Hyperbolic arcsine

Percentage Accurate: 18.7% → 99.4%

Time: 5.5s

Alternatives: 4

Speedup: 207.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log \left(x + \sqrt{x \cdot x + 1}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (log (+ x (sqrt (+ (* x x) 1.0)))))

C

double code(double x) {
	return log((x + sqrt(((x * x) + 1.0))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = log((x + sqrt(((x * x) + 1.0d0))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return Math.log((x + Math.sqrt(((x * x) + 1.0))));
}

Python

def code(x):
	return math.log((x + math.sqrt(((x * x) + 1.0))))

Julia

function code(x)
	return log(Float64(x + sqrt(Float64(Float64(x * x) + 1.0))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = log((x + sqrt(((x * x) + 1.0))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[Log[N[(x + N[Sqrt[N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 18.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log \left(x + \sqrt{x \cdot x + 1}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (log (+ x (sqrt (+ (* x x) 1.0)))))

C

double code(double x) {
	return log((x + sqrt(((x * x) + 1.0))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = log((x + sqrt(((x * x) + 1.0d0))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return Math.log((x + Math.sqrt(((x * x) + 1.0))));
}

Python

def code(x):
	return math.log((x + math.sqrt(((x * x) + 1.0))))

Julia

function code(x)
	return log(Float64(x + sqrt(Float64(Float64(x * x) + 1.0))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = log((x + sqrt(((x * x) + 1.0))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[Log[N[(x + N[Sqrt[N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;-\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right) - x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.25:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(x \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -6.2e-6)
   (- (log (- (hypot 1.0 x) x)))
   (if (<= x 1.25) x (log (* x 2.0)))))

C

double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -6.2e-6) {
		tmp = -log((hypot(1.0, x) - x));
	} else if (x <= 1.25) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = log((x * 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -6.2e-6) {
		tmp = -Math.log((Math.hypot(1.0, x) - x));
	} else if (x <= 1.25) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log((x * 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -6.2e-6:
		tmp = -math.log((math.hypot(1.0, x) - x))
	elif x <= 1.25:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = math.log((x * 2.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -6.2e-6)
		tmp = Float64(-log(Float64(hypot(1.0, x) - x)));
	elseif (x <= 1.25)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = log(Float64(x * 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -6.2e-6)
		tmp = -log((hypot(1.0, x) - x));
	elseif (x <= 1.25)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = log((x * 2.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := If[LessEqual[x, -6.2e-6], (-N[Log[N[(N[Sqrt[1.0 ^ 2 + x ^ 2], $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), If[LessEqual[x, 1.25], x, N[Log[N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -6.1999999999999999e-6

   1. Initial program 3.4%

      \[\log \left(x + \sqrt{x \cdot x + 1}\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqr-neg 3.4%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)} + 1}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 3.4%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{\color{blue}{1 + \left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)}}\right) \]

      3. sqr-neg 3.4%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{1 + \color{blue}{x \cdot x}}\right) \]

      4. hypot-1-def 4.6%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 4.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(x + \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. flip-+ 3.1%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x \cdot x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right) \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)}{x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)}\right)} \]

      2. frac-2neg 3.1%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-\left(x \cdot x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right) \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)}{-\left(x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)}\right)} \]

      3. log-div 3.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(-\left(x \cdot x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right) \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right) - \log \left(-\left(x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      4. pow2 3.1%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(-\left(\color{blue}{{x}^{2}} - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right) \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right) - \log \left(-\left(x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. hypot-1-def 3.7%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(-\left({x}^{2} - \color{blue}{\sqrt{1 + x \cdot x}} \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right) - \log \left(-\left(x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right) \]

      6. hypot-1-def 3.1%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(-\left({x}^{2} - \sqrt{1 + x \cdot x} \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{1 + x \cdot x}}\right)\right) - \log \left(-\left(x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right) \]

      7. add-sqr-sqrt 4.6%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(-\left({x}^{2} - \color{blue}{\left(1 + x \cdot x\right)}\right)\right) - \log \left(-\left(x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right) \]

      8. +-commutative 4.6%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(-\left({x}^{2} - \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot x + 1\right)}\right)\right) - \log \left(-\left(x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right) \]

      9. fma-define 4.6%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(-\left({x}^{2} - \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, 1\right)}\right)\right) - \log \left(-\left(x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 4.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(-\left({x}^{2} - \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, 1\right)\right)\right) - \log \left(-\left(x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-sub0 4.6%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(0 - \left({x}^{2} - \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, 1\right)\right)\right)} - \log \left(-\left(x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right) \]

      2. associate--r- 4.6%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(0 - {x}^{2}\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, 1\right)\right)} - \log \left(-\left(x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right) \]

      3. neg-sub0 4.6%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(\color{blue}{\left(-{x}^{2}\right)} + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, 1\right)\right) - \log \left(-\left(x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 4.6%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, 1\right) + \left(-{x}^{2}\right)\right)} - \log \left(-\left(x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. sub-neg 4.6%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, 1\right) - {x}^{2}\right)} - \log \left(-\left(x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right) \]

      6. fma-undefine 4.6%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot x + 1\right)} - {x}^{2}\right) - \log \left(-\left(x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right) \]

      7. unpow2 4.6%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(\left(\color{blue}{{x}^{2}} + 1\right) - {x}^{2}\right) - \log \left(-\left(x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right) \]

      8. +-commutative 4.6%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + {x}^{2}\right)} - {x}^{2}\right) - \log \left(-\left(x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right) \]

      9. associate--l+ 52.3%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left({x}^{2} - {x}^{2}\right)\right)} - \log \left(-\left(x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right) \]

      10. +-inverses 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \log \left(1 + \color{blue}{0}\right) - \log \left(-\left(x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right) \]

      11. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{1} - \log \left(-\left(x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right) \]

      12. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} - \log \left(-\left(x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right) \]

      13. neg-sub0 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\log \left(-\left(x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      14. neg-sub0 100.0%

          \[\leadsto -\log \color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(x - \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      15. associate--r- 100.0%

          \[\leadsto -\log \color{blue}{\left(\left(0 - x\right) + \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)} \]

      16. neg-sub0 100.0%

          \[\leadsto -\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} + \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right) \]

      17. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto -\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right) + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      18. sub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto -\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right) - x\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right) - x\right)} \]

   if -6.1999999999999999e-6 < x < 1.25

   1. Initial program 6.4%

      \[\log \left(x + \sqrt{x \cdot x + 1}\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqr-neg 6.4%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)} + 1}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 6.4%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{\color{blue}{1 + \left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)}}\right) \]

      3. sqr-neg 6.4%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{1 + \color{blue}{x \cdot x}}\right) \]

      4. hypot-1-def 6.4%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 6.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(x + \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.25 < x

   1. Initial program 61.0%

      \[\log \left(x + \sqrt{x \cdot x + 1}\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqr-neg 61.0%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)} + 1}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 61.0%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{\color{blue}{1 + \left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)}}\right) \]

      3. sqr-neg 61.0%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{1 + \color{blue}{x \cdot x}}\right) \]

      4. hypot-1-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(x + \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot x\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;-\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right) - x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.25:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(x \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.0% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.3:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(\frac{-0.5}{x}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.25:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(x \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.3) (log (/ -0.5 x)) (if (<= x 1.25) x (log (* x 2.0)))))

C

double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.3) {
		tmp = log((-0.5 / x));
	} else if (x <= 1.25) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = log((x * 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.3d0)) then
        tmp = log(((-0.5d0) / x))
    else if (x <= 1.25d0) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = log((x * 2.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.3) {
		tmp = Math.log((-0.5 / x));
	} else if (x <= 1.25) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log((x * 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.3:
		tmp = math.log((-0.5 / x))
	elif x <= 1.25:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = math.log((x * 2.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.3)
		tmp = log(Float64(-0.5 / x));
	elseif (x <= 1.25)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = log(Float64(x * 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.3)
		tmp = log((-0.5 / x));
	elseif (x <= 1.25)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = log((x * 2.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.3], N[Log[N[(-0.5 / x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1.25], x, N[Log[N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -1.30000000000000004

   1. Initial program 3.4%

      \[\log \left(x + \sqrt{x \cdot x + 1}\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqr-neg 3.4%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)} + 1}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 3.4%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{\color{blue}{1 + \left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)}}\right) \]

      3. sqr-neg 3.4%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{1 + \color{blue}{x \cdot x}}\right) \]

      4. hypot-1-def 4.6%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 4.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(x + \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around -inf 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-0.5}{x}\right)} \]

   if -1.30000000000000004 < x < 1.25

   1. Initial program 6.4%

      \[\log \left(x + \sqrt{x \cdot x + 1}\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqr-neg 6.4%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)} + 1}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 6.4%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{\color{blue}{1 + \left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)}}\right) \]

      3. sqr-neg 6.4%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{1 + \color{blue}{x \cdot x}}\right) \]

      4. hypot-1-def 6.4%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 6.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(x + \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.25 < x

   1. Initial program 61.0%

      \[\log \left(x + \sqrt{x \cdot x + 1}\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqr-neg 61.0%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)} + 1}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 61.0%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{\color{blue}{1 + \left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)}}\right) \]

      3. sqr-neg 61.0%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{1 + \color{blue}{x \cdot x}}\right) \]

      4. hypot-1-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(x + \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot x\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.3:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(\frac{-0.5}{x}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.25:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(x \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 75.4% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 1.25:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(x \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (if (<= x 1.25) x (log (* x 2.0))))

C

double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 1.25) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = log((x * 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= 1.25d0) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = log((x * 2.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 1.25) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log((x * 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= 1.25:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = math.log((x * 2.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= 1.25)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = log(Float64(x * 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= 1.25)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = log((x * 2.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := If[LessEqual[x, 1.25], x, N[Log[N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < 1.25

   1. Initial program 5.4%

      \[\log \left(x + \sqrt{x \cdot x + 1}\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqr-neg 5.4%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)} + 1}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 5.4%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{\color{blue}{1 + \left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)}}\right) \]

      3. sqr-neg 5.4%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{1 + \color{blue}{x \cdot x}}\right) \]

      4. hypot-1-def 5.8%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 5.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(x + \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 66.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.25 < x

   1. Initial program 61.0%

      \[\log \left(x + \sqrt{x \cdot x + 1}\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqr-neg 61.0%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)} + 1}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 61.0%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{\color{blue}{1 + \left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)}}\right) \]

      3. sqr-neg 61.0%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{1 + \color{blue}{x \cdot x}}\right) \]

      4. hypot-1-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(x + \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot x\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 1.25:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(x \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 51.8% accurate, 207.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x):
	return x

Julia

function code(x)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 21.0%

   \[\log \left(x + \sqrt{x \cdot x + 1}\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sqr-neg 21.0%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)} + 1}\right) \]

   2. +-commutative 21.0%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{\color{blue}{1 + \left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)}}\right) \]

   3. sqr-neg 21.0%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \sqrt{1 + \color{blue}{x \cdot x}}\right) \]

   4. hypot-1-def 32.3%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)}\right) \]

3. Simplified 32.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(x + \mathsf{hypot}\left(1, x\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 49.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

6. Final simplification 49.4%

   \[\leadsto x \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 30.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \sqrt{x \cdot x + 1}\\ \mathbf{if}\;x < 0:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(\frac{-1}{x - t\_0}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(x + t\_0\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (sqrt (+ (* x x) 1.0))))
   (if (< x 0.0) (log (/ -1.0 (- x t_0))) (log (+ x t_0)))))

C

double code(double x) {
	double t_0 = sqrt(((x * x) + 1.0));
	double tmp;
	if (x < 0.0) {
		tmp = log((-1.0 / (x - t_0)));
	} else {
		tmp = log((x + t_0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = sqrt(((x * x) + 1.0d0))
    if (x < 0.0d0) then
        tmp = log(((-1.0d0) / (x - t_0)))
    else
        tmp = log((x + t_0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	double t_0 = Math.sqrt(((x * x) + 1.0));
	double tmp;
	if (x < 0.0) {
		tmp = Math.log((-1.0 / (x - t_0)));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log((x + t_0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x):
	t_0 = math.sqrt(((x * x) + 1.0))
	tmp = 0
	if x < 0.0:
		tmp = math.log((-1.0 / (x - t_0)))
	else:
		tmp = math.log((x + t_0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x)
	t_0 = sqrt(Float64(Float64(x * x) + 1.0))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x < 0.0)
		tmp = log(Float64(-1.0 / Float64(x - t_0)));
	else
		tmp = log(Float64(x + t_0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x)
	t_0 = sqrt(((x * x) + 1.0));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x < 0.0)
		tmp = log((-1.0 / (x - t_0)));
	else
		tmp = log((x + t_0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[Sqrt[N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[x, 0.0], N[Log[N[(-1.0 / N[(x - t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], N[Log[N[(x + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024030 
(FPCore (x)
  :name "Hyperbolic arcsine"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< x 0.0) (log (/ -1.0 (- x (sqrt (+ (* x x) 1.0))))) (log (+ x (sqrt (+ (* x x) 1.0)))))

  (log (+ x (sqrt (+ (* x x) 1.0)))))