Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Axis:tickPosition from plot-0.2.3.4

Percentage Accurate: 97.7% → 97.7%

Time: 5.5s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 1.0×

• 25.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (- y x) (/ z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y - x) * (z / t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y - x) * (z / t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y - x) * (z / t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y - x) * (z / t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y - x) * Float64(z / t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y - x) * (z / t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (- y x) (/ z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y - x) * (z / t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y - x) * (z / t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y - x) * (z / t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y - x) * (z / t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y - x) * Float64(z / t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y - x) * (z / t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (- y x) (/ z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y - x) * (z / t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y - x) * (z / t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y - x) * (z / t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y - x) * (z / t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y - x) * Float64(z / t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y - x) * (z / t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.1%

   \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 85.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{+163} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{+80}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -6.5e+163) (not (<= x 7.5e+80)))
   (* x (- 1.0 (/ z t)))
   (+ x (* y (/ z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -6.5e+163) || !(x <= 7.5e+80)) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (z / t));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-6.5d+163)) .or. (.not. (x <= 7.5d+80))) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - (z / t))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (z / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -6.5e+163) || !(x <= 7.5e+80)) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (z / t));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -6.5e+163) or not (x <= 7.5e+80):
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (z / t))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -6.5e+163) || !(x <= 7.5e+80))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(z / t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -6.5e+163) || ~((x <= 7.5e+80)))
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (z / t));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -6.5e+163], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 7.5e+80]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -6.4999999999999998e163 or 7.49999999999999994e80 < x

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 86.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot z}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 86.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x \cdot z}{t}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 93.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{x}{\frac{t}{z}}}\right) \]

      3. associate-/r/ 89.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{x}{t} \cdot z}\right) \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 89.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{x}{t} \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 89.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{x}{t} \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 93.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 93.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 93.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 93.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]

   if -6.4999999999999998e163 < x < 7.49999999999999994e80

   1. Initial program 97.1%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 81.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 86.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   5. Simplified 86.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{+163} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{+80}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 85.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{+163} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+85}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{x}{\frac{t}{z}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -6.5e+163) (not (<= x 1.9e+85)))
   (- x (/ x (/ t z)))
   (+ x (* y (/ z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -6.5e+163) || !(x <= 1.9e+85)) {
		tmp = x - (x / (t / z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-6.5d+163)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.9d+85))) then
        tmp = x - (x / (t / z))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (z / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -6.5e+163) || !(x <= 1.9e+85)) {
		tmp = x - (x / (t / z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -6.5e+163) or not (x <= 1.9e+85):
		tmp = x - (x / (t / z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -6.5e+163) || !(x <= 1.9e+85))
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(x / Float64(t / z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -6.5e+163) || ~((x <= 1.9e+85)))
		tmp = x - (x / (t / z));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -6.5e+163], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.9e+85]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x - N[(x / N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -6.4999999999999998e163 or 1.89999999999999996e85 < x

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 86.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot z}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 86.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x \cdot z}{t}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 93.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{x}{\frac{t}{z}}}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 93.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x}{\frac{t}{z}}\right)} \]

   if -6.4999999999999998e163 < x < 1.89999999999999996e85

   1. Initial program 97.1%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 81.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 86.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   5. Simplified 86.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{+163} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+85}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{x}{\frac{t}{z}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 65.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (* x (- 1.0 (/ z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x * (1.0 - (z / t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x * (1.0d0 - (z / t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x * (1.0 - (z / t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x * (1.0 - (z / t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(z / t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x * (1.0 - (z / t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.1%

   \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 65.8%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot z}{t}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 65.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x \cdot z}{t}\right)} \]

   2. associate-/l* 68.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{x}{\frac{t}{z}}}\right) \]

   3. associate-/r/ 66.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{x}{t} \cdot z}\right) \]

   4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 66.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{x}{t} \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

5. Simplified 66.9%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{x}{t} \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 68.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 68.8%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z}{t}\right)}\right) \]

   2. unsub-neg 68.8%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]

8. Simplified 68.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]

9. Final simplification 68.8%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right) \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 38.9% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.1%

   \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 74.2%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r/ 80.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

5. Simplified 80.0%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 43.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

7. Final simplification 43.7%

   \[\leadsto x \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 97.5% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ t_2 := x + \frac{y - x}{\frac{t}{z}}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 < -1013646692435.8867:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 < 0:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (- y x) (/ z t))) (t_2 (+ x (/ (- y x) (/ t z)))))
   (if (< t_1 -1013646692435.8867)
     t_2
     (if (< t_1 0.0) (+ x (/ (* (- y x) z) t)) t_2))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (y - x) * (z / t);
	double t_2 = x + ((y - x) / (t / z));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 < -1013646692435.8867) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (t_1 < 0.0) {
		tmp = x + (((y - x) * z) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (y - x) * (z / t)
    t_2 = x + ((y - x) / (t / z))
    if (t_1 < (-1013646692435.8867d0)) then
        tmp = t_2
    else if (t_1 < 0.0d0) then
        tmp = x + (((y - x) * z) / t)
    else
        tmp = t_2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (y - x) * (z / t);
	double t_2 = x + ((y - x) / (t / z));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 < -1013646692435.8867) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (t_1 < 0.0) {
		tmp = x + (((y - x) * z) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = (y - x) * (z / t)
	t_2 = x + ((y - x) / (t / z))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 < -1013646692435.8867:
		tmp = t_2
	elif t_1 < 0.0:
		tmp = x + (((y - x) * z) / t)
	else:
		tmp = t_2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(y - x) * Float64(z / t))
	t_2 = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y - x) / Float64(t / z)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 < -1013646692435.8867)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (t_1 < 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(y - x) * z) / t));
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = (y - x) * (z / t);
	t_2 = x + ((y - x) / (t / z));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 < -1013646692435.8867)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (t_1 < 0.0)
		tmp = x + (((y - x) * z) / t);
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(x + N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[t$95$1, -1013646692435.8867], t$95$2, If[Less[t$95$1, 0.0], N[(x + N[(N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$2]]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024036 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Axis:tickPosition from plot-0.2.3.4"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< (* (- y x) (/ z t)) -1013646692435.8867) (+ x (/ (- y x) (/ t z))) (if (< (* (- y x) (/ z t)) 0.0) (+ x (/ (* (- y x) z) t)) (+ x (/ (- y x) (/ t z)))))

  (+ x (* (- y x) (/ z t))))