Octave 3.8, jcobi/4

Percentage Accurate: 16.6% → 84.6%

Time: 22.4s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 53.0×

Specification

\[\left(\alpha > -1 \land \beta > -1\right) \land i > 1\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\\ t_1 := \left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\\ t_2 := t\_1 \cdot t\_1\\ \frac{\frac{t\_0 \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + t\_0\right)}{t\_2}}{t\_2 - 1} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* i (+ (+ alpha beta) i)))
        (t_1 (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i)))
        (t_2 (* t_1 t_1)))
   (/ (/ (* t_0 (+ (* beta alpha) t_0)) t_2) (- t_2 1.0))))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = i * ((alpha + beta) + i);
	double t_1 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return ((t_0 * ((beta * alpha) + t_0)) / t_2) / (t_2 - 1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    t_0 = i * ((alpha + beta) + i)
    t_1 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0d0 * i)
    t_2 = t_1 * t_1
    code = ((t_0 * ((beta * alpha) + t_0)) / t_2) / (t_2 - 1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = i * ((alpha + beta) + i);
	double t_1 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return ((t_0 * ((beta * alpha) + t_0)) / t_2) / (t_2 - 1.0);
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta, i):
	t_0 = i * ((alpha + beta) + i)
	t_1 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i)
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1
	return ((t_0 * ((beta * alpha) + t_0)) / t_2) / (t_2 - 1.0)

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = Float64(i * Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + i))
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + Float64(2.0 * i))
	t_2 = Float64(t_1 * t_1)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(t_0 * Float64(Float64(beta * alpha) + t_0)) / t_2) / Float64(t_2 - 1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = i * ((alpha + beta) + i);
	t_1 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	tmp = ((t_0 * ((beta * alpha) + t_0)) / t_2) / (t_2 - 1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(i * N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(t$95$1 * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(N[(t$95$0 * N[(N[(beta * alpha), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$2 - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Initial Program: 16.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\\ t_1 := \left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\\ t_2 := t\_1 \cdot t\_1\\ \frac{\frac{t\_0 \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + t\_0\right)}{t\_2}}{t\_2 - 1} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* i (+ (+ alpha beta) i)))
        (t_1 (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i)))
        (t_2 (* t_1 t_1)))
   (/ (/ (* t_0 (+ (* beta alpha) t_0)) t_2) (- t_2 1.0))))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = i * ((alpha + beta) + i);
	double t_1 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return ((t_0 * ((beta * alpha) + t_0)) / t_2) / (t_2 - 1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    t_0 = i * ((alpha + beta) + i)
    t_1 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0d0 * i)
    t_2 = t_1 * t_1
    code = ((t_0 * ((beta * alpha) + t_0)) / t_2) / (t_2 - 1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = i * ((alpha + beta) + i);
	double t_1 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return ((t_0 * ((beta * alpha) + t_0)) / t_2) / (t_2 - 1.0);
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta, i):
	t_0 = i * ((alpha + beta) + i)
	t_1 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i)
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1
	return ((t_0 * ((beta * alpha) + t_0)) / t_2) / (t_2 - 1.0)

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = Float64(i * Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + i))
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + Float64(2.0 * i))
	t_2 = Float64(t_1 * t_1)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(t_0 * Float64(Float64(beta * alpha) + t_0)) / t_2) / Float64(t_2 - 1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = i * ((alpha + beta) + i);
	t_1 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	tmp = ((t_0 * ((beta * alpha) + t_0)) / t_2) / (t_2 - 1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(i * N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(t$95$1 * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(N[(t$95$0 * N[(N[(beta * alpha), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$2 - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Alternative 1: 84.6% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [alpha, beta, i] = \mathsf{sort}([alpha, beta, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+158}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(0.0625 + 0.0625 \cdot \frac{2 \cdot \alpha + \beta \cdot 2}{i}\right) - 0.125 \cdot \frac{\beta + \alpha}{i}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \frac{\alpha + i}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta + \alpha\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= beta 1.35e+158)
   (-
    (+ 0.0625 (* 0.0625 (/ (+ (* 2.0 alpha) (* beta 2.0)) i)))
    (* 0.125 (/ (+ beta alpha) i)))
   (* (/ i beta) (/ (+ alpha i) (fma i 2.0 (+ beta alpha))))))

C

assert(alpha < beta && beta < i);
double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (beta <= 1.35e+158) {
		tmp = (0.0625 + (0.0625 * (((2.0 * alpha) + (beta * 2.0)) / i))) - (0.125 * ((beta + alpha) / i));
	} else {
		tmp = (i / beta) * ((alpha + i) / fma(i, 2.0, (beta + alpha)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

alpha, beta, i = sort([alpha, beta, i])
function code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (beta <= 1.35e+158)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(0.0625 + Float64(0.0625 * Float64(Float64(Float64(2.0 * alpha) + Float64(beta * 2.0)) / i))) - Float64(0.125 * Float64(Float64(beta + alpha) / i)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(i / beta) * Float64(Float64(alpha + i) / fma(i, 2.0, Float64(beta + alpha))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := If[LessEqual[beta, 1.35e+158], N[(N[(0.0625 + N[(0.0625 * N[(N[(N[(2.0 * alpha), $MachinePrecision] + N[(beta * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(0.125 * N[(N[(beta + alpha), $MachinePrecision] / i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(i / beta), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(alpha + i), $MachinePrecision] / N[(i * 2.0 + N[(beta + alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if beta < 1.34999999999999989e158

   1. Initial program 22.9%

      \[\frac{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \]

   3. Simplified 42.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), \alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), -1\right)} \cdot \frac{i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}{\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right)}\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 86.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.0625 + 0.0625 \cdot \frac{2 \cdot \alpha + 2 \cdot \beta}{i}\right) - 0.125 \cdot \frac{\alpha + \beta}{i}} \]

   if 1.34999999999999989e158 < beta

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\frac{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l/ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)\right)}} \]

      2. times-frac 14.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \cdot \frac{\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 14.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{i \cdot \left(\beta + \left(i + \alpha\right)\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right), -1\right)} \cdot \frac{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, \beta + \left(i + \alpha\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 26.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{i}{\beta}} \cdot \frac{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, \beta + \left(i + \alpha\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\alpha + i}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+158}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(0.0625 + 0.0625 \cdot \frac{2 \cdot \alpha + \beta \cdot 2}{i}\right) - 0.125 \cdot \frac{\beta + \alpha}{i}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \frac{\alpha + i}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta + \alpha\right)}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 84.5% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [alpha, beta, i] = \mathsf{sort}([alpha, beta, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{+158}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(0.0625 + 0.0625 \cdot \frac{2 \cdot \alpha + \beta \cdot 2}{i}\right) - 0.125 \cdot \frac{\beta + \alpha}{i}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \frac{\alpha + i}{\beta}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= beta 6.2e+158)
   (-
    (+ 0.0625 (* 0.0625 (/ (+ (* 2.0 alpha) (* beta 2.0)) i)))
    (* 0.125 (/ (+ beta alpha) i)))
   (* (/ i beta) (/ (+ alpha i) beta))))

C

assert(alpha < beta && beta < i);
double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (beta <= 6.2e+158) {
		tmp = (0.0625 + (0.0625 * (((2.0 * alpha) + (beta * 2.0)) / i))) - (0.125 * ((beta + alpha) / i));
	} else {
		tmp = (i / beta) * ((alpha + i) / beta);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (beta <= 6.2d+158) then
        tmp = (0.0625d0 + (0.0625d0 * (((2.0d0 * alpha) + (beta * 2.0d0)) / i))) - (0.125d0 * ((beta + alpha) / i))
    else
        tmp = (i / beta) * ((alpha + i) / beta)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert alpha < beta && beta < i;
public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (beta <= 6.2e+158) {
		tmp = (0.0625 + (0.0625 * (((2.0 * alpha) + (beta * 2.0)) / i))) - (0.125 * ((beta + alpha) / i));
	} else {
		tmp = (i / beta) * ((alpha + i) / beta);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[alpha, beta, i] = sort([alpha, beta, i])
def code(alpha, beta, i):
	tmp = 0
	if beta <= 6.2e+158:
		tmp = (0.0625 + (0.0625 * (((2.0 * alpha) + (beta * 2.0)) / i))) - (0.125 * ((beta + alpha) / i))
	else:
		tmp = (i / beta) * ((alpha + i) / beta)
	return tmp

Julia

alpha, beta, i = sort([alpha, beta, i])
function code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (beta <= 6.2e+158)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(0.0625 + Float64(0.0625 * Float64(Float64(Float64(2.0 * alpha) + Float64(beta * 2.0)) / i))) - Float64(0.125 * Float64(Float64(beta + alpha) / i)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(i / beta) * Float64(Float64(alpha + i) / beta));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

alpha, beta, i = num2cell(sort([alpha, beta, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (beta <= 6.2e+158)
		tmp = (0.0625 + (0.0625 * (((2.0 * alpha) + (beta * 2.0)) / i))) - (0.125 * ((beta + alpha) / i));
	else
		tmp = (i / beta) * ((alpha + i) / beta);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := If[LessEqual[beta, 6.2e+158], N[(N[(0.0625 + N[(0.0625 * N[(N[(N[(2.0 * alpha), $MachinePrecision] + N[(beta * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(0.125 * N[(N[(beta + alpha), $MachinePrecision] / i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(i / beta), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(alpha + i), $MachinePrecision] / beta), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if beta < 6.2000000000000004e158

   1. Initial program 22.9%

      \[\frac{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \]

   3. Simplified 42.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), \alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), -1\right)} \cdot \frac{i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}{\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right)}\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 86.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.0625 + 0.0625 \cdot \frac{2 \cdot \alpha + 2 \cdot \beta}{i}\right) - 0.125 \cdot \frac{\alpha + \beta}{i}} \]

   if 6.2000000000000004e158 < beta

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\frac{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l/ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)\right)}} \]

      2. times-frac 14.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \cdot \frac{\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 14.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{i \cdot \left(\beta + \left(i + \alpha\right)\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right), -1\right)} \cdot \frac{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, \beta + \left(i + \alpha\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 26.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{i}{\beta}} \cdot \frac{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, \beta + \left(i + \alpha\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in i around 0 60.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(i \cdot \left(\frac{1}{\alpha + \beta} - 4 \cdot \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{3}}\right) + \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{2}}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 60.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, \frac{1}{\alpha + \beta} - 4 \cdot \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{3}}, \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{2}}\right)} \]

      2. cancel-sign-sub-inv 60.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(i, \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\alpha + \beta} + \left(-4\right) \cdot \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{3}}}, \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{2}}\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 60.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(i, \frac{1}{\alpha + \beta} + \color{blue}{-4} \cdot \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{3}}, \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{2}}\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 60.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(i, \frac{1}{\alpha + \beta} + -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\alpha \cdot \frac{\beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{3}}\right)}, \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{2}}\right) \]

      5. associate-/l* 64.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(i, \frac{1}{\alpha + \beta} + -4 \cdot \left(\alpha \cdot \frac{\beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{3}}\right), \color{blue}{\alpha \cdot \frac{\beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{2}}}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 64.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, \frac{1}{\alpha + \beta} + -4 \cdot \left(\alpha \cdot \frac{\beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{3}}\right), \alpha \cdot \frac{\beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{2}}\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in alpha around 0 71.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\alpha \cdot \left(-5 \cdot \frac{i}{{\beta}^{2}} + \frac{1}{\beta}\right) + \frac{i}{\beta}\right)} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 71.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\alpha + i}{\beta}} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. +-commutative 71.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{i + \alpha}}{\beta} \]

   12. Simplified 71.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{i + \alpha}{\beta}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{+158}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(0.0625 + 0.0625 \cdot \frac{2 \cdot \alpha + \beta \cdot 2}{i}\right) - 0.125 \cdot \frac{\beta + \alpha}{i}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \frac{\alpha + i}{\beta}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 84.6% accurate, 3.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [alpha, beta, i] = \mathsf{sort}([alpha, beta, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{+157}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \frac{\alpha + i}{\beta}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= beta 7.5e+157) 0.0625 (* (/ i beta) (/ (+ alpha i) beta))))

C

assert(alpha < beta && beta < i);
double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (beta <= 7.5e+157) {
		tmp = 0.0625;
	} else {
		tmp = (i / beta) * ((alpha + i) / beta);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (beta <= 7.5d+157) then
        tmp = 0.0625d0
    else
        tmp = (i / beta) * ((alpha + i) / beta)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert alpha < beta && beta < i;
public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (beta <= 7.5e+157) {
		tmp = 0.0625;
	} else {
		tmp = (i / beta) * ((alpha + i) / beta);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[alpha, beta, i] = sort([alpha, beta, i])
def code(alpha, beta, i):
	tmp = 0
	if beta <= 7.5e+157:
		tmp = 0.0625
	else:
		tmp = (i / beta) * ((alpha + i) / beta)
	return tmp

Julia

alpha, beta, i = sort([alpha, beta, i])
function code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (beta <= 7.5e+157)
		tmp = 0.0625;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(i / beta) * Float64(Float64(alpha + i) / beta));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

alpha, beta, i = num2cell(sort([alpha, beta, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (beta <= 7.5e+157)
		tmp = 0.0625;
	else
		tmp = (i / beta) * ((alpha + i) / beta);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := If[LessEqual[beta, 7.5e+157], 0.0625, N[(N[(i / beta), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(alpha + i), $MachinePrecision] / beta), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if beta < 7.5e157

   1. Initial program 22.9%

      \[\frac{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \]

   3. Simplified 42.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), \alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), -1\right)} \cdot \frac{i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}{\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right)}\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 82.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0625} \]

   if 7.5e157 < beta

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\frac{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l/ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)\right)}} \]

      2. times-frac 14.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \cdot \frac{\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 14.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{i \cdot \left(\beta + \left(i + \alpha\right)\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right), -1\right)} \cdot \frac{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, \beta + \left(i + \alpha\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 26.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{i}{\beta}} \cdot \frac{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, \beta + \left(i + \alpha\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in i around 0 60.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(i \cdot \left(\frac{1}{\alpha + \beta} - 4 \cdot \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{3}}\right) + \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{2}}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 60.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, \frac{1}{\alpha + \beta} - 4 \cdot \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{3}}, \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{2}}\right)} \]

      2. cancel-sign-sub-inv 60.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(i, \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\alpha + \beta} + \left(-4\right) \cdot \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{3}}}, \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{2}}\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 60.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(i, \frac{1}{\alpha + \beta} + \color{blue}{-4} \cdot \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{3}}, \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{2}}\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 60.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(i, \frac{1}{\alpha + \beta} + -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\alpha \cdot \frac{\beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{3}}\right)}, \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{2}}\right) \]

      5. associate-/l* 64.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(i, \frac{1}{\alpha + \beta} + -4 \cdot \left(\alpha \cdot \frac{\beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{3}}\right), \color{blue}{\alpha \cdot \frac{\beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{2}}}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 64.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, \frac{1}{\alpha + \beta} + -4 \cdot \left(\alpha \cdot \frac{\beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{3}}\right), \alpha \cdot \frac{\beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{2}}\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in alpha around 0 71.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\alpha \cdot \left(-5 \cdot \frac{i}{{\beta}^{2}} + \frac{1}{\beta}\right) + \frac{i}{\beta}\right)} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 71.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\alpha + i}{\beta}} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. +-commutative 71.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{i + \alpha}}{\beta} \]

   12. Simplified 71.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{i + \alpha}{\beta}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{+157}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \frac{\alpha + i}{\beta}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 82.6% accurate, 4.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [alpha, beta, i] = \mathsf{sort}([alpha, beta, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{+157}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \frac{i}{\beta}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= beta 8.5e+157) 0.0625 (* (/ i beta) (/ i beta))))

C

assert(alpha < beta && beta < i);
double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (beta <= 8.5e+157) {
		tmp = 0.0625;
	} else {
		tmp = (i / beta) * (i / beta);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (beta <= 8.5d+157) then
        tmp = 0.0625d0
    else
        tmp = (i / beta) * (i / beta)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert alpha < beta && beta < i;
public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (beta <= 8.5e+157) {
		tmp = 0.0625;
	} else {
		tmp = (i / beta) * (i / beta);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[alpha, beta, i] = sort([alpha, beta, i])
def code(alpha, beta, i):
	tmp = 0
	if beta <= 8.5e+157:
		tmp = 0.0625
	else:
		tmp = (i / beta) * (i / beta)
	return tmp

Julia

alpha, beta, i = sort([alpha, beta, i])
function code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (beta <= 8.5e+157)
		tmp = 0.0625;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(i / beta) * Float64(i / beta));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

alpha, beta, i = num2cell(sort([alpha, beta, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (beta <= 8.5e+157)
		tmp = 0.0625;
	else
		tmp = (i / beta) * (i / beta);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := If[LessEqual[beta, 8.5e+157], 0.0625, N[(N[(i / beta), $MachinePrecision] * N[(i / beta), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if beta < 8.4999999999999998e157

   1. Initial program 22.9%

      \[\frac{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \]

   3. Simplified 42.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), \alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), -1\right)} \cdot \frac{i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}{\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right)}\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 82.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0625} \]

   if 8.4999999999999998e157 < beta

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\frac{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l/ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)\right)}} \]

      2. times-frac 14.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \cdot \frac{\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 14.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{i \cdot \left(\beta + \left(i + \alpha\right)\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right), -1\right)} \cdot \frac{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, \beta + \left(i + \alpha\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 26.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{i}{\beta}} \cdot \frac{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, \beta + \left(i + \alpha\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \alpha + \beta\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in i around 0 60.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(i \cdot \left(\frac{1}{\alpha + \beta} - 4 \cdot \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{3}}\right) + \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{2}}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 60.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, \frac{1}{\alpha + \beta} - 4 \cdot \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{3}}, \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{2}}\right)} \]

      2. cancel-sign-sub-inv 60.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(i, \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\alpha + \beta} + \left(-4\right) \cdot \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{3}}}, \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{2}}\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 60.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(i, \frac{1}{\alpha + \beta} + \color{blue}{-4} \cdot \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{3}}, \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{2}}\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 60.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(i, \frac{1}{\alpha + \beta} + -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\alpha \cdot \frac{\beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{3}}\right)}, \frac{\alpha \cdot \beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{2}}\right) \]

      5. associate-/l* 64.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(i, \frac{1}{\alpha + \beta} + -4 \cdot \left(\alpha \cdot \frac{\beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{3}}\right), \color{blue}{\alpha \cdot \frac{\beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{2}}}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 64.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, \frac{1}{\alpha + \beta} + -4 \cdot \left(\alpha \cdot \frac{\beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{3}}\right), \alpha \cdot \frac{\beta}{{\left(\alpha + \beta\right)}^{2}}\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in alpha around 0 64.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{i}{\beta}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{+157}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{i}{\beta} \cdot \frac{i}{\beta}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 70.2% accurate, 53.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [alpha, beta, i] = \mathsf{sort}([alpha, beta, i])\\ \\ 0.0625 \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (alpha beta i) :precision binary64 0.0625)

C

assert(alpha < beta && beta < i);
double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	return 0.0625;
}

Fortran

NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 0.0625d0
end function

Java

assert alpha < beta && beta < i;
public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	return 0.0625;
}

Python

[alpha, beta, i] = sort([alpha, beta, i])
def code(alpha, beta, i):
	return 0.0625

Julia

alpha, beta, i = sort([alpha, beta, i])
function code(alpha, beta, i)
	return 0.0625
end

MATLAB

alpha, beta, i = num2cell(sort([alpha, beta, i])){:}
function tmp = code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0625;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: alpha, beta, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := 0.0625

Derivation

1. Initial program 19.6%

   \[\frac{\frac{\left(i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta \cdot \alpha + i \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + i\right)\right)}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) - 1} \]

3. Simplified 38.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right), \alpha \cdot \beta\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), \alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right), -1\right)} \cdot \frac{i + \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}{\left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(i, 2, \beta\right)\right)}\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 74.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0625} \]

6. Final simplification 74.2%

   \[\leadsto 0.0625 \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024040 
(FPCore (alpha beta i)
  :name "Octave 3.8, jcobi/4"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (> alpha -1.0) (> beta -1.0)) (> i 1.0))
  (/ (/ (* (* i (+ (+ alpha beta) i)) (+ (* beta alpha) (* i (+ (+ alpha beta) i)))) (* (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i)) (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i)))) (- (* (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i)) (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i))) 1.0)))