Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quartForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, B

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 5.0s

Alternatives: 4

Speedup: 1.2×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (* (/ 1.0 8.0) x) (/ (* y z) 2.0)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((1.0d0 / 8.0d0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0d0)) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 / 8.0) * x) - Float64(Float64(y * z) / 2.0)) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(1.0 / 8.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (* (/ 1.0 8.0) x) (/ (* y z) 2.0)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((1.0d0 / 8.0d0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0d0)) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 / 8.0) * x) - Float64(Float64(y * z) / 2.0)) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(1.0 / 8.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (- (* 0.125 x) (/ (* y z) 2.0)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((0.125 * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((0.125d0 * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0d0)) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((0.125 * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((0.125 * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(0.125 * x) - Float64(Float64(y * z) / 2.0)) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((0.125 * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 80.7% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{+88} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-88}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x + t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -4.6e+88) (not (<= y 1.15e-88)))
   (+ t (* y (* z -0.5)))
   (+ (* 0.125 x) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -4.6e+88) || !(y <= 1.15e-88)) {
		tmp = t + (y * (z * -0.5));
	} else {
		tmp = (0.125 * x) + t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-4.6d+88)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.15d-88))) then
        tmp = t + (y * (z * (-0.5d0)))
    else
        tmp = (0.125d0 * x) + t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -4.6e+88) || !(y <= 1.15e-88)) {
		tmp = t + (y * (z * -0.5));
	} else {
		tmp = (0.125 * x) + t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -4.6e+88) or not (y <= 1.15e-88):
		tmp = t + (y * (z * -0.5))
	else:
		tmp = (0.125 * x) + t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -4.6e+88) || !(y <= 1.15e-88))
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(y * Float64(z * -0.5)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(0.125 * x) + t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -4.6e+88) || ~((y <= 1.15e-88)))
		tmp = t + (y * (z * -0.5));
	else
		tmp = (0.125 * x) + t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -4.6e+88], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.15e-88]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(t + N[(y * N[(z * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -4.6000000000000003e88 or 1.14999999999999993e-88 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 81.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} + t \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 81.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -0.5} + t \]

      2. associate-*l* 81.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5\right)} + t \]

   7. Simplified 81.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5\right)} + t \]

   if -4.6000000000000003e88 < y < 1.14999999999999993e-88

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 85.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.125 \cdot x} + t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{+88} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-88}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x + t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t + \left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ t (- (* 0.125 x) (/ y (/ 2.0 z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + ((0.125 * x) - (y / (2.0 / z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t + ((0.125d0 * x) - (y / (2.0d0 / z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + ((0.125 * x) - (y / (2.0 / z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t + ((0.125 * x) - (y / (2.0 / z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(t + Float64(Float64(0.125 * x) - Float64(y / Float64(2.0 / z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t + ((0.125 * x) - (y / (2.0 / z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(t + N[(N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y / N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. metadata-eval 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

   2. associate-/l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto t + \left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 64.3% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.125 \cdot x + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* 0.125 x) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (0.125 * x) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (0.125d0 * x) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (0.125 * x) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (0.125 * x) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(0.125 * x) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (0.125 * x) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. metadata-eval 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

   2. associate-/l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 63.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.125 \cdot x} + t \]

6. Final simplification 63.8%

   \[\leadsto 0.125 \cdot x + t \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 100.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{x}{8} + t\right) - \frac{z}{2} \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (+ (/ x 8.0) t) (* (/ z 2.0) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x / 8.0) + t) - ((z / 2.0) * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((x / 8.0d0) + t) - ((z / 2.0d0) * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x / 8.0) + t) - ((z / 2.0) * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((x / 8.0) + t) - ((z / 2.0) * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x / 8.0) + t) - Float64(Float64(z / 2.0) * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((x / 8.0) + t) - ((z / 2.0) * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(x / 8.0), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(z / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024039 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quartForm  from diagrams-solve-0.1, B"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- (+ (/ x 8.0) t) (* (/ z 2.0) y))

  (+ (- (* (/ 1.0 8.0) x) (/ (* y z) 2.0)) t))