Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C

Percentage Accurate: 95.8% → 98.0%

Time: 12.7s

Alternatives: 14

Speedup: 0.4×

• 41.1% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 95.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.0% accurate, 0.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (fma c i (fma x y (fma z t (* a b)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return fma(c, i, fma(x, y, fma(z, t, (a * b))));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return fma(c, i, fma(x, y, fma(z, t, Float64(a * b))))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(c * i + N[(x * y + N[(z * t + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.3%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. associate-+l+ 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   4. fma-define 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   5. fma-define 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)\right)\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 97.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, a \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* c i) (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t))))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (fma c i (* a b)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(c, i, (a * b));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = fma(c, i, Float64(a * b));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(c * i + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 33.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 33.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 41.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 50.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 50.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-undefine 41.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. fma-undefine 33.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      3. associate-+l+ 33.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 33.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 33.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot t}\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 33.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot t}\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around inf 50.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b}\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, a \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 96.8% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (fma c i (+ (+ (* a b) (* x y)) (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return fma(c, i, (((a * b) + (x * y)) + (z * t)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return fma(c, i, Float64(Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x * y)) + Float64(z * t)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(c * i + N[(N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.3%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. associate-+l+ 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   4. fma-define 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   5. fma-define 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-undefine 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   2. fma-undefine 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. associate-+l+ 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b}\right) \]

   4. +-commutative 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   5. associate-+r+ 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot t}\right) \]

6. Applied egg-rr 96.9%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot t}\right) \]

7. Final simplification 96.9%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot t\right) \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 97.4% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* c i) (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t))))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (+ (* a b) (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 16.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 16.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) + x \cdot y} \]

      2. fma-undefine 33.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right)} + x \cdot y \]

      3. +-commutative 33.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right)} \]

      4. fma-define 50.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 50.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 50.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 42.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -9.6 \cdot 10^{+217}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-129}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{+68}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 8.4 \cdot 10^{+136}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* c i) -9.6e+217)
   (* c i)
   (if (<= (* c i) 1.25e-129)
     (* z t)
     (if (<= (* c i) 1.55e+68)
       (* a b)
       (if (<= (* c i) 8.4e+136) (* z t) (* c i))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -9.6e+217) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 1.25e-129) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 1.55e+68) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 8.4e+136) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = c * i;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c * i) <= (-9.6d+217)) then
        tmp = c * i
    else if ((c * i) <= 1.25d-129) then
        tmp = z * t
    else if ((c * i) <= 1.55d+68) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if ((c * i) <= 8.4d+136) then
        tmp = z * t
    else
        tmp = c * i
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -9.6e+217) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 1.25e-129) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 1.55e+68) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 8.4e+136) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = c * i;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c * i) <= -9.6e+217:
		tmp = c * i
	elif (c * i) <= 1.25e-129:
		tmp = z * t
	elif (c * i) <= 1.55e+68:
		tmp = a * b
	elif (c * i) <= 8.4e+136:
		tmp = z * t
	else:
		tmp = c * i
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(c * i) <= -9.6e+217)
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 1.25e-129)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 1.55e+68)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 8.4e+136)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c * i) <= -9.6e+217)
		tmp = c * i;
	elseif ((c * i) <= 1.25e-129)
		tmp = z * t;
	elseif ((c * i) <= 1.55e+68)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif ((c * i) <= 8.4e+136)
		tmp = z * t;
	else
		tmp = c * i;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -9.6e+217], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 1.25e-129], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 1.55e+68], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 8.4e+136], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -9.5999999999999992e217 or 8.3999999999999996e136 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 88.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf 69.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

   if -9.5999999999999992e217 < (*.f64 c i) < 1.25000000000000007e-129 or 1.5499999999999999e68 < (*.f64 c i) < 8.3999999999999996e136

   1. Initial program 98.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 45.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if 1.25000000000000007e-129 < (*.f64 c i) < 1.5499999999999999e68

   1. Initial program 97.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 39.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 50.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -9.6 \cdot 10^{+217}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-129}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{+68}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 8.4 \cdot 10^{+136}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 65.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -450:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-251}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 1.52 \cdot 10^{+147}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* a b) (* x y))))
   (if (<= (* x y) -450.0)
     t_1
     (if (<= (* x y) -3.5e-251)
       (+ (* a b) (* c i))
       (if (<= (* x y) 1.52e+147) (+ (* a b) (* z t)) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) + (x * y);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -450.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -3.5e-251) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1.52e+147) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (a * b) + (x * y)
    if ((x * y) <= (-450.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if ((x * y) <= (-3.5d-251)) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    else if ((x * y) <= 1.52d+147) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) + (x * y);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -450.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -3.5e-251) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1.52e+147) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (a * b) + (x * y)
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -450.0:
		tmp = t_1
	elif (x * y) <= -3.5e-251:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	elif (x * y) <= 1.52e+147:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -450.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -3.5e-251)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 1.52e+147)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (a * b) + (x * y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -450.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif ((x * y) <= -3.5e-251)
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	elseif ((x * y) <= 1.52e+147)
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -450.0], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -3.5e-251], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1.52e+147], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -450 or 1.51999999999999992e147 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 81.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 81.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) + x \cdot y} \]

      2. fma-undefine 81.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right)} + x \cdot y \]

      3. +-commutative 81.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right)} \]

      4. fma-define 83.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 83.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 73.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]

   if -450 < (*.f64 x y) < -3.50000000000000034e-251

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + t \cdot z\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around inf 67.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} + c \cdot i \]

   if -3.50000000000000034e-251 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.51999999999999992e147

   1. Initial program 95.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-undefine 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. fma-undefine 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      3. associate-+l+ 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot t}\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot t}\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z}\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in c around 0 69.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -450:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-251}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 1.52 \cdot 10^{+147}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 84.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+54} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+135}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* c i) -1.3e+54) (not (<= (* c i) 3.5e+135)))
   (+ (* c i) (* z t))
   (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -1.3e+54) || !((c * i) <= 3.5e+135)) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((c * i) <= (-1.3d+54)) .or. (.not. ((c * i) <= 3.5d+135))) then
        tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -1.3e+54) || !((c * i) <= 3.5e+135)) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((c * i) <= -1.3e+54) or not ((c * i) <= 3.5e+135):
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(c * i) <= -1.3e+54) || !(Float64(c * i) <= 3.5e+135))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((c * i) <= -1.3e+54) || ~(((c * i) <= 3.5e+135)))
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -1.3e+54], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 3.5e+135]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -1.30000000000000003e54 or 3.5000000000000003e135 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 90.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + c \cdot i \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 88.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   5. Simplified 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 82.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + t \cdot z} \]

   if -1.30000000000000003e54 < (*.f64 c i) < 3.5000000000000003e135

   1. Initial program 98.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around 0 96.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+54} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+135}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 88.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -6 \cdot 10^{+49} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+64}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* c i) -6e+49) (not (<= (* c i) 7e+64)))
   (+ (* c i) (+ (* a b) (* z t)))
   (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -6e+49) || !((c * i) <= 7e+64)) {
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((c * i) <= (-6d+49)) .or. (.not. ((c * i) <= 7d+64))) then
        tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t))
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -6e+49) || !((c * i) <= 7e+64)) {
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((c * i) <= -6e+49) or not ((c * i) <= 7e+64):
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(c * i) <= -6e+49) || !(Float64(c * i) <= 7e+64))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((c * i) <= -6e+49) || ~(((c * i) <= 7e+64)))
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t));
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -6e+49], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 7e+64]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -6.0000000000000005e49 or 6.9999999999999997e64 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 91.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 85.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + t \cdot z\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   if -6.0000000000000005e49 < (*.f64 c i) < 6.9999999999999997e64

   1. Initial program 98.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around 0 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -6 \cdot 10^{+49} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+64}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 42.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+101}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{-46}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{+148}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -2.6e+101)
   (* x y)
   (if (<= (* x y) -1.4e-46)
     (* a b)
     (if (<= (* x y) 1.7e+148) (* z t) (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -2.6e+101) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -1.4e-46) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1.7e+148) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-2.6d+101)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if ((x * y) <= (-1.4d-46)) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if ((x * y) <= 1.7d+148) then
        tmp = z * t
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -2.6e+101) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -1.4e-46) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1.7e+148) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -2.6e+101:
		tmp = x * y
	elif (x * y) <= -1.4e-46:
		tmp = a * b
	elif (x * y) <= 1.7e+148:
		tmp = z * t
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -2.6e+101)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -1.4e-46)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 1.7e+148)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -2.6e+101)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif ((x * y) <= -1.4e-46)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 1.7e+148)
		tmp = z * t;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2.6e+101], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.4e-46], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1.7e+148], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -2.6e101 or 1.7000000000000001e148 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 93.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 65.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -2.6e101 < (*.f64 x y) < -1.3999999999999999e-46

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 48.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if -1.3999999999999999e-46 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.7000000000000001e148

   1. Initial program 95.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 45.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 51.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+101}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{-46}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{+148}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 64.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -900 \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+170}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -900.0) (not (<= (* x y) 1.1e+170)))
   (+ (* a b) (* x y))
   (+ (* c i) (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -900.0) || !((x * y) <= 1.1e+170)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-900.0d0)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 1.1d+170))) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (x * y)
    else
        tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -900.0) || !((x * y) <= 1.1e+170)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -900.0) or not ((x * y) <= 1.1e+170):
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y)
	else:
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -900.0) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 1.1e+170))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -900.0) || ~(((x * y) <= 1.1e+170)))
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	else
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -900.0], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1.1e+170]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -900 or 1.09999999999999994e170 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 94.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 81.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 81.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) + x \cdot y} \]

      2. fma-undefine 81.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right)} + x \cdot y \]

      3. +-commutative 81.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right)} \]

      4. fma-define 83.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 83.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 74.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]

   if -900 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.09999999999999994e170

   1. Initial program 95.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 78.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + c \cdot i \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 78.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   5. Simplified 78.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 72.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -900 \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+170}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 64.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+133}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{+136}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* c i) -5.2e+133)
   (+ (* a b) (* c i))
   (if (<= (* c i) 8.5e+136) (+ (* a b) (* z t)) (* c i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -5.2e+133) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else if ((c * i) <= 8.5e+136) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = c * i;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c * i) <= (-5.2d+133)) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    else if ((c * i) <= 8.5d+136) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = c * i
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -5.2e+133) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else if ((c * i) <= 8.5e+136) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = c * i;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c * i) <= -5.2e+133:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	elif (c * i) <= 8.5e+136:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = c * i
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(c * i) <= -5.2e+133)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 8.5e+136)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c * i) <= -5.2e+133)
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	elseif ((c * i) <= 8.5e+136)
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = c * i;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -5.2e+133], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 8.5e+136], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -5.1999999999999995e133

   1. Initial program 92.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + t \cdot z\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around inf 74.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} + c \cdot i \]

   if -5.1999999999999995e133 < (*.f64 c i) < 8.49999999999999966e136

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-undefine 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. fma-undefine 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      3. associate-+l+ 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot t}\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot t}\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 70.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z}\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in c around 0 66.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]

   if 8.49999999999999966e136 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 84.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf 65.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+133}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{+136}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 43.1% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -3.1 \cdot 10^{+50} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+136}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* c i) -3.1e+50) (not (<= (* c i) 2.8e+136))) (* c i) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -3.1e+50) || !((c * i) <= 2.8e+136)) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((c * i) <= (-3.1d+50)) .or. (.not. ((c * i) <= 2.8d+136))) then
        tmp = c * i
    else
        tmp = a * b
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -3.1e+50) || !((c * i) <= 2.8e+136)) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((c * i) <= -3.1e+50) or not ((c * i) <= 2.8e+136):
		tmp = c * i
	else:
		tmp = a * b
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(c * i) <= -3.1e+50) || !(Float64(c * i) <= 2.8e+136))
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((c * i) <= -3.1e+50) || ~(((c * i) <= 2.8e+136)))
		tmp = c * i;
	else
		tmp = a * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -3.1e+50], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 2.8e+136]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -3.10000000000000003e50 or 2.8000000000000002e136 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 90.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf 62.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

   if -3.10000000000000003e50 < (*.f64 c i) < 2.8000000000000002e136

   1. Initial program 98.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 31.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 42.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -3.1 \cdot 10^{+50} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+136}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 53.7% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{-21} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+85}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -4.5e-21) (not (<= t 7.2e+85))) (* z t) (+ (* a b) (* c i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -4.5e-21) || !(t <= 7.2e+85)) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-4.5d-21)) .or. (.not. (t <= 7.2d+85))) then
        tmp = z * t
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -4.5e-21) || !(t <= 7.2e+85)) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -4.5e-21) or not (t <= 7.2e+85):
		tmp = z * t
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -4.5e-21) || !(t <= 7.2e+85))
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -4.5e-21) || ~((t <= 7.2e+85)))
		tmp = z * t;
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -4.5e-21], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 7.2e+85]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -4.49999999999999968e-21 or 7.1999999999999996e85 < t

   1. Initial program 94.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 52.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -4.49999999999999968e-21 < t < 7.1999999999999996e85

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 70.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + t \cdot z\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around inf 57.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} + c \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 54.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{-21} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+85}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 27.4% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (* a b))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a * b;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = a * b
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a * b;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return a * b

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(a * b)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = a * b;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.3%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 25.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

4. Final simplification 25.6%

   \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024034 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))