tan-example (used to crash)

Percentage Accurate: 79.7% → 99.7%

Time: 34.3s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

\[\left(\left(\left(x = 0 \lor 0.5884142 \leq x \land x \leq 505.5909\right) \land \left(-1.796658 \cdot 10^{+308} \leq y \land y \leq -9.425585 \cdot 10^{-310} \lor 1.284938 \cdot 10^{-309} \leq y \land y \leq 1.751224 \cdot 10^{+308}\right)\right) \land \left(-1.776707 \cdot 10^{+308} \leq z \land z \leq -8.599796 \cdot 10^{-310} \lor 3.293145 \cdot 10^{-311} \leq z \land z \leq 1.725154 \cdot 10^{+308}\right)\right) \land \left(-1.796658 \cdot 10^{+308} \leq a \land a \leq -9.425585 \cdot 10^{-310} \lor 1.284938 \cdot 10^{-309} \leq a \land a \leq 1.751224 \cdot 10^{+308}\right)\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z a) :precision binary64 (+ x (- (tan (+ y z)) (tan a))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x + (tan((y + z)) - tan(a));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, a)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    code = x + (tan((y + z)) - tan(a))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x + (Math.tan((y + z)) - Math.tan(a));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, a):
	return x + (math.tan((y + z)) - math.tan(a))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, a)
	return Float64(x + Float64(tan(Float64(y + z)) - tan(a)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, a)
	tmp = x + (tan((y + z)) - tan(a));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, a_] := N[(x + N[(N[Tan[N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tan[a], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 79.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z a) :precision binary64 (+ x (- (tan (+ y z)) (tan a))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x + (tan((y + z)) - tan(a));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, a)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    code = x + (tan((y + z)) - tan(a))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x + (Math.tan((y + z)) - Math.tan(a));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, a):
	return x + (math.tan((y + z)) - math.tan(a))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, a)
	return Float64(x + Float64(tan(Float64(y + z)) - tan(a)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, a)
	tmp = x + (tan((y + z)) - tan(a));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, a_] := N[(x + N[(N[Tan[N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tan[a], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.7% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(\frac{1}{\frac{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z}{\tan y + \tan z}} - \tan a\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z a)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (- (/ 1.0 (/ (- 1.0 (* (tan y) (tan z))) (+ (tan y) (tan z)))) (tan a))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x + ((1.0 / ((1.0 - (tan(y) * tan(z))) / (tan(y) + tan(z)))) - tan(a));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, a)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    code = x + ((1.0d0 / ((1.0d0 - (tan(y) * tan(z))) / (tan(y) + tan(z)))) - tan(a))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x + ((1.0 / ((1.0 - (Math.tan(y) * Math.tan(z))) / (Math.tan(y) + Math.tan(z)))) - Math.tan(a));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, a):
	return x + ((1.0 / ((1.0 - (math.tan(y) * math.tan(z))) / (math.tan(y) + math.tan(z)))) - math.tan(a))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, a)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(1.0 - Float64(tan(y) * tan(z))) / Float64(tan(y) + tan(z)))) - tan(a)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, a)
	tmp = x + ((1.0 / ((1.0 - (tan(y) * tan(z))) / (tan(y) + tan(z)))) - tan(a));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, a_] := N[(x + N[(N[(1.0 / N[(N[(1.0 - N[(N[Tan[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[Tan[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Tan[y], $MachinePrecision] + N[Tan[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[Tan[a], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 79.3%

   \[x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. tan-sum 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\tan y + \tan z}{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z}} - \tan a\right) \]

   2. clear-num 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z}{\tan y + \tan z}}} - \tan a\right) \]

4. Applied egg-rr 99.7%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z}{\tan y + \tan z}}} - \tan a\right) \]

5. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(\frac{1}{\frac{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z}{\tan y + \tan z}} - \tan a\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.7% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(\frac{\tan y + \tan z}{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z} - \tan a\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z a)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (- (/ (+ (tan y) (tan z)) (- 1.0 (* (tan y) (tan z)))) (tan a))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x + (((tan(y) + tan(z)) / (1.0 - (tan(y) * tan(z)))) - tan(a));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, a)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    code = x + (((tan(y) + tan(z)) / (1.0d0 - (tan(y) * tan(z)))) - tan(a))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x + (((Math.tan(y) + Math.tan(z)) / (1.0 - (Math.tan(y) * Math.tan(z)))) - Math.tan(a));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, a):
	return x + (((math.tan(y) + math.tan(z)) / (1.0 - (math.tan(y) * math.tan(z)))) - math.tan(a))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, a)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(tan(y) + tan(z)) / Float64(1.0 - Float64(tan(y) * tan(z)))) - tan(a)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, a)
	tmp = x + (((tan(y) + tan(z)) / (1.0 - (tan(y) * tan(z)))) - tan(a));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, a_] := N[(x + N[(N[(N[(N[Tan[y], $MachinePrecision] + N[Tan[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 - N[(N[Tan[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[Tan[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[Tan[a], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 79.3%

   \[x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. tan-sum 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\tan y + \tan z}{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z}} - \tan a\right) \]

   2. div-inv 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\tan y + \tan z\right) \cdot \frac{1}{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z}} - \tan a\right) \]

4. Applied egg-rr 99.7%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\tan y + \tan z\right) \cdot \frac{1}{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z}} - \tan a\right) \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r/ 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\left(\tan y + \tan z\right) \cdot 1}{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z}} - \tan a\right) \]

   2. *-rgt-identity 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\tan y + \tan z}}{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z} - \tan a\right) \]

6. Simplified 99.7%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\tan y + \tan z}{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z}} - \tan a\right) \]

7. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(\frac{\tan y + \tan z}{1 - \tan y \cdot \tan z} - \tan a\right) \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 49.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(\tan a + \tan \left(y + z\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z a) :precision binary64 (+ x (+ (tan a) (tan (+ y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x + (tan(a) + tan((y + z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, a)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    code = x + (tan(a) + tan((y + z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x + (Math.tan(a) + Math.tan((y + z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, a):
	return x + (math.tan(a) + math.tan((y + z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, a)
	return Float64(x + Float64(tan(a) + tan(Float64(y + z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, a)
	tmp = x + (tan(a) + tan((y + z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, a_] := N[(x + N[(N[Tan[a], $MachinePrecision] + N[Tan[N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 79.3%

   \[x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 79.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\tan \left(y + z\right) + \left(-\tan a\right)\right)} \]

4. Applied egg-rr 79.3%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\tan \left(y + z\right) + \left(-\tan a\right)\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. rem-square-sqrt 41.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-\tan a} \cdot \sqrt{-\tan a}}\right) \]

   2. fabs-sqr 41.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left|\sqrt{-\tan a} \cdot \sqrt{-\tan a}\right|}\right) \]

   3. rem-square-sqrt 68.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) + \left|\color{blue}{-\tan a}\right|\right) \]

   4. fabs-neg 68.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left|\tan a\right|}\right) \]

   5. rem-square-sqrt 26.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) + \left|\color{blue}{\sqrt{\tan a} \cdot \sqrt{\tan a}}\right|\right) \]

   6. fabs-sqr 26.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\tan a} \cdot \sqrt{\tan a}}\right) \]

   7. rem-square-sqrt 52.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\tan a}\right) \]

   8. +-commutative 52.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\tan \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)} + \tan a\right) \]

6. Simplified 52.6%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\tan \left(z + y\right) + \tan a\right)} \]

7. Final simplification 52.6%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(\tan a + \tan \left(y + z\right)\right) \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 79.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z a) :precision binary64 (+ x (- (tan (+ y z)) (tan a))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x + (tan((y + z)) - tan(a));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, a)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    code = x + (tan((y + z)) - tan(a))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x + (Math.tan((y + z)) - Math.tan(a));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, a):
	return x + (math.tan((y + z)) - math.tan(a))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, a)
	return Float64(x + Float64(tan(Float64(y + z)) - tan(a)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, a)
	tmp = x + (tan((y + z)) - tan(a));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, a_] := N[(x + N[(N[Tan[N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tan[a], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 79.3%

   \[x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 79.3%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 50.9% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.6:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 0.17:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - a\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z a)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a -1.6) x (if (<= a 0.17) (+ x (- (tan (+ y z)) a)) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -1.6) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (a <= 0.17) {
		tmp = x + (tan((y + z)) - a);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, a)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-1.6d0)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (a <= 0.17d0) then
        tmp = x + (tan((y + z)) - a)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -1.6) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (a <= 0.17) {
		tmp = x + (Math.tan((y + z)) - a);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, a):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -1.6:
		tmp = x
	elif a <= 0.17:
		tmp = x + (math.tan((y + z)) - a)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, a)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -1.6)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (a <= 0.17)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(tan(Float64(y + z)) - a));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, a)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -1.6)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (a <= 0.17)
		tmp = x + (tan((y + z)) - a);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, a_] := If[LessEqual[a, -1.6], x, If[LessEqual[a, 0.17], N[(x + N[(N[Tan[N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -1.6000000000000001 or 0.170000000000000012 < a

   1. Initial program 76.5%

      \[x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 22.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.6000000000000001 < a < 0.170000000000000012

   1. Initial program 81.6%

      \[x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 81.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \color{blue}{a}\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.6:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 0.17:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - a\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 31.8% accurate, 207.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z a) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, a)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double a) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, a):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, a)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, a)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, a_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 79.3%

   \[x + \left(\tan \left(y + z\right) - \tan a\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 33.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

4. Final simplification 33.6%

   \[\leadsto x \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024039 
(FPCore (x y z a)
  :name "tan-example (used to crash)"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (and (or (== x 0.0) (and (<= 0.5884142 x) (<= x 505.5909))) (or (and (<= -1.796658e+308 y) (<= y -9.425585e-310)) (and (<= 1.284938e-309 y) (<= y 1.751224e+308)))) (or (and (<= -1.776707e+308 z) (<= z -8.599796e-310)) (and (<= 3.293145e-311 z) (<= z 1.725154e+308)))) (or (and (<= -1.796658e+308 a) (<= a -9.425585e-310)) (and (<= 1.284938e-309 a) (<= a 1.751224e+308))))
  (+ x (- (tan (+ y z)) (tan a))))