Logistic function from Lakshay Garg

Percentage Accurate: 54.5% → 99.7%

Time: 12.1s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 18.1×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) - 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 54.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) - 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -1000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 0.002:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3} + 0.13333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{5}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{2 + \mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)} + -1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* -2.0 x) -1000.0)
   (+ (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) -1.0)
   (if (<= (* -2.0 x) 0.002)
     (+
      x
      (+
       (* -0.3333333333333333 (pow x 3.0))
       (* 0.13333333333333333 (pow x 5.0))))
     (+ (/ 2.0 (+ 2.0 (expm1 (* -2.0 x)))) -1.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -1000.0) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else if ((-2.0 * x) <= 0.002) {
		tmp = x + ((-0.3333333333333333 * pow(x, 3.0)) + (0.13333333333333333 * pow(x, 5.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 / (2.0 + expm1((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -1000.0) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else if ((-2.0 * x) <= 0.002) {
		tmp = x + ((-0.3333333333333333 * Math.pow(x, 3.0)) + (0.13333333333333333 * Math.pow(x, 5.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 / (2.0 + Math.expm1((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if (-2.0 * x) <= -1000.0:
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0
	elif (-2.0 * x) <= 0.002:
		tmp = x + ((-0.3333333333333333 * math.pow(x, 3.0)) + (0.13333333333333333 * math.pow(x, 5.0)))
	else:
		tmp = (2.0 / (2.0 + math.expm1((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= -1000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0);
	elseif (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= 0.002)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0)) + Float64(0.13333333333333333 * (x ^ 5.0))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(2.0 + expm1(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], -1000.0], N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], 0.002], N[(x + N[(N[(-0.3333333333333333 * N[Power[x, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(0.13333333333333333 * N[Power[x, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 / N[(2.0 + N[(Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 -2 x) < -1e3

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if -1e3 < (*.f64 -2 x) < 2e-3

   1. Initial program 7.2%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3} + 0.13333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{5}\right)} \]

   if 2e-3 < (*.f64 -2 x)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-log1p-u 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}\right)\right)}} - 1 \]

      2. expm1-undefine 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}\right)} - 1}} - 1 \]

      3. exp-prod 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(1 + \color{blue}{{\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x}}\right)} - 1} - 1 \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(1 + {\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x}\right)} - 1}} - 1 \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-undefine 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(1 + \left(1 + {\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x}\right)\right)}} - 1} - 1 \]

      2. rem-exp-log 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(1 + {\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x}\right)\right)} - 1} - 1 \]

      3. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 + 1\right) + {\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x}\right)} - 1} - 1 \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\left(\color{blue}{2} + {\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x}\right) - 1} - 1 \]

      5. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + \left({\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x} - 1\right)}} - 1 \]

      6. exp-prod 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \left(\color{blue}{e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1\right)} - 1 \]

      7. expm1-undefine 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)}} - 1 \]

      8. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot -2}\right)} - 1 \]

   6. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + \mathsf{expm1}\left(x \cdot -2\right)}} - 1 \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -1000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 0.002:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3} + 0.13333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{5}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{2 + \mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)} + -1\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.6% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -1000 \lor \neg \left(-2 \cdot x \leq 0.002\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* -2.0 x) -1000.0) (not (<= (* -2.0 x) 0.002)))
   (+ (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) -1.0)
   (+ x (* -0.3333333333333333 (pow x 3.0)))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -1000.0) || !((-2.0 * x) <= 0.002)) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * pow(x, 3.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((((-2.0d0) * x) <= (-1000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (((-2.0d0) * x) <= 0.002d0))) then
        tmp = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) + (-1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = x + ((-0.3333333333333333d0) * (x ** 3.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -1000.0) || !((-2.0 * x) <= 0.002)) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * Math.pow(x, 3.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -1000.0) or not ((-2.0 * x) <= 0.002):
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0
	else:
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * math.pow(x, 3.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(-2.0 * x) <= -1000.0) || !(Float64(-2.0 * x) <= 0.002))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -1000.0) || ~(((-2.0 * x) <= 0.002)))
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	else
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], -1000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], 0.002]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(-0.3333333333333333 * N[Power[x, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 -2 x) < -1e3 or 2e-3 < (*.f64 -2 x)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if -1e3 < (*.f64 -2 x) < 2e-3

   1. Initial program 7.2%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -1000 \lor \neg \left(-2 \cdot x \leq 0.002\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.6% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -1000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 0.002:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{2 + \mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)} + -1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* -2.0 x) -1000.0)
   (+ (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) -1.0)
   (if (<= (* -2.0 x) 0.002)
     (+ x (* -0.3333333333333333 (pow x 3.0)))
     (+ (/ 2.0 (+ 2.0 (expm1 (* -2.0 x)))) -1.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -1000.0) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else if ((-2.0 * x) <= 0.002) {
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * pow(x, 3.0));
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 / (2.0 + expm1((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -1000.0) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else if ((-2.0 * x) <= 0.002) {
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * Math.pow(x, 3.0));
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 / (2.0 + Math.expm1((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if (-2.0 * x) <= -1000.0:
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0
	elif (-2.0 * x) <= 0.002:
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * math.pow(x, 3.0))
	else:
		tmp = (2.0 / (2.0 + math.expm1((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= -1000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0);
	elseif (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= 0.002)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(2.0 + expm1(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], -1000.0], N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], 0.002], N[(x + N[(-0.3333333333333333 * N[Power[x, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 / N[(2.0 + N[(Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 -2 x) < -1e3

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if -1e3 < (*.f64 -2 x) < 2e-3

   1. Initial program 7.2%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}} \]

   if 2e-3 < (*.f64 -2 x)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-log1p-u 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}\right)\right)}} - 1 \]

      2. expm1-undefine 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}\right)} - 1}} - 1 \]

      3. exp-prod 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(1 + \color{blue}{{\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x}}\right)} - 1} - 1 \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(1 + {\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x}\right)} - 1}} - 1 \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-undefine 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(1 + \left(1 + {\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x}\right)\right)}} - 1} - 1 \]

      2. rem-exp-log 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(1 + {\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x}\right)\right)} - 1} - 1 \]

      3. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 + 1\right) + {\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x}\right)} - 1} - 1 \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\left(\color{blue}{2} + {\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x}\right) - 1} - 1 \]

      5. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + \left({\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x} - 1\right)}} - 1 \]

      6. exp-prod 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \left(\color{blue}{e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1\right)} - 1 \]

      7. expm1-undefine 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)}} - 1 \]

      8. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot -2}\right)} - 1 \]

   6. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + \mathsf{expm1}\left(x \cdot -2\right)}} - 1 \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -1000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 0.002:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{2 + \mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)} + -1\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 78.6% accurate, 7.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -0.66:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{x + 2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -0.66) -1.0 (* (* x 2.0) (/ 1.0 (+ x 2.0)))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -0.66) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) * (1.0 / (x + 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-0.66d0)) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = (x * 2.0d0) * (1.0d0 / (x + 2.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -0.66) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) * (1.0 / (x + 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -0.66:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = (x * 2.0) * (1.0 / (x + 2.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -0.66)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) * Float64(1.0 / Float64(x + 2.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -0.66)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = (x * 2.0) * (1.0 / (x + 2.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -0.66], -1.0, N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 / N[(x + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -0.660000000000000031

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + -2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   5. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if -0.660000000000000031 < x

   1. Initial program 37.8%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 6.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + x\right)} - 1 \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 6.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right)} - 1 \]

   5. Simplified 6.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right)} - 1 \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. flip-- 6.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - 1 \cdot 1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1}} \]

      2. div-inv 6.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - 1 \cdot 1\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1}} \]

      3. metadata-eval 6.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - \color{blue}{1}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      4. difference-of-sqr-1 6.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + 1\right) + 1\right) \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      5. associate-+l+ 6.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(1 + 1\right)\right)} \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      6. metadata-eval 6.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + \color{blue}{2}\right) \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      7. associate--l+ 68.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(1 - 1\right)\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      8. metadata-eval 68.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{0}\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      9. +-rgt-identity 68.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      10. associate-+l+ 68.3%

          \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{x + \left(1 + 1\right)}} \]

      11. metadata-eval 68.3%

          \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x\right) \cdot \frac{1}{x + \color{blue}{2}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 68.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x\right) \cdot \frac{1}{x + 2}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot x\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{x + 2} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 72.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot 2}}{x + 2} \]

   10. Simplified 72.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{x + 2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -0.66:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{x + 2}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 78.6% accurate, 9.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -0.66:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x \cdot 2}{x + 2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -0.66) -1.0 (/ (* x 2.0) (+ x 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -0.66) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) / (x + 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-0.66d0)) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = (x * 2.0d0) / (x + 2.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -0.66) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) / (x + 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -0.66:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = (x * 2.0) / (x + 2.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -0.66)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) / Float64(x + 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -0.66)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = (x * 2.0) / (x + 2.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -0.66], -1.0, N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(x + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -0.660000000000000031

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + -2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   5. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if -0.660000000000000031 < x

   1. Initial program 37.8%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 6.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + x\right)} - 1 \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 6.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right)} - 1 \]

   5. Simplified 6.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right)} - 1 \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. flip-- 6.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - 1 \cdot 1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1}} \]

      2. metadata-eval 6.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - \color{blue}{1}}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      3. difference-of-sqr-1 6.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + 1\right) + 1\right) \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)}}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      4. associate-+l+ 6.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(1 + 1\right)\right)} \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      5. metadata-eval 6.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + \color{blue}{2}\right) \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      6. associate--l+ 68.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(1 - 1\right)\right)}}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      7. metadata-eval 68.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{0}\right)}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      8. +-rgt-identity 68.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x}}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      9. associate-+l+ 68.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}{\color{blue}{x + \left(1 + 1\right)}} \]

      10. metadata-eval 68.3%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}{x + \color{blue}{2}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 68.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}{x + 2}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot x}}{x + 2} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 72.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot 2}}{x + 2} \]

   10. Simplified 72.3%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot 2}}{x + 2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -0.66:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x \cdot 2}{x + 2}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 75.8% accurate, 18.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (if (<= x -1.0) -1.0 x))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.0) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.0) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.0:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.0)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.0)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.0], -1.0, x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + -2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   5. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if -1 < x

   1. Initial program 37.8%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 68.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 75.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 27.5% accurate, 109.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 -1.0)

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = -1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return -1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return -1.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return -1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := -1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 52.8%

   \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 27.4%

   \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + -2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 27.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

5. Simplified 27.4%

   \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 26.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

7. Final simplification 26.3%

   \[\leadsto -1 \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024039 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Logistic function from Lakshay Garg"
  :precision binary64
  (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))