SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 93.5% → 97.7%
Time: 14.8s
Alternatives: 10
Speedup: 0.7×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 10 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 93.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 97.7% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{+169}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y\_m, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y\_m}\right)\right), x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 2.3e+169)
   (fma y_m (* z (- (tanh (/ t y_m)) (tanh (/ x y_m)))) x)
   (+ x (* z (- t x)))))
y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 2.3e+169) {
		tmp = fma(y_m, (z * (tanh((t / y_m)) - tanh((x / y_m)))), x);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 2.3e+169)
		tmp = fma(y_m, Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y_m)) - tanh(Float64(x / y_m)))), x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end
y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 2.3e+169], N[(y$95$m * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
y_m = \left|y\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{+169}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y\_m, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y\_m}\right)\right), x\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 2.2999999999999999e169

    1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative96.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]
      2. associate-*l*98.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]
      3. fma-define98.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
    3. Simplified98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing

    if 2.2999999999999999e169 < y

    1. Initial program 72.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 95.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification98.5%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{+169}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x - \left(y\_m \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y\_m}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+304}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- x (* (* y_m z) (- (tanh (/ x y_m)) (tanh (/ t y_m)))))))
   (if (<= t_1 5e+304) t_1 (+ x (* z (- t x))))))
y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x - ((y_m * z) * (tanh((x / y_m)) - tanh((t / y_m))));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 5e+304) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = x - ((y_m * z) * (tanh((x / y_m)) - tanh((t / y_m))))
    if (t_1 <= 5d+304) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x - ((y_m * z) * (Math.tanh((x / y_m)) - Math.tanh((t / y_m))));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 5e+304) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	t_1 = x - ((y_m * z) * (math.tanh((x / y_m)) - math.tanh((t / y_m))))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= 5e+304:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp
y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(y_m * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(x / y_m)) - tanh(Float64(t / y_m)))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= 5e+304)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end
y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	t_1 = x - ((y_m * z) * (tanh((x / y_m)) - tanh((t / y_m))));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= 5e+304)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x - N[(N[(y$95$m * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(x / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 5e+304], t$95$1, N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}
y_m = \left|y\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x - \left(y\_m \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y\_m}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right)\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+304}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_1\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y))))) < 4.9999999999999997e304

    1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing

    if 4.9999999999999997e304 < (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y)))))

    1. Initial program 30.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 85.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification97.7%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x - \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right) \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+304}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 87.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y\_m, z \cdot t\_1, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot t\_1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (tanh (/ t y_m))))
   (if (<= y_m 6.8e+49) (fma y_m (* z t_1) x) (+ x (* z (- (* y_m t_1) x))))))
y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = tanh((t / y_m));
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 6.8e+49) {
		tmp = fma(y_m, (z * t_1), x);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh(Float64(t / y_m))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 6.8e+49)
		tmp = fma(y_m, Float64(z * t_1), x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y_m * t_1) - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end
y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 6.8e+49], N[(y$95$m * N[(z * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(N[(y$95$m * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}
y_m = \left|y\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y\_m, z \cdot t\_1, x\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot t\_1 - x\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 6.8000000000000001e49

    1. Initial program 97.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative97.2%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]
      2. associate-*l*98.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]
      3. fma-define98.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
    3. Simplified98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 20.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)}, x\right) \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-/r*20.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right), x\right) \]
      2. div-sub20.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}, x\right) \]
      3. rec-exp20.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}, x\right) \]
      4. rec-exp20.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}, x\right) \]
      5. tanh-def-a83.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}, x\right) \]
    7. Simplified83.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}, x\right) \]

    if 6.8000000000000001e49 < y

    1. Initial program 81.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 53.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative53.2%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
    5. Simplified91.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot y + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 53.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative53.2%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
      2. mul-1-neg53.2%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot z\right)}\right) \]
      3. unsub-neg53.2%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) - x \cdot z\right)} \]
    8. Simplified91.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - x\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification84.7%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right), x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 87.6% accurate, 1.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t\_1 \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot t\_1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (tanh (/ t y_m))))
   (if (<= y_m 1.15e+49)
     (+ x (* t_1 (* y_m z)))
     (+ x (* z (- (* y_m t_1) x))))))
y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = tanh((t / y_m));
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 1.15e+49) {
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (y_m * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = tanh((t / y_m))
    if (y_m <= 1.15d+49) then
        tmp = x + (t_1 * (y_m * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = Math.tanh((t / y_m));
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 1.15e+49) {
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (y_m * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	t_1 = math.tanh((t / y_m))
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 1.15e+49:
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (y_m * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x))
	return tmp
y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh(Float64(t / y_m))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 1.15e+49)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(t_1 * Float64(y_m * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y_m * t_1) - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end
y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh((t / y_m));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 1.15e+49)
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (y_m * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 1.15e+49], N[(x + N[(t$95$1 * N[(y$95$m * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(N[(y$95$m * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}
y_m = \left|y\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + t\_1 \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot z\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot t\_1 - x\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 1.15000000000000001e49

    1. Initial program 97.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 20.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r*20.4%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]
      2. associate-/r*20.4%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]
      3. div-sub20.4%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]
      4. rec-exp20.4%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]
      5. rec-exp20.4%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]
      6. tanh-def-a83.5%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]
      7. *-commutative83.5%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
    5. Simplified83.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]

    if 1.15000000000000001e49 < y

    1. Initial program 81.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 53.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative53.2%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
    5. Simplified91.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot y + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 53.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative53.2%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
      2. mul-1-neg53.2%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot z\right)}\right) \]
      3. unsub-neg53.2%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) - x \cdot z\right)} \]
    8. Simplified91.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - x\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification84.8%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 85.5% accurate, 1.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{+127}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right) \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 5.5e+127)
   (+ x (* (tanh (/ t y_m)) (* y_m z)))
   (+ x (* z (- t x)))))
y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 5.5e+127) {
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 5.5d+127) then
        tmp = x + (tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 5.5e+127) {
		tmp = x + (Math.tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 5.5e+127:
		tmp = x + (math.tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp
y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 5.5e+127)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y_m)) * Float64(y_m * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end
y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 5.5e+127)
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 5.5e+127], N[(x + N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(y$95$m * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
y_m = \left|y\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{+127}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right) \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot z\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 5.50000000000000041e127

    1. Initial program 96.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 20.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r*20.6%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]
      2. associate-/r*20.6%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]
      3. div-sub20.6%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]
      4. rec-exp20.6%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]
      5. rec-exp20.6%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]
      6. tanh-def-a83.6%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]
      7. *-commutative83.6%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
    5. Simplified83.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]

    if 5.50000000000000041e127 < y

    1. Initial program 80.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 93.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification84.7%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{+127}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 64.3% accurate, 14.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+70}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y\_m \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+199}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 6.5e+70) x (if (<= y_m 2.5e+199) (* z (- t x)) (* x (- 1.0 z)))))
y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 6.5e+70) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y_m <= 2.5e+199) {
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 6.5d+70) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y_m <= 2.5d+199) then
        tmp = z * (t - x)
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 6.5e+70) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y_m <= 2.5e+199) {
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 6.5e+70:
		tmp = x
	elif y_m <= 2.5e+199:
		tmp = z * (t - x)
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	return tmp
y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 6.5e+70)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y_m <= 2.5e+199)
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(t - x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	end
	return tmp
end
y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 6.5e+70)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y_m <= 2.5e+199)
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 6.5e+70], x, If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 2.5e+199], N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}
y_m = \left|y\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+70}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y\_m \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+199}:\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if y < 6.49999999999999978e70

    1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 66.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

    if 6.49999999999999978e70 < y < 2.4999999999999999e199

    1. Initial program 91.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative91.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]
      2. associate-*l*94.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]
      3. fma-define94.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
    3. Simplified94.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)}{y}}, x\right) \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-/l*71.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{y}{t - x}}}, x\right) \]
    7. Simplified71.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{y}{t - x}}}, x\right) \]
    8. Taylor expanded in z around inf 46.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

    if 2.4999999999999999e199 < y

    1. Initial program 62.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative62.1%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]
      2. associate-*l*80.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]
      3. fma-define80.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
    3. Simplified80.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)}{y}}, x\right) \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-/l*80.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{y}{t - x}}}, x\right) \]
    7. Simplified80.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{y}{t - x}}}, x\right) \]
    8. Taylor expanded in t around 0 68.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
    9. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg68.7%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot z\right)} \]
      2. *-rgt-identity68.7%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 1} + \left(-x \cdot z\right) \]
      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in68.7%

        \[\leadsto x \cdot 1 + \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]
      4. distribute-lft-in68.7%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]
      5. unsub-neg68.7%

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \]
    10. Simplified68.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification64.6%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+70}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+199}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 77.7% accurate, 17.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 1.1e+49) x (+ x (* z (- t x)))))
y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 1.1e+49) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 1.1d+49) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 1.1e+49) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 1.1e+49:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp
y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 1.1e+49)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end
y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 1.1e+49)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 1.1e+49], x, N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
y_m = \left|y\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 1.1e49

    1. Initial program 97.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 66.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

    if 1.1e49 < y

    1. Initial program 81.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 86.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification69.4%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 67.7% accurate, 21.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 2.05 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 2.05e+49) x (* x (- 1.0 z))))
y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 2.05e+49) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 2.05d+49) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 2.05e+49) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 2.05e+49:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	return tmp
y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 2.05e+49)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	end
	return tmp
end
y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 2.05e+49)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 2.05e+49], x, N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
y_m = \left|y\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 2.05 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 2.05e49

    1. Initial program 97.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 66.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

    if 2.05e49 < y

    1. Initial program 81.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative81.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]
      2. associate-*l*89.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]
      3. fma-define89.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
    3. Simplified89.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 84.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)}{y}}, x\right) \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-/l*75.1%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{y}{t - x}}}, x\right) \]
    7. Simplified75.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{y}{t - x}}}, x\right) \]
    8. Taylor expanded in t around 0 54.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
    9. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg54.4%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot z\right)} \]
      2. *-rgt-identity54.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 1} + \left(-x \cdot z\right) \]
      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in54.4%

        \[\leadsto x \cdot 1 + \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]
      4. distribute-lft-in54.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]
      5. unsub-neg54.4%

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \]
    10. Simplified54.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification64.1%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.05 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 70.1% accurate, 21.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{+75}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= y_m 5.8e+75) x (+ x (* z t))))
y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 5.8e+75) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 5.8d+75) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 5.8e+75) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 5.8e+75:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * t)
	return tmp
y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 5.8e+75)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end
y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 5.8e+75)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 5.8e+75], x, N[(x + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
y_m = \left|y\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{+75}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 5.7999999999999997e75

    1. Initial program 96.8%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 65.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

    if 5.7999999999999997e75 < y

    1. Initial program 81.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 43.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r*42.3%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]
      2. associate-/r*42.3%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]
      3. div-sub42.3%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]
      4. rec-exp42.3%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]
      5. rec-exp42.3%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]
      6. tanh-def-a80.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]
      7. *-commutative80.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
    5. Simplified80.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 73.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + t \cdot z} \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative73.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x} \]
    8. Simplified73.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification67.1%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{+75}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 60.7% accurate, 213.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ x \end{array} \]
y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t) :precision binary64 x)
y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}
y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function
y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}
y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	return x
y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	return x
end
y_m = abs(y);
function tmp = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end
y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := x
\begin{array}{l}
y_m = \left|y\right|

\\
x
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 94.7%

    \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 62.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
  4. Final simplification62.4%

    \[\leadsto x \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 97.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y)))));
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (z * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y)))))
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)
\end{array}

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024034 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

  (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))