Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B

Percentage Accurate: 96.9% → 98.9%

Time: 14.5s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* x (log y)) (* z (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x * log(y)) + (z * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((x * log(y)) + (z * log((1.0d0 - y)))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x * Math.log(y)) + (z * Math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((x * math.log(y)) + (z * math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) + Float64(z * log(Float64(1.0 - y)))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((x * log(y)) + (z * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Log[N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 96.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* x (log y)) (* z (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x * log(y)) + (z * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((x * log(y)) + (z * log((1.0d0 - y)))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x * Math.log(y)) + (z * Math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((x * math.log(y)) + (z * math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) + Float64(z * log(Float64(1.0 - y)))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((x * log(y)) + (z * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Log[N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{-47}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), t\_1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- (* x (log y)) t)))
   (if (<= y 1.1e-47) t_1 (fma z (log1p (- y)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (x * log(y)) - t;
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.1e-47) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(z, log1p(-y), t_1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.1e-47)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = fma(z, log1p(Float64(-y)), t_1);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, 1.1e-47], t$95$1, N[(z * N[Log[1 + (-y)], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.10000000000000009e-47

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} - t \]

   if 1.10000000000000009e-47 < y

   1. Initial program 74.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 74.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + x \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      2. associate--l+ 74.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]

      3. fma-def 74.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \log \left(1 - y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]

      4. sub-neg 74.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, x \cdot \log y - t\right) \]

      5. log1p-def 94.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, x \cdot \log y - t\right) \]

   3. Simplified 94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{-47}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), x \cdot \log y - t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* x (log y)) (* z (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x * log(y)) + (z * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((x * log(y)) + (z * log((1.0d0 - y)))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x * Math.log(y)) + (z * Math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((x * math.log(y)) + (z * math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) + Float64(z * log(Float64(1.0 - y)))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((x * log(y)) + (z * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Log[N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.7%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 95.7%

   \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 95.7% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \log y - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x (log y)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * log(y)) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * log(y)) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * Math.log(y)) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * math.log(y)) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * log(y)) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.7%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 95.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} - t \]

4. Final simplification 95.0%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \log y - t \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 51.5% accurate, 19.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.75 \cdot 10^{-45}:\\ \;\;\;\;-t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right) - t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.75e-45) (- t) (- (* y (- z)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.75e-45) {
		tmp = -t;
	} else {
		tmp = (y * -z) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.75d-45) then
        tmp = -t
    else
        tmp = (y * -z) - t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.75e-45) {
		tmp = -t;
	} else {
		tmp = (y * -z) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.75e-45:
		tmp = -t
	else:
		tmp = (y * -z) - t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.75e-45)
		tmp = Float64(-t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * Float64(-z)) - t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.75e-45)
		tmp = -t;
	else
		tmp = (y * -z) - t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.75e-45], (-t), N[(N[(y * (-z)), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.75000000000000015e-45

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 53.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 53.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

   5. Simplified 53.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

   if 2.75000000000000015e-45 < y

   1. Initial program 74.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 47.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)} - t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 47.7%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. mul-1-neg 47.7%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \log \left(1 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y}\right) - t \]

      3. log1p-def 67.7%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-1 \cdot y\right)} - t \]

      4. mul-1-neg 67.7%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{-y}\right) - t \]

   5. Simplified 67.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 64.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} - t \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 64.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} - t \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 64.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} - t \]

   8. Simplified 64.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} - t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 54.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.75 \cdot 10^{-45}:\\ \;\;\;\;-t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right) - t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 48.8% accurate, 105.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = -t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return -t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(-t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = -t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := (-t)

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.7%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y + z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 51.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot t} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 51.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

5. Simplified 51.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

6. Final simplification 51.4%

   \[\leadsto -t \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 87.5% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-z\right) \cdot \left(\left(0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot y\right) + y\right) + \frac{0.3333333333333333}{1 \cdot \left(1 \cdot 1\right)} \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot y\right)\right)\right) - \left(t - x \cdot \log y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (*
   (- z)
   (+
    (+ (* 0.5 (* y y)) y)
    (* (/ 0.3333333333333333 (* 1.0 (* 1.0 1.0))) (* y (* y y)))))
  (- t (* x (log y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (-z * (((0.5 * (y * y)) + y) + ((0.3333333333333333 / (1.0 * (1.0 * 1.0))) * (y * (y * y))))) - (t - (x * log(y)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (-z * (((0.5d0 * (y * y)) + y) + ((0.3333333333333333d0 / (1.0d0 * (1.0d0 * 1.0d0))) * (y * (y * y))))) - (t - (x * log(y)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (-z * (((0.5 * (y * y)) + y) + ((0.3333333333333333 / (1.0 * (1.0 * 1.0))) * (y * (y * y))))) - (t - (x * Math.log(y)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (-z * (((0.5 * (y * y)) + y) + ((0.3333333333333333 / (1.0 * (1.0 * 1.0))) * (y * (y * y))))) - (t - (x * math.log(y)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(-z) * Float64(Float64(Float64(0.5 * Float64(y * y)) + y) + Float64(Float64(0.3333333333333333 / Float64(1.0 * Float64(1.0 * 1.0))) * Float64(y * Float64(y * y))))) - Float64(t - Float64(x * log(y))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (-z * (((0.5 * (y * y)) + y) + ((0.3333333333333333 / (1.0 * (1.0 * 1.0))) * (y * (y * y))))) - (t - (x * log(y)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[((-z) * N[(N[(N[(0.5 * N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(0.3333333333333333 / N[(1.0 * N[(1.0 * 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t - N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024031 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- (* (- z) (+ (+ (* 0.5 (* y y)) y) (* (/ 0.3333333333333333 (* 1.0 (* 1.0 1.0))) (* y (* y y))))) (- t (* x (log y))))

  (- (+ (* x (log y)) (* z (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))