Data.Colour.RGBSpace.HSV:hsv from colour-2.3.3, I

Percentage Accurate: 96.1% → 97.9%

Time: 5.9s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 0.5×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(1 - y \cdot z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* x (- 1.0 (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * (1.0 - (y * z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x * (1.0d0 - (y * z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * (1.0 - (y * z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x * (1.0 - (y * z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(y * z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x * (1.0 - (y * z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 96.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(1 - y \cdot z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* x (- 1.0 (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * (1.0 - (y * z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x * (1.0d0 - (y * z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * (1.0 - (y * z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x * (1.0 - (y * z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(y * z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x * (1.0 - (y * z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot z \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* y z) (- INFINITY)) (* y (* z (- x))) (- x (* (* y z) x))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y * z) <= -((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = y * (z * -x);
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((y * z) * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y * z) <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = y * (z * -x);
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((y * z) * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y * z) <= -math.inf:
		tmp = y * (z * -x)
	else:
		tmp = x - ((y * z) * x)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y * z) <= Float64(-Inf))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(-x)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(y * z) * x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y * z) <= -Inf)
		tmp = y * (z * -x);
	else
		tmp = x - ((y * z) * x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], (-Infinity)], N[(y * N[(z * (-x)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 y z) < -inf.0

   1. Initial program 48.3%

      \[x \cdot \left(1 - y \cdot z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 48.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 48.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)} \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

      5. associate-*r* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-out 99.9%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -inf.0 < (*.f64 y z)

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[x \cdot \left(1 - y \cdot z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 98.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot x + \left(-y \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. *-un-lft-identity 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + \left(-y \cdot z\right) \cdot x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 98.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)} \cdot x \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y \cdot \left(-z\right)\right) \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot z \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 95.9% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot z \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \cdot z \leq -2000 \lor \neg \left(y \cdot z \leq 0.0005\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* y z) (- INFINITY))
   (* y (* z (- x)))
   (if (or (<= (* y z) -2000.0) (not (<= (* y z) 0.0005)))
     (* x (* y (- z)))
     x)))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y * z) <= -((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = y * (z * -x);
	} else if (((y * z) <= -2000.0) || !((y * z) <= 0.0005)) {
		tmp = x * (y * -z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y * z) <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = y * (z * -x);
	} else if (((y * z) <= -2000.0) || !((y * z) <= 0.0005)) {
		tmp = x * (y * -z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y * z) <= -math.inf:
		tmp = y * (z * -x)
	elif ((y * z) <= -2000.0) or not ((y * z) <= 0.0005):
		tmp = x * (y * -z)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y * z) <= Float64(-Inf))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(-x)));
	elseif ((Float64(y * z) <= -2000.0) || !(Float64(y * z) <= 0.0005))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y * Float64(-z)));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y * z) <= -Inf)
		tmp = y * (z * -x);
	elseif (((y * z) <= -2000.0) || ~(((y * z) <= 0.0005)))
		tmp = x * (y * -z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], (-Infinity)], N[(y * N[(z * (-x)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], -2000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], 0.0005]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y * (-z)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 y z) < -inf.0

   1. Initial program 48.3%

      \[x \cdot \left(1 - y \cdot z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 48.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 48.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)} \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

      5. associate-*r* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-out 99.9%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -inf.0 < (*.f64 y z) < -2e3 or 5.0000000000000001e-4 < (*.f64 y z)

   1. Initial program 96.4%

      \[x \cdot \left(1 - y \cdot z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 94.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 94.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-out 94.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

   if -2e3 < (*.f64 y z) < 5.0000000000000001e-4

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(1 - y \cdot z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot z \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \cdot z \leq -2000 \lor \neg \left(y \cdot z \leq 0.0005\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 94.1% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot z \leq -2000 \lor \neg \left(y \cdot z \leq 0.0005\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* y z) -2000.0) (not (<= (* y z) 0.0005))) (* x (* y (- z))) x))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * z) <= -2000.0) || !((y * z) <= 0.0005)) {
		tmp = x * (y * -z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((y * z) <= (-2000.0d0)) .or. (.not. ((y * z) <= 0.0005d0))) then
        tmp = x * (y * -z)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * z) <= -2000.0) || !((y * z) <= 0.0005)) {
		tmp = x * (y * -z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if ((y * z) <= -2000.0) or not ((y * z) <= 0.0005):
		tmp = x * (y * -z)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(y * z) <= -2000.0) || !(Float64(y * z) <= 0.0005))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y * Float64(-z)));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((y * z) <= -2000.0) || ~(((y * z) <= 0.0005)))
		tmp = x * (y * -z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], -2000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], 0.0005]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y * (-z)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 y z) < -2e3 or 5.0000000000000001e-4 < (*.f64 y z)

   1. Initial program 89.1%

      \[x \cdot \left(1 - y \cdot z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 87.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 87.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 87.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-out 87.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 87.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

   if -2e3 < (*.f64 y z) < 5.0000000000000001e-4

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(1 - y \cdot z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot z \leq -2000 \lor \neg \left(y \cdot z \leq 0.0005\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 97.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot z \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - y \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* y z) (- INFINITY)) (* y (* z (- x))) (* x (- 1.0 (* y z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y * z) <= -((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = y * (z * -x);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y * z) <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = y * (z * -x);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y * z) <= -math.inf:
		tmp = y * (z * -x)
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y * z))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y * z) <= Float64(-Inf))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(-x)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y * z) <= -Inf)
		tmp = y * (z * -x);
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], (-Infinity)], N[(y * N[(z * (-x)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 y z) < -inf.0

   1. Initial program 48.3%

      \[x \cdot \left(1 - y \cdot z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 48.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 48.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)} \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

      5. associate-*r* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-out 99.9%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -inf.0 < (*.f64 y z)

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[x \cdot \left(1 - y \cdot z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot z \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - y \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 50.9% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 94.4%

   \[x \cdot \left(1 - y \cdot z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 48.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

4. Final simplification 48.9%

   \[\leadsto x \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024031 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Data.Colour.RGBSpace.HSV:hsv from colour-2.3.3, I"
  :precision binary64
  (* x (- 1.0 (* y z))))