Linear.V3:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, B

Percentage Accurate: 97.8% → 98.5%

Time: 6.3s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 0.4×

• 33.3% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.5% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ t_2 := a \cdot b + t\_1\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* x y) (* z t))) (t_2 (+ (* a b) t_1)))
   (if (<= t_2 INFINITY) t_2 t_1)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double t_2 = (a * b) + t_1;
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double t_2 = (a * b) + t_1;
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t)
	t_2 = (a * b) + t_1
	tmp = 0
	if t_2 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_2
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(a * b) + t_1)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_2 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_2;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	t_2 = (a * b) + t_1;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_2 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_2;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, Infinity], t$95$2, t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 55.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.1% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, z \cdot t\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (fma x y (fma a b (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return fma(x, y, fma(a, b, (z * t)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return fma(x, y, fma(a, b, Float64(z * t)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(x * y + N[(a * b + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.5%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + z \cdot t}\right) \]

   4. fma-define 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

3. Simplified 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, z \cdot t\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, z \cdot t\right)\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.2% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (fma x y (* z t)) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return fma(x, y, (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(fma(x, y, Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(x * y + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.5%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-define 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + a \cdot b \]

3. Simplified 97.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 97.2%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 78.5% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+209} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{+88} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq -9.6 \cdot 10^{+54}\right) \land x \cdot y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+50}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -5.2e+209)
         (not
          (or (<= (* x y) -1.2e+88)
              (and (not (<= (* x y) -9.6e+54)) (<= (* x y) 2.1e+50)))))
   (* x y)
   (+ (* a b) (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -5.2e+209) || !(((x * y) <= -1.2e+88) || (!((x * y) <= -9.6e+54) && ((x * y) <= 2.1e+50)))) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-5.2d+209)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= (-1.2d+88)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= (-9.6d+54))) .and. ((x * y) <= 2.1d+50))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -5.2e+209) || !(((x * y) <= -1.2e+88) || (!((x * y) <= -9.6e+54) && ((x * y) <= 2.1e+50)))) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -5.2e+209) or not (((x * y) <= -1.2e+88) or (not ((x * y) <= -9.6e+54) and ((x * y) <= 2.1e+50))):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -5.2e+209) || !((Float64(x * y) <= -1.2e+88) || (!(Float64(x * y) <= -9.6e+54) && (Float64(x * y) <= 2.1e+50))))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -5.2e+209) || ~((((x * y) <= -1.2e+88) || (~(((x * y) <= -9.6e+54)) && ((x * y) <= 2.1e+50)))))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -5.2e+209], N[Not[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.2e+88], And[N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -9.6e+54]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2.1e+50]]]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -5.2000000000000001e209 or -1.2e88 < (*.f64 x y) < -9.59999999999999993e54 or 2.1e50 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 91.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 79.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -5.2000000000000001e209 < (*.f64 x y) < -1.2e88 or -9.59999999999999993e54 < (*.f64 x y) < 2.1e50

   1. Initial program 98.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 86.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+209} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{+88} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq -9.6 \cdot 10^{+54}\right) \land x \cdot y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+50}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 84.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -4 \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 860000000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -4.0) (not (<= (* x y) 860000000000.0)))
   (+ (* a b) (* x y))
   (+ (* a b) (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -4.0) || !((x * y) <= 860000000000.0)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-4.0d0)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 860000000000.0d0))) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (x * y)
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -4.0) || !((x * y) <= 860000000000.0)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -4.0) or not ((x * y) <= 860000000000.0):
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y)
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -4.0) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 860000000000.0))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -4.0) || ~(((x * y) <= 860000000000.0)))
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -4.0], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 860000000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -4 or 8.6e11 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 94.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 81.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]

   if -4 < (*.f64 x y) < 8.6e11

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -4 \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 860000000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 54.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+21} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 500000000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -3.5e+21) (not (<= (* x y) 500000000000.0)))
   (* x y)
   (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -3.5e+21) || !((x * y) <= 500000000000.0)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-3.5d+21)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 500000000000.0d0))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = z * t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -3.5e+21) || !((x * y) <= 500000000000.0)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -3.5e+21) or not ((x * y) <= 500000000000.0):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = z * t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -3.5e+21) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 500000000000.0))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -3.5e+21) || ~(((x * y) <= 500000000000.0)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = z * t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -3.5e+21], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 500000000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -3.5e21 or 5e11 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 93.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 65.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -3.5e21 < (*.f64 x y) < 5e11

   1. Initial program 98.6%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 50.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 57.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+21} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 500000000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 47.1% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{-76} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{+143}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -6.8e-76) (not (<= t 1.6e+143))) (* z t) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -6.8e-76) || !(t <= 1.6e+143)) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-6.8d-76)) .or. (.not. (t <= 1.6d+143))) then
        tmp = z * t
    else
        tmp = a * b
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -6.8e-76) || !(t <= 1.6e+143)) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -6.8e-76) or not (t <= 1.6e+143):
		tmp = z * t
	else:
		tmp = a * b
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -6.8e-76) || !(t <= 1.6e+143))
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -6.8e-76) || ~((t <= 1.6e+143)))
		tmp = z * t;
	else
		tmp = a * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -6.8e-76], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 1.6e+143]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -6.7999999999999998e-76 or 1.60000000000000008e143 < t

   1. Initial program 92.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 59.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -6.7999999999999998e-76 < t < 1.60000000000000008e143

   1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 44.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 50.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{-76} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{+143}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 35.3% accurate, 3.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (* a b))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * b;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = a * b
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * b;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return a * b

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(a * b)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = a * b;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.5%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 35.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

4. Final simplification 35.6%

   \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024034 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Linear.V3:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))