System.Random.MWC.Distributions:gamma from mwc-random-0.13.3.2

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 9.8s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * ((1.0d0 - z) + log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * ((1.0d0 - z) + log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)) (* x 0.5)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(y, ((1.0 - z) + log(z)), (x * 0.5));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(y, Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z)), Float64(x * 0.5))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) + x \cdot 0.5} \]

   2. fma-def 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 75.2% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{-270} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.3 \cdot 10^{-119}\right) \land z \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{-44}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z 9.5e-270) (and (not (<= z 4.3e-119)) (<= z 4.1e-44)))
   (* y (+ 1.0 (log z)))
   (- (* x 0.5) (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= 9.5e-270) || (!(z <= 4.3e-119) && (z <= 4.1e-44))) {
		tmp = y * (1.0 + log(z));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= 9.5d-270) .or. (.not. (z <= 4.3d-119)) .and. (z <= 4.1d-44)) then
        tmp = y * (1.0d0 + log(z))
    else
        tmp = (x * 0.5d0) - (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= 9.5e-270) || (!(z <= 4.3e-119) && (z <= 4.1e-44))) {
		tmp = y * (1.0 + Math.log(z));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= 9.5e-270) or (not (z <= 4.3e-119) and (z <= 4.1e-44)):
		tmp = y * (1.0 + math.log(z))
	else:
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= 9.5e-270) || (!(z <= 4.3e-119) && (z <= 4.1e-44)))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 + log(z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= 9.5e-270) || (~((z <= 4.3e-119)) && (z <= 4.1e-44)))
		tmp = y * (1.0 + log(z));
	else
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, 9.5e-270], And[N[Not[LessEqual[z, 4.3e-119]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[z, 4.1e-44]]], N[(y * N[(1.0 + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 9.5000000000000006e-270 or 4.3e-119 < z < 4.09999999999999992e-44

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 69.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)} \]

   if 9.5000000000000006e-270 < z < 4.3e-119 or 4.09999999999999992e-44 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 85.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 85.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 85.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 85.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 85.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{-270} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.3 \cdot 10^{-119}\right) \land z \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{-44}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 0.07:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \log \left(z \cdot e\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 0.07) (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (log (* z E)))) (- (* x 0.5) (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 0.07) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * log((z * ((double) M_E))));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 0.07) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * Math.log((z * Math.E)));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 0.07:
		tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * math.log((z * math.e)))
	else:
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 0.07)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * log(Float64(z * exp(1)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 0.07)
		tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * log((z * 2.71828182845904523536)));
	else
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, 0.07], N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[Log[N[(z * E), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 0.070000000000000007

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(1 - z\right)\right)} \]

      2. add-log-exp 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\log z + \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{1 - z}\right)}\right) \]

      3. sum-log 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(z \cdot e^{1 - z}\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(z \cdot e^{1 - z}\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 98.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot e^{1}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-1-e 98.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \log \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{e}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 98.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot e\right)} \]

   if 0.070000000000000007 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 97.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 97.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 0.07:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \log \left(z \cdot e\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * ((1.0d0 - z) + log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 75.2% accurate, 15.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x 0.5) (* y z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) - (y * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) - (y * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(y * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 74.4%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 74.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 74.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right) \]

   3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 74.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

5. Simplified 74.4%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

6. Final simplification 74.4%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 40.4% accurate, 37.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* x 0.5))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * 0.5;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x * 0.5d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * 0.5;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x * 0.5

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x * 0.5)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x * 0.5;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) + x \cdot 0.5} \]

   2. fma-def 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 37.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]

6. Final simplification 37.6%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(y + 0.5 \cdot x\right) - y \cdot \left(z - \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (+ y (* 0.5 x)) (* y (- z (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (y + (0.5d0 * x)) - (y * (z - log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(y + Float64(0.5 * x)) - Float64(y * Float64(z - log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(y + N[(0.5 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * N[(z - N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024031 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "System.Random.MWC.Distributions:gamma from mwc-random-0.13.3.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- (+ y (* 0.5 x)) (* y (- z (log z))))

  (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))