Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1

Percentage Accurate: 92.4% → 96.6%

Time: 11.3s

Alternatives: 13

Speedup: 0.6×

• 32.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 92.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.6% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(z \cdot a\right) \cdot b\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* z a) b))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (+ x (* z (+ y (* a b)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((z * a) * b);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((z * a) * b);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((z * a) * b)
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(z * a) * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(a * b))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((z * a) * b);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * a), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(x + N[(z * N[(y + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 98.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 13.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 13.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 40.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 40.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative 40.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* 40.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

   7. Simplified 95.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right) + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(z \cdot a\right) \cdot b \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(z \cdot a\right) \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 57.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{+176}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{-47} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 2.45 \cdot 10^{-20}\right) \land a \leq 1.28 \cdot 10^{+51}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a -1.25e+176)
   (* z (* a b))
   (if (or (<= a 4.5e-47) (and (not (<= a 2.45e-20)) (<= a 1.28e+51)))
     (+ x (* y z))
     (* a (* z b)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -1.25e+176) {
		tmp = z * (a * b);
	} else if ((a <= 4.5e-47) || (!(a <= 2.45e-20) && (a <= 1.28e+51))) {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = a * (z * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-1.25d+176)) then
        tmp = z * (a * b)
    else if ((a <= 4.5d-47) .or. (.not. (a <= 2.45d-20)) .and. (a <= 1.28d+51)) then
        tmp = x + (y * z)
    else
        tmp = a * (z * b)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -1.25e+176) {
		tmp = z * (a * b);
	} else if ((a <= 4.5e-47) || (!(a <= 2.45e-20) && (a <= 1.28e+51))) {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = a * (z * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -1.25e+176:
		tmp = z * (a * b)
	elif (a <= 4.5e-47) or (not (a <= 2.45e-20) and (a <= 1.28e+51)):
		tmp = x + (y * z)
	else:
		tmp = a * (z * b)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -1.25e+176)
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(a * b));
	elseif ((a <= 4.5e-47) || (!(a <= 2.45e-20) && (a <= 1.28e+51)))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(z * b));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -1.25e+176)
		tmp = z * (a * b);
	elseif ((a <= 4.5e-47) || (~((a <= 2.45e-20)) && (a <= 1.28e+51)))
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	else
		tmp = a * (z * b);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[a, -1.25e+176], N[(z * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[a, 4.5e-47], And[N[Not[LessEqual[a, 2.45e-20]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[a, 1.28e+51]]], N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if a < -1.25e176

   1. Initial program 65.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 65.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 74.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 74.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 62.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 62.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative 62.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* 62.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in 69.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

   7. Simplified 69.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right) + x} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around 0 65.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} + x \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around inf 65.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-*r* 65.8%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

       2. *-commutative 65.8%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   11. Simplified 65.8%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if -1.25e176 < a < 4.5e-47 or 2.4500000000000001e-20 < a < 1.27999999999999993e51

   1. Initial program 94.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 93.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 70.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]

   if 4.5e-47 < a < 2.4500000000000001e-20 or 1.27999999999999993e51 < a

   1. Initial program 86.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 86.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 88.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 62.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 54.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{+176}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{-47} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 2.45 \cdot 10^{-20}\right) \land a \leq 1.28 \cdot 10^{+51}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 38.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -85000000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-163}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{-112}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5.7 \cdot 10^{+54}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -85000000000000.0)
   (* y z)
   (if (<= z 3.2e-163)
     x
     (if (<= z 5.8e-112) (* t a) (if (<= z 5.7e+54) (* y z) (* a (* z b)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -85000000000000.0) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (z <= 3.2e-163) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (z <= 5.8e-112) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else if (z <= 5.7e+54) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = a * (z * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-85000000000000.0d0)) then
        tmp = y * z
    else if (z <= 3.2d-163) then
        tmp = x
    else if (z <= 5.8d-112) then
        tmp = t * a
    else if (z <= 5.7d+54) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = a * (z * b)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -85000000000000.0) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (z <= 3.2e-163) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (z <= 5.8e-112) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else if (z <= 5.7e+54) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = a * (z * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -85000000000000.0:
		tmp = y * z
	elif z <= 3.2e-163:
		tmp = x
	elif z <= 5.8e-112:
		tmp = t * a
	elif z <= 5.7e+54:
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = a * (z * b)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -85000000000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	elseif (z <= 3.2e-163)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (z <= 5.8e-112)
		tmp = Float64(t * a);
	elseif (z <= 5.7e+54)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(z * b));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -85000000000000.0)
		tmp = y * z;
	elseif (z <= 3.2e-163)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (z <= 5.8e-112)
		tmp = t * a;
	elseif (z <= 5.7e+54)
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = a * (z * b);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -85000000000000.0], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 3.2e-163], x, If[LessEqual[z, 5.8e-112], N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 5.7e+54], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if z < -8.5e13 or 5.79999999999999985e-112 < z < 5.6999999999999997e54

   1. Initial program 87.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 87.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 89.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 89.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 45.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 45.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   7. Simplified 45.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -8.5e13 < z < 3.19999999999999988e-163

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 52.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 3.19999999999999988e-163 < z < 5.79999999999999985e-112

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 58.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

   if 5.6999999999999997e54 < z

   1. Initial program 75.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 75.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 72.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 72.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 54.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 50.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -85000000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-163}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{-112}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5.7 \cdot 10^{+54}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 38.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.16 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{-162}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-112}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{+54}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.16e+14)
   (* y z)
   (if (<= z 7.2e-162)
     x
     (if (<= z 4e-112) (* t a) (if (<= z 5.2e+54) (* y z) (* z (* a b)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.16e+14) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (z <= 7.2e-162) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (z <= 4e-112) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else if (z <= 5.2e+54) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = z * (a * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.16d+14)) then
        tmp = y * z
    else if (z <= 7.2d-162) then
        tmp = x
    else if (z <= 4d-112) then
        tmp = t * a
    else if (z <= 5.2d+54) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = z * (a * b)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.16e+14) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (z <= 7.2e-162) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (z <= 4e-112) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else if (z <= 5.2e+54) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = z * (a * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.16e+14:
		tmp = y * z
	elif z <= 7.2e-162:
		tmp = x
	elif z <= 4e-112:
		tmp = t * a
	elif z <= 5.2e+54:
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = z * (a * b)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.16e+14)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	elseif (z <= 7.2e-162)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (z <= 4e-112)
		tmp = Float64(t * a);
	elseif (z <= 5.2e+54)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(a * b));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.16e+14)
		tmp = y * z;
	elseif (z <= 7.2e-162)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (z <= 4e-112)
		tmp = t * a;
	elseif (z <= 5.2e+54)
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = z * (a * b);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.16e+14], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 7.2e-162], x, If[LessEqual[z, 4e-112], N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 5.2e+54], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if z < -1.16e14 or 3.9999999999999998e-112 < z < 5.20000000000000013e54

   1. Initial program 87.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 87.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 89.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 89.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 45.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 45.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   7. Simplified 45.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -1.16e14 < z < 7.1999999999999996e-162

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 52.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 7.1999999999999996e-162 < z < 3.9999999999999998e-112

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 58.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

   if 5.20000000000000013e54 < z

   1. Initial program 75.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 75.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 72.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 72.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 72.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative 72.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* 79.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in 90.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

   7. Simplified 90.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right) + x} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around 0 59.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} + x \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around inf 54.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-*r* 58.4%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

       2. *-commutative 58.4%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   11. Simplified 58.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 51.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.16 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{-162}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-112}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{+54}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 95.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+166} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{+80}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.3e+166) (not (<= z 2.3e+80)))
   (+ x (* z (+ y (* a b))))
   (+ (+ x (* y z)) (+ (* t a) (* a (* z b))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.3e+166) || !(z <= 2.3e+80)) {
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = (x + (y * z)) + ((t * a) + (a * (z * b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.3d+166)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.3d+80))) then
        tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)))
    else
        tmp = (x + (y * z)) + ((t * a) + (a * (z * b)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.3e+166) || !(z <= 2.3e+80)) {
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = (x + (y * z)) + ((t * a) + (a * (z * b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.3e+166) or not (z <= 2.3e+80):
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)))
	else:
		tmp = (x + (y * z)) + ((t * a) + (a * (z * b)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.3e+166) || !(z <= 2.3e+80))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(a * b))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(Float64(t * a) + Float64(a * Float64(z * b))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.3e+166) || ~((z <= 2.3e+80)))
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)));
	else
		tmp = (x + (y * z)) + ((t * a) + (a * (z * b)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.3e+166], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.3e+80]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(z * N[(y + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.3e166 or 2.30000000000000004e80 < z

   1. Initial program 73.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 73.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 71.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 71.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 71.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 71.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative 71.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* 78.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in 92.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

   7. Simplified 92.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right) + x} \]

   if -1.3e166 < z < 2.30000000000000004e80

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+166} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{+80}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 74.2% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{+27}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-57}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+40}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* a (+ t (* z b)))))
   (if (<= a -3.6e+27)
     t_1
     (if (<= a 3.1e-57)
       (+ x (* y z))
       (if (<= a 2.2e+40) (+ x (* a (* z b))) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = a * (t + (z * b));
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -3.6e+27) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= 3.1e-57) {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	} else if (a <= 2.2e+40) {
		tmp = x + (a * (z * b));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = a * (t + (z * b))
    if (a <= (-3.6d+27)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (a <= 3.1d-57) then
        tmp = x + (y * z)
    else if (a <= 2.2d+40) then
        tmp = x + (a * (z * b))
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = a * (t + (z * b));
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -3.6e+27) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= 3.1e-57) {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	} else if (a <= 2.2e+40) {
		tmp = x + (a * (z * b));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = a * (t + (z * b))
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -3.6e+27:
		tmp = t_1
	elif a <= 3.1e-57:
		tmp = x + (y * z)
	elif a <= 2.2e+40:
		tmp = x + (a * (z * b))
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(a * Float64(t + Float64(z * b)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -3.6e+27)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= 3.1e-57)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * z));
	elseif (a <= 2.2e+40)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(a * Float64(z * b)));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = a * (t + (z * b));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -3.6e+27)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= 3.1e-57)
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	elseif (a <= 2.2e+40)
		tmp = x + (a * (z * b));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a * N[(t + N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[a, -3.6e+27], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[a, 3.1e-57], N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, 2.2e+40], N[(x + N[(a * N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if a < -3.59999999999999983e27 or 2.1999999999999999e40 < a

   1. Initial program 79.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 79.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 84.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 78.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -3.59999999999999983e27 < a < 3.09999999999999976e-57

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 93.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 82.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]

   if 3.09999999999999976e-57 < a < 2.1999999999999999e40

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 86.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 86.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative 86.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* 82.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in 82.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

   7. Simplified 82.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right) + x} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around 0 73.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} + x \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{+27}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-57}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+40}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 61.1% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.06 \cdot 10^{-97}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{+59}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ x (* y z))))
   (if (<= z -1.25e+14)
     t_1
     (if (<= z 1.06e-97)
       (+ x (* t a))
       (if (<= z 2.3e+59) t_1 (* z (* a b)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = x + (y * z);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.25e+14) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 1.06e-97) {
		tmp = x + (t * a);
	} else if (z <= 2.3e+59) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = z * (a * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = x + (y * z)
    if (z <= (-1.25d+14)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z <= 1.06d-97) then
        tmp = x + (t * a)
    else if (z <= 2.3d+59) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = z * (a * b)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = x + (y * z);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.25e+14) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 1.06e-97) {
		tmp = x + (t * a);
	} else if (z <= 2.3e+59) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = z * (a * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = x + (y * z)
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.25e+14:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z <= 1.06e-97:
		tmp = x + (t * a)
	elif z <= 2.3e+59:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = z * (a * b)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(x + Float64(y * z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.25e+14)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 1.06e-97)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(t * a));
	elseif (z <= 2.3e+59)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(a * b));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = x + (y * z);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.25e+14)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 1.06e-97)
		tmp = x + (t * a);
	elseif (z <= 2.3e+59)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = z * (a * b);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -1.25e+14], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, 1.06e-97], N[(x + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 2.3e+59], t$95$1, N[(z * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -1.25e14 or 1.06000000000000006e-97 < z < 2.30000000000000008e59

   1. Initial program 87.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 87.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 89.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 89.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 59.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]

   if -1.25e14 < z < 1.06000000000000006e-97

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 77.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 77.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

   7. Simplified 77.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

   if 2.30000000000000008e59 < z

   1. Initial program 74.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 74.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 70.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 70.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 73.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 73.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative 73.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* 80.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in 92.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

   7. Simplified 92.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right) + x} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around 0 60.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} + x \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around inf 56.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-*r* 60.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

       2. *-commutative 60.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   11. Simplified 60.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.06 \cdot 10^{-97}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{+59}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 80.0% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -7.4 \cdot 10^{+71} \lor \neg \left(b \leq 1.22 \cdot 10^{+60}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(t \cdot a + y \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= b -7.4e+71) (not (<= b 1.22e+60)))
   (+ x (* a (* z b)))
   (+ x (+ (* t a) (* y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((b <= -7.4e+71) || !(b <= 1.22e+60)) {
		tmp = x + (a * (z * b));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((t * a) + (y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((b <= (-7.4d+71)) .or. (.not. (b <= 1.22d+60))) then
        tmp = x + (a * (z * b))
    else
        tmp = x + ((t * a) + (y * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((b <= -7.4e+71) || !(b <= 1.22e+60)) {
		tmp = x + (a * (z * b));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((t * a) + (y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (b <= -7.4e+71) or not (b <= 1.22e+60):
		tmp = x + (a * (z * b))
	else:
		tmp = x + ((t * a) + (y * z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((b <= -7.4e+71) || !(b <= 1.22e+60))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(a * Float64(z * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(t * a) + Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((b <= -7.4e+71) || ~((b <= 1.22e+60)))
		tmp = x + (a * (z * b));
	else
		tmp = x + ((t * a) + (y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[b, -7.4e+71], N[Not[LessEqual[b, 1.22e+60]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(a * N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < -7.4e71 or 1.21999999999999995e60 < b

   1. Initial program 87.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 87.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 81.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 81.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 79.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 79.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative 79.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* 80.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in 86.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

   7. Simplified 86.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right) + x} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around 0 79.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} + x \]

   if -7.4e71 < b < 1.21999999999999995e60

   1. Initial program 91.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 91.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 90.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -7.4 \cdot 10^{+71} \lor \neg \left(b \leq 1.22 \cdot 10^{+60}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(t \cdot a + y \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 84.8% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-48} \lor \neg \left(b \leq 1.32 \cdot 10^{-76}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(t \cdot a + y \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= b -5e-48) (not (<= b 1.32e-76)))
   (+ x (* z (+ y (* a b))))
   (+ x (+ (* t a) (* y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((b <= -5e-48) || !(b <= 1.32e-76)) {
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((t * a) + (y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((b <= (-5d-48)) .or. (.not. (b <= 1.32d-76))) then
        tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)))
    else
        tmp = x + ((t * a) + (y * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((b <= -5e-48) || !(b <= 1.32e-76)) {
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((t * a) + (y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (b <= -5e-48) or not (b <= 1.32e-76):
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)))
	else:
		tmp = x + ((t * a) + (y * z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((b <= -5e-48) || !(b <= 1.32e-76))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(a * b))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(t * a) + Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((b <= -5e-48) || ~((b <= 1.32e-76)))
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)));
	else
		tmp = x + ((t * a) + (y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[b, -5e-48], N[Not[LessEqual[b, 1.32e-76]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(z * N[(y + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < -4.9999999999999999e-48 or 1.31999999999999996e-76 < b

   1. Initial program 87.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 87.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 84.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 84.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 78.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 78.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative 78.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in 86.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

   7. Simplified 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right) + x} \]

   if -4.9999999999999999e-48 < b < 1.31999999999999996e-76

   1. Initial program 92.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-48} \lor \neg \left(b \leq 1.32 \cdot 10^{-76}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(t \cdot a + y \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 38.7% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-161}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{-112}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.95e+14)
   (* y z)
   (if (<= z 1.4e-161) x (if (<= z 5.8e-112) (* t a) (* y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.95e+14) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (z <= 1.4e-161) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (z <= 5.8e-112) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.95d+14)) then
        tmp = y * z
    else if (z <= 1.4d-161) then
        tmp = x
    else if (z <= 5.8d-112) then
        tmp = t * a
    else
        tmp = y * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.95e+14) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (z <= 1.4e-161) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (z <= 5.8e-112) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.95e+14:
		tmp = y * z
	elif z <= 1.4e-161:
		tmp = x
	elif z <= 5.8e-112:
		tmp = t * a
	else:
		tmp = y * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.95e+14)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	elseif (z <= 1.4e-161)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (z <= 5.8e-112)
		tmp = Float64(t * a);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.95e+14)
		tmp = y * z;
	elseif (z <= 1.4e-161)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (z <= 5.8e-112)
		tmp = t * a;
	else
		tmp = y * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.95e+14], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.4e-161], x, If[LessEqual[z, 5.8e-112], N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -1.95e14 or 5.79999999999999985e-112 < z

   1. Initial program 83.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 83.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 84.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 84.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 44.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 44.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   7. Simplified 44.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -1.95e14 < z < 1.39999999999999996e-161

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 52.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.39999999999999996e-161 < z < 5.79999999999999985e-112

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 58.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 47.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-161}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{-112}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 73.9% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+38} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-57}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -4e+38) (not (<= a 3.1e-57)))
   (* a (+ t (* z b)))
   (+ x (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -4e+38) || !(a <= 3.1e-57)) {
		tmp = a * (t + (z * b));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= (-4d+38)) .or. (.not. (a <= 3.1d-57))) then
        tmp = a * (t + (z * b))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -4e+38) || !(a <= 3.1e-57)) {
		tmp = a * (t + (z * b));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= -4e+38) or not (a <= 3.1e-57):
		tmp = a * (t + (z * b))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -4e+38) || !(a <= 3.1e-57))
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(t + Float64(z * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= -4e+38) || ~((a <= 3.1e-57)))
		tmp = a * (t + (z * b));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -4e+38], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 3.1e-57]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * N[(t + N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -3.99999999999999991e38 or 3.09999999999999976e-57 < a

   1. Initial program 82.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 82.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 87.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -3.99999999999999991e38 < a < 3.09999999999999976e-57

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 93.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 82.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+38} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-57}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 39.2% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -0.0013:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{-29}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -0.0013) x (if (<= x 1.2e-29) (* t a) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -0.0013) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 1.2e-29) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-0.0013d0)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 1.2d-29) then
        tmp = t * a
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -0.0013) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 1.2e-29) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -0.0013:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 1.2e-29:
		tmp = t * a
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -0.0013)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 1.2e-29)
		tmp = Float64(t * a);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -0.0013)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 1.2e-29)
		tmp = t * a;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[x, -0.0013], x, If[LessEqual[x, 1.2e-29], N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -0.0012999999999999999 or 1.19999999999999996e-29 < x

   1. Initial program 90.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 90.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 91.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 43.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -0.0012999999999999999 < x < 1.19999999999999996e-29

   1. Initial program 89.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 89.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 88.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 88.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 33.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 38.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -0.0013:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{-29}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 26.6% accurate, 15.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 89.6%

   \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 89.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. associate-*l* 89.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

3. Simplified 89.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 25.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

6. Final simplification 25.3%

   \[\leadsto x \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 97.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot \left(b \cdot a + y\right) + \left(x + t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -11820553527347888000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 4.7589743188364287 \cdot 10^{-122}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot z + t\right) \cdot a + \left(z \cdot y + x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a)))))
   (if (< z -11820553527347888000.0)
     t_1
     (if (< z 4.7589743188364287e-122)
       (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x))
       t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
    if (z < (-11820553527347888000.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z < 4.7589743188364287d-122) then
        tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
	tmp = 0
	if z < -11820553527347888000.0:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z < 4.7589743188364287e-122:
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(b * a) + y)) + Float64(x + Float64(t * a)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(b * z) + t) * a) + Float64(Float64(z * y) + x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(z * N[(N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -11820553527347888000.0], t$95$1, If[Less[z, 4.7589743188364287e-122], N[(N[(N[(N[(b * z), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024041 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< z -11820553527347888000.0) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))) (if (< z 4.7589743188364287e-122) (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x)) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a)))))

  (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))