Main:bigenough2 from A

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 3.8s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

• 20.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z + x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z + x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z + x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z + x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z + x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z + x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma y (+ x z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(y, (x + z), x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(y, Float64(x + z), x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right) + x} \]

   2. fma-define 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z + x, x\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{x + z}, x\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 61.9% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{+23}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{-18} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{-37}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.15e+23)
   (* y x)
   (if (or (<= y -3.6e-18) (not (<= y 1.65e-37))) (* y z) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.15e+23) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else if ((y <= -3.6e-18) || !(y <= 1.65e-37)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1.15d+23)) then
        tmp = y * x
    else if ((y <= (-3.6d-18)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.65d-37))) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.15e+23) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else if ((y <= -3.6e-18) || !(y <= 1.65e-37)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.15e+23:
		tmp = y * x
	elif (y <= -3.6e-18) or not (y <= 1.65e-37):
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.15e+23)
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	elseif ((y <= -3.6e-18) || !(y <= 1.65e-37))
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.15e+23)
		tmp = y * x;
	elseif ((y <= -3.6e-18) || ~((y <= 1.65e-37)))
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.15e+23], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[y, -3.6e-18], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.65e-37]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -1.15e23

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 64.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 64.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 64.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 64.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 64.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   8. Simplified 64.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -1.15e23 < y < -3.6000000000000001e-18 or 1.64999999999999991e-37 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 58.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -3.6000000000000001e-18 < y < 1.64999999999999991e-37

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 77.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{+23}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{-18} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{-37}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 73.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+191} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{+55}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.3e+191) (not (<= z 8.8e+55))) (* y z) (* x (+ y 1.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.3e+191) || !(z <= 8.8e+55)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.3d+191)) .or. (.not. (z <= 8.8d+55))) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = x * (y + 1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.3e+191) || !(z <= 8.8e+55)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.3e+191) or not (z <= 8.8e+55):
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.3e+191) || !(z <= 8.8e+55))
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y + 1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.3e+191) || ~((z <= 8.8e+55)))
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.3e+191], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 8.8e+55]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(y + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.3e191 or 8.80000000000000042e55 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 82.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -1.3e191 < z < 8.80000000000000042e55

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 82.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 82.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+191} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{+55}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 85.2% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{-19} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-38}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -5.2e-19) (not (<= y 3.5e-38))) (* y (+ x z)) (* x (+ y 1.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -5.2e-19) || !(y <= 3.5e-38)) {
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-5.2d-19)) .or. (.not. (y <= 3.5d-38))) then
        tmp = y * (x + z)
    else
        tmp = x * (y + 1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -5.2e-19) || !(y <= 3.5e-38)) {
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -5.2e-19) or not (y <= 3.5e-38):
		tmp = y * (x + z)
	else:
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -5.2e-19) || !(y <= 3.5e-38))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x + z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y + 1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -5.2e-19) || ~((y <= 3.5e-38)))
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	else
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -5.2e-19], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 3.5e-38]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(y + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -5.20000000000000026e-19 or 3.5000000000000001e-38 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.2%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

   if -5.20000000000000026e-19 < y < 3.5000000000000001e-38

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 77.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 77.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 77.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{-19} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-38}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 61.1% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{-7} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 31000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -6.5e-7) (not (<= y 31000.0))) (* y x) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -6.5e-7) || !(y <= 31000.0)) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-6.5d-7)) .or. (.not. (y <= 31000.0d0))) then
        tmp = y * x
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -6.5e-7) || !(y <= 31000.0)) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -6.5e-7) or not (y <= 31000.0):
		tmp = y * x
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -6.5e-7) || !(y <= 31000.0))
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -6.5e-7) || ~((y <= 31000.0)))
		tmp = y * x;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -6.5e-7], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 31000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -6.50000000000000024e-7 or 31000 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 57.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 57.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 57.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 56.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 56.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   8. Simplified 56.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -6.50000000000000024e-7 < y < 31000

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 71.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{-7} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 31000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(x + z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ x z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (x + z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (x + z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (x + z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (x + z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(x + z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (x + z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(x + z\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 36.9% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 37.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

4. Final simplification 37.0%

   \[\leadsto x \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024039 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Main:bigenough2 from A"
  :precision binary64
  (+ x (* y (+ z x))))