symmetry log of sum of exp

Percentage Accurate: 54.0% → 98.9%

Time: 19.2s

Alternatives: 13

Speedup: 1.4×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. a = 2.0649805186237287e+251
  2. b = -1.1495825953489526e+53

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (log (+ (exp a) (exp b))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return log((exp(a) + exp(b)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = log((exp(a) + exp(b)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return Math.log((Math.exp(a) + Math.exp(b)));
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return math.log((math.exp(a) + math.exp(b)))

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return log(Float64(exp(a) + exp(b)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = log((exp(a) + exp(b)));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[Log[N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 54.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (log (+ (exp a) (exp b))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return log((exp(a) + exp(b)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = log((exp(a) + exp(b)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return Math.log((Math.exp(a) + Math.exp(b)));
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return math.log((math.exp(a) + math.exp(b)))

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return log(Float64(exp(a) + exp(b)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = log((exp(a) + exp(b)));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[Log[N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -45:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a -45.0) (/ b (+ (exp a) 1.0)) (log (+ (exp a) (exp b)))))

C

assert(a < b);
double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -45.0) {
		tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = log((exp(a) + exp(b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-45.0d0)) then
        tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = log((exp(a) + exp(b)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert a < b;
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -45.0) {
		tmp = b / (Math.exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log((Math.exp(a) + Math.exp(b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[a, b] = sort([a, b])
def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -45.0:
		tmp = b / (math.exp(a) + 1.0)
	else:
		tmp = math.log((math.exp(a) + math.exp(b)))
	return tmp

Julia

a, b = sort([a, b])
function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -45.0)
		tmp = Float64(b / Float64(exp(a) + 1.0));
	else
		tmp = log(Float64(exp(a) + exp(b)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

a, b = num2cell(sort([a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -45.0)
		tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0);
	else
		tmp = log((exp(a) + exp(b)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[a, -45.0], N[(b / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Log[N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -45

   1. Initial program 8.3%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right)} + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   if -45 < a

   1. Initial program 67.2%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -45:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{a + 2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp a) 0.0)
   (/ b (+ (exp a) 1.0))
   (+ (log1p (exp a)) (/ b (+ a 2.0)))))

C

assert(a < b);
double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(a) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = log1p(exp(a)) + (b / (a + 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

assert a < b;
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(a) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = b / (Math.exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log1p(Math.exp(a)) + (b / (a + 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[a, b] = sort([a, b])
def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(a) <= 0.0:
		tmp = b / (math.exp(a) + 1.0)
	else:
		tmp = math.log1p(math.exp(a)) + (b / (a + 2.0))
	return tmp

Julia

a, b = sort([a, b])
function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(a) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(b / Float64(exp(a) + 1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(log1p(exp(a)) + Float64(b / Float64(a + 2.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(b / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[1 + N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + N[(b / N[(a + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 a) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 8.3%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right)} + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   if 0.0 < (exp.f64 a)

   1. Initial program 67.2%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0 64.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-define 64.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right)} + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}} \]

   5. Simplified 64.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 64.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{\color{blue}{2 + a}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{a + 2}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(e^{a} + \left(b + 1\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp a) 0.0) (/ b (+ (exp a) 1.0)) (log (+ (exp a) (+ b 1.0)))))

C

assert(a < b);
double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(a) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = log((exp(a) + (b + 1.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (exp(a) <= 0.0d0) then
        tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = log((exp(a) + (b + 1.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert a < b;
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(a) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = b / (Math.exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log((Math.exp(a) + (b + 1.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[a, b] = sort([a, b])
def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(a) <= 0.0:
		tmp = b / (math.exp(a) + 1.0)
	else:
		tmp = math.log((math.exp(a) + (b + 1.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

a, b = sort([a, b])
function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(a) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(b / Float64(exp(a) + 1.0));
	else
		tmp = log(Float64(exp(a) + Float64(b + 1.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

a, b = num2cell(sort([a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (exp(a) <= 0.0)
		tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0);
	else
		tmp = log((exp(a) + (b + 1.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(b / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Log[N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + N[(b + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 a) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 8.3%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right)} + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   if 0.0 < (exp.f64 a)

   1. Initial program 67.2%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0 63.2%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(b + e^{a}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 + b\right) + e^{a}\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + \left(1 + b\right)\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 63.2%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + \left(1 + b\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(e^{a} + \left(b + 1\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 98.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b])\\ \\ \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{e^{a} + 1} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (+ (log1p (exp a)) (/ b (+ (exp a) 1.0))))

C

assert(a < b);
double code(double a, double b) {
	return log1p(exp(a)) + (b / (exp(a) + 1.0));
}

Java

assert a < b;
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return Math.log1p(Math.exp(a)) + (b / (Math.exp(a) + 1.0));
}

Python

[a, b] = sort([a, b])
def code(a, b):
	return math.log1p(math.exp(a)) + (b / (math.exp(a) + 1.0))

Julia

a, b = sort([a, b])
function code(a, b)
	return Float64(log1p(exp(a)) + Float64(b / Float64(exp(a) + 1.0)))
end

Wolfram

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_] := N[(N[Log[1 + N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + N[(b / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 50.9%

   \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in b around 0 74.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. log1p-define 74.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right)} + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}} \]

5. Simplified 74.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

6. Final simplification 74.2%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{e^{a} + 1} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 97.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{b}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp a) 0.0) (/ b (+ (exp a) 1.0)) (log1p (exp b))))

C

assert(a < b);
double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(a) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = log1p(exp(b));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

assert a < b;
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(a) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = b / (Math.exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log1p(Math.exp(b));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[a, b] = sort([a, b])
def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(a) <= 0.0:
		tmp = b / (math.exp(a) + 1.0)
	else:
		tmp = math.log1p(math.exp(b))
	return tmp

Julia

a, b = sort([a, b])
function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(a) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(b / Float64(exp(a) + 1.0));
	else
		tmp = log1p(exp(b));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(b / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Log[1 + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 a) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 8.3%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right)} + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   if 0.0 < (exp.f64 a)

   1. Initial program 67.2%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 65.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{b}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-define 65.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{b}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 65.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{b}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{b}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 97.6% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log 2 + \left(b \cdot 0.5 + a \cdot \left(0.5 - b \cdot 0.25\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp a) 0.0)
   (/ b (+ (exp a) 1.0))
   (+ (log 2.0) (+ (* b 0.5) (* a (- 0.5 (* b 0.25)))))))

C

assert(a < b);
double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(a) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = log(2.0) + ((b * 0.5) + (a * (0.5 - (b * 0.25))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (exp(a) <= 0.0d0) then
        tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = log(2.0d0) + ((b * 0.5d0) + (a * (0.5d0 - (b * 0.25d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert a < b;
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(a) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = b / (Math.exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log(2.0) + ((b * 0.5) + (a * (0.5 - (b * 0.25))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[a, b] = sort([a, b])
def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(a) <= 0.0:
		tmp = b / (math.exp(a) + 1.0)
	else:
		tmp = math.log(2.0) + ((b * 0.5) + (a * (0.5 - (b * 0.25))))
	return tmp

Julia

a, b = sort([a, b])
function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(a) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(b / Float64(exp(a) + 1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(2.0) + Float64(Float64(b * 0.5) + Float64(a * Float64(0.5 - Float64(b * 0.25)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

a, b = num2cell(sort([a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (exp(a) <= 0.0)
		tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0);
	else
		tmp = log(2.0) + ((b * 0.5) + (a * (0.5 - (b * 0.25))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(b / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[2.0], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(b * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(0.5 - N[(b * 0.25), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 a) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 8.3%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right)} + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   if 0.0 < (exp.f64 a)

   1. Initial program 67.2%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0 64.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-define 64.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right)} + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}} \]

   5. Simplified 64.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 64.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log 2 + \left(0.5 \cdot b + a \cdot \left(0.5 - 0.25 \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log 2 + \left(b \cdot 0.5 + a \cdot \left(0.5 - b \cdot 0.25\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 97.6% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(a + 2\right) + \frac{b}{a + 2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp a) 0.0)
   (/ b (+ (exp a) 1.0))
   (+ (log (+ a 2.0)) (/ b (+ a 2.0)))))

C

assert(a < b);
double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(a) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = log((a + 2.0)) + (b / (a + 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (exp(a) <= 0.0d0) then
        tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = log((a + 2.0d0)) + (b / (a + 2.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert a < b;
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(a) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = b / (Math.exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log((a + 2.0)) + (b / (a + 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[a, b] = sort([a, b])
def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(a) <= 0.0:
		tmp = b / (math.exp(a) + 1.0)
	else:
		tmp = math.log((a + 2.0)) + (b / (a + 2.0))
	return tmp

Julia

a, b = sort([a, b])
function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(a) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(b / Float64(exp(a) + 1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(Float64(a + 2.0)) + Float64(b / Float64(a + 2.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

a, b = num2cell(sort([a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (exp(a) <= 0.0)
		tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0);
	else
		tmp = log((a + 2.0)) + (b / (a + 2.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(b / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[N[(a + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + N[(b / N[(a + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 a) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 8.3%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right)} + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   if 0.0 < (exp.f64 a)

   1. Initial program 67.2%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0 63.2%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(b + e^{a}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 + b\right) + e^{a}\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + \left(1 + b\right)\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 63.2%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + \left(1 + b\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 62.9%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(2 + \left(a + b\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 62.9%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(2 + \color{blue}{\left(b + a\right)}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 62.9%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(2 + \left(b + a\right)\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in b around 0 64.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(2 + a\right) + \frac{b}{2 + a}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. +-commutative 64.0%

          \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(a + 2\right)} + \frac{b}{2 + a} \]

       2. +-commutative 64.0%

          \[\leadsto \log \left(a + 2\right) + \frac{b}{\color{blue}{a + 2}} \]

   11. Simplified 64.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(a + 2\right) + \frac{b}{a + 2}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(a + 2\right) + \frac{b}{a + 2}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 97.5% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{log1p}\left(b + \left(a + 1\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp a) 0.0) (/ b (+ (exp a) 1.0)) (log1p (+ b (+ a 1.0)))))

C

assert(a < b);
double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(a) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = log1p((b + (a + 1.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

assert a < b;
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(a) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = b / (Math.exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log1p((b + (a + 1.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[a, b] = sort([a, b])
def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(a) <= 0.0:
		tmp = b / (math.exp(a) + 1.0)
	else:
		tmp = math.log1p((b + (a + 1.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

a, b = sort([a, b])
function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(a) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(b / Float64(exp(a) + 1.0));
	else
		tmp = log1p(Float64(b + Float64(a + 1.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(b / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Log[1 + N[(b + N[(a + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 a) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 8.3%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right)} + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   if 0.0 < (exp.f64 a)

   1. Initial program 67.2%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0 63.2%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(b + e^{a}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 + b\right) + e^{a}\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + \left(1 + b\right)\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 63.2%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + \left(1 + b\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 62.9%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(2 + \left(a + b\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 62.9%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(2 + \color{blue}{\left(b + a\right)}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 62.9%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(2 + \left(b + a\right)\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-expm1-u 62.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\log \left(2 + \left(b + a\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

      2. expm1-undefine 62.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{\log \left(2 + \left(b + a\right)\right)} - 1}\right) \]

      3. add-exp-log 62.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(2 + \left(b + a\right)\right)} - 1\right) \]

      4. associate-+r+ 62.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(2 + b\right) + a\right)} - 1\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 62.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(b + 2\right)} + a\right) - 1\right) \]

      6. associate-+l+ 62.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(b + \left(2 + a\right)\right)} - 1\right) \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 62.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(b + \left(2 + a\right)\right) - 1\right)} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate--l+ 62.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{b + \left(\left(2 + a\right) - 1\right)}\right) \]

       2. +-commutative 62.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(b + \left(\color{blue}{\left(a + 2\right)} - 1\right)\right) \]

       3. associate--l+ 63.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(b + \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(2 - 1\right)\right)}\right) \]

       4. metadata-eval 63.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(b + \left(a + \color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

   12. Simplified 63.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(b + \left(a + 1\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{log1p}\left(b + \left(a + 1\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 49.8% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b])\\ \\ \log 2 + b \cdot 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (+ (log 2.0) (* b 0.5)))

C

assert(a < b);
double code(double a, double b) {
	return log(2.0) + (b * 0.5);
}

Fortran

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = log(2.0d0) + (b * 0.5d0)
end function

Java

assert a < b;
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return Math.log(2.0) + (b * 0.5);
}

Python

[a, b] = sort([a, b])
def code(a, b):
	return math.log(2.0) + (b * 0.5)

Julia

a, b = sort([a, b])
function code(a, b)
	return Float64(log(2.0) + Float64(b * 0.5))
end

MATLAB

a, b = num2cell(sort([a, b])){:}
function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = log(2.0) + (b * 0.5);
end

Wolfram

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_] := N[(N[Log[2.0], $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 50.9%

   \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in b around 0 74.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. log1p-define 74.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right)} + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}} \]

5. Simplified 74.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 47.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log 2 + 0.5 \cdot b} \]

7. Final simplification 47.1%

   \[\leadsto \log 2 + b \cdot 0.5 \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 49.6% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b])\\ \\ \log \left(b + 2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (log (+ b 2.0)))

C

assert(a < b);
double code(double a, double b) {
	return log((b + 2.0));
}

Fortran

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = log((b + 2.0d0))
end function

Java

assert a < b;
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return Math.log((b + 2.0));
}

Python

[a, b] = sort([a, b])
def code(a, b):
	return math.log((b + 2.0))

Julia

a, b = sort([a, b])
function code(a, b)
	return log(Float64(b + 2.0))
end

MATLAB

a, b = num2cell(sort([a, b])){:}
function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = log((b + 2.0));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_] := N[Log[N[(b + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 50.9%

   \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 48.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{b}\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in b around 0 46.2%

   \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(2 + b\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 46.2%

   \[\leadsto \log \left(b + 2\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 49.2% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b])\\ \\ \log 2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (log 2.0))

C

assert(a < b);
double code(double a, double b) {
	return log(2.0);
}

Fortran

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = log(2.0d0)
end function

Java

assert a < b;
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return Math.log(2.0);
}

Python

[a, b] = sort([a, b])
def code(a, b):
	return math.log(2.0)

Julia

a, b = sort([a, b])
function code(a, b)
	return log(2.0)
end

MATLAB

a, b = num2cell(sort([a, b])){:}
function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = log(2.0);
end

Wolfram

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_] := N[Log[2.0], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 50.9%

   \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 48.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{b}\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. log1p-define 48.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{b}\right)} \]

5. Simplified 48.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{b}\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in b around 0 46.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log 2} \]

7. Final simplification 46.5%

   \[\leadsto \log 2 \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 5.0% accurate, 60.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b])\\ \\ \frac{b}{a + 2} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ b (+ a 2.0)))

C

assert(a < b);
double code(double a, double b) {
	return b / (a + 2.0);
}

Fortran

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = b / (a + 2.0d0)
end function

Java

assert a < b;
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return b / (a + 2.0);
}

Python

[a, b] = sort([a, b])
def code(a, b):
	return b / (a + 2.0)

Julia

a, b = sort([a, b])
function code(a, b)
	return Float64(b / Float64(a + 2.0))
end

MATLAB

a, b = num2cell(sort([a, b])){:}
function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = b / (a + 2.0);
end

Wolfram

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_] := N[(b / N[(a + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 50.9%

   \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in b around 0 47.9%

   \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(b + e^{a}\right)\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+r+ 47.9%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 + b\right) + e^{a}\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative 47.9%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + \left(1 + b\right)\right)} \]

5. Simplified 47.9%

   \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + \left(1 + b\right)\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 45.5%

   \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(2 + \left(a + b\right)\right)} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 45.5%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(2 + \color{blue}{\left(b + a\right)}\right) \]

8. Simplified 45.5%

   \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(2 + \left(b + a\right)\right)} \]

9. Taylor expanded in b around 0 46.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(2 + a\right) + \frac{b}{2 + a}} \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

    1. +-commutative 46.2%

       \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(a + 2\right)} + \frac{b}{2 + a} \]

    2. +-commutative 46.2%

       \[\leadsto \log \left(a + 2\right) + \frac{b}{\color{blue}{a + 2}} \]

11. Simplified 46.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(a + 2\right) + \frac{b}{a + 2}} \]

12. Taylor expanded in b around inf 4.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b}{2 + a}} \]
13. Step-by-step derivation

    1. +-commutative 4.1%

       \[\leadsto \frac{b}{\color{blue}{a + 2}} \]

14. Simplified 4.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b}{a + 2}} \]

15. Final simplification 4.1%

    \[\leadsto \frac{b}{a + 2} \]
16. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 2.6% accurate, 101.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b])\\ \\ a \cdot 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (* a 0.5))

C

assert(a < b);
double code(double a, double b) {
	return a * 0.5;
}

Fortran

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = a * 0.5d0
end function

Java

assert a < b;
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return a * 0.5;
}

Python

[a, b] = sort([a, b])
def code(a, b):
	return a * 0.5

Julia

a, b = sort([a, b])
function code(a, b)
	return Float64(a * 0.5)
end

MATLAB

a, b = num2cell(sort([a, b])){:}
function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = a * 0.5;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_] := N[(a * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 50.9%

   \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in b around 0 47.9%

   \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(b + e^{a}\right)\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+r+ 47.9%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 + b\right) + e^{a}\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative 47.9%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + \left(1 + b\right)\right)} \]

5. Simplified 47.9%

   \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + \left(1 + b\right)\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 46.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(2 + b\right) + \frac{a}{2 + b}} \]

7. Taylor expanded in a around inf 3.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{2 + b}} \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 3.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\color{blue}{b + 2}} \]

9. Simplified 3.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{b + 2}} \]

10. Taylor expanded in b around 0 7.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot a} \]
11. Step-by-step derivation

    1. *-commutative 7.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot 0.5} \]

12. Simplified 7.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot 0.5} \]

13. Final simplification 7.3%

    \[\leadsto a \cdot 0.5 \]
14. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024042 
(FPCore (a b)
  :name "symmetry log of sum of exp"
  :precision binary64
  (log (+ (exp a) (exp b))))