 100.0d0 * (x / (x + y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return 100.0 * (x / (x + y));
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return 100.0 * (x / (x + y))

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(100.0 * Float64(x / Float64(x + y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = 100.0 * (x / (x + y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(100.0 * N[(x / N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.6%

   \[\frac{x \cdot 100}{x + y} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{100 \cdot x}}{x + y} \]

   2. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{100 \cdot \frac{x}{x + y}} \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{100 \cdot \frac{x}{x + y}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto 100 \cdot \frac{x}{x + y} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 74.3% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{+53}:\\ \;\;\;\;100\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 6 \cdot 10^{+54}:\\ \;\;\;\;100 \cdot \frac{x}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;100\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -4.6e+53) 100.0 (if (<= x 6e+54) (* 100.0 (/ x y)) 100.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -4.6e+53) {
		tmp = 100.0;
	} else if (x <= 6e+54) {
		tmp = 100.0 * (x / y);
	} else {
		tmp = 100.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-4.6d+53)) then
        tmp = 100.0d0
    else if (x <= 6d+54) then
        tmp = 100.0d0 * (x / y)
    else
        tmp = 100.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -4.6e+53) {
		tmp = 100.0;
	} else if (x <= 6e+54) {
		tmp = 100.0 * (x / y);
	} else {
		tmp = 100.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -4.6e+53:
		tmp = 100.0
	elif x <= 6e+54:
		tmp = 100.0 * (x / y)
	else:
		tmp = 100.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -4.6e+53)
		tmp = 100.0;
	elseif (x <= 6e+54)
		tmp = Float64(100.0 * Float64(x / y));
	else
		tmp = 100.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -4.6e+53)
		tmp = 100.0;
	elseif (x <= 6e+54)
		tmp = 100.0 * (x / y);
	else
		tmp = 100.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -4.6e+53], 100.0, If[LessEqual[x, 6e+54], N[(100.0 * N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 100.0]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -4.60000000000000039e53 or 5.9999999999999998e54 < x

   1. Initial program 97.1%

      \[\frac{x \cdot 100}{x + y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{100 \cdot x}}{x + y} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{100 \cdot \frac{x}{x + y}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{100 \cdot \frac{x}{x + y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 83.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{100} \]

   if -4.60000000000000039e53 < x < 5.9999999999999998e54

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\frac{x \cdot 100}{x + y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{100 \cdot x}}{x + y} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{100 \cdot \frac{x}{x + y}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{100 \cdot \frac{x}{x + y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 76.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{100 \cdot \frac{x}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{+53}:\\ \;\;\;\;100\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 6 \cdot 10^{+54}:\\ \;\;\;\;100 \cdot \frac{x}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;100\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 74.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{+43}:\\ \;\;\;\;100\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+54}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \frac{100}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;100\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.6e+43) 100.0 (if (<= x 6.5e+54) (* x (/ 100.0 y)) 100.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.6e+43) {
		tmp = 100.0;
	} else if (x <= 6.5e+54) {
		tmp = x * (100.0 / y);
	} else {
		tmp = 100.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.6d+43)) then
        tmp = 100.0d0
    else if (x <= 6.5d+54) then
        tmp = x * (100.0d0 / y)
    else
        tmp = 100.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.6e+43) {
		tmp = 100.0;
	} else if (x <= 6.5e+54) {
		tmp = x * (100.0 / y);
	} else {
		tmp = 100.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.6e+43:
		tmp = 100.0
	elif x <= 6.5e+54:
		tmp = x * (100.0 / y)
	else:
		tmp = 100.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.6e+43)
		tmp = 100.0;
	elseif (x <= 6.5e+54)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(100.0 / y));
	else
		tmp = 100.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.6e+43)
		tmp = 100.0;
	elseif (x <= 6.5e+54)
		tmp = x * (100.0 / y);
	else
		tmp = 100.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.6e+43], 100.0, If[LessEqual[x, 6.5e+54], N[(x * N[(100.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 100.0]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.60000000000000007e43 or 6.5e54 < x

   1. Initial program 97.1%

      \[\frac{x \cdot 100}{x + y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{100 \cdot x}}{x + y} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{100 \cdot \frac{x}{x + y}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{100 \cdot \frac{x}{x + y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 83.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{100} \]

   if -1.60000000000000007e43 < x < 6.5e54

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\frac{x \cdot 100}{x + y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{100 \cdot x}}{x + y} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{100 \cdot \frac{x}{x + y}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{100 \cdot \frac{x}{x + y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 76.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{100 \cdot \frac{x}{y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 76.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{100 \cdot x}{y}} \]

      2. *-commutative 76.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot 100}}{y} \]

      3. associate-/l* 76.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{100}{y}} \]

   7. Simplified 76.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{100}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{+43}:\\ \;\;\;\;100\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+54}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \frac{100}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;100\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 51.2% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 100 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 100.0)

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return 100.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = 100.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return 100.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return 100.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return 100.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = 100.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := 100.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.6%

   \[\frac{x \cdot 100}{x + y} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{100 \cdot x}}{x + y} \]

   2. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{100 \cdot \frac{x}{x + y}} \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{100 \cdot \frac{x}{x + y}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 50.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{100} \]

6. Final simplification 50.1%

   \[\leadsto 100 \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 99.8% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{x}{1} \cdot \frac{100}{x + y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (* (/ x 1.0) (/ 100.0 (+ x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (x / 1.0) * (100.0 / (x + y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (x / 1.0d0) * (100.0d0 / (x + y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (x / 1.0) * (100.0 / (x + y));
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (x / 1.0) * (100.0 / (x + y))

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(x / 1.0) * Float64(100.0 / Float64(x + y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (x / 1.0) * (100.0 / (x + y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(x / 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(100.0 / N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024043 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Development.Shake.Progress:message from shake-0.15.5"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (* (/ x 1.0) (/ 100.0 (+ x y)))

  (/ (* x 100.0) (+ x y)))