Diagrams.ThreeD.Shapes:frustum from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3, A

Percentage Accurate: 90.9% → 96.5%

Time: 17.8s

Alternatives: 11

Speedup: 0.5×

• 47.5% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* (+ a (* b c)) c) i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * c) * i)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * c), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 90.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* (+ a (* b c)) c) i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * c) * i)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * c), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.5% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - t\_1 \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot \left(i \cdot {c}^{2}\right)\right) \cdot -2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))))
   (if (<= (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* c t_1) i)) INFINITY)
     (* 2.0 (- (fma x y (* z t)) (* t_1 (* c i))))
     (* (* b (* i (pow c 2.0))) -2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double tmp;
	if ((((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (fma(x, y, (z * t)) - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = (b * (i * pow(c, 2.0))) * -2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(fma(x, y, Float64(z * t)) - Float64(t_1 * Float64(c * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(b * Float64(i * (c ^ 2.0))) * -2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t$95$1 * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(b * N[(i * N[Power[c, 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 96.7%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-def 96.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 99.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      3. associate--l+ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + t \cdot z\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      4. associate--l+ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(t \cdot z - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      6. associate--l+ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      7. fma-def 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      9. associate-*l* 6.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      10. +-commutative 6.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      11. fma-def 6.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 6.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around inf 75.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(b \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 75.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot i\right)\right) \cdot -2} \]

   7. Simplified 75.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot i\right)\right) \cdot -2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot \left(i \cdot {c}^{2}\right)\right) \cdot -2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 93.4% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1 \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot \left(i \cdot {c}^{2}\right)\right) \cdot -2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* c (+ a (* b c))) i))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) (* t_1 2.0) (* (* b (* i (pow c 2.0))) -2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = ((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((c * (a + (b * c))) * i);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1 * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (b * (i * pow(c, 2.0))) * -2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = ((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((c * (a + (b * c))) * i);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_1 * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (b * (i * Math.pow(c, 2.0))) * -2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = ((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((c * (a + (b * c))) * i)
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_1 * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = (b * (i * math.pow(c, 2.0))) * -2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(c * Float64(a + Float64(b * c))) * i))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(t_1 * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(b * Float64(i * (c ^ 2.0))) * -2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = ((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((c * (a + (b * c))) * i);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1 * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (b * (i * (c ^ 2.0))) * -2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(c * N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], N[(t$95$1 * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(b * N[(i * N[Power[c, 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 96.7%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      3. associate--l+ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + t \cdot z\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      4. associate--l+ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(t \cdot z - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      6. associate--l+ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      7. fma-def 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      9. associate-*l* 6.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      10. +-commutative 6.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      11. fma-def 6.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 6.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around inf 75.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(b \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 75.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot i\right)\right) \cdot -2} \]

   7. Simplified 75.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot i\right)\right) \cdot -2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot \left(i \cdot {c}^{2}\right)\right) \cdot -2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 93.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2 \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(t\_1 \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))) (t_2 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* c t_1) i))))
   (if (<= t_2 INFINITY) (* t_2 2.0) (* -2.0 (* c (* t_1 i))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = ((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((c * t_1) * i);
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_2 * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = ((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((c * t_1) * i);
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_2 * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = a + (b * c)
	t_2 = ((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((c * t_1) * i)
	tmp = 0
	if t_2 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_2 * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_2 <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(t_2 * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(t_1 * i)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = a + (b * c);
	t_2 = ((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((c * t_1) * i);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_2 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_2 * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, Infinity], N[(t$95$2 * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(t$95$1 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 96.7%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      3. associate--l+ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + t \cdot z\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      4. associate--l+ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(t \cdot z - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      6. associate--l+ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      7. fma-def 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      9. associate-*l* 6.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      10. +-commutative 6.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      11. fma-def 6.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 6.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 75.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 74.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := -2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -13000000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 2850000:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{+93} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 1.46 \cdot 10^{+140}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - c \cdot \left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* -2.0 (* c (* (+ a (* b c)) i)))))
   (if (<= c -13000000.0)
     t_1
     (if (<= c 2850000.0)
       (* (+ (* x y) (* z t)) 2.0)
       (if (or (<= c 8.8e+93) (not (<= c 1.46e+140)))
         t_1
         (* 2.0 (- (* z t) (* c (* b (* c i))))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i));
	double tmp;
	if (c <= -13000000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (c <= 2850000.0) {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	} else if ((c <= 8.8e+93) || !(c <= 1.46e+140)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * (b * (c * i))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (-2.0d0) * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i))
    if (c <= (-13000000.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (c <= 2850000.0d0) then
        tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0d0
    else if ((c <= 8.8d+93) .or. (.not. (c <= 1.46d+140))) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((z * t) - (c * (b * (c * i))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i));
	double tmp;
	if (c <= -13000000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (c <= 2850000.0) {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	} else if ((c <= 8.8e+93) || !(c <= 1.46e+140)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * (b * (c * i))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i))
	tmp = 0
	if c <= -13000000.0:
		tmp = t_1
	elif c <= 2850000.0:
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0
	elif (c <= 8.8e+93) or not (c <= 1.46e+140):
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * (b * (c * i))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * i)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (c <= -13000000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (c <= 2850000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) * 2.0);
	elseif ((c <= 8.8e+93) || !(c <= 1.46e+140))
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(z * t) - Float64(c * Float64(b * Float64(c * i)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (c <= -13000000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (c <= 2850000.0)
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	elseif ((c <= 8.8e+93) || ~((c <= 1.46e+140)))
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * (b * (c * i))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[c, -13000000.0], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[c, 2850000.0], N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[c, 8.8e+93], N[Not[LessEqual[c, 1.46e+140]], $MachinePrecision]], t$95$1, N[(2.0 * N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(c * N[(b * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if c < -1.3e7 or 2.85e6 < c < 8.80000000000000084e93 or 1.45999999999999996e140 < c

   1. Initial program 84.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 84.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 84.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      3. associate--l+ 84.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + t \cdot z\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      4. associate--l+ 84.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(t \cdot z - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 84.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      6. associate--l+ 84.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      7. fma-def 84.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 84.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      9. associate-*l* 87.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      10. +-commutative 87.8%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      11. fma-def 87.8%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 87.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.3e7 < c < 2.85e6

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around 0 79.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if 8.80000000000000084e93 < c < 1.45999999999999996e140

   1. Initial program 73.9%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 66.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 73.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z - c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)}\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -13000000:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 2850000:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{+93} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 1.46 \cdot 10^{+140}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - c \cdot \left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 73.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -10500000 \lor \neg \left(c \leq 240000\right) \land \left(c \leq 1.56 \cdot 10^{+116} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+140}\right)\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= c -10500000.0)
         (and (not (<= c 240000.0))
              (or (<= c 1.56e+116) (not (<= c 1.35e+140)))))
   (* -2.0 (* c (* (+ a (* b c)) i)))
   (* (+ (* x y) (* z t)) 2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -10500000.0) || (!(c <= 240000.0) && ((c <= 1.56e+116) || !(c <= 1.35e+140)))) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c <= (-10500000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (c <= 240000.0d0)) .and. (c <= 1.56d+116) .or. (.not. (c <= 1.35d+140))) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i))
    else
        tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -10500000.0) || (!(c <= 240000.0) && ((c <= 1.56e+116) || !(c <= 1.35e+140)))) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c <= -10500000.0) or (not (c <= 240000.0) and ((c <= 1.56e+116) or not (c <= 1.35e+140))):
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i))
	else:
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((c <= -10500000.0) || (!(c <= 240000.0) && ((c <= 1.56e+116) || !(c <= 1.35e+140))))
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * i)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c <= -10500000.0) || (~((c <= 240000.0)) && ((c <= 1.56e+116) || ~((c <= 1.35e+140)))))
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i));
	else
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[c, -10500000.0], And[N[Not[LessEqual[c, 240000.0]], $MachinePrecision], Or[LessEqual[c, 1.56e+116], N[Not[LessEqual[c, 1.35e+140]], $MachinePrecision]]]], N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -1.05e7 or 2.4e5 < c < 1.56000000000000002e116 or 1.35000000000000009e140 < c

   1. Initial program 84.4%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 84.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 84.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      3. associate--l+ 84.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + t \cdot z\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      4. associate--l+ 84.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(t \cdot z - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 84.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      6. associate--l+ 84.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      7. fma-def 84.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 84.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      9. associate-*l* 88.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      10. +-commutative 88.1%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      11. fma-def 88.1%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 80.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.05e7 < c < 2.4e5 or 1.56000000000000002e116 < c < 1.35000000000000009e140

   1. Initial program 96.9%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around 0 78.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -10500000 \lor \neg \left(c \leq 240000\right) \land \left(c \leq 1.56 \cdot 10^{+116} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+140}\right)\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 79.8% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{-93} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 300000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= c -2.8e-93) (not (<= c 300000.0)))
   (* 2.0 (- (* z t) (* c (* (+ a (* b c)) i))))
   (* (+ (* x y) (* z t)) 2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -2.8e-93) || !(c <= 300000.0)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c <= (-2.8d-93)) .or. (.not. (c <= 300000.0d0))) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((z * t) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)))
    else
        tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -2.8e-93) || !(c <= 300000.0)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c <= -2.8e-93) or not (c <= 300000.0):
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)))
	else:
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((c <= -2.8e-93) || !(c <= 300000.0))
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(z * t) - Float64(c * Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c <= -2.8e-93) || ~((c <= 300000.0)))
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	else
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[c, -2.8e-93], N[Not[LessEqual[c, 300000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(c * N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -2.79999999999999998e-93 or 3e5 < c

   1. Initial program 84.4%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 79.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.79999999999999998e-93 < c < 3e5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around 0 82.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{-93} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 300000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 80.1% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -8.8 \cdot 10^{-94}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - t\_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{-36}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - t\_1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* c (* (+ a (* b c)) i))))
   (if (<= c -8.8e-94)
     (* 2.0 (- (* z t) t_1))
     (if (<= c 1.55e-36)
       (* (+ (* x y) (* z t)) 2.0)
       (* 2.0 (- (* x y) t_1))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = c * ((a + (b * c)) * i);
	double tmp;
	if (c <= -8.8e-94) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - t_1);
	} else if (c <= 1.55e-36) {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)
    if (c <= (-8.8d-94)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((z * t) - t_1)
    else if (c <= 1.55d-36) then
        tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((x * y) - t_1)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = c * ((a + (b * c)) * i);
	double tmp;
	if (c <= -8.8e-94) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - t_1);
	} else if (c <= 1.55e-36) {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)
	tmp = 0
	if c <= -8.8e-94:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - t_1)
	elif c <= 1.55e-36:
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_1)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(c * Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * i))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (c <= -8.8e-94)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(z * t) - t_1));
	elseif (c <= 1.55e-36)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) - t_1));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = c * ((a + (b * c)) * i);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (c <= -8.8e-94)
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - t_1);
	elseif (c <= 1.55e-36)
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_1);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(c * N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[c, -8.8e-94], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[c, 1.55e-36], N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if c < -8.80000000000000004e-94

   1. Initial program 86.2%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 80.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -8.80000000000000004e-94 < c < 1.5499999999999999e-36

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around 0 85.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if 1.5499999999999999e-36 < c

   1. Initial program 84.2%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 87.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -8.8 \cdot 10^{-94}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{-36}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 87.0% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -3 \cdot 10^{+25}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - t\_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 5.1 \cdot 10^{-30}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - i \cdot \left(a \cdot c\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - t\_1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* c (* (+ a (* b c)) i))))
   (if (<= c -3e+25)
     (* 2.0 (- (* z t) t_1))
     (if (<= c 5.1e-30)
       (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* i (* a c))))
       (* 2.0 (- (* x y) t_1))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = c * ((a + (b * c)) * i);
	double tmp;
	if (c <= -3e+25) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - t_1);
	} else if (c <= 5.1e-30) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (a * c)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)
    if (c <= (-3d+25)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((z * t) - t_1)
    else if (c <= 5.1d-30) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (a * c)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((x * y) - t_1)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = c * ((a + (b * c)) * i);
	double tmp;
	if (c <= -3e+25) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - t_1);
	} else if (c <= 5.1e-30) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (a * c)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)
	tmp = 0
	if c <= -3e+25:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - t_1)
	elif c <= 5.1e-30:
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (a * c)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_1)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(c * Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * i))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (c <= -3e+25)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(z * t) - t_1));
	elseif (c <= 5.1e-30)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(i * Float64(a * c))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) - t_1));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = c * ((a + (b * c)) * i);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (c <= -3e+25)
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - t_1);
	elseif (c <= 5.1e-30)
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (a * c)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_1);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(c * N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[c, -3e+25], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[c, 5.1e-30], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(i * N[(a * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if c < -3.00000000000000006e25

   1. Initial program 82.6%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 82.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -3.00000000000000006e25 < c < 5.09999999999999972e-30

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 92.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot c\right)} \cdot i\right) \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 92.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot a\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

   5. Simplified 92.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot a\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

   if 5.09999999999999972e-30 < c

   1. Initial program 84.2%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 87.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -3 \cdot 10^{+25}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 5.1 \cdot 10^{-30}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - i \cdot \left(a \cdot c\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 56.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;i \leq -1.02 \cdot 10^{+155}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;i \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{+213}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(-c\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= i -1.02e+155)
   (* -2.0 (* a (* c i)))
   (if (<= i 7.8e+213) (* (+ (* x y) (* z t)) 2.0) (* 2.0 (* i (* a (- c)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (i <= -1.02e+155) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (a * (c * i));
	} else if (i <= 7.8e+213) {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (i * (a * -c));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (i <= (-1.02d+155)) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * (a * (c * i))
    else if (i <= 7.8d+213) then
        tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (i * (a * -c))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (i <= -1.02e+155) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (a * (c * i));
	} else if (i <= 7.8e+213) {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (i * (a * -c));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if i <= -1.02e+155:
		tmp = -2.0 * (a * (c * i))
	elif i <= 7.8e+213:
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (i * (a * -c))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (i <= -1.02e+155)
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(a * Float64(c * i)));
	elseif (i <= 7.8e+213)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(i * Float64(a * Float64(-c))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (i <= -1.02e+155)
		tmp = -2.0 * (a * (c * i));
	elseif (i <= 7.8e+213)
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (i * (a * -c));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[i, -1.02e+155], N[(-2.0 * N[(a * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[i, 7.8e+213], N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(i * N[(a * (-c)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if i < -1.02e155

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      3. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + t \cdot z\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      4. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(t \cdot z - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      6. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      7. fma-def 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      9. associate-*l* 88.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      10. +-commutative 88.1%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      11. fma-def 88.1%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 56.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.02e155 < i < 7.8000000000000003e213

   1. Initial program 90.7%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around 0 61.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if 7.8000000000000003e213 < i

   1. Initial program 82.6%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 82.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 82.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)}\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 82.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-in 61.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(b \cdot c\right) + \left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot a\right)}\right) \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 61.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(b \cdot c\right) + \left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot a\right)}\right) \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-log1p-u 40.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} + \left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot a\right)\right) \]

      2. expm1-udef 40.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(b \cdot c\right)\right)} - 1\right)} + \left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot a\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 34.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(b \cdot c\right)\right)}\right)} - 1\right) + \left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot a\right)\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 34.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot b\right)}\right)\right)} - 1\right) + \left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot a\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 34.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(c \cdot b\right)\right)\right)} - 1\right)} + \left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot a\right)\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-def 34.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(c \cdot b\right)\right)\right)\right)} + \left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot a\right)\right) \]

      2. expm1-log1p 52.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\color{blue}{c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(c \cdot b\right)\right)} + \left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot a\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 52.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(i \cdot c\right) \cdot b\right)} + \left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot a\right)\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 52.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(c \cdot i\right)} \cdot b\right) + \left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot a\right)\right) \]

      5. associate-*l* 42.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot b\right)\right)} + \left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot a\right)\right) \]

   8. Simplified 42.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\color{blue}{c \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot b\right)\right)} + \left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot a\right)\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around inf 46.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-*r* 46.1%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-1 \cdot a\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

       2. *-commutative 46.1%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(-1 \cdot a\right)\right)} \]

       3. *-commutative 46.1%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(i \cdot c\right)} \cdot \left(-1 \cdot a\right)\right) \]

       4. associate-*r* 46.1%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(i \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(-1 \cdot a\right)\right)\right)} \]

       5. neg-mul-1 46.1%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-a\right)}\right)\right) \]

   11. Simplified 46.1%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(i \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(-a\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 59.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;i \leq -1.02 \cdot 10^{+155}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;i \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{+213}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(-c\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 38.4% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{+117} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 8 \cdot 10^{-94}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -3.4e+117) (not (<= x 8e-94))) (* x (* y 2.0)) (* t (* z 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.4e+117) || !(x <= 8e-94)) {
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = t * (z * 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-3.4d+117)) .or. (.not. (x <= 8d-94))) then
        tmp = x * (y * 2.0d0)
    else
        tmp = t * (z * 2.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.4e+117) || !(x <= 8e-94)) {
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = t * (z * 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -3.4e+117) or not (x <= 8e-94):
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0)
	else:
		tmp = t * (z * 2.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -3.4e+117) || !(x <= 8e-94))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t * Float64(z * 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -3.4e+117) || ~((x <= 8e-94)))
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = t * (z * 2.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -3.4e+117], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 8e-94]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t * N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -3.4000000000000001e117 or 7.9999999999999996e-94 < x

   1. Initial program 86.9%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 86.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 86.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      3. associate--l+ 86.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + t \cdot z\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      4. associate--l+ 86.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(t \cdot z - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 86.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      6. associate--l+ 86.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      7. fma-def 86.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 86.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      9. associate-*l* 84.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      10. +-commutative 84.7%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      11. fma-def 84.7%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 84.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 41.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 41.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 2} \]

      2. associate-*l* 41.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 41.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)} \]

   if -3.4000000000000001e117 < x < 7.9999999999999996e-94

   1. Initial program 94.6%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 94.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 94.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      3. associate--l+ 94.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + t \cdot z\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      4. associate--l+ 94.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(t \cdot z - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 94.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      6. associate--l+ 94.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      7. fma-def 94.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 94.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      9. associate-*l* 87.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      10. +-commutative 87.7%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      11. fma-def 87.7%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 87.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 36.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 36.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2} \]

      2. associate-*l* 36.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 36.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 38.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{+117} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 8 \cdot 10^{-94}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 29.1% accurate, 3.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (* t (* z 2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return t * (z * 2.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = t * (z * 2.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return t * (z * 2.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return t * (z * 2.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(t * Float64(z * 2.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = t * (z * 2.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(t * N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.7%

   \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate--l+ 90.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 90.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. associate--l+ 90.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + t \cdot z\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

   4. associate--l+ 90.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(t \cdot z - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   5. *-commutative 90.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   6. associate--l+ 90.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

   7. fma-def 90.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   8. *-commutative 90.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

   9. associate-*l* 86.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   10. +-commutative 86.2%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   11. fma-def 86.2%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 86.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 27.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 27.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2} \]

   2. associate-*l* 27.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)} \]

7. Simplified 27.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)} \]

8. Final simplification 27.7%

   \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 94.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (+ a (* b c)) (* c i)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * Float64(c * i))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024031 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Diagrams.ThreeD.Shapes:frustum from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3, A"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (+ a (* b c)) (* c i))))

  (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* (+ a (* b c)) c) i))))