ENA, Section 1.4, Exercise 4b, n=5

Percentage Accurate: 90.6% → 97.6%

Time: 14.7s

Alternatives: 4

Speedup: 1.8×

Specification

\[\left(-1000000000 \leq x \land x \leq 1000000000\right) \land \left(-1 \leq \varepsilon \land \varepsilon \leq 1\right)\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ {\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x eps) :precision binary64 (- (pow (+ x eps) 5.0) (pow x 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double eps) {
	return pow((x + eps), 5.0) - pow(x, 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = ((x + eps) ** 5.0d0) - (x ** 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double eps) {
	return Math.pow((x + eps), 5.0) - Math.pow(x, 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, eps):
	return math.pow((x + eps), 5.0) - math.pow(x, 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, eps)
	return Float64((Float64(x + eps) ^ 5.0) - (x ^ 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, eps)
	tmp = ((x + eps) ^ 5.0) - (x ^ 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, eps_] := N[(N[Power[N[(x + eps), $MachinePrecision], 5.0], $MachinePrecision] - N[Power[x, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 90.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ {\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x eps) :precision binary64 (- (pow (+ x eps) 5.0) (pow x 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double eps) {
	return pow((x + eps), 5.0) - pow(x, 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = ((x + eps) ** 5.0d0) - (x ** 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double eps) {
	return Math.pow((x + eps), 5.0) - Math.pow(x, 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, eps):
	return math.pow((x + eps), 5.0) - math.pow(x, 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, eps)
	return Float64((Float64(x + eps) ^ 5.0) - (x ^ 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, eps)
	tmp = ((x + eps) ^ 5.0) - (x ^ 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, eps_] := N[(N[Power[N[(x + eps), $MachinePrecision], 5.0], $MachinePrecision] - N[Power[x, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.6% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := {\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-306} \lor \neg \left(t\_0 \leq 0\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 \cdot {x}^{4}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x eps)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (- (pow (+ x eps) 5.0) (pow x 5.0))))
   (if (or (<= t_0 -1e-306) (not (<= t_0 0.0)))
     t_0
     (* eps (* 5.0 (pow x 4.0))))))

C

double code(double x, double eps) {
	double t_0 = pow((x + eps), 5.0) - pow(x, 5.0);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 <= -1e-306) || !(t_0 <= 0.0)) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = eps * (5.0 * pow(x, 4.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = ((x + eps) ** 5.0d0) - (x ** 5.0d0)
    if ((t_0 <= (-1d-306)) .or. (.not. (t_0 <= 0.0d0))) then
        tmp = t_0
    else
        tmp = eps * (5.0d0 * (x ** 4.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double eps) {
	double t_0 = Math.pow((x + eps), 5.0) - Math.pow(x, 5.0);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 <= -1e-306) || !(t_0 <= 0.0)) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = eps * (5.0 * Math.pow(x, 4.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, eps):
	t_0 = math.pow((x + eps), 5.0) - math.pow(x, 5.0)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_0 <= -1e-306) or not (t_0 <= 0.0):
		tmp = t_0
	else:
		tmp = eps * (5.0 * math.pow(x, 4.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, eps)
	t_0 = Float64((Float64(x + eps) ^ 5.0) - (x ^ 5.0))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_0 <= -1e-306) || !(t_0 <= 0.0))
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(eps * Float64(5.0 * (x ^ 4.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, eps)
	t_0 = ((x + eps) ^ 5.0) - (x ^ 5.0);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_0 <= -1e-306) || ~((t_0 <= 0.0)))
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = eps * (5.0 * (x ^ 4.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, eps_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[Power[N[(x + eps), $MachinePrecision], 5.0], $MachinePrecision] - N[Power[x, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$0, -1e-306], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$0, 0.0]], $MachinePrecision]], t$95$0, N[(eps * N[(5.0 * N[Power[x, 4.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (pow.f64 (+.f64 x eps) 5) (pow.f64 x 5)) < -1.00000000000000003e-306 or 0.0 < (-.f64 (pow.f64 (+.f64 x eps) 5) (pow.f64 x 5))

   1. Initial program 95.8%

      \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if -1.00000000000000003e-306 < (-.f64 (pow.f64 (+.f64 x eps) 5) (pow.f64 x 5)) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 89.8%

      \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right) \cdot {x}^{4}} \]

      2. distribute-rgt1-in 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(4 + 1\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot {x}^{4} \]

      3. metadata-eval 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{5} \cdot \varepsilon\right) \cdot {x}^{4} \]

      4. *-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon \cdot 5\right)} \cdot {x}^{4} \]

      5. associate-*r* 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 \cdot {x}^{4}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 \cdot {x}^{4}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-306} \lor \neg \left({\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \leq 0\right):\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 \cdot {x}^{4}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 95.7% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{-54} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{-42}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;5 \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot {x}^{4}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\varepsilon}^{5}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x eps)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.05e-54) (not (<= x 4.8e-42)))
   (* 5.0 (* eps (pow x 4.0)))
   (pow eps 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.05e-54) || !(x <= 4.8e-42)) {
		tmp = 5.0 * (eps * pow(x, 4.0));
	} else {
		tmp = pow(eps, 5.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2.05d-54)) .or. (.not. (x <= 4.8d-42))) then
        tmp = 5.0d0 * (eps * (x ** 4.0d0))
    else
        tmp = eps ** 5.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.05e-54) || !(x <= 4.8e-42)) {
		tmp = 5.0 * (eps * Math.pow(x, 4.0));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow(eps, 5.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, eps):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2.05e-54) or not (x <= 4.8e-42):
		tmp = 5.0 * (eps * math.pow(x, 4.0))
	else:
		tmp = math.pow(eps, 5.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, eps)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.05e-54) || !(x <= 4.8e-42))
		tmp = Float64(5.0 * Float64(eps * (x ^ 4.0)));
	else
		tmp = eps ^ 5.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, eps)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2.05e-54) || ~((x <= 4.8e-42)))
		tmp = 5.0 * (eps * (x ^ 4.0));
	else
		tmp = eps ^ 5.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, eps_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.05e-54], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 4.8e-42]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(5.0 * N[(eps * N[Power[x, 4.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[eps, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.05e-54 or 4.80000000000000005e-42 < x

   1. Initial program 53.7%

      \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 53.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5}} \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5}}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5}}} \]

      2. pow2 53.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5}}\right)}^{2}} \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5}} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 53.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5}}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5}}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 77.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 77.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right) \cdot {x}^{4}} \]

      2. distribute-rgt1-in 77.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(4 + 1\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot {x}^{4} \]

      3. metadata-eval 77.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{5} \cdot \varepsilon\right) \cdot {x}^{4} \]

      4. associate-*l* 77.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot {x}^{4}\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 77.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot {x}^{4}\right)} \]

   if -2.05e-54 < x < 4.80000000000000005e-42

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\varepsilon}^{5}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{-54} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{-42}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;5 \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot {x}^{4}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\varepsilon}^{5}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 95.8% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{-56} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-42}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 \cdot {x}^{4}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\varepsilon}^{5}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x eps)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -8.2e-56) (not (<= x 1.25e-42)))
   (* eps (* 5.0 (pow x 4.0)))
   (pow eps 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -8.2e-56) || !(x <= 1.25e-42)) {
		tmp = eps * (5.0 * pow(x, 4.0));
	} else {
		tmp = pow(eps, 5.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-8.2d-56)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.25d-42))) then
        tmp = eps * (5.0d0 * (x ** 4.0d0))
    else
        tmp = eps ** 5.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -8.2e-56) || !(x <= 1.25e-42)) {
		tmp = eps * (5.0 * Math.pow(x, 4.0));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow(eps, 5.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, eps):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -8.2e-56) or not (x <= 1.25e-42):
		tmp = eps * (5.0 * math.pow(x, 4.0))
	else:
		tmp = math.pow(eps, 5.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, eps)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -8.2e-56) || !(x <= 1.25e-42))
		tmp = Float64(eps * Float64(5.0 * (x ^ 4.0)));
	else
		tmp = eps ^ 5.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, eps)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -8.2e-56) || ~((x <= 1.25e-42)))
		tmp = eps * (5.0 * (x ^ 4.0));
	else
		tmp = eps ^ 5.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, eps_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -8.2e-56], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.25e-42]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(eps * N[(5.0 * N[Power[x, 4.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[eps, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -8.2000000000000003e-56 or 1.25000000000000001e-42 < x

   1. Initial program 53.7%

      \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 77.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 77.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right) \cdot {x}^{4}} \]

      2. distribute-rgt1-in 77.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(4 + 1\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot {x}^{4} \]

      3. metadata-eval 77.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{5} \cdot \varepsilon\right) \cdot {x}^{4} \]

      4. *-commutative 77.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon \cdot 5\right)} \cdot {x}^{4} \]

      5. associate-*r* 77.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 \cdot {x}^{4}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 77.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 \cdot {x}^{4}\right)} \]

   if -8.2000000000000003e-56 < x < 1.25000000000000001e-42

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\varepsilon}^{5}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{-56} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-42}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 \cdot {x}^{4}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\varepsilon}^{5}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 89.6% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ {\varepsilon}^{5} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x eps) :precision binary64 (pow eps 5.0))

C

double code(double x, double eps) {
	return pow(eps, 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = eps ** 5.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double eps) {
	return Math.pow(eps, 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, eps):
	return math.pow(eps, 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, eps)
	return eps ^ 5.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, eps)
	tmp = eps ^ 5.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, eps_] := N[Power[eps, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 91.0%

   \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 88.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\varepsilon}^{5}} \]

4. Final simplification 88.8%

   \[\leadsto {\varepsilon}^{5} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024031 
(FPCore (x eps)
  :name "ENA, Section 1.4, Exercise 4b, n=5"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (<= -1000000000.0 x) (<= x 1000000000.0)) (and (<= -1.0 eps) (<= eps 1.0)))
  (- (pow (+ x eps) 5.0) (pow x 5.0)))