Diagrams.TwoD.Segment:bezierClip from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3

Percentage Accurate: 97.9% → 100.0%

Time: 5.5s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.3×

• 21.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(1 - y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x y) (* z (- 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + (z * (1.0 - y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * y) + (z * (1.0d0 - y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + (z * (1.0 - y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * y) + (z * (1.0 - y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * Float64(1.0 - y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * y) + (z * (1.0 - y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(1 - y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x y) (* z (- 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + (z * (1.0 - y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * y) + (z * (1.0d0 - y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + (z * (1.0 - y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * y) + (z * (1.0 - y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * Float64(1.0 - y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * y) + (z * (1.0 - y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x - z, z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma y (- x z) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(y, (x - z), z);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(y, Float64(x - z), z)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.6%

   \[x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(1 - y\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-lft-out-- 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 1 - z \cdot y\right)} \]

   2. *-rgt-identity 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z} - z \cdot y\right) \]

   3. cancel-sign-sub-inv 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-z\right) \cdot y\right)} \]

   4. +-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-z\right) \cdot y + z\right)} \]

   5. associate-+r+ 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(-z\right) \cdot y\right) + z} \]

   6. +-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-z\right) \cdot y + x \cdot y\right)} + z \]

   7. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + x\right)} + z \]

   8. fma-def 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(-z\right) + x, z\right)} \]

   9. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{x + \left(-z\right)}, z\right) \]

   10. unsub-neg 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{x - z}, z\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x - z, z\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x - z, z\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 60.2% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.8 \cdot 10^{-104}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{+91} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3 \cdot 10^{+197}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -8.8e-104)
   (* y x)
   (if (<= y 1.0)
     z
     (if (or (<= y 1.7e+91) (not (<= y 3e+197))) (* y (- z)) (* y x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -8.8e-104) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else if (y <= 1.0) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if ((y <= 1.7e+91) || !(y <= 3e+197)) {
		tmp = y * -z;
	} else {
		tmp = y * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-8.8d-104)) then
        tmp = y * x
    else if (y <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = z
    else if ((y <= 1.7d+91) .or. (.not. (y <= 3d+197))) then
        tmp = y * -z
    else
        tmp = y * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -8.8e-104) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else if (y <= 1.0) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if ((y <= 1.7e+91) || !(y <= 3e+197)) {
		tmp = y * -z;
	} else {
		tmp = y * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -8.8e-104:
		tmp = y * x
	elif y <= 1.0:
		tmp = z
	elif (y <= 1.7e+91) or not (y <= 3e+197):
		tmp = y * -z
	else:
		tmp = y * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -8.8e-104)
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	elseif (y <= 1.0)
		tmp = z;
	elseif ((y <= 1.7e+91) || !(y <= 3e+197))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(-z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -8.8e-104)
		tmp = y * x;
	elseif (y <= 1.0)
		tmp = z;
	elseif ((y <= 1.7e+91) || ~((y <= 3e+197)))
		tmp = y * -z;
	else
		tmp = y * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -8.8e-104], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.0], z, If[Or[LessEqual[y, 1.7e+91], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 3e+197]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * (-z)), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -8.80000000000000047e-104 or 1.7e91 < y < 3.0000000000000002e197

   1. Initial program 97.9%

      \[x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(1 - y\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 60.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 60.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   5. Simplified 60.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -8.80000000000000047e-104 < y < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(1 - y\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if 1 < y < 1.7e91 or 3.0000000000000002e197 < y

   1. Initial program 89.7%

      \[x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(1 - y\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 72.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 69.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 69.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 69.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]

      3. *-commutative 69.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 69.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.8 \cdot 10^{-104}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{+91} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3 \cdot 10^{+197}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 83.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-104} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -7e-104) (not (<= y 5.4e-6))) (* y (- x z)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -7e-104) || !(y <= 5.4e-6)) {
		tmp = y * (x - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-7d-104)) .or. (.not. (y <= 5.4d-6))) then
        tmp = y * (x - z)
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -7e-104) || !(y <= 5.4e-6)) {
		tmp = y * (x - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -7e-104) or not (y <= 5.4e-6):
		tmp = y * (x - z)
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -7e-104) || !(y <= 5.4e-6))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x - z));
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -7e-104) || ~((y <= 5.4e-6)))
		tmp = y * (x - z);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -7e-104], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 5.4e-6]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], z]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -7.00000000000000057e-104 or 5.39999999999999997e-6 < y

   1. Initial program 95.6%

      \[x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(1 - y\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 91.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 91.5%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 91.5%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x - z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 91.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

   if -7.00000000000000057e-104 < y < 5.39999999999999997e-6

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(1 - y\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-104} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 83.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-104} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 42000000000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -8e-104) (not (<= y 42000000000000.0)))
   (* y (- x z))
   (* z (- 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -8e-104) || !(y <= 42000000000000.0)) {
		tmp = y * (x - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (1.0 - y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-8d-104)) .or. (.not. (y <= 42000000000000.0d0))) then
        tmp = y * (x - z)
    else
        tmp = z * (1.0d0 - y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -8e-104) || !(y <= 42000000000000.0)) {
		tmp = y * (x - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (1.0 - y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -8e-104) or not (y <= 42000000000000.0):
		tmp = y * (x - z)
	else:
		tmp = z * (1.0 - y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -8e-104) || !(y <= 42000000000000.0))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(1.0 - y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -8e-104) || ~((y <= 42000000000000.0)))
		tmp = y * (x - z);
	else
		tmp = z * (1.0 - y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -8e-104], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 42000000000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -7.99999999999999941e-104 or 4.2e13 < y

   1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(1 - y\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 92.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 92.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x - z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

   if -7.99999999999999941e-104 < y < 4.2e13

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(1 - y\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 77.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-104} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 42000000000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 98.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.0) (not (<= y 1.0))) (* y (- x z)) (+ z (* y x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.0) || !(y <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = y * (x - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (y * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = y * (x - z)
    else
        tmp = z + (y * x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.0) || !(y <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = y * (x - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (y * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.0) or not (y <= 1.0):
		tmp = y * (x - z)
	else:
		tmp = z + (y * x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.0) || !(y <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(y * x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.0) || ~((y <= 1.0)))
		tmp = y * (x - z);
	else
		tmp = z + (y * x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1 or 1 < y

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(1 - y\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 98.5%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 98.5%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x - z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

   if -1 < y < 1

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(1 - y\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - y\right) + x \cdot y} \]

      2. +-lft-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0 + z \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\right)} + x \cdot y \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(-z\right) \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\right)} + x \cdot y \]

      4. cancel-sign-sub 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0 + z \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\right)} + x \cdot y \]

      5. +-lft-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - y\right)} + x \cdot y \]

      6. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 1 - z \cdot y\right)} + x \cdot y \]

      7. *-rgt-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z} - z \cdot y\right) + x \cdot y \]

      8. associate-+l- 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(z \cdot y - x \cdot y\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out-- 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - y \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.1%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 99.1%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 99.1%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. *-commutative 99.1%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 99.1%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(-y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right) + z} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-out 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot x\right)}\right) + z \]

      4. remove-double-neg 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x + z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 61.4% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -9 \cdot 10^{-104} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -9e-104) (not (<= y 3.6e-6))) (* y x) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -9e-104) || !(y <= 3.6e-6)) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-9d-104)) .or. (.not. (y <= 3.6d-6))) then
        tmp = y * x
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -9e-104) || !(y <= 3.6e-6)) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -9e-104) or not (y <= 3.6e-6):
		tmp = y * x
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -9e-104) || !(y <= 3.6e-6))
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -9e-104) || ~((y <= 3.6e-6)))
		tmp = y * x;
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -9e-104], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 3.6e-6]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], z]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -8.9999999999999995e-104 or 3.59999999999999984e-6 < y

   1. Initial program 95.6%

      \[x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(1 - y\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 52.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 52.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   5. Simplified 52.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -8.9999999999999995e-104 < y < 3.59999999999999984e-6

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(1 - y\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -9 \cdot 10^{-104} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 100.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z + y \cdot \left(x - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ z (* y (- x z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z + (y * (x - z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z + (y * (x - z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z + (y * (x - z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z + (y * (x - z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z + Float64(y * Float64(x - z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z + (y * (x - z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z + N[(y * N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.6%

   \[x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(1 - y\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - y\right) + x \cdot y} \]

   2. +-lft-identity 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0 + z \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\right)} + x \cdot y \]

   3. cancel-sign-sub 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(-z\right) \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\right)} + x \cdot y \]

   4. cancel-sign-sub 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0 + z \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\right)} + x \cdot y \]

   5. +-lft-identity 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - y\right)} + x \cdot y \]

   6. distribute-lft-out-- 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 1 - z \cdot y\right)} + x \cdot y \]

   7. *-rgt-identity 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z} - z \cdot y\right) + x \cdot y \]

   8. associate-+l- 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(z \cdot y - x \cdot y\right)} \]

   9. distribute-rgt-out-- 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - y \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto z + y \cdot \left(x - z\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 36.6% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.6%

   \[x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(1 - y\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 39.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

4. Final simplification 39.9%

   \[\leadsto z \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 100.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z - \left(z - x\right) \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- z (* (- z x) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z - ((z - x) * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z - ((z - x) * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z - ((z - x) * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z - ((z - x) * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z - Float64(Float64(z - x) * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z - ((z - x) * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z - N[(N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024027 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.TwoD.Segment:bezierClip from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- z (* (- z x) y))

  (+ (* x y) (* z (- 1.0 y))))